Search

Fei Guo,1,* Yuting Yan,1,* Li Sun,1 Ruili Han,1 Lanlan Zheng,1 Yuan Qin,1 Shuang Wang,1 Xude Sun,1 Zhaohua Ji,2 Changjun Gao1 1Department of Anesthesiology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Air Force Medical University, Xi’an, 710038, People’s Republic of China; 2Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Hazard Assessment and Control in Special Operational Environment, Air Force Medical University, Xi’an, 710032, People’s Republic of China*These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Changjun Gao, Department of Anesthesiology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Air Force Medical University, Xin Si Road & 569, Xi’an City, Shaanxi, 710038, People’s Republic of China, Tel/Fax +86 2984777439, Email gaocj74@163.com Zhaohua Ji, Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Hazard Assessment and Control in Special Operational Environment, Air Force Medical University, ChangLe Road & 169, Xi’an City, Shaanxi, 710032, People’s Republic of China, Tel/Fax +86 2884711316, Email hellojzh@msn.comObjective: This meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation (TEAS) for postoperative delirium (POD) in surgical patients.Methods: Based on database searches of the Wanfang, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), VIP, Chinese Biology Medicine (CBM), PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science, relevant RCTs published before December 30, 2022, were extracted. Outcome indicators included the incidence of POD, changes in Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) scores, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores, and the intraoperative consumption of anesthetics. Data were pooled and analyzed by Review Manager 5.3, and publication bias detection was conducted using Stata 17.0.Results: A meta-analysis containing 715 experimental and 717 control part

Fei Guo,1,* Ruili Han,1,* Ting Luo,2,* Shengyang Jin,3 Yuting Yan,1 Jun Wang,4 Xude Sun,1 Changjun Gao1 1Department of Anesthesiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Air Force Medical University, Xi’an, People’s Republic of China; 2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, People’s Republic of China; 3Plastic Surgery Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People’s Republic of China; 4Department of Anesthesiology, Shaanxi Provincial Armed Police Hospital, Xi’an, People’s Republic of China*These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Changjun Gao; Xude Sun, Department of Anesthesiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Air Force Medical University, Xi’an, 710038, People’s Republic of China, Tel +86-13379227869 ; +86-13891905550, Fax +86-029-84777439, Email gaocj74@163.com; sunxude@fmmu.edu.cnPurpose: This study aims to evaluate the psychological status and the attitudes toward the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine among anesthesiologists. We expected to analyze related factors and offer them some strategies to prevent and manage psychological issues under the post COVID-19 era.Methods: Based on the Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES), an online survey was designed and conducted among anesthesiologists in Shaanxi, China. Participants were asked to complete a validated questionnaire voluntarily. The following tests were performed: Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS-21), Primary Care Post-traumatic Stress Disorder Screen (PC-PTSD), and the attitudes toward COVID-19 vaccine.Results: A total of 795 anesthesiologists completed the survey, the majority of them were female, young and middle-aged, well educated, and married. The prevalence of depression, anxiety, and stress in this sample were 26.5%, 35.5%, and 19.9%, respectively. Longer dail