Search

Item does not contain fulltext, BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) for treatment response monitoring is feasible on hybrid magnetic resonance linear accelerator (MR-linac) systems. The MRI scanner of the Elekta Unity system has an adjusted design compared to diagnostic scanners. We investigated its impact on measuring the DWI-derived apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) regarding three aspects: the choice of b-values, the spatial variation of the ADC, and scanning during radiation treatment. The aim of this study is to give recommendations for accurate ADC measurements on Unity systems. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) measurements with increasing b-values were done to determine the highest bvalue that can be measured reliably. The spatial variation of the ADC was assessed on six Unity systems with a cylindrical phantom of 40 cm diameter. The influence of gantry rotation and irradiation was investigated by acquiring DWI images before and during treatment of 11 prostate cancer patients. RESULTS: On the Unity system, a maximum b-value of 500 s/mm(2) should be used for ADC quantification, as a trade-off between SNR and diffusion weighting. Accurate ADC values were obtained within 7 cm from the iso-center, while outside this region ADC values deviated more than 5%. The ADC was not influenced by the rotating linac or irradiation during treatment. CONCLUSION: We provide Unity system specific recommendations for measuring the ADC. This will increase the consistency of ADC values acquired in different centers on the Unity system, enabling large cohort studies for biomarker discovery and treatment response monitoring.

Item does not contain fulltext, BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) for treatment response monitoring is feasible on hybrid magnetic resonance linear accelerator (MR-linac) systems. The MRI scanner of the Elekta Unity system has an adjusted design compared to diagnostic scanners. We investigated its impact on measuring the DWI-derived apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) regarding three aspects: the choice of b-values, the spatial variation of the ADC, and scanning during radiation treatment. The aim of this study is to give recommendations for accurate ADC measurements on Unity systems. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) measurements with increasing b-values were done to determine the highest bvalue that can be measured reliably. The spatial variation of the ADC was assessed on six Unity systems with a cylindrical phantom of 40 cm diameter. The influence of gantry rotation and irradiation was investigated by acquiring DWI images before and during treatment of 11 prostate cancer patients. RESULTS: On the Unity system, a maximum b-value of 500 s/mm(2) should be used for ADC quantification, as a trade-off between SNR and diffusion weighting. Accurate ADC values were obtained within 7 cm from the iso-center, while outside this region ADC values deviated more than 5%. The ADC was not influenced by the rotating linac or irradiation during treatment. CONCLUSION: We provide Unity system specific recommendations for measuring the ADC. This will increase the consistency of ADC values acquired in different centers on the Unity system, enabling large cohort studies for biomarker discovery and treatment response monitoring.

Contains fulltext : 207179.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Closed access), PURPOSE: One of the major challenges in stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) of renal cell carcinoma is internal motion during treatment. Previous literature has aimed to mitigate the effects of motion by expanding the treatment margins or respiratory tracking. Online magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided radiation therapy has the potential to further improve the treatment of renal cell carcinoma by direct visualization of the tumor during treatment. The efficacy of 2 motion management techniques were assessed: tumor trailing and respiratory tracking. The simulation of a single-fraction, MRI-based SBRT was performed to quantify intrafraction motion and assess the efficacy of the different motion management strategies. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Fifteen patients were included in the study. At the beginning and end of the scanning protocol, 2 cine-MRI scans were acquired to assess cyclic respiratory motion. In addition, 3-dimensional spoiled gradient echo scans were acquired at 4 different time points to assess the slow drifts over 25 minutes. The systematic and random errors owing to intrafraction drift were calculated, as well as the random error induced by respiratory motion. The motion margins were calculated for tumor trailing and respiratory tracking and compared with the margin when no motion compensation would be performed to assess the relative efficacy of each technique. RESULTS: The largest respiratory tumor motion was observed along the caudo-cranial direction with a median 95% maximum amplitude of approximately 12 mm. SigmaDRIFT, sigmaDRIFT, and sigmaRESP were determined to be 1.0 mm 1.8 mm, and 3.8 mm, respectively. Without mechanical immobilization, intrafraction drift accounted for 75% of the total intrafraction motion margin for online midposition-based SBRT treatments. CONCLUSIONS: The contribution of intrafraction drift to the total internal motion margin is much larger than periodic respiratory motion. This makes tumor trailing a viable option

Contains fulltext : 215382.pdf (publisher's version ) (Open Access), Background and purpose: The promise of the MR-linac is that one can visualize all anatomical changes during the course of radiotherapy and hence adapt the treatment plan in order to always have the optimal treatment. Yet, there is a trade-off to be made between the time spent for adapting the treatment plan against the dosimetric gain. In this work, the various daily plan adaptation methods will be presented and applied on a variety of tumour sites. The aim is to provide an insight in the behavior of the state-of-the-art 1.5T MRI guided on-line adaptive radiotherapy methods. Materials and methods: To explore the different available plan adaptation workflows and methods, we have simulated online plan adaptation for five cases with varying levels of inter-fraction motion, regions of interest and target sizes: prostate, rectum, esophagus and lymph node oligometastases (single and multiple target). The plans were evaluated based on the clinical dose constraints and the optimization time was measured. Results: The time needed for plan adaptation ranged between 17 and 485s. More advanced plan adaptation methods generally resulted in more plans that met the clinical dose criteria. Violations were often caused by insufficient PTV coverage or, for the multiple lymph node case, a too high dose to OAR in the vicinity of the PTV. With full online replanning it was possible to create plans that met all clinical dose constraints for all cases. Conclusion: Daily full online replanning is the most robust adaptive planning method for Unity. It is feasible for specific sites in clinically acceptable times. Faster methods are available, but before applying these, the specific use cases should be explored dosimetrically.

Item does not contain fulltext, For successful abdominal radiotherapy it is crucial to have a clear tumor definition and an accurate characterization of the motion. While dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI aids tumor visualization, it is often hampered by motion artifacts. 4D-MRI characterizes this motion, but often lacks the contrast to clearly visualize the tumor. This dual requirement is challenging due to time constraints. Here, we propose combining both into a single acquisition by reconstructing the data in various ways in order to achieve both high spatio-temporal resolution DCE-MRI and accurate 4D-MRI motion estimates. A 5 min T1-weigthed DCE acquisition was collected in five renal-cell carcinoma patients and simulated in a digital phantom. Data were acquired continuously using a 3D golden angle radial stack-of-stars acquisition. This enabled three types of reconstruction; (1) a high spatio-temporal resolution DCE time series, (2) a 5D reconstruction and (3) a contrast-enhanced 4D-MRI for motion characterization. Motion extracted from the 4D- and 5D-MRI was compared with a separately acquired 4D-MRI and additional 2D cine MR imaging. Simulations on XCAT showed that 5D reconstructions severely underestimated motion ([Formula: see text]), whereas contrast-enhanced 4D-MRI only underestimated motion by [Formula: see text]. This was confirmed in the in vivo data where motion of the contrast-enhanced 4D-MRI was approximately [Formula: see text] smaller than the motion in the 2D cine MRI (5.8 mm versus 6.5 mm), but equal to a separately acquired 4D-MRI (5.8 mm versus 5.9 mm). 5D reconstructions underestimated the motion by more than [Formula: see text], but minimized respiratory-induced blurring in the contrast enhanced images. DCE time-series demonstrated clear tumor visualization and contrast enhancement throughout the entire field-of-view. DCE- and 4D-MRI can be integrated into a single acquisition that enables different reconstructions with complementary information for abdominal radiotherap

Contains fulltext : 207179.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Closed access), PURPOSE: One of the major challenges in stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) of renal cell carcinoma is internal motion during treatment. Previous literature has aimed to mitigate the effects of motion by expanding the treatment margins or respiratory tracking. Online magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided radiation therapy has the potential to further improve the treatment of renal cell carcinoma by direct visualization of the tumor during treatment. The efficacy of 2 motion management techniques were assessed: tumor trailing and respiratory tracking. The simulation of a single-fraction, MRI-based SBRT was performed to quantify intrafraction motion and assess the efficacy of the different motion management strategies. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Fifteen patients were included in the study. At the beginning and end of the scanning protocol, 2 cine-MRI scans were acquired to assess cyclic respiratory motion. In addition, 3-dimensional spoiled gradient echo scans were acquired at 4 different time points to assess the slow drifts over 25 minutes. The systematic and random errors owing to intrafraction drift were calculated, as well as the random error induced by respiratory motion. The motion margins were calculated for tumor trailing and respiratory tracking and compared with the margin when no motion compensation would be performed to assess the relative efficacy of each technique. RESULTS: The largest respiratory tumor motion was observed along the caudo-cranial direction with a median 95% maximum amplitude of approximately 12 mm. SigmaDRIFT, sigmaDRIFT, and sigmaRESP were determined to be 1.0 mm 1.8 mm, and 3.8 mm, respectively. Without mechanical immobilization, intrafraction drift accounted for 75% of the total intrafraction motion margin for online midposition-based SBRT treatments. CONCLUSIONS: The contribution of intrafraction drift to the total internal motion margin is much larger than periodic respiratory motion. This makes tumor trailing a viable option

Contains fulltext : 215382.pdf (publisher's version ) (Open Access), Background and purpose: The promise of the MR-linac is that one can visualize all anatomical changes during the course of radiotherapy and hence adapt the treatment plan in order to always have the optimal treatment. Yet, there is a trade-off to be made between the time spent for adapting the treatment plan against the dosimetric gain. In this work, the various daily plan adaptation methods will be presented and applied on a variety of tumour sites. The aim is to provide an insight in the behavior of the state-of-the-art 1.5T MRI guided on-line adaptive radiotherapy methods. Materials and methods: To explore the different available plan adaptation workflows and methods, we have simulated online plan adaptation for five cases with varying levels of inter-fraction motion, regions of interest and target sizes: prostate, rectum, esophagus and lymph node oligometastases (single and multiple target). The plans were evaluated based on the clinical dose constraints and the optimization time was measured. Results: The time needed for plan adaptation ranged between 17 and 485s. More advanced plan adaptation methods generally resulted in more plans that met the clinical dose criteria. Violations were often caused by insufficient PTV coverage or, for the multiple lymph node case, a too high dose to OAR in the vicinity of the PTV. With full online replanning it was possible to create plans that met all clinical dose constraints for all cases. Conclusion: Daily full online replanning is the most robust adaptive planning method for Unity. It is feasible for specific sites in clinically acceptable times. Faster methods are available, but before applying these, the specific use cases should be explored dosimetrically.

Item does not contain fulltext, For successful abdominal radiotherapy it is crucial to have a clear tumor definition and an accurate characterization of the motion. While dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI aids tumor visualization, it is often hampered by motion artifacts. 4D-MRI characterizes this motion, but often lacks the contrast to clearly visualize the tumor. This dual requirement is challenging due to time constraints. Here, we propose combining both into a single acquisition by reconstructing the data in various ways in order to achieve both high spatio-temporal resolution DCE-MRI and accurate 4D-MRI motion estimates. A 5 min T1-weigthed DCE acquisition was collected in five renal-cell carcinoma patients and simulated in a digital phantom. Data were acquired continuously using a 3D golden angle radial stack-of-stars acquisition. This enabled three types of reconstruction; (1) a high spatio-temporal resolution DCE time series, (2) a 5D reconstruction and (3) a contrast-enhanced 4D-MRI for motion characterization. Motion extracted from the 4D- and 5D-MRI was compared with a separately acquired 4D-MRI and additional 2D cine MR imaging. Simulations on XCAT showed that 5D reconstructions severely underestimated motion ([Formula: see text]), whereas contrast-enhanced 4D-MRI only underestimated motion by [Formula: see text]. This was confirmed in the in vivo data where motion of the contrast-enhanced 4D-MRI was approximately [Formula: see text] smaller than the motion in the 2D cine MRI (5.8 mm versus 6.5 mm), but equal to a separately acquired 4D-MRI (5.8 mm versus 5.9 mm). 5D reconstructions underestimated the motion by more than [Formula: see text], but minimized respiratory-induced blurring in the contrast enhanced images. DCE time-series demonstrated clear tumor visualization and contrast enhancement throughout the entire field-of-view. DCE- and 4D-MRI can be integrated into a single acquisition that enables different reconstructions with complementary information for abdominal radiotherap

Contains fulltext : 215382.pdf (publisher's version ) (Open Access), Background and purpose: The promise of the MR-linac is that one can visualize all anatomical changes during the course of radiotherapy and hence adapt the treatment plan in order to always have the optimal treatment. Yet, there is a trade-off to be made between the time spent for adapting the treatment plan against the dosimetric gain. In this work, the various daily plan adaptation methods will be presented and applied on a variety of tumour sites. The aim is to provide an insight in the behavior of the state-of-the-art 1.5T MRI guided on-line adaptive radiotherapy methods. Materials and methods: To explore the different available plan adaptation workflows and methods, we have simulated online plan adaptation for five cases with varying levels of inter-fraction motion, regions of interest and target sizes: prostate, rectum, esophagus and lymph node oligometastases (single and multiple target). The plans were evaluated based on the clinical dose constraints and the optimization time was measured. Results: The time needed for plan adaptation ranged between 17 and 485s. More advanced plan adaptation methods generally resulted in more plans that met the clinical dose criteria. Violations were often caused by insufficient PTV coverage or, for the multiple lymph node case, a too high dose to OAR in the vicinity of the PTV. With full online replanning it was possible to create plans that met all clinical dose constraints for all cases. Conclusion: Daily full online replanning is the most robust adaptive planning method for Unity. It is feasible for specific sites in clinically acceptable times. Faster methods are available, but before applying these, the specific use cases should be explored dosimetrically.

Item does not contain fulltext, For successful abdominal radiotherapy it is crucial to have a clear tumor definition and an accurate characterization of the motion. While dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI aids tumor visualization, it is often hampered by motion artifacts. 4D-MRI characterizes this motion, but often lacks the contrast to clearly visualize the tumor. This dual requirement is challenging due to time constraints. Here, we propose combining both into a single acquisition by reconstructing the data in various ways in order to achieve both high spatio-temporal resolution DCE-MRI and accurate 4D-MRI motion estimates. A 5 min T1-weigthed DCE acquisition was collected in five renal-cell carcinoma patients and simulated in a digital phantom. Data were acquired continuously using a 3D golden angle radial stack-of-stars acquisition. This enabled three types of reconstruction; (1) a high spatio-temporal resolution DCE time series, (2) a 5D reconstruction and (3) a contrast-enhanced 4D-MRI for motion characterization. Motion extracted from the 4D- and 5D-MRI was compared with a separately acquired 4D-MRI and additional 2D cine MR imaging. Simulations on XCAT showed that 5D reconstructions severely underestimated motion ([Formula: see text]), whereas contrast-enhanced 4D-MRI only underestimated motion by [Formula: see text]. This was confirmed in the in vivo data where motion of the contrast-enhanced 4D-MRI was approximately [Formula: see text] smaller than the motion in the 2D cine MRI (5.8 mm versus 6.5 mm), but equal to a separately acquired 4D-MRI (5.8 mm versus 5.9 mm). 5D reconstructions underestimated the motion by more than [Formula: see text], but minimized respiratory-induced blurring in the contrast enhanced images. DCE time-series demonstrated clear tumor visualization and contrast enhancement throughout the entire field-of-view. DCE- and 4D-MRI can be integrated into a single acquisition that enables different reconstructions with complementary information for abdominal radiotherap