Search

OBJECTIVE Patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) or kidney failure receiving replacement therapy (KFRT) are highly vulnerable to COVID-19 infection, morbidity and mortality. Vaccination is effective, but access differs around the world. We aimed to ascertain the availability, readiness and prioritisation of COVID-19 vaccines for this group of patients globally. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS Collaborators from the International Society of Nephrology (ISN), Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study and ISN-Global Kidney Health Atlas developed an online survey that was administered electronically to key nephrology leaders in 174 countries between 2 July and 4 August 2021. RESULTS Survey responses were received from 99 of 174 countries from all 10 ISN regions, among which 88/174 (50%) were complete. At least one vaccine was available in 96/99 (97%) countries. In 71% of the countries surveyed, patients on dialysis were prioritised for vaccination, followed by patients living with a kidney transplant (KT) (62%) and stage 4/5 CKD (51%). Healthcare workers were the most common high priority group for vaccination. At least 50% of patients receiving in-centre haemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis or KT were estimated to have completed vaccination at the time of the survey in 55%, 64% and 51% of countries, respectively. At least 50% of patients in all three patient groups had been vaccinated in >70% of high-income countries and in 100% of respondent countries in Western Europe.The most common barriers to vaccination of patients were vaccine hesitancy (74%), vaccine shortages (61%) and mass vaccine distribution challenges (48%). These were reported more in low-income and lower middle-income countries compared with high-income countries. CONCLUSION Patients with advanced CKD or KFRT were prioritised in COVID-19 vaccination in most countries. Multiple barriers led to substantial variability in the successful achievement of COVID-19 vaccination across the world, with high

INTRODUCTION: The uptake of the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) 2012 chronic kidney disease (CKD) Guideline is not fully described in real-world nephrology practice across the world. METHODS: We used baseline data from the CKD Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (2013-2017), a 4-country cohort of patients with estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 ml/min per 1.73 m2 recruited from national samples of nephrology clinics, to describe adherence to measures for monitoring and delaying CKD progression. Data were collected as in clinical practice, except laboratory measures per protocol in France. RESULTS: The mean age ranged from 65 years in Brazil to 72 years in Germany. Albuminuria (mostly proteinuria) was measured routinely in 36% to 43% of patients in Brazil, Germany, and the United States. Blood pressure control (≤140/90 mm Hg) ranged from 49% in France to 76% in Brazil; <40% of patients had blood pressure ≤130/80 mm Hg everywhere but Brazil (52%). More than 40% of nephrologists in Brazil reported a systolic blood pressure target ≤130 mm Hg for nondiabetic patients without proteinuria, but only 19% to 24% elsewhere. Prescription of renin-angiotensin aldosterone system inhibitors ranged from 52% in the United States to 81% in Germany. Dietary advice was more frequent for salt than protein intake; dietitian visits were uncommon. In nondiabetic patients, achievement of all 3 targets including blood pressure ≤130/80 mm Hg, renin-angiotensin aldosterone system inhibition, and dietary advice, ranged from 10% in the United States to 32% in Brazil; in treated diabetic patients, this ranged from 6% to 11% after including hemoglobin A1c target. CONCLUSION: Adherence to recommendations to slow CKD progression is low in typical practice settings, and substantial variation among countries for some indicates opportunities for improvement.

As the worst global pandemic of the past century, COVID-19 has had a disproportionate effect on maintenance dialysis patients and their health care providers. At a virtual roundtable on 12 June 2020, DOPPS investigators from fifteen countries in Asia, Europe, and the Americas described and compared the effects of COVID-19 on dialysis care, with recent updates added. Most striking is the huge difference in risk to dialysis patients and staff across the world. Per-population cases and deaths among dialysis patients vary over 100-fold across participating countries, mirroring burden in the general population. International data indicate case fatality ratio remains at 10-30% among dialysis patients, confirming the gravity of infection, and that cases are much more common among in-center than home dialysis patients. This latter finding merits urgent study because in-center patients often have greater community exposure, and in-center transmission may be uncommon under optimal protocols. Greater telemedicine use is a welcome change here to stay, and our community needs to improve emergency planning and protect dialysis staff from the next pandemic. Finally, the pandemic's challenges have prompted widespread partnering and innovation in kidney care and research that must be sustained after this global health crisis.

Angelo Karaboyas,1,2 Hal Morgenstern,3 Nancy L Fleischer,2 Douglas E Schaubel,4,5 Bruce M Robinson1,6 1Arbor Research Collaborative for Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; 2University of Michigan, Department of Epidemiology, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; 3University of Michigan, Departments of Epidemiology and Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, and Department of Urology, Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; 4University of Michigan, Department of Biostatistics, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; 5University of Pennsylvania, Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, Philadelphia, PA, USA; 6University of Michigan, Department of Internal Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USACorrespondence: Angelo KaraboyasArbor Research Collaborative for Health, 3700 Earhart Road, Ann Arbor, MI 48105, USATel +1 (734) 665-4108Email Angelo.Karaboyas@ArborResearch.orgBackground: Reproducibility of clinical and epidemiologic research is important to generalize findings and has increasingly been scrutinized. A recently published randomized trial, PIVOTAL, evaluated high vs low intravenous iron dosing strategies to manage anemia in hemodialysis patients in the UK. Our objective was to assess the reproducibility of the PIVOTAL trial findings using data from a well-established cohort study, the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS).Methods: To overcome the absence of randomization in the DOPPS, we applied the parametric g-formula, an extension of standardization to longitudinal data. We estimated the effect of a proactive high-dose vs reactive low-dose iron supplementation strategy on all-cause mortality (primary outcome), hemoglobin, two measures of iron concentration (ferritin and TSAT), and erythropoiesis-stimulating agent dose over 12 months of follow-up in 6325 DOPPS patients.Results: Comparing high- vs low-iron dose strategies, the 1-year mortality risk difference was 0.020 (95% CI: 0.008, 0.031) and risk ratio was 1.20 (95% CI: 1.07, 1.33), compared with null 1-year findings i

Angelo Karaboyas, 1 Hal Morgenstern, 2 Yun Li, 3 Brian A Bieber, 1 Raymond Hakim, 4 Takeshi Hasegawa, 5 Michel Jadoul, 6 Elke Schaeffner, 7 Raymond Vanholder, 8 Ronald L Pisoni, 1 Friedrich K Port, 9 Bruce M Robinson 1 1Arbor Research Collaborative for Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; 2Departments of Epidemiology and Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, and Department of Urology, Medical School, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; 3Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; 4Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA; 5Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Showa University Fujigaoka Hospital, Yokohama, Japan, and Showa University Research Administration Center (SURAC), Showa University, Tokyo, Japan; 6Cliniques universitaires St Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium; 7Institute of Public Health, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; 8Department of Nephrology, University Hospital Ghent, Ghent, Belgium; 9Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health, and Department of Internal Medicine-Nephrology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USACorrespondence: Angelo KaraboyasArbor Research Collaborative for Health, 3700 Earhart Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48105, USATel +1 734 665-4108Fax +1 734 665-2103Email Angelo.Karaboyas@ArborResearch.orgPurpose: Mortality among first-year hemodialysis (HD) patients remains unacceptably high. To address this problem, we estimate the proportions of early HD deaths that are potentially preventable by modifying known risk factors.Methods: We included 15,891 HD patients (within 60 days of starting HD) from 21 countries in the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (1996– 2015), a prospective cohort study. Using Cox regression adjusted for potential confounders, we estimated the fraction of first-year deaths attri

To the Editor: The prognostic importance of residual kidney function (RKF) for maintenance hemodialysis (HD) patients has previously been recognized.1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 In previous studies, monitoring of RKF typically required urine collection preceding the HD session and a predialysis blood sample from the end of collection to compute the renal clearance of urea/creatinine (ie, urinary urea/creatinine divided by serum concentration2, 4, 5) and more specifically, renal Kt/Vurea.3 Urine volume, the prerequisite for RKF, can also be estimated by patient self-report.7 In the present analysis of the DOPPS, we evaluated predictors and outcomes of self-reported urine volume; specifically, whether a positive response to the question: “Did the patient have urine output > 200 mL/d or 1 cup/day at the time of enrollment?” was associated with mortality during follow-up periods of 2 to 3 years.

The benefits of renin angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors (RAASi) are well-established in the general population, particularly among those with diabetes, congestive heart failure (CHF), or coronary artery disease (CAD). However, conflicting evidence from trials and concerns about hyperkalemia limit RAASi use in hemodialysis patients, relative to other antihypertensive agents, including beta blockers and calcium channel blockers. Therefore, we investigated prescription patterns and associations with mortality for RAASi and other antihypertensive agents using data from the international Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS). Cox regression was used to estimate the effect of the prescription of RAASi and other antihypertensive agents at study entry on mortality in 11,421 incident (120 days or less) hemodialysis and 37,124 prevalent (over 120 days) hemodialysis patients from DOPPS phases 2-5 (2002-2015). Over 95% of RAASi were angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers. RAASi prevalence was 39% and varied minimally by CHF and CAD. The adjusted hazard ratio for RAASi (vs. no RAASi) was 0.89 (95% confidence interval 0.80-0.99) among incident and 0.94 (0.90-0.99) among prevalent hemodialysis patients, with no convincing evidence of interaction with diabetes, CAD or CHF. Inverse associations with mortality were also observed for beta blockers and calcium channel blockers, and were stronger for angiotensin receptor blockers than angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, but this latter finding requires further study. Thus, our observations suggest a relatively small survival benefit of RAASi and other antihypertensive agents in hemodialysis patients, though randomized prospective studies are needed to potentially change prescribing criteria.

Background: Socioeconomic status (SES) factors such as employment, educational attainment, income, and marital status can affect the health and well-being of the general population and have been associated with the prevalence of chronic kidney disease (CKD). However, no studies to date in Japan have reported on the prognosis of patients with CKD with respect to SES. This study aimed to investigate the influences of employment and education level on mortality and hospitalization among maintenance hemodialysis (HD) patients in Japan.Methods: Data on 7974 HD patients enrolled in Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study phases 1–4 (1999–2011) in Japan were analysed. Employment status, education level, demographic data, and comorbidities were abstracted at entry into DOPPS from patient records. Mortality and hospitalization events were collected during follow-up. Patients on dialysis < 120 days at study entry were excluded from the analyses. Cox regression modelled the association between employment and both mortality and hospitalization among patients < 60 years old. The association between education and outcomes was also assessed. The association between patient characteristics and employment among patients < 60 years old was assessed using logistic regression.Results: During a median follow-up of 24.9 months (interquartile range, 18.4–32.0), 10% of patients died and 43% of patients had an inpatient hospitalization. Unemployment was associated with mortality (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.57; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.05–2.36) and hospitalization (HR = 1.25; 95% CI: 1.08–1.44). Compared to patients who graduated from university, patients with less than a high school (HS) education and patients who graduated HS with some college tended to have elevated mortality (HR = 1.41; 95% CI, 1.04–1.92 and HR = 1.36; 95% CI: 1.02–1.82, respectively) but were not at risk for increased hospitalizations. Factors associated with unemployment included lower level of education, older

publié sur CD-ROM

Because of multiple comorbidities, hemodialysis (HD) patients are prescribed many oral medications, including phosphate binders (PBs), often resulting in a high “pill burden.” Using data from the international Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS), we assessed associations between PB pill burden, patient-reported PB non-adherence, and levels of serum phosphorus (SPhos) and parathyroid hormone (PTH) using standard regression analyses. The study included data collected from 5262 HD patients from dialysis units participating in the DOPPS in 12 countries. PB prescription ranged from a mean of 7.4 pills per day in the United States to 3.9 pills per day in France. About half of the patients were prescribed at least 6 PB pills per day, and 13% were prescribed at least 12 PB pills per day. Overall, the proportion of patients who reported skipping PBs at least once in the past month was 45% overall, ranging from 33% in Belgium to 57% in the United States. There was a trend toward greater PB non-adherence and a higher number of prescribed PB pills per day. Non-adherence to PB prescription was associated with high SPhos (>5.5 mg/dL) and PTH (>600 pg/mL). Adherence to PB is a challenge for many HD patients and may be related to the number of PB pills prescribed. Prescription of a simplified PB regimen could improve patient adherence and perhaps improve SPhos and PTH levels.

Background and objectivesAnemia management changed substantially among dialysis patients in the United States around the time of implementation of the new Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services bundled payment system and erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) label change in 2011. Among these, average ferritin levels increased dramatically and have remained high since; this study sought to gain understanding of this sustained rise in ferritin levels.Design, setting, participants, & measurementsTrends in mean ferritin, hemoglobin, IV iron dose, and ESA dose from 2009 to 2013 were examined in 9735 patients from 91 United States Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study facilities. Linear mixed models were used to assess the extent to which intravenous (IV) iron and ESA dose accounted for patients' changes in ferritin over time.ResultsMean ESA dose and hemoglobin levels declined throughout the study. Mean IV iron dose increased from 210 mg/mo in 2009-2010 to a peak of 280 mg/mo in 2011, then declined back to 200 mg/mo and remained stable from 2012 to 2013. Mean ferritin increased from 601 ng/ml in the third quarter of 2009 to 887 ng/ml in the first quarter of 2012; models suggest that higher IV iron dosing was a primary determinant during 2011, but lower ESA doses contributed to the sustained high ferritin levels thereafter. In a subset of 17 facilities that decreased IV iron dose in 2011, mean ferritin rose by 120 ng/ml to 764 ng/ml, which appeared to be primarily due to ESA reduction. Together, changes in IV iron and ESA doses accounted for 46% of the increase in ferritin over the study period.ConclusionsIn contrast to expectations, the rise in average IV iron dose did not persist beyond 2011. The sustained rise in ferritin levels in United States dialysis patients after policy changes in 2011, to average levels well in excess of 800 ng/ml, appeared to be partly due to reductions in ESA dosing and not solely IV iron dosing practices. The effect of these

Background and objectivesAnemia management changed substantially among dialysis patients in the United States around the time of implementation of the new Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services bundled payment system and erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) label change in 2011. Among these, average ferritin levels increased dramatically and have remained high since; this study sought to gain understanding of this sustained rise in ferritin levels.Design, setting, participants, & measurementsTrends in mean ferritin, hemoglobin, IV iron dose, and ESA dose from 2009 to 2013 were examined in 9735 patients from 91 United States Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study facilities. Linear mixed models were used to assess the extent to which intravenous (IV) iron and ESA dose accounted for patients' changes in ferritin over time.ResultsMean ESA dose and hemoglobin levels declined throughout the study. Mean IV iron dose increased from 210 mg/mo in 2009-2010 to a peak of 280 mg/mo in 2011, then declined back to 200 mg/mo and remained stable from 2012 to 2013. Mean ferritin increased from 601 ng/ml in the third quarter of 2009 to 887 ng/ml in the first quarter of 2012; models suggest that higher IV iron dosing was a primary determinant during 2011, but lower ESA doses contributed to the sustained high ferritin levels thereafter. In a subset of 17 facilities that decreased IV iron dose in 2011, mean ferritin rose by 120 ng/ml to 764 ng/ml, which appeared to be primarily due to ESA reduction. Together, changes in IV iron and ESA doses accounted for 46% of the increase in ferritin over the study period.ConclusionsIn contrast to expectations, the rise in average IV iron dose did not persist beyond 2011. The sustained rise in ferritin levels in United States dialysis patients after policy changes in 2011, to average levels well in excess of 800 ng/ml, appeared to be partly due to reductions in ESA dosing and not solely IV iron dosing practices. The effect of these

Predialysis volume overload is the sum of interdialytic weight gain (IDWG) and residual postdialysis volume overload. It results mostly from failure to achieve an adequate volume status at the end of the dialysis session. Recent developments in bioimpedance spectroscopy and possibly relative plasma volume monitoring permit noninvasive volume status assessment in hemodialysis patients. A large proportion of patients have previously been shown to be chronically volume overloaded predialysis (defined as >15% above 'normal' extracellular fluid volume, equivalent to >2.5 liters on average), and to exhibit a more than twofold increased mortality risk. By contrast, the magnitude of the mortality risk associated with IDWG is much smaller and only evident with very large weight gains. Here we review the available evidence on volume overload and IDWG, and question the use of IDWG as an indicator of 'nonadherence' by describing its association with postdialysis volume depletion. We also demonstrate the relationship between IDWG, volume overload and predialysis serum sodium concentration, and comment on salt intake. Discriminating between volume overload and IDWG will likely lead to a more appropriate management of fluid withdrawal during dialysis. Consensually, the present authors agree that this discrimination should be among the primary goals for dialysis caretakers today. In consequence, we recommend objective measures of volume status beyond mere evaluations of IDWG.

Background: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is associated with increased mortality among hemodialysis (HD) patients. Guidelines from Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes recommend that infected HD patients awaiting renal transplantation be treated for HCV and that clinicians decide whether to treat other infected patients on a case-by-case basis. We evaluated the extent and outcome of HCV therapy among HD patients. Methods: The Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study is an observational study; 49,762 HD patients in 12 nations enrolled between 1996 and 2011. We reviewed HCV status, use of interferon or ribavirin, and survival over a median 1.4 years per study phase. Results: 4,735 patients (9.5%) were HCV+. Only 48 (1.0%) of the 4,589 HCV+ patients with prescription data were receiving antiviral medication. Among the subset of 617 HCV+ patients also known to be on a waiting list for renal transplantation, only 3.7% were receiving treatment. After restricting to HCV+ patients with overlapping propensity for antiviral treatment, 4 (9.5%) of 42 treated patients and 638 (21.0%) of 3,037 untreated patients died. The hazard ratio for adjusted mortality comparing treated patients with untreated patients was 0.47 (95% CI, 0.17-1.26). Conclusions: HD patients with hepatitis C infection very rarely receive antiviral therapy. Increased intervention might prolong survival for some patients and in particular might improve the prospects for those awaiting renal transplantation. © 2013 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Predialysis volume overload is the sum of interdialytic weight gain (IDWG) and residual postdialysis volume overload. It results mostly from failure to achieve an adequate volume status at the end of the dialysis session. Recent developments in bioimpedance spectroscopy and possibly relative plasma volume monitoring permit noninvasive volume status assessment in hemodialysis patients. A large proportion of patients have previously been shown to be chronically volume overloaded predialysis (defined as >15% above 'normal' extracellular fluid volume, equivalent to >2.5 liters on average), and to exhibit a more than twofold increased mortality risk. By contrast, the magnitude of the mortality risk associated with IDWG is much smaller and only evident with very large weight gains. Here we review the available evidence on volume overload and IDWG, and question the use of IDWG as an indicator of 'nonadherence' by describing its association with postdialysis volume depletion. We also demonstrate the relationship between IDWG, volume overload and predialysis serum sodium concentration, and comment on salt intake. Discriminating between volume overload and IDWG will likely lead to a more appropriate management of fluid withdrawal during dialysis. Consensually, the present authors agree that this discrimination should be among the primary goals for dialysis caretakers today. In consequence, we recommend objective measures of volume status beyond mere evaluations of IDWG.

Although dialysis after kidney transplant failure (TF) is common, the outcomes of these patients remain unclear. We compared outcomes of TF patients with transplant-nave (TN) patients wait-listed for kidney transplantation. We used data from the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS), including laboratory markers and health-related quality of life (HR-QOL). Mortality and hospitalization of participants with one prior TF versus TN patients were compared using the Cox regression analysis. HR-QOL physical and mental component summary scores (PCS and MCS) were examined using linear mixed models, and clinical practices were compared using logistic regression. Compared with TN patients (n 2806), TF patients (n 1856) were younger (48 versus 51 years, P 0.003), less likely to be diabetic (18 versus 27, P 0.0001) and to use a permanent surgical vascular access {adjusted odds ratio (AOR): 0.85 [95 confidence interval (CI): 0.701.03], P 0.10}, particularly within the first 3 months after TF [AOR 0.45 (0.320.62), P 0.0001]. TF patients also had lower PCS [mean difference 2.56 (3.36, 1.75), P 0.0001] but not MCS [0.42 (1.34, 0.50), P 0.37]. All-cause mortality [adjusted hazard ratio (AHR): 1.32 (95 CI: 1.051.66), P 0.02], especially infection-related [AHR 2.45 (95 CI: 1.364.41), P 0.01], was higher among TF patients. TF patients have reduced QOL and higher mortality, particularly due to infections, than TN patients. Interventions to optimize care before and after starting dialysis remain to be identified and applied in clinical practice.

The risk of death for hemodialysis patients is thought to be highest on the days following the longest interval without dialysis (usually Mondays and Tuesdays); however, existing results are inconclusive. To clarify this we analyzed Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS) data of 22,163 hemodialysis patients from the United States, Europe, and Japan. Our study focused on the association between dialysis schedule and day of the week of all-cause, cardiovascular, and noncardiovascular mortality with day-of-week coded as a time-dependent covariate. The models were adjusted for dialysis schedule, age, country, DOPPS phase I or II, and other demographic and clinical covariates, and compared mortality on each day to the 7-day average. Patients on a Monday-Wednesday-Friday (MWF) schedule had elevated all-cause mortality on Mondays, and those on a Tuesday-Thursday-Saturday (TTS) schedule had increased risk of mortality on Tuesdays in all three regions. The association between day-of-week mortality and schedule was generally stronger for cardiovascular than noncardiovascular mortality, and was most pronounced in the United States. Unexpectedly, Japanese patients on a MWF schedule had a higher risk of noncardiovascular mortality on Fridays, and European patients on a TTS schedule experienced an elevated cardiovascular mortality on Saturdays. Thus, future studies are needed to evaluate the influence of practice patterns on schedule-specific mortality and factors that could modulate this effect.

This study identified modifiable dialysis practices associated with higher risk of sudden death, including short TT, large ultrafiltration volume, and low K(D). Because K(D) <3 mEq/L is common and easy to change, K(D) tailoring may prevent some sudden deaths. This hypothesis merits testing in clinical trials.

FR-OR283

Background. Levels of physical exercise among haemodialysis patients are low. Increased physical activity in this population has been associated with improved health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and survival. However, results of previous studies may not be applicable to the haemodialysis population as a whole. The present study provides the first description of international patterns of exercise frequency and its association with exercise programmes and clinical outcomes among participants in the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS). Methods. Data from a cross section of 20 920 DOPPS participants in 12 countries between 1996 and 2004 were analysed. Regular exercise was defined as exercise frequency equal to or more than once/week based on patient self-report. Linear mixed models and logistic regression assessed associations of exercise frequency with HRQoL and other psychosocial variables. Mortality risk was calculated in Cox proportional hazard models using patient-level (patient self-reported exercise frequency) and facility-level (the dialysis facility percentage of regular exercisers) predictors. Results. Regular exercise frequency varied widely across countries and across dialysis facilities within a country. Overall, 47.4% of participants were categorized as regular exercisers. The odds of regular exercise was 38% higher for patients from facilities offering exercise programmes (adjusted odds ratio = 1.38 [95% confidence interval: 1.03-1.84]; P = 0.03). Regular exercisers had higher HRQoL, physical functioning and sleep quality scores; reported fewer limitations in physical activities; and were less bothered by bodily pain or lack of appetite (P 0.0001 for all). Regular exercise was also correlated with more positive patient affect and fewer depressive symptoms (P 0.0001). In models extensively adjusted for demographics, comorbidities and socio-economic indicators, mortality risk was lower among regular exercisers (hazard ratio = 0.73 [0.69