1. Cluster randomized trial of influenza vaccination in patients with acute heart failure in China: A mixed-methods feasibility study.
- Author
-
Liu, Rong, Guariguata, Leonor1, Liu, Rong, Du, Xin, Patel, Anushka, Di Tanna, Gian Luca, Zhao, Yangyang, Wang, Zhiyan, Fan, Yihang, Zhang, Hao, Yi, Yang, Dong, Jianzeng, Anderson, Craig, Liu, Hueiming, Liu, Rong, Guariguata, Leonor1, Liu, Rong, Du, Xin, Patel, Anushka, Di Tanna, Gian Luca, Zhao, Yangyang, Wang, Zhiyan, Fan, Yihang, Zhang, Hao, Yi, Yang, Dong, Jianzeng, Anderson, Craig, and Liu, Hueiming
- Abstract
Uncertainties about the efficacy of influenza vaccination for populations with heart failure (HF) in preventing cardiovascular outcomes, as well as lack of effective vaccination strategies, may contribute to low vaccine coverage rate (VCR) in China and globally. We assessed the feasibility of a strategy to promote influenza vaccines in patients hospitalized with acute HF in China and to inform the design of a hybrid effectiveness-implementation cluster randomized trial to evaluate this strategy on mortality and hospital re-admission. We conducted a cluster randomized pilot trial involving 11 hospitals in Henan Province in China, with mixed-methods evaluation between December 2020 and April 2021. A process evaluation involved interviews with 51 key informants (patients, health professionals, policy makers). The intervention included education about influenza vaccination and availability of free vaccines administered prior to hospital discharge for HF patients, while usual care included attending community-based points of vaccination (PoV) for screening and vaccination. Implementation outcomes focused on reach, fidelity, adoption, and acceptability. Recruitment rates were assessed for trial feasibility. Effectiveness outcomes were influenza VCR, HF-specific rehospitalizations and mortality at 90 days. A total of 518 HF patients were recruited from 7 intervention and 4 usual care hospitals (mean of 45 participants per hospital per month). VCR was 89.9% (311/346, 86.1-92.8%) in the intervention group and 0.6% (1/172, 0.0-3.7%) in the control group. The process evaluation demonstrated reach to patients with lower socioeconomic and education status. There was good fidelity of the intervention components, with education and PoV set up processes being adapted to local hospital workflow and workforce capacity. Intervention was acceptable and adopted by patients and health professionals. However, outside of a trial setting, concerns were raised around vaccination reimbursemen
- Published
- 2023