Search

Somatostatin receptor (SST) PET/CT is the gold standard for well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumours (NET) imaging. Higher grades of neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) show preferential [18F]FDG (FDG) uptake, and even low-grade NET may de-differentiate over time. FDG PET/CT's prognostic role is widely accepted; however, its impact on clinical decision-making remains controversial and its use varies widely. A questionnaire-based survey on FDG PET/CT use and perceived decision-making utility in NEN was submitted to the ENETS Advisory Board Meeting attendees (November 2022, response rate = 70%). In 3/15 statements, agreement was higher than 75%: (i) FDG was considered useful in NET, irrespective of grade, in case of mis-matched lesions (detectable on diagnostic CT but negative/faintly positive on SST PET/CT), especially if PRRT is contemplated (80%); (ii) in NET G3 if curative surgery is considered (82%); and (iii) in NEC prior to surgery with curative intent (98%). FDG use in NET G3, even in the presence of matched lesions, as a baseline for response assessment was favoured by 74%. Four statements obtained more than 60% consensus: (i) FDG use in NET G3 if locoregional therapy is considered (65%); (ii) in neuroendocrine carcinoma before initiating active therapy as a baseline for response assessment (61%); (iii) biopsy to re-assess tumour grade prior to a change in therapeutic management (68%) upon detection of FDG-positivity on the background of a prior G1-2 NET; (iv) 67% were in favour to reconsider PRRT to treat residual SST-positive lesions after achieving complete remission on FDG of the SST-negative disease component. Multidisciplinary opinion broadly supports the use of FDG PET/CT for characterisation of disease biology and to guide treatment selection across a range of indications, despite the lack of full consensus in many situations. This may reflect existing clinical access due to lack of reimbursement or experience with this investigation, which should be add

Background: We aimed to identify optimal grading Ki-67 cut-offs to delineate differences in prognosis of patients with small intestinal neuroendocrine tumours (SI-NETs) in terms of overall- and event-free survival rates. Methods: We included 551 patients with SI-NETs diagnosed from June 15th, 1993, through March 8th, 2021, identified using the SI-NET databases from five European referral centers. Results: Median age at baseline was 62.3(17-90) years; 252 patients were women (45.7%). All tumours were well-differentiated; 326 were G1 tumours (59.2%), 169 G2(30.7%), only 8 G3(1.5%), while 48 tumourswere of unspecified grade (8.7%). The median Ki67 was 2%(1-70%). 247 patients(44.8%) had distant metastases at baseline (stage IV), 217locoregional disease (41.1%; stage III), whereas 29(7.1%) and 25(4.5%) presented at stages II and I, respectively. Within a mean(SD) follow-up of 51.5(52.9) months, 94 patients(17.1%) died, whereas overall 188 experienced disease recurrence, progression and/or death(34.1%). The median OS was 214.7(95%CI: 152.7-276.6) months and the median EFS was 79.8(95%CI: 68.2-91.5) months, respectively. In multivariable Cox-regression OS analysis, age (HR=1.07, 95%CI: 1.04-1.09; p<0.001), Charlson Comorbidity Index(HR=1.1, 95%CI: 1.03-1.17; p=0.006) and the proposed modified histopathological Ki67 grading system(K67:5-10% group: HR=2.4, 95%CI: 1.3-4.5; p=0.007 and K67≥10% group: HR=5.1, 95%CI: 2.9-9.2; p<0.001) were independent predictors for death. Pertinent EFS analysis, confirmed age(HR=1.04, 95%CI: 1.02-1.05;p<0.001) and the proposed modified histopathological Ki67 grading system(K67≥10% group: HR=4; 95%CI:2.5-6.2;p<0.001) as independent predictors for recurrence, progression and/or death. Conclusions: Ki-67 proliferation index is an independent predictor of EFS and OS. A modified site-specific histopathological grading system applying Ki-67 cut-offs of 5% and 10% seems more optimal to predict differences in SI-NET patient prognosis

Pancreatic metastases (PMs) from neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are rare but the increased sensitivity of new diagnostic tools such as 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT has resulted in their increased recognition at initial diagnosis or follow-up. A retrospective analysis of the data of patients from six tertiary referral centres was performed in order to identify the characteristics and the prognostic significance of PMs in patients with NENs. We used a control group of 69 age-, sex- and primary tumour – matched NEN patients from the same cohort with stage IV disease but no PMs. Overall survival (OS) was assessed using the Kaplan–Meier method log-rank analysis was used to assess the impact of various clinical and histopathological variables in OS. We identified 25 patients (11 females) with PMs with a median age at diagnosis of 60 years. The small intestine was the most common primary (80%) with a prevalence of 4.2% PMs (21/506). Fourteen patients presented with synchronous PMs whereas 11 developed metachronous PMs after a median time of 28 months (range: 7–168 months). Grading was available in 24 patients; 16 patients had G1 tumours, four G2, two atypical lung carcinoid, one typical and one atypical thymic carcinoid. Most patients had other concomitant metastases (12 hepatic, 4 lung and 6 bone) while five patients exhibited peritoneal carcinomatosis. Median OS in the PMs group was not reached compared with 212 months in the control group (95% CI: 26–398). The univariate analysis identified no prognostic factors statistically significantly associated with the OS. In conclusion, PMs are encountered with a low prevalence among NEN patients mostly developing in patients with advanced metastatic disease. The presence of PMs does not seem to be associated with a negative prognostic impact in OS. © 2023 British Society for Neuroendocrinology.

We aimed to assess the prognostic impact of tumor- and patient-related parameters in patients with stage I–III small intestinal neuroendocrine tumors (SI-NETs), who underwent locoregional resective surgery (LRS) with curative intent. We included 229 patients with stage I–III SI-NETs diagnosed from June 15, 1993, through March 8, 2021, identified using the SI-NET databases from five European referral centers. Mean ± SD age at baseline was 62.5 ± 13.6 years; 111/229 patients were women (49.3%). All tumors were well-differentiated; 160 were grade 1 (G1) tumors, 51 were G2, two were G3 and 18 tumors were of unspecified grade (median Ki-67: 2%, range 1%–50%). One-hundred and sixty-three patients (71.2%) had lymph node (LN) involvement. The median number of retrieved lymph nodes was 10 (0–63), whereas the median number of positive LNs was 2 (0–43). After a mean ± SD follow-up of 54.1 ± 64.1 months, 60 patients experienced disease recurrence at a median (range) of 36.2 (2.5–285.1) months. The 5- and 10-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates were 66.6% and 49.3% respectively. In univariable analysis, there was no difference in RFS and overall survival (OS) between LN-positive and LN-negative patients (log-rank, p =.380 and.198, respectively). However, in stage IIIb patients who underwent mesenteric lymph node dissection (MLND) with a minimum of five retrieved LN (n = 125), five or more LN metastases were associated with shorter RFS (median RFS [95% CI] = 107.4 [0–229.6] vs. 73.7 [35.3–112.1] months; log-rank, p =.048). In addition, patients with G2 tumors exhibited shorter RFS compared to patients with G1 tumors (median RFS [95% confidence interval (CI)] = 46.9 [36.4–57.3] vs. 120.7 [82.7–158.8] months; log-rank, p =.001). In multivariable Cox-regression RFS analysis in stage IIIb patients, the Ki-67 proliferation index (hazard ratio = 1.08, 95% CI = 1.035–1.131; p <.0001) and the number of LN metastases (hazard ratio = 1.06, 95% CI = 1.001–1.125; p =.047) were indepe

Background: Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are rare tumours with variable clinical behaviour. Their natural history is ideally best approached in large, multicentre and multinational registries with long-term patients’ follow-up. The European Neuroendocrine Tumour Society registry aims to obtain information regarding NEN outcomes and prognostic factors in a European frame. Patients and methods: We collected data from 7 national NEN registries (Belgium, Czech Republic, Germany, Greece, Poland, Spain, Switzerland), representing 10,102 patients. Anonymised/pseudonymised data were collected in a secured server. Descriptive statistical methods were applied, as well as Kaplan–Meier survival curves and multivariable analyses for prognostic factors of overall survival (OS). Results: median age of the study population was 60 years (range: 18–102), 48% were female. Common primary tumour sites were pancreas (27%) and small intestine (21%). Stage 4 disease was found in 47% of patients, while 26/10/16% had stage 1/2/3 disease, respectively. Grading (n = 6952) was G1/2/3 in 48/37/15% of the patients, respectively. Surgery was the main treatment, provided to 71% of patients, followed by somatostatin analogues (32%), chemotherapy (20%), Peptide receptor Radionuclide Therapy (PRRT) (9%) and targeted therapies (8%). OS at 5 years was 74%, influenced by grade, stage and tissue of origin in multivariate analysis. A Ki67 cut-off value set at 55% within the G3 group allowed to separate 2 groups with a meaningful different OS. Conclusion: We report the first analysis of the European Neuroendocrine Tumour Society registry, comprising 10,102 patients with NEN from 7 European countries. This large cohort study describes prognostic factors for the survival of NENs throughout Europe, including primary tumour site, grade, stage and treatment. © 2022 Elsevier Ltd

This expert consensus document represents an initiative by the European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (ENETS) to provide guidance for synoptic reporting of radiological examinations critical to the diagnosis, grading, staging and treatment of neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs). Template drafts for initial tumor staging and follow-up by computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were established, based on existing institutional and organisational reporting templates relevant for NEN imaging, and applying the RadLex lexicon of radiological information (Radiological Society of North America), for consistency regarding the radiological terms. During the ENETS Scientific Advisory Board meeting 2018, the template drafts were subject to iterative interdisciplinary discussions among experts in imaging, surgery, gastroenterology, oncology and pathology. Members of the imaging group stated a strong preference for a combination of limited and standardised options by way of drop-down menus. Separate templates were produced for the initial work-up and for follow-up, respectively. To provide a detailed description of the radiological findings of the primary tumor and its local extension and spread, different templates were developed for bronchial, pancreatic and gastrointestinal NENs for CT and MRI, respectively. Each template was structured in 10 sections: clinical details, comparative imaging modality, acquisition technique, primary tumor findings, regional lymph node metastases, distant metastases, TNM classification, reference lesions according to RECIST 1.1, additional findings and conclusion. Two templates were developed for follow-up, for CT and MRI, respectively, and were specifically focused on assessment of therapy response. These included a qualitative response assessment, such as decrease of vascularisation and presence of necrosis, and a quantitative assessment according to RECIST 1.1 and the modified RECIST (mRECIST) for assessing tumor response follo

Background: Long-term outcomes, including health-related quality of life (HRQoL) issues are understudied in patients with well-differentiated ppendiceal neuroendocrine neoplasms (WD-ANENs). We aimed to evaluate the validity of currently applied criteria for completion prophylactic right hemicolectomy (pRHC) and determine its association with patient outcomes. Methods: This cohort study included patients with WD-ANENs from five European Centers of Excellence for neuroendocrine tumors. Eligible patients were divided between those who underwent appendectomy alone and those who underwent pRHC. HRQoL EORTCqlqc30 questionnaires and cross-sectional imaging data were prospectively collected. Results: The 166 patients included 119 women (71.2%). Mean age was 31 ± 16 years. Mean follow-up was 51 ± 54 months. Most patients (152[92%]) had tumors≤20 mm. Fifty-eight patients (34.9%) underwent pRHC that was unnecessary in 65.5%(38/58); and in 79.1%(34/43) of tumors≤20 mm. In multivariable analysis, tumor size>20 mm was the only independent predictor for lymph node (LN) positivity(p = 0.021). No disease-specific mortality was reported. Three patients developed recurrence (n = 2inthepRHC group vs. n = 1 in the appendectomy group;p = 0.263). Although global HRQol was not significantly depreciated in patients undergoing pRHC compared to appendectomy alone (median scores 0.79[0.25-1] vs. 0.83[0.08-1], respectively; p = 0.738), impaired social functioning (p = 0.016), diarrhea (p = 0.003) and financial difficulties (0.024) were more frequently reported in the pRHC group. Furthermore, physical-(p = 0.066) and role functioning (p = 0.055), as well as constipation issues(p = 0.072) emerged in the pRHC group with marginal significance. Conclusion: pRHC in WD-ANENs comes at a high rate of unnecessary procedures, functional HRQoL issues and diarrhoea. LN positivity at pRHC may lack prognostic significance, as no disease-specific mortality and scarce recurrence was evident in this series. T

Unmet medical needs are not infrequent in oncology, and these needs are usually of higher magnitude in rare cancers. The field of neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) has evolved rapidly during the last decade, and, currently, a new WHO classification is being implemented and several treatment options are available in the metastatic setting after the results of prospective phase III clinical trials. However, several questions are still unanswered, and decisions in our daily clinical practice should be made with limited evidence. In the 2016 meeting of the advisory board of the European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (ENETS), the main unmet medical needs in the metastatic NENs setting were deeply discussed, and several proposals to try to solve them are presented in this article, including biomarkers, imaging, and therapy.

Neuroendocrine tumors of the small intestine are the most common causes of the carcinoid syndrome. Carcinoid heart disease occurs in more than half of the patients with the carcinoid syndrome. Patients with carcinoid heart disease who need to undergo surgery should also undergo preoperative evaluation by an expert cardiologist. Treatment with long-acting somatostatin analogs aims at controlling the excessive hormonal output and symptoms related to the carcinoid syndrome and at preventing a carcinoid crisis during interventions. Patients with a gastrinoma require pre- A nd postoperative treatment with high doses of proton pump inhibitors. Patients with a glucagonoma require somatostatin analog treatment and nutritional supplementation. Patients with a VIPoma also require somatostatin analog treatment and intravenous fluid and electrolyte therapy. Insulinoma patients generally require intravenous glucose infusion prior to operation. In patients with localized operable insulinoma, somatostatin analog infusion should only be considered after the effect of this therapy has been electively studied. © 2017 The Author(s).

ENETS consensus recommendations for the standards of care in neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) concerning follow-up and documentation are considered in this review. The documentation of patients with NEN should include the most relevant data characterizing an individual patient from the first contact with his/her physician/hospital until his/her last presentation during follow-up. It is advocated that follow-up occurs in specialized NEN centers with regular NEN tumor boards with expert panels. The follow-up should be in accordance with the ENETS consensus guidelines from 2011 and 2016, the present and coming WHO classification and ENETS/UICC recommendations for TNM staging. The recommendations for follow-up in patients with thymic, bronchopulmonary and gastroenteropancreatic NEN are given in Table 1. However, it should be stressed that evidence-based studies for follow-up are largely missing.

Neuroendocrine tumors of the small intestine are the most common causes of the carcinoid syndrome. Carcinoid heart disease occurs in more than half of the patients with the carcinoid syndrome. Patients with carcinoid heart disease who need to undergo surgery should also undergo preoperative evaluation by an expert cardiologist. Treatment with long-acting somatostatin analogs aims at controlling the excessive hormonal output and symptoms related to the carcinoid syndrome and at preventing a carcinoid crisis during interventions. Patients with a gastrinoma require pre- A nd postoperative treatment with high doses of proton pump inhibitors. Patients with a glucagonoma require somatostatin analog treatment and nutritional supplementation. Patients with a VIPoma also require somatostatin analog treatment and intravenous fluid and electrolyte therapy. Insulinoma patients generally require intravenous glucose infusion prior to operation. In patients with localized operable insulinoma, somatostatin analog infusion should only be considered after the effect of this therapy has been electively studied.

ENETS consensus recommendations for the standards of care in neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) concerning follow-up and documentation are considered in this review. The documentation of patients with NEN should include the most relevant data characterizing an individual patient from the first contact with his/her physician/hospital until his/her last presentation during follow-up. It is advocated that follow-up occurs in specialized NEN centers with regular NEN tumor boards with expert panels. The follow-up should be in accordance with the ENETS consensus guidelines from 2011 and 2016, the present and coming WHO classification and ENETS/UICC recommendations for TNM staging. The recommendations for follow-up in patients with thymic, bronchopulmonary and gastroenteropancreatic NEN are given in Table 1. However, it should be stressed that evidence-based studies for follow-up are largely missing.

N/A

Consensus Guidelines Update for the Management of Functional p-NETs (F-p-NETs) and Non-Functional p-NETs (NF-p-NETs).

Background: Pulmonary carcinoids (PCs) are rare tumors. As there is a paucity of randomized studies, this expert consensus document represents an initiative by the European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society to provide guidance on their management. Patients and methods: Bibliographical searches were carried out in PubMed for the terms 'pulmonary neuroendocrine tumors', 'bronchial neuroendocrine tumors', 'bronchial carcinoid tumors', 'pulmonary carcinoid', 'pulmonary typical/atypical carcinoid', and 'pulmonary carcinoid and diagnosis/treatment/epidemiology/prognosis'. A systematic review of the relevant literature was carried out, followed by expert review. Results: PCs are well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors and include low- and intermediate-grade malignant tumors, i.e. typical (TC) and atypical carcinoid (AC), respectively. Contrast CT scan is the diagnostic gold standard for PCs, but pathology examination is mandatory for their correct classification. Somatostatin receptor imaging may visualize nearly 80% of the primary tumors and is most sensitive for metastatic disease. Plasma chromogranin A can be increased in PCs. Surgery is the treatment of choice for PCs with the aim of removing the tumor and preserving as much lung tissue as possible. Resection of metastases should be considered whenever possible with curative intent. Somatostatin analogs are the first-line treatment of carcinoid syndrome and may be considered as first-line systemic antiproliferative treatment in unresectable PCs, particularly of low-grade TC and AC. Locoregional or radiotargeted therapies should be considered for metastatic disease. Systemic chemotherapy is used for progressive PCs, although cytotoxic regimens have demonstrated limited effects with etoposide and platinum combination the most commonly used, however, temozolomide has shown most clinical benefit. Conclusions: PCs are complex tumors which require a multidisciplinary a

Background: Pulmonary carcinoids (PCs) are rare tumors. As there is a paucity of randomized studies, this expert consensus document represents an initiative by the European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society to provide guidance on their management. Patients and methods: Bibliographical searches were carried out in PubMed for the terms 'pulmonary neuroendocrine tumors', 'bronchial neuroendocrine tumors', 'bronchial carcinoid tumors', 'pulmonary carcinoid', 'pulmonary typical/atypical carcinoid', and 'pulmonary carcinoid and diagnosis/treatment/epidemiology/prognosis'. A systematic review of the relevant literature was carried out, followed by expert review. Results: PCs are well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors and include low- and intermediate-grade malignant tumors, i.e. typical (TC) and atypical carcinoid (AC), respectively. Contrast CT scan is the diagnostic gold standard for PCs, but pathology examination is mandatory for their correct classification. Somatostatin receptor imaging may visualize nearly 80% of the primary tumors and is most sensitive for metastatic disease. Plasma chromogranin A can be increased in PCs. Surgery is the treatment of choice for PCs with the aim of removing the tumor and preserving as much lung tissue as possible. Resection of metastases should be considered whenever possible with curative intent. Somatostatin analogs are the first-line treatment of carcinoid syndrome and may be considered as first-line systemic antiproliferative treatment in unresectable PCs, particularly of low-grade TC and AC. Locoregional or radiotargeted therapies should be considered for metastatic disease. Systemic chemotherapy is used for progressive PCs, although cytotoxic regimens have demonstrated limited effects with etoposide and platinum combination the most commonly used, however, temozolomide has shown most clinical benefit. Conclusions: PCs are complex tumors which require a multidisciplinary approach and long-term follow-up.

Not available.