Poelman, Marnix, Temple, Andrew J., van den Burg, Sander, Petersen, Jens Kjerulf, Taylor, Daniel, Hodgson, Steve, de Clerck, Adelbert, Owen, Harry, Triantaphyllidis, George V., Payne, Ian, Capuzzo, Elisa, Dalsgaard, Johanne, Deetman, Bea, Ecke, Martin, Pousão-Ferreira, Pedro, Gaffney, Joanne, Garmendia, Joxe Mikel, Jokumsen, Alfred, Knöpfel, Tim, Lansbergen, Romy, Matthes, Stefan, Mytlewski, Adam, Nielsen, Mette Møller, O'Beirn, Francis, Pedersen, Per Bovbjerg, Pelikan, Jadranka, Rakowski, Marcin, Ramos, Jorge, Ribeiro, Laura, Ruane, Neil M, Rurangwa, Eugene, Schotanus, Jildou, Solarun, Oihana, Szulecka, Olga, de Bruijn, Paulien, Oostenbrugge, Hans van, Hintzen, Niels, Wakeford, Robert, Poelman, Marnix, Temple, Andrew J., van den Burg, Sander, Petersen, Jens Kjerulf, Taylor, Daniel, Hodgson, Steve, de Clerck, Adelbert, Owen, Harry, Triantaphyllidis, George V., Payne, Ian, Capuzzo, Elisa, Dalsgaard, Johanne, Deetman, Bea, Ecke, Martin, Pousão-Ferreira, Pedro, Gaffney, Joanne, Garmendia, Joxe Mikel, Jokumsen, Alfred, Knöpfel, Tim, Lansbergen, Romy, Matthes, Stefan, Mytlewski, Adam, Nielsen, Mette Møller, O'Beirn, Francis, Pedersen, Per Bovbjerg, Pelikan, Jadranka, Rakowski, Marcin, Ramos, Jorge, Ribeiro, Laura, Ruane, Neil M, Rurangwa, Eugene, Schotanus, Jildou, Solarun, Oihana, Szulecka, Olga, de Bruijn, Paulien, Oostenbrugge, Hans van, Hintzen, Niels, and Wakeford, Robert
Aquaculture is one of the world’s fastest-growing industries, with 6 % annual growth since 2010, and is becoming an increasingly important component of the world’s food production. European aquaculture has not kept up with the pace of change in other parts of the world, growing only 24 % since 1990, and only 6 % since 2007. As with all food production industries, aquaculture has a range of positive and negative impacts for the environment and the socio-economic system, which varies across production type, species, geography and biophysical context. The overall purpose of this study is to present the scientific basis of the positive and negative impacts of European aquaculture from an economic, environmental and social point of view, in order to facilitate a well-informed debate. However, the study does not seek to assess the magnitude or likelihood of impacts, compare magnitude or likelihood of impacts among different types of aquaculture nor compare the impacts identified to those of alternative food production systems. In order to achieve this aim, the project first undertook an extensive literature review to collate state-of-the-art scientific information on the positive and negative impacts of aquaculture. The study examined scientific peer-reviewed literature, supplemented by the Scientific, Technical and Economic Committee for Fisheries and European Data Collection Framework for aquaculture and focused on finfish culture (sea cages; ponds, tanks, and raceways; and recirculating aquaculture systems), shellfish culture (suspended, trays, and bottom culture), macroalgae and microalgae. To complement the impacts derived from the scientific literature a deeper analysis of impacts was conducted via 18 case studies across Denmark, Germany, France, Poland, Netherlands, Croatia, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Portugal and Spain. The case studies covered a range of production technologies and species types. The case studies were used to verify impacts identified in the scienti