1. Diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic optical evaluation and forceps biopsy in comparison with pathohistological findings of colorectal laterally spreading tumors
- Abstract
Following the principles of image-enhanced endoscopy and using standardized endoscopic classifications, it is possible to predict the morphological diagnosis of colorectal neoplasms with high accuracy. The large size and uneven surface of lesion significantly complicates a thorough examination, and routine biopsy is still widely practiced, despite its drawbacks. This makes it necessary to compare the results of optical and forceps biopsy and determine the expediency of performing the latter for different types of colorectal laterally spreading tumors (LST). Aim. To compare the pit and vascular pattern, determined endoscopically, with histopathological findings in LST, with the calculation of the diagnostic accuracy of optical evaluation and forceps biopsy. To ascertain the relationship between lesion size, morphological type, and the presence of malignant changes. Materials and methods. 80 LST ≥20 mm were included in the study. Expert image-enhanced endoscopy with NBI and utilizing Paris, Kudo, JNET and Hiroshima classifications was employed for optical evaluation and stratification of lesions. Target forceps biopsy was obtained from areas showing the most progressive changes. The data from optical biopsy and the pathohistology of forceps biopsy specimens were compared with the results of the pathohistological findings of removed LST. Statistics were calculated in the Statistica 13. Results. Group 1 comprised 30 patients with non-granular type LST, while group 2 consisted of 50 patients with granular type LST. The median diameter was 20 mm (IQR, 20; 25) and 40 mm (IQR, 25; 50), adenocarcinoma loci were found in 10 % and 32 % in the first and second groups, respectively. Correlations between lesion localization and LST subtype were assessed, as well as between the presence of malignant changes and the size and morphological type of the lesions. Comparative indicators of sensitivity (80.0 % / 81.8 % in the first and 76.7 % / 80.0 % in the second group), diagnostic acc
- Published
- 2024