Search

El desarrollo comparado del derecho administrativo en el mundo demuestra la existencia de un arquetipo universal que responde a una necesidad humana común más allá de las culturas: el control del poder. Japón es un buen ejemplo porque ha sumado a su orden constitucional las técnicas más apropiadas del derecho administrativo (control judicial, procedimiento, burocracia profesionalizada, descentralización, responsabilidad patrimonial). Así, ha logrado realizar un Estado de derecho que explica los excelentes niveles de calidad de vida y progreso económico del país., The development of comparative administrative law in the world proofs the existence of a universal archetype. Japan is a good example because has added to its constitutional order the most appropriate administrative law technics (judicial review, administrative procedure, civil service, decentralization state liability). So has been possible to achieve the rule of law, excellent levels of quality of life and economic progress for the country.

The approval of the recovery and resiliencie instrument and its regulation by de european institutions has activated successive rules in the state and regional levels. These laws and provisions must comply with the indications of the European regulations to avoid repayment of subsidies., La aprobación del Instrumento de Recuperación y resiliencia y su regulación por parte de las instituciones europeas ha activado normas sucesivas en los niveles estatal y autonómico. Estas leyes y reglamentos deben cumplir las indicaciones de los reglamentos europeos para evitar expedientes de reintegro.

A new administrative procedure Act is always and event for public Law. The processing of the bill in the Paraguayan Congress give us the opportunity to participate in the improvement of this text and to mention other recent legislative initiatives in El Salvador. All these Latin American norms show inspiration from Spanish Law, also reflected in the Ibero American Chart of Citizen´s Rights and Obligations, approved by CLAD in the XXIII Ibero American Summit of Heads of State., Una nueva ley de procedimiento administrativo es siempre un acontecimiento para el derecho público. La tramitación del proyecto legislativo en el Congreso de la Nación paraguaya nos da la oportunidad de participar en su mejora, además de mencionar iniciativas recientes en otros países (El Salvador). En todas estas normas latinoamericanas se observa la inspiración del derecho español, proyectada también sobre la Carta Iberoamericana de los Derechos y Deberes del Ciudadano en Relación con la Administración Pública, aprobada por el CLAD y la XXIII Cumbre Iberoamericana de Jefes de Estado y de Gobierno de 2013.

Las nuevas Leyes 39 y 40/2015, de 1 de octubre, excluyen en principio a las universidades públicas de su ámbito de aplicación, limitándose a afirmar su proyección supletoria sobre el régimen de instituciones hasta ahora sometidas plenamente al derecho administrativo. Esta declaración suscita toda una serie de interrogantes sobre el sistema de fuentes y las normas a aplicar a los procedimientos universitarios, pudiendo plantearse la posibilidad de la elaboración de reglamentos propios que adapten a las peculiaridades de las universidades (organizativas y procedimentales) previsiones novedosas en materia de Administración electrónica (registro, archivo, expediente electrónico, entre otras)., Although the public universities are subject to administrative law, the new administrative codes exclude them from their scope. The supplementary use of these norms raises questions about the sources of law and the rule to apply in the university procedures. It is possible in this frame to propose autonomus regulations adapted to the specificietes of the universities, solving the demands of e-administration (records, archives, registers).

This Doctoral Thesis develops the illegal procedure delays in Spain, making a comparison with Italian system, which is more advanced in this matter and recently issued the Law 69 of 2009 on the damage delay. The illegal delays can be defined as a: “Postpone incurred by the Spanish Public Administration exceeding the term provided to decide, causing damages to the associates”. Currently at Spain, despite of the obligation of solving established in Article 42 of Law 30 of 1992, does not exist a truly liability when public authorities non fulfillment the term to provide and the citizens are defenseless against Administration’s inactivity.

This Doctoral Thesis develops the illegal procedure delays in Spain, making a comparison with Italian system, which is more advanced in this matter and recently issued the Law 69 of 2009 on the damage delay. The illegal delays can be defined as a: “Postpone incurred by the Spanish Public Administration exceeding the term provided to decide, causing damages to the associates”. Currently at Spain, despite of the obligation of solving established in Article 42 of Law 30 of 1992, does not exist a truly liability when public authorities non fulfillment the term to provide and the citizens are defenseless against Administration’s inactivity.

This Doctoral Thesis develops the illegal procedure delays in Spain, making a comparison with Italian system, which is more advanced in this matter and recently issued the Law 69 of 2009 on the damage delay. The illegal delays can be defined as a: “Postpone incurred by the Spanish Public Administration exceeding the term provided to decide, causing damages to the associates”. Currently at Spain, despite of the obligation of solving established in Article 42 of Law 30 of 1992, does not exist a truly liability when public authorities non fulfillment the term to provide and the citizens are defenseless against Administration’s inactivity.

This Doctoral Thesis develops the illegal procedure delays in Spain, making a comparison with Italian system, which is more advanced in this matter and recently issued the Law 69 of 2009 on the damage delay. The illegal delays can be defined as a: “Postpone incurred by the Spanish Public Administration exceeding the term provided to decide, causing damages to the associates”. Currently at Spain, despite of the obligation of solving established in Article 42 of Law 30 of 1992, does not exist a truly liability when public authorities non fulfillment the term to provide and the citizens are defenseless against Administration’s inactivity.

This Doctoral Thesis develops the illegal procedure delays in Spain, making a comparison with Italian system, which is more advanced in this matter and recently issued the Law 69 of 2009 on the damage delay. The illegal delays can be defined as a: “Postpone incurred by the Spanish Public Administration exceeding the term provided to decide, causing damages to the associates”. Currently at Spain, despite of the obligation of solving established in Article 42 of Law 30 of 1992, does not exist a truly liability when public authorities non fulfillment the term to provide and the citizens are defenseless against Administration’s inactivity.

This Doctoral Thesis develops the illegal procedure delays in Spain, making a comparison with Italian system, which is more advanced in this matter and recently issued the Law 69 of 2009 on the damage delay. The illegal delays can be defined as a: “Postpone incurred by the Spanish Public Administration exceeding the term provided to decide, causing damages to the associates”. Currently at Spain, despite of the obligation of solving established in Article 42 of Law 30 of 1992, does not exist a truly liability when public authorities non fulfillment the term to provide and the citizens are defenseless against Administration’s inactivity.

This Doctoral Thesis develops the illegal procedure delays in Spain, making a comparison with Italian system, which is more advanced in this matter and recently issued the Law 69 of 2009 on the damage delay. The illegal delays can be defined as a: “Postpone incurred by the Spanish Public Administration exceeding the term provided to decide, causing damages to the associates”. Currently at Spain, despite of the obligation of solving established in Article 42 of Law 30 of 1992, does not exist a truly liability when public authorities non fulfillment the term to provide and the citizens are defenseless against Administration’s inactivity.

This Doctoral Thesis develops the illegal procedure delays in Spain, making a comparison with Italian system, which is more advanced in this matter and recently issued the Law 69 of 2009 on the damage delay. The illegal delays can be defined as a: “Postpone incurred by the Spanish Public Administration exceeding the term provided to decide, causing damages to the associates”. Currently at Spain, despite of the obligation of solving established in Article 42 of Law 30 of 1992, does not exist a truly liability when public authorities non fulfillment the term to provide and the citizens are defenseless against Administration’s inactivity.

This paper analyzes the main repercussions of the Services Directive over Commerce in Spain. The commercial reforms in the different administrative levels are valued to conclude if they satisfy the exigences of the European Law or not, and who are the winners and losers of these reforms., Se analizan en este artículo las probables repercusiones de la transposición de la Directiva 2006/123, de 12 de diciembre, del Parlamento Europeo y del Consejo, relativa a los servicios en el mercado interior, sobre el sector comercial en España. Tras la exposición de las reformas efectuadas en los niveles estatal, autonómico y local, se expresa una opinión sobre el grado de cumplimiento de las exigencias europeas y las eventuales consecuencias de la opción adoptada por la mayoría de los poderes legislativos y administrativos españoles.