Search

Reformulating poorly water-soluble drugs as supersaturated lipid-based formulations achieves higher drug loading and potentially improves solubilisation and bioavailability. However, for the weak base blonanserin, silica solidified supersaturated lipid-based formulations have demonstrated reduced in vitro solubilisation compared to their liquid-state counterparts. Therefore, this study aimed to understand the influence of supersaturated drug load on blonanserin solubilisation from liquid and silica solidified supersaturated self-nanoemulsifying drug delivery systems (super-SNEDDS) during in vitro lipolysis. Stable liquid super-SNEDDS with varying drug loads (90–300% of the equilibrium solubility) were solidified by imbibition into porous silica microparticles (1:1 lipid: silica ratio). In vitro lipolysis revealed greater blonanserin solubilisation from liquid super-SNEDDS compared to solid at equivalent drug saturation levels, owing to strong silica-BLON/lipid interactions, evidenced by a significant decrease in blonanserin solubilisation upon addition of silica to a digesting liquid super-SNEDDS. An increase in solid super-SNEDDS drug loading led to increased solubilisation, owing to the increased drug:silica and drug:lipid ratios. Solidifying SNEDDS with silica enables the fabrication of powdered formulations with higher blonanserin loading and greater stability than liquid super-SNEDDS, however at the expense of drug solubilisation. These competing parameters need careful consideration in designing optimal super-SNEDDS for pre-clinical and clinical application.

Reformulating poorly water-soluble drugs as supersaturated lipid-based formulations achieves higher drug loading and potentially improves solubilisation and bioavailability. However, for the weak base blonanserin, silica solidified supersaturated lipid-based formulations have demonstrated reduced in vitro solubilisation compared to their liquid-state counterparts. Therefore, this study aimed to understand the influence of supersaturated drug load on blonanserin solubilisation from liquid and silica solidified supersaturated self-nanoemulsifying drug delivery systems (super-SNEDDS) during in vitro lipolysis. Stable liquid super-SNEDDS with varying drug loads (90–300% of the equilibrium solubility) were solidified by imbibition into porous silica microparticles (1:1 lipid: silica ratio). In vitro lipolysis revealed greater blonanserin solubilisation from liquid super-SNEDDS compared to solid at equivalent drug saturation levels, owing to strong silica-BLON/lipid interactions, evidenced by a significant decrease in blonanserin solubilisation upon addition of silica to a digesting liquid super-SNEDDS. An increase in solid super-SNEDDS drug loading led to increased solubilisation, owing to the increased drug:silica and drug:lipid ratios. Solidifying SNEDDS with silica enables the fabrication of powdered formulations with higher blonanserin loading and greater stability than liquid super-SNEDDS, however at the expense of drug solubilisation. These competing parameters need careful consideration in designing optimal super-SNEDDS for pre-clinical and clinical application.

Objectives: To evaluate the short-term efficacy and safety of blonanserin in adolescents with schizophrenia.Methods: This 6-week multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study investigated fixed-dose blonanserin (8 or 16 mg/day) in patients 12-18 years of age diagnosed with schizophrenia, as indicated by a Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score of 60-120 and a Clinical Global Impressions-Severity score of >= 3. The primary endpoint was change from baseline to week 6 in the PANSS total score, using a mixed model for repeated measures analysis. Safety was assessed by the incidence and severity of adverse events (AEs).Results: Among 151 randomized patients, 150 were included in the primary analysis population. Demographic and clinical characteristics were similar across groups at baseline. The rate of study discontinuation was 14.9%, 23.5%, and 28.3% in patients administered with placebo, blonanserin 8 mg/day, and blonanserin 16 mg/day, respectively. The least-squares mean change (95% confidence interval [CI]) from baseline to week 6 in PANSS total score was -10.6 (-16.10 to -5.10), -15.3 (-20.80 to -9.86), and -20.5 (-25.89 to -15.16) in patients administered placebo, 8 mg/day blonanserin, and 16 mg/day blonanserin, respectively. The 16-mg/day blonanserin group showed significantly greater reduction in the PANSS total score than the placebo group (least-squares mean difference [95% CI]: -9.9 [-17.61 to -2.25], p = 0.012, effect size: 0.538), although the 8-mg/day group showed no significant difference. The incidence of AEs such as akathisia, somnolence, and hyperprolactinemia was higher in the blonanserin groups than in the placebo group. AEs associated with blonanserin were generally mild and were consistent with its known profile in adults with schizophrenia.Conclusions: Blonanserin achieved a sufficient efficacy in adolescent patients, and the safety profile was similar to that in adults, which suggests that blonanserin may be a s

Objectives: To evaluate the short-term efficacy and safety of blonanserin in adolescents with schizophrenia.Methods: This 6-week multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study investigated fixed-dose blonanserin (8 or 16 mg/day) in patients 12-18 years of age diagnosed with schizophrenia, as indicated by a Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score of 60-120 and a Clinical Global Impressions-Severity score of >= 3. The primary endpoint was change from baseline to week 6 in the PANSS total score, using a mixed model for repeated measures analysis. Safety was assessed by the incidence and severity of adverse events (AEs).Results: Among 151 randomized patients, 150 were included in the primary analysis population. Demographic and clinical characteristics were similar across groups at baseline. The rate of study discontinuation was 14.9%, 23.5%, and 28.3% in patients administered with placebo, blonanserin 8 mg/day, and blonanserin 16 mg/day, respectively. The least-squares mean change (95% confidence interval [CI]) from baseline to week 6 in PANSS total score was -10.6 (-16.10 to -5.10), -15.3 (-20.80 to -9.86), and -20.5 (-25.89 to -15.16) in patients administered placebo, 8 mg/day blonanserin, and 16 mg/day blonanserin, respectively. The 16-mg/day blonanserin group showed significantly greater reduction in the PANSS total score than the placebo group (least-squares mean difference [95% CI]: -9.9 [-17.61 to -2.25], p = 0.012, effect size: 0.538), although the 8-mg/day group showed no significant difference. The incidence of AEs such as akathisia, somnolence, and hyperprolactinemia was higher in the blonanserin groups than in the placebo group. AEs associated with blonanserin were generally mild and were consistent with its known profile in adults with schizophrenia.Conclusions: Blonanserin achieved a sufficient efficacy in adolescent patients, and the safety profile was similar to that in adults, which suggests that blonanserin may be a s

Objectives: To evaluate the short-term efficacy and safety of blonanserin in adolescents with schizophrenia.Methods: This 6-week multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study investigated fixed-dose blonanserin (8 or 16 mg/day) in patients 12-18 years of age diagnosed with schizophrenia, as indicated by a Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score of 60-120 and a Clinical Global Impressions-Severity score of >= 3. The primary endpoint was change from baseline to week 6 in the PANSS total score, using a mixed model for repeated measures analysis. Safety was assessed by the incidence and severity of adverse events (AEs).Results: Among 151 randomized patients, 150 were included in the primary analysis population. Demographic and clinical characteristics were similar across groups at baseline. The rate of study discontinuation was 14.9%, 23.5%, and 28.3% in patients administered with placebo, blonanserin 8 mg/day, and blonanserin 16 mg/day, respectively. The least-squares mean change (95% confidence interval [CI]) from baseline to week 6 in PANSS total score was -10.6 (-16.10 to -5.10), -15.3 (-20.80 to -9.86), and -20.5 (-25.89 to -15.16) in patients administered placebo, 8 mg/day blonanserin, and 16 mg/day blonanserin, respectively. The 16-mg/day blonanserin group showed significantly greater reduction in the PANSS total score than the placebo group (least-squares mean difference [95% CI]: -9.9 [-17.61 to -2.25], p = 0.012, effect size: 0.538), although the 8-mg/day group showed no significant difference. The incidence of AEs such as akathisia, somnolence, and hyperprolactinemia was higher in the blonanserin groups than in the placebo group. AEs associated with blonanserin were generally mild and were consistent with its known profile in adults with schizophrenia.Conclusions: Blonanserin achieved a sufficient efficacy in adolescent patients, and the safety profile was similar to that in adults, which suggests that blonanserin may be

Objectives: To evaluate the short-term efficacy and safety of blonanserin in adolescents with schizophrenia.Methods: This 6-week multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study investigated fixed-dose blonanserin (8 or 16 mg/day) in patients 12-18 years of age diagnosed with schizophrenia, as indicated by a Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score of 60-120 and a Clinical Global Impressions-Severity score of >= 3. The primary endpoint was change from baseline to week 6 in the PANSS total score, using a mixed model for repeated measures analysis. Safety was assessed by the incidence and severity of adverse events (AEs).Results: Among 151 randomized patients, 150 were included in the primary analysis population. Demographic and clinical characteristics were similar across groups at baseline. The rate of study discontinuation was 14.9%, 23.5%, and 28.3% in patients administered with placebo, blonanserin 8 mg/day, and blonanserin 16 mg/day, respectively. The least-squares mean change (95% confidence interval [CI]) from baseline to week 6 in PANSS total score was -10.6 (-16.10 to -5.10), -15.3 (-20.80 to -9.86), and -20.5 (-25.89 to -15.16) in patients administered placebo, 8 mg/day blonanserin, and 16 mg/day blonanserin, respectively. The 16-mg/day blonanserin group showed significantly greater reduction in the PANSS total score than the placebo group (least-squares mean difference [95% CI]: -9.9 [-17.61 to -2.25], p = 0.012, effect size: 0.538), although the 8-mg/day group showed no significant difference. The incidence of AEs such as akathisia, somnolence, and hyperprolactinemia was higher in the blonanserin groups than in the placebo group. AEs associated with blonanserin were generally mild and were consistent with its known profile in adults with schizophrenia.Conclusions: Blonanserin achieved a sufficient efficacy in adolescent patients, and the safety profile was similar to that in adults, which suggests that blonanserin may be a s

Supersaturated silica-lipid hybrids have previously demonstrated improved in vitro solubilisation and in vivo oral bioavailability of poorly water-soluble drugs, however were only fabricated using a single lipid (LFCS type I formulations) and were not compared to their liquid precursors. This study investigated the influence of lipid formulation classification (type I vs. type II vs. type IIIA/SNEDDS) and physical state (liquid LBF vs. solidified with silica) on the in vitro solubilisation of the poorly soluble, weak base, anti-psychotic drug, blonanserin (BLON), from a supersaturated lipid-based formulation (LBF).Stable liquid supersaturated LBF were fabricated using BLON (loaded at 150% of its equilibrium solubility), and solidified through encapsulation within porous silica microparticles at a 1:1 ratio. Their physicochemical properties and in vitro solubilisation during lipolysis were compared.Supersaturated BLON was encapsulated in the non-crystalline form. All supersaturated LBF improved the solubilisation of pure BLON during lipolysis regardless of their lipid formulation type or their physical state (1.7- to 13.4-fold). SNEDDS achieved greater solubilisation than the type II formulations (1.4- to 1.7-fold). Furthermore, the liquid precursors achieved greater solubilisation than the silica solidified formulations (4.5- to 5.7-fold). Additionally, in an attempt to increase BLON solubilisation, a spray-dried SNEDDS and dual-loaded solidified super-SNEDDS solidified with silica pre-loaded with BLON was developed, however did not significantly improve solubilisation.Liquid SNEDDS were identified as the optimal oral supersaturated LBF strategy for BLON based on in vitro lipolysis studies. Solidification of LBF using silica is a viable strategy for improving stability, however for drugs such as BLON, solidification may impede in vitro release and solubilisation.

Background: It is desirable to establish evidence for the selection of antipsychotics from the viewpoint of recovery of social activity in individual patient with schizophrenia receiving medication. From this perspective, awareness of the importance of studies about drug effectiveness on treatment discontinuation rate, remission rate, and improvement in QOL has grown recently. In Western countries, numerous reports are available in effectiveness studies, which are related to olanzapine and risperidone primarily, whereas evidence for other second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) is poor. In Japan, no effectiveness study has been reported: thus, it is desirable to collect data that will serve as evidence for selection of the 3 SGAs approved after olanzapine. Methods: The present study was a long-term effectiveness study under healthcare setting in Japan. It was designed as an open-label, multicenter, randomized, comparative study involving 104-week oral treatment with 1 of the 3 drugs (aripiprazole, blonanserin, and paliperidone) in patients with schizophrenia aged 20 years or over who required antipsychotic medication or switching of the current medication to others for reasons such as lack of efficacy and intolerability. The primary endpoint is treatment discontinuation rate for any causes. The secondary endpoints include remission rate, improvement of social activity, alleviation, aggravation or recurrence of psychiatric symptoms, and safety. The target number of subjects was set at 300. Discussion: Because this study is expected to yield evidence regarding the selection of antipsychotics for facilitating the recovery of social activity in patients with schizophrenia, it is considered highly valuable to perform this effectiveness study under ordinary healthcare setting in Japan.