Search

BACKGROUND: Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is an immune-mediated, chronic cholestatic liver disease. Currently, liver transplantation is the only established life-saving treatment. Several studies have evaluated the effect of different biologic therapies on PSC with inconclusive findings. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the effects of biologics in PSC and associated inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). METHODS: MEDLINE, Scopus, and Embase were searched up to July 31, 2023, for studies reporting the effects of biologics in patients with PSC-IBD. Effects of biologic therapy on alkaline phosphatase, total bilirubin, ulcerative colitis response score, and adverse events were calculated and expressed as standardized difference of means (SMD), proportions, and 95% CI using a random-effects model. RESULTS: Six studies, including 411 PSC-IBD patients who received biologics, were included. Biologic treatment was associated with no change in alkaline phosphatase (SMD: 0.1, 95% CI: -0.07 -0.17, p=0.43), but a small and statistically significant increase in total bilirubin (SMD: 0.2, 95% CI: 0.05-0.35, p<0.01). 31.2% (95% CI: 23.8-39.7) of patients with IBD achieved endoscopic response, and there was a significant improvement in ulcerative colitis response score (SMD: -0.6,95% CI: -0.88 to 0.36, p<0.01). Furthermore, 17.6% (95% CI: 13.0-23.5) of patients experienced adverse events severe enough to discontinue therapy, and 29.9% (95% CI: 25.2-34.8) had a loss of response to biologics. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of patients with PSC-IBD with biologics (vedolizumab, infliximab, and adalimumab) was not associated with improvement of biochemical markers of cholestasis. Biologics are effective in treating the colitis associated with PSC. Vedolizumab was associated with worsening liver enzymes in contrast to other biologics, a finding that warrants further study.

Elizabeth E Powell,1,2 Katherine A Stuart,1 Simon Finnigan,3 Jan Hinson,4 Christina M Bernardes,5 Gunter Hartel,6 Patricia C Valery2,5 1Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, Queensland, Australia; 2Centre for Liver Disease Research, Faculty of Medicine, the University of Queensland, Woolloongabba, Queensland, Australia; 3Community and Oral Health, Metro North Health, Chermside, Queensland, Australia; 4Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Allied Health, Australian Catholic University, Banyo, Queensland, Australia; 5Population Health Department, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, Queensland, Australia; 6Statistics, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, Queensland, AustraliaCorrespondence: Patricia C Valery, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, 300 Herston Road, Herston, Queensland, 4006, Australia, Tel +61 07 3362 0376, Email Patricia.Valery@qimrberghofer.edu.auBackground: Psychosocial, lifestyle and practical needs are not routinely attended to during outpatient hepatology management, and little is known about the type and effectiveness of support services accessed by patients with cirrhosis. We quantified the type and use of community and allied health services in patients with cirrhosis.Methods: The study included 562 Australian adults with a diagnosis of cirrhosis. Health service use was assessed via questionnaire and via linkage to the Australian Medicare Benefits Schedule. Patient needs were assessed using the Supportive Needs Assessment tool for Cirrhosis (SNAC).Results: Although most patients (85.9%) used at least one community/allied health service for support with their liver disease, many reported requiring additional help with psychosocial (67.4%), lifestyle (34.3%) or practical needs (21.9%) that were not met by available services, or patients did not access services. A multidisciplinary care plan or case conference (in the 12 months prior to recruitment) was access

Although there are several established international guidelines on the management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), there is limited information detailing specific indicators of good quality care. The aim of this study was to develop a core set of quality indicators (QIs) to underpin the management of HCC. We undertook a modified, two-round, Delphi consensus study comprising a working group and experts involved in the management of HCC as well as consumer representatives. QIs were derived from an extensive review of the literature. The role of the participants was to identify the most important and measurable QIs for inclusion in an HCC clinical quality registry. From an initial 94 QIs, 40 were proposed to the participants. Of these, 23 QIs ultimately met the inclusion criteria and were included in the final set. This included (a) nine related to the initial diagnosis and staging, including timing to diagnosis, required baseline clinical and laboratory assessments, prior surveillance for HCC, diagnostic imaging and pathology, tumor staging, and multidisciplinary care; (b) thirteen related to treatment and management, including role of antiviral therapy, timing to treatment, localized ablation and locoregional therapy, surgery, transplantation, systemic therapy, method of response assessment, and supportive care; and (c) one outcome assessment related to surgical mortality. Conclusion: We identified a core set of nationally agreed measurable QIs for the diagnosis, staging, and management of HCC. The adherence to these best practice QIs may lead to system-level improvement in quality of care and, ultimately, improvement in patient outcomes, including survival.

Background: The rate of hospital admissions for cirrhosis increased 1.3-fold during 2008–2016 in Queensland. Alcohol misuse was a contributing factor for cirrhosis in 55% of admissions and 40% of patients had at least one comorbidity. Aims: To examine the temporal change in aetiology of liver disease and presence of comorbidity in patients admitted with cirrhosis. Methods: Population-based retrospective cohort study of all people treated in hospital for cirrhosis (10 254 patients) in Queensland during 2008–2016. Data were sourced from Queensland Hospital Admitted Patient Data Collection. Results: The commonest aetiology was alcohol (49.5%), followed by cryptogenic (unspecified cirrhosis; 28.5%), hepatitis C virus (19.3%), non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD)/non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) (4.8%) and hepatitis B virus (HBV) (4.3%). The prevalence of alcohol-related (P = 0.41) and hepatitis C virus (P = 0.08) remained stable between 2008–2010 and 2014–2016, that of NAFLD/NASH, cryptogenic and HBV-cirrhosis increased by 67% (P < 0.00001), 27% (P < 0.00001) and 20% (P = 0.00019), respectively; 41.1% of patients had at least one comorbidity. The prevalence of type 2 diabetes nearly doubled (from 13.7% to 25.4%; P < 0.00001) between 2008–2010 and 2014–2016. Conclusions: Alcohol misuse was the most important aetiology. The importance of NAFLD/NASH, cryptogenic and HBV-cirrhosis and the burden of comorbidity increased during 2008–2016. Ongoing alcohol misuse and the increasing prevalence of NAFLD/NASH, cryptogenic cirrhosis and comorbid type 2 diabetes among admissions for cirrhosis has implications for public health interventions to reduce the burden of unhealthy lifestyle and metabolic disorders.

Background and Aim Health‐related quality‐of‐life measurements are important to understand lived experiences of patients who have cirrhosis. These measures also inform economic evaluations by modelling quality‐adjusted life years (QALYs). We aimed to describe health‐related quality of life, specifically multiattribute utility (scale anchors of death = 0.00 and full health = 1.00), across various stages and etiologies of cirrhosis. Methods Face‐to‐face interviews were used to collect Short Form 36 (SF‐36) questionnaire responses from CirCare study participants with cirrhosis (June 2017 to December 2018). The severity of cirrhosis was assessed using the Child‐Pugh score classified as class A (5–6 points), B (7–9), or C (10–15) and by the absence (“compensated”) versus presence (“decompensated”) of cirrhosis‐related complications. Results Patients (n = 562, average 59.8 years [SD = 11.0], male 69.9%) had a range of primary etiologies (alcohol‐related 35.2%, chronic hepatitis C 25.4%, non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) 25.1%, chronic hepatitis B 5.9%, “other” 8.4%). Significantly lower (all P < 0.001) mean multiattribute utility was observed in the health states of patients with decompensated (mean = 0.62, SD = 0.15) versus compensated cirrhosis (mean = 0.68, SD = 0.12), Child‐Pugh class C (mean = 0.59, SD = 0.15) or B (mean = 0.63, SD = 0.15) versus A (mean = 0.68, SD = 0.16), and between those of working age (18–64 years; mean = 0.64, SD = 0.16) versus those aged 65+ years (mean = 0.70, SD = 0.16). The greatest decrements in health‐related quality of life relative to Australian population norms were observed across physical SF‐36 domains. Conclusions Persons with more advanced cirrhosis report greater life impacts. Estimates from this study are suitable for informing economic evaluations, particularly cost‐utility modelling, which captures the benefits of effective prevention, surveillance, and treatments on both the quality and quantity of patients' lives.

Christina M Bernardes,1 Paul J Clark,2 Cath Brown,1 Katherine Stuart,3 Gregory Pratt,1 Maree Toombs,4 Gunter Hartel,1 Elizabeth E Powell,3,5,&ast; Patricia C Valery1,&ast; 1QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, QLD, Australia; 2Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mater Hospitals, Brisbane, QLD, Australia; 3Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia; 4Rural Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Toowoomba, QLD, Australia; 5Centre for Liver Disease Research, Translational Research Institute, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia&ast;These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Patricia C Valery Tel +61 07 3362 0376Email Patricia.Valery@qimrberghofer.edu.auPurpose: Understanding and responding to the supportive care needs of people with cirrhosis is essential to quality care. Indigenous Australians, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people, are overrepresented amongst patients with cirrhosis. This study documented the nature and extent of supportive care needs of Indigenous Australians with cirrhosis, in comparison with non-Indigenous Australians.Patients and Methods: The supportive care needs of adult patients diagnosed with cirrhosis attending public hospitals in Queensland were assessed through the Supportive Needs Assessment tool for Cirrhosis (SNAC). Patients indicated how much additional help they needed on four subscales: 1. psychosocial issues; 2. practical and physical needs; 3. information needs; and 4. lifestyle changes. We examined the rate of moderate-to-high unmet needs based on Indigenous status (Poisson regression; incidence rate ratio (IRR)).Results: Indigenous (n=20) and non-Indigenous (n=438) patients included in the study had similar sociodemographic and clinical characteristics except for a lower educational level among Indigenous patients (p< 0.01). Most Indigenous pat

Background: We report the development and psychometric testing of a Supportive Needs Assessment tool for Cirrhosis (SNAC). Methods: The 50-item SNAC was administered to patients (n=465) diagnosed with cirrhosis recruited from five metropolitan hospitals in Queensland, Australia. Items were assessed for ceiling and floor effects, and exploratory factor analysis was used to assess the factor structure. Identified factors were assessed for internal consistency and convergent validity to validated psychosocial tools. Results: Exploratory factor analysis identified 4 factors (39 items), which together accounted for 49.2% of the total variance. The 39-item SNAC met the requirements of a needs assessment tool and identified a range of needs important to patients with cirrhosis that were grouped in four subscales: “Psychosocial issues”, “Practical and physical needs”, “Information needs”, and “Lifestyle changes”. Cronbach's alpha values for the four subscales ranged from 0.64 to 0.92. Convergent validity was supported by a strong correlation between the total SNAC score and that of the Chronic Liver Disease Questionnaire (CLDQ; Spearman rho −0.68; p<0.001), and moderate correlations with the Distress Thermometer (Spearman rho 0.53; p<0.001) and seven subscales of a generic health-related quality of life instrument (Short Form 36; Spearman rho ranged from −0.48 to −0.57; p<0.001). The SNAC discriminated patient groups with respect to sex (p=0.013), age group (p<0.001), and hospital admission status (admitted vs not; p<0.001). Conclusion: These data provide initial evidence for the validity and reliability of the SNAC, an instrument designed to measure type and amount of perceived unmet practical and psychological needs of people diagnosed with cirrhosis.

Patricia C Valery,1,2 Christina M Bernardes,1 Katherine A Stuart,3 Gunter F Hartel,1 Steven M McPhail,4 Richard Skoien,5 Tony Rahman,6 Paul J Clark,7 Leigh U Horsfall,2,3 Kelly L Hayward,2 Rohit Gupta,8 Elizabeth E Powell2,3 1QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, QLD, Australia; 2Centre for Liver Disease Research, Translational Research Institute, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia; 3Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia; 4Centre for Functioning and Health Research, Queensland Health and the School of Public Health and Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia; 5Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia; 6Gastroenterology & Hepatology Department, The Prince Charles Hospital, Chermside, QLD, Australia; 7Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mater Hospitals, Brisbane, QLD, Australia; 8Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Sunshine Coast University Hospital, Birtinya, QLD, AustraliaCorrespondence: Patricia C ValeryQIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, 300 Herston Road, Herston, QLD 4006, AustraliaTel +61 7 33620376Email Patricia.Valery@qimrberghofer.edu.auBackground: We report the development and psychometric testing of a Supportive Needs Assessment tool for Cirrhosis (SNAC).Methods: The 50-item SNAC was administered to patients (n=465) diagnosed with cirrhosis recruited from five metropolitan hospitals in Queensland, Australia. Items were assessed for ceiling and floor effects, and exploratory factor analysis was used to assess the factor structure. Identified factors were assessed for internal consistency and convergent validity to validated psychosocial tools.Results: Exploratory factor analysis identified 4 factors (39 items), which together accounted for 49.2% of the total variance. The 39-i

Background and aims:While chronic liver disease is a major global public health problem, it has not been recognized as a National Health Priority Area in Australia. A population-based study using hospital admission data for cirrhosis in the large state of Queensland, Australia during 2008-2016 was performed. Method:Hospital data on all patient admissions (public and private)and deaths during 2008-2016 in the state of Queensland were obtained. Queensland is a large state in the north-east of Australia with a population of 4.9 million. We identified all hospital admissions for cirrhosis for patients aged 20 years or older. We reported age-standardized hospitalization rates/10, 000 person-years by gender and per calendar year, in-hospital case fatality rate among these admissions (n = 30, 327) and examined the factors associated with hospital deaths. Results:Age-adjusted hospitalization rates increased by 32%between 2008 and 2016, from 8.50/10, 000 (95%CI 8.18-8.82) to11.21/10, 000 (95%CI 10.87-11.54). Admission rates peaked in men at34.03/10, 000 in 55-59 year-olds. The age-standardized admission rate for Indigenous Australians was 32.79/10, 000 (95%CI 31.28-34.31). Alcohol misuse was a contributing factor in over half (55.1%) of all admissions, and in 26.8% of admissions patients resided in most socio-economically disadvantaged areas. The overall in-hospital case fatality rate was 9.7% for males and 9.3% for females, and decreased significantly in males from 10.25% in 2008 to 8.32% in 2016 (p <0.001). Admissions associated with hepatorenal syndrome (AOR =7.24, 95%CI 5.99-8.75), HCC (AOR = 2.53, 95%CI 2.20-2.91), hepatic encephalopathy (AOR = 1.94, 95%CI 1.61-2.34), acute peritonitis (AOR= 1.93, 95%CI 1.61-2.33), jaundice (AOR = 1.82, 95%CI 1.20-2.75) andage≥70 years (AOR = 1.63, 95%CI 1.38-1.92) were significantly associated with in-hospital mortality. A higher Charlson comorbidity index (p = 0.021), longer length of hospitalization (p < 0.001) and residence

Background: Limited information is available about hospitalization rates for cirrhosis in Australia. Methods: Using information on all hospital episodes of care for patients admitted to Queensland hospitals during 2008–2016, we report age-standardized hospitalization rates/10,000 person-years, in-hospital case-fatality rate among these admissions (n = 30,327), and examine the factors associated with hospital deaths using logistic regression analyses. Findings: Hospitalization rates increased from 8.50/10,000 (95% confidence interval (CI) 8.18–8.82) to 11.21/10,000 (95%CI 10.87–11.54) between 2008 and 2016, and peaked in men aged 55–59 years (34.03/10,000) and in Indigenous Australians (32.79/10,000). The number of admissions increased by 61.7% from 2701 admissions in 2008 to 4367 in 2016. During the same period, the percentage increase varied by socioeconomic disadvantage (3.2%/year in the most affluent vs. 9.4%/year in the most disadvantaged quintile; p < 0.001). Alcohol misuse was a contributing factor for cirrhosis in 55.1% of admissions, and socioeconomic disadvantage in 26.8%. The overall in-hospital case-fatality rate was 9.7% for males and 9.3% for females, and decreased in males (p < 0.001). Predictors of in-hospital mortality included hepatorenal syndrome (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 7.24, 95%CI 5.99–8.75), HCC (AOR = 2.53, 95%CI 2.20–2.91), hepatic encephalopathy (AOR = 1.94, 95%CI 1.61–2.34), acute peritonitis (AOR = 1.93, 95%CI 1.61–2.33), jaundice (AOR = 1.82, 95%CI 1.20–2.75), age ≥ 70 years (AOR = 1.63, 95%CI 1.38–1.92), a higher comorbidity index (p = 0.021), and residence outside of a “major city” (p < 0.001). Interpretation: The increasing healthcare use by Australians with cirrhosis has resource and economic implications. Our data highlight the disproportionate impact of cirrhosis on Indigenous Australians and people from the most socioeconomically disadvantaged areas. Funding: Brisbane Diamantina Health Partners.

Britton, L., Bridle, K., Reiling, J., Santrampurwala, N., Wockner, L., Ching, H., ... & House, M. (2018). Hepatic iron concentration correlates with insulin sensitivity in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology communications, 2(6), 644-653. Available here