Search

BackgroundVaginal cancer is a rare malignancy making up 1-2% of all female genital tract cancers. Among vaginal cancers, sarcomas constitute 2% of malignant vaginal lesions, with leiomyosarcomas being the most common type of sarcoma. There is a paucity of data to guide treatment of vaginal sarcomas. This case report details a patient diagnosed with a gynecologic sarcoma during pregnancy who is subsequently treated for residual vaginal disease in the postpartum period with local resection and adjuvant vaginal brachytherapy.CaseA 31-year-old gravida 4 para 0 who presented at 22-weeks gestation with vaginal bleeding to an outside hospital and expelled a mass 11 cm in diameter from the vagina during her admission. Findings were consistent with a high grade gynecologic sarcoma. She underwent planned cesarean section at 36 weeks gestational age with uterine pathology showing no sarcoma. At her 3 month postpartum visit she was found to have a 1 cm posterior vaginal wall lesion which was resected and consistent with vaginal sarcoma. She underwent adjuvant brachytherapy.ConclusionThis case demonstrates the challenges with obtaining a correct pathological diagnosis for pregnant patients with vaginal sarcoma during pregnancy. Surgical resection with negative margins remains an important treatment component. Given the low incidence of disease occurrence in pregnancy and rare number of cases reported in literature, further elucidation of timing of delivery and adjuvant treatment is warranted.

INTRODUCTION: In the Greater Mekong Subregion, community health workers, known as malaria volunteers, have played a key role in reducing malaria in the control phase, providing essential malaria services in areas with limited formal healthcare. However, the motivation and social role of malaria volunteers, and testing rates, have declined with decreasing malaria burden and reorientation of malaria programmes from control to elimination. Provision of additional interventions for common health concerns could help sustain the effectiveness of volunteers and maintain malaria testing rates required for malaria elimination accreditation by the WHO. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The Community-delivered Integrated Malaria Elimination (CIME) volunteer model, integrating interventions for malaria, dengue, tuberculosis, childhood diarrhoea and malaria Rapid Diagnostic Test (RDT)-negative fever, was developed based on global evidence and extensive stakeholder consultations. An open stepped-wedge cluster-randomised controlled trial, randomised at the volunteer level, will be conducted over 6 months to evaluate the effectiveness of the CIME model in Myanmar. One hundred and forty Integrated Community Malaria Volunteers (ICMVs, current model of care) providing malaria services in 140 villages will be retrained as CIME volunteers (intervention). These 140 ICMVs/villages will be grouped into 10 blocks of 14 villages, with blocks transitioned from control (ICMV) to intervention states (CIME), fortnightly, in random order, following a 1-week training and transition period. The primary outcome of the trial is blood examination rate determined by the number of malaria RDTs performed weekly. Difference in rates will be estimated across village intervention and control states using a generalised linear mixed modelling analytical approach with maximum likelihood estimation. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study was approved by Institutional Review Board, Myanmar Department of Medical Research (Ethic

BackgroundVaginal cancer is a rare malignancy making up 1-2% of all female genital tract cancers. Among vaginal cancers, sarcomas constitute 2% of malignant vaginal lesions, with leiomyosarcomas being the most common type of sarcoma. There is a paucity of data to guide treatment of vaginal sarcomas. This case report details a patient diagnosed with a gynecologic sarcoma during pregnancy who is subsequently treated for residual vaginal disease in the postpartum period with local resection and adjuvant vaginal brachytherapy.CaseA 31-year-old gravida 4 para 0 who presented at 22-weeks gestation with vaginal bleeding to an outside hospital and expelled a mass 11 cm in diameter from the vagina during her admission. Findings were consistent with a high grade gynecologic sarcoma. She underwent planned cesarean section at 36 weeks gestational age with uterine pathology showing no sarcoma. At her 3 month postpartum visit she was found to have a 1 cm posterior vaginal wall lesion which was resected and consistent with vaginal sarcoma. She underwent adjuvant brachytherapy.ConclusionThis case demonstrates the challenges with obtaining a correct pathological diagnosis for pregnant patients with vaginal sarcoma during pregnancy. Surgical resection with negative margins remains an important treatment component. Given the low incidence of disease occurrence in pregnancy and rare number of cases reported in literature, further elucidation of timing of delivery and adjuvant treatment is warranted.