Search

The Watch List (WL) is a monitoring program under the European Water Framework Directive (WFD) to obtain high-quality Union-wide monitoring data on potential water pollutants for which scarce monitoring data or data of insufficient quality are available. The main purpose of the WL data collection is to determine if the substances pose a risk to the aquatic environment at EU level and subsequently to decide whether a threshold, the Environmental Quality Standards (EQS) should be set for them and, potentially to be listed as priority substance in the WFD. The first WL was established in 2015 and contained 10 individual or groups of substances while the 4th WL was launched in 2022. The results of monitoring the substances of the first WL showed that some countries had difficulties to reach an analytical Limit of Quantification (LOQ) below or equal to the Predicted No-Effect Concentrations (PNEC) or EQS. The Joint Research Centre (JRC) of the European Commission (EC) organised a series of workshops to support the EU Member States (MS) and their activities under the WFD. Sharing the knowledge among the Member States on the analytical methods is important to deliver good data quality. The outcome and the discussion engaged with the experts are described in this paper, and in addition a literature review of the most important publications on the analysis of 17-alpha-ethinylestradiol (EE2), amoxicillin, ciprofloxacin, metaflumizone, fipronil, metformin, and guanylurea from the last years is presented.

To better understand the impact of conventional agricultural practices on soil and water resources, two main objectives were established in this study: to measure nitrate (NO3-) and sulphate (SO4 2-) concentrations in lysimeters and drainpipes leachates in response to different nitrogen fertilization levels and soil amendments and to identify organic contaminants that could have originated from the long-term use of agrochemicals in historically intensive agricultural area in Croatia. During the two-year study period leachate samples were collected from lysimeters and drainpipes. Research results indicate NO3- content in both lysimeters and drainpipes increased with rising doses of N fertilizer. The highest concentration of SO4 2- was recorded in the treatment with added phosphogypsum, while in all other treatments the concentrations were low. Over 40% of the 287 target substances were detected at least once during the two-year study period but only two substances (IPC/propham and carbosulfan) were found to have concentrations above 0.5 µg/L. Additionally, three priority substances were continuously present in the leachate samples: atrazine, simazine and isoproturon., Da bi se bolje razumio utjecaj konvencionalne poljoprivredne prakse na tlo i vodne resurse, u ovom radu uspostavljena su dva glavna cilja: mjerenje koncentracija nitrata (NO3-) i sulfata (SO4 2-) u lizimetarskim i drenskim procjednim vodama kao odgovor na gnojidbu različitim razinama dušika te poboljšivača tla te identificirati organske onečišćivače čije je moguće izvorište u dugotrajnoj uporabi pesticida na povijesno intenzivno poljoprivrednom području u Hrvatskoj. Tijekom dvogodišnjeg razdoblja uzorci procjednih voda prikupljani su iz lizimetara i drenskih cijevi. Rezultati istraživanja pokazuju da se sadržaj NO3- u lizimetrima i u drenskim cijevima povećavao s porastom doza N gnojiva. Najveća koncentracija SO4 2- zabilježena je u tretmanu s dodanim fosfogipsom, dok su u svim ostalim tretmanima koncentracije bile niske. Preko 40% od 287 ciljnih tvari otkriveno je barem jednom tijekom dvogodišnjeg razdoblja ispitivanja, ali utvrđeno je da su samo dvije tvari (IPC/propham i carbosulfan) imale koncentracije iznad 0,5 µg/L. Uz to, tri prioritetne tvari bile su kontinuirano prisutne u uzorcima procjednih voda: atrazin, simazin i izoproturon.

To better understand the impact of conventional agricultural practices on soil and water resources, two main objectives were established in this study: to measure nitrate (NO3-) and sulphate (SO4 2-) concentrations in lysimeters and drainpipes leachates in response to different nitrogen fertilization levels and soil amendments and to identify organic contaminants that could have originated from the long-term use of agrochemicals in historically intensive agricultural area in Croatia. During the two-year study period leachate samples were collected from lysimeters and drainpipes. Research results indicate NO3- content in both lysimeters and drainpipes increased with rising doses of N fertilizer. The highest concentration of SO4 2- was recorded in the treatment with added phosphogypsum, while in all other treatments the concentrations were low. Over 40% of the 287 target substances were detected at least once during the two-year study period but only two substances (IPC/propham and carbosulfan) were found to have concentrations above 0.5 µg/L. Additionally, three priority substances were continuously present in the leachate samples: atrazine, simazine and isoproturon., Da bi se bolje razumio utjecaj konvencionalne poljoprivredne prakse na tlo i vodne resurse, u ovom radu uspostavljena su dva glavna cilja: mjerenje koncentracija nitrata (NO3-) i sulfata (SO4 2-) u lizimetarskim i drenskim procjednim vodama kao odgovor na gnojidbu različitim razinama dušika te poboljšivača tla te identificirati organske onečišćivače čije je moguće izvorište u dugotrajnoj uporabi pesticida na povijesno intenzivno poljoprivrednom području u Hrvatskoj. Tijekom dvogodišnjeg razdoblja uzorci procjednih voda prikupljani su iz lizimetara i drenskih cijevi. Rezultati istraživanja pokazuju da se sadržaj NO3- u lizimetrima i u drenskim cijevima povećavao s porastom doza N gnojiva. Najveća koncentracija SO4 2- zabilježena je u tretmanu s dodanim fosfogipsom, dok su u svim ostalim tretmanima koncentracije bile niske. Preko 40% od 287 ciljnih tvari otkriveno je barem jednom tijekom dvogodišnjeg razdoblja ispitivanja, ali utvrđeno je da su samo dvije tvari (IPC/propham i carbosulfan) imale koncentracije iznad 0,5 µg/L. Uz to, tri prioritetne tvari bile su kontinuirano prisutne u uzorcima procjednih voda: atrazin, simazin i izoproturon.

In this article, a dataset from a collaborative non-target screening trial organised by the NORMAN Association is used to review the state-of-the-art and discuss future perspectives of non-target screening using high-resolution mass spectrometry in water analysis. A total of 18 institutes from 12 European countries analysed an extract of the same water sample collected from the River Danube with either one or both of liquid and gas chromatography coupled with massspectrometry detection. This article focuses mainly on the use of highresolution screening techniques with target, suspect, and non-target workflows to identify substances in environmental samples. Specific examples are given to emphasise major challenges including isobaric and co-eluting substances, dependence on target and suspect lists, formula assignment, the use of retention information, and the confidence of identification. Approaches and methods applicable to unit resolution data are also discussed. Although most substances were identified using highresolution data with target and suspect-screening approaches, some participants proposed tentative non-target identifications. This comprehensive dataset revealed that non-target analytical techniques are already substantially harmonised between the participants, but the data processing remains time-consuming. Although the objective of a "fully-automated identification workflow” remains elusive in the short term, important steps in this direction have been taken, exemplified by the growing popularity of suspectscreening approaches. Major recommendations to improve non-target screening include better integration and connection of desired features into software packages, the exchange of target and suspect lists, and the contribution of more spectra from standard substances into (openly accessible) databases. Graphical Abstract Matrix of identification approach versus identification confidence

In this article, a dataset from a collaborative non-target screening trial organised by the NORMAN Association is used to review the state-of-the-art and discuss future perspectives of non-target screening using high-resolution mass spectrometry in water analysis. A total of 18 institutes from 12 European countries analysed an extract of the same water sample collected from the River Danube with either one or both of liquid and gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry detection. This article focuses mainly on the use of high resolution screening techniques with target, suspect, and non-target workflows to identify substances in environmental samples. Specific examples are given to emphasise major challenges including isobaric and co-eluting substances, dependence on target and suspect lists, formula assignment, the use of retention information, and the confidence of identification. Approaches and methods applicable to unit resolution data are also discussed. Although most substances were identified using high resolution data with target and suspect-screening approaches, some participants proposed tentative non-target identifications. This comprehensive dataset revealed that non-target analytical techniques are already substantially harmonised between the participants, but the data processing remains time-consuming. Although the objective of a "fully-automated identification workflow" remains elusive in the short term, important steps in this direction have been taken, exemplified by the growing popularity of suspect screening approaches. Major recommendations to improve non-target screening include better integration and connection of desired features into software packages, the exchange of target and suspect lists, and the contribution of more spectra from standard substances into (openly accessible) databases.

In this article, a dataset from a collaborative non-target screening trial organised by the NORMAN Association is used to review the state-of-the-art and discuss future perspectives of non-target screening using high-resolution mass spectrometry in water analysis. A total of 18 institutes from 12 European countries analysed an extract of the same water sample collected from the River Danube with either one or both of liquid and gas chromatography coupled with massspectrometry detection. This article focuses mainly on the use of highresolution screening techniques with target, suspect, and non-target workflows to identify substances in environmental samples. Specific examples are given to emphasise major challenges including isobaric and co-eluting substances, dependence on target and suspect lists, formula assignment, the use of retention information, and the confidence of identification. Approaches and methods applicable to unit resolution data are also discussed. Although most substances were identified using highresolution data with target and suspect-screening approaches, some participants proposed tentative non-target identifications. This comprehensive dataset revealed that non-target analytical techniques are already substantially harmonised between the participants, but the data processing remains time-consuming. Although the objective of a "fully-automated identification workflow” remains elusive in the short term, important steps in this direction have been taken, exemplified by the growing popularity of suspectscreening approaches. Major recommendations to improve non-target screening include better integration and connection of desired features into software packages, the exchange of target and suspect lists, and the contribution of more spectra from standard substances into (openly accessible) databases. Graphical Abstract Matrix of identification approach versus identification confidence