Search

Background: Person-centred care (PCC) has been suggested as the preferred model of dementia care in all settings. The EPCentCare study showed that an adapted PCC approach was difficult to implement and had no effect on prescription of antipsychotics in nursing home residents in Germany. This paper reports the qualitative process evaluation to identify facilitators and barriers of the implementation of PCC in German nursing homes from the perspective of participating practice development champions. Methods: Five individual and 14 group interviews were conducted with 66 participants (staff and managers) from 18 nursing homes. The analysis was based on inductive coding to identify factors influencing the PCC implementation process. Identified factors were systematised and structured by mapping them to the four constructs (coherence, cognitive participation, collective action, reflexive monitoring) of the Normalization Process Theory (NPT) as a framework that explains implementation processes. Results: Facilitating implementation factors included among others broadening of the care perspective (coherence), tolerance development within the care team regarding challenging behaviour (cognitive participation), testing new approaches to solutions as a multi-professional team (collective action), and perception of effects of PCC measures (reflexive monitoring). Among the facilitating factors reported in all the NPT constructs, thus affecting the entire implementation process, were the involvement of relatives, multi-professional teamwork and effective collaboration with physicians. Barriers implied uncertainties about the implementation and expectation of a higher workload (coherence), concerns about the feasibility of PCC implementation in terms of human resources (cognitive participation), lack of a person-centred attitude by colleagues or the institution (collective action), and doubts about the effects of PCC (reflexive monitoring). Barriers influencing the entire impleme

Advance care planning conversations in home care: Intervention development with the Behaviour Change Wheel Abstract. Background: StAdPlan is a multicenter, cluster-randomized controlled trial aimed to develop and evaluate an advance care planning (ACP) intervention for the German home care setting. Aim: This paper reports the intervention development. Available ACP concepts were reviewed and adapted to the German home care context in terms of staffing and available time resources. Skilled nurses are assigned to raise the awareness on ACP among older care-dependent people and their informal caregivers/relatives through structured conversation and facilitating the use of existing counselling services. Methods: The Behavior Change Wheel (BCW) was applied to the development of the intervention components. Results: The complex intervention addresses care-dependent people aged 65 years and above and their informal caregivers. A two-day training session qualifies nursing professionals to offer guideline-based conversations which take place at least twice at the care-dependent person's home, if possible with the involvement of relatives. An additional information brochure is provided. Conclusions: The application of the BCW model proved to be appropriate for the analysis, description and definition of the specific functions of the intervention. The intervention is prepared for the effectiveness study.

Nurses' perspectives on their potential role in advance care planning in home care: A qualitative study Abstract. Background: Advance Care Planning (ACP) in long-term care in Germany has been identified as a potential area of nurses' responsibility. In the StAdPlan study (DRKS0016886), an ACP intervention in outpatient care was implemented and evaluated: Trained nurses conducted ACP conversations with patients. A comprehensive process evaluation was part of the study. Aim: A partial result of the process evaluation was analysing the perspective of nurses on their potential role as ACP facilitators for outpatients. Methods: Semi-structured interviews with nursing professionals and nursing service managers (n = 42) were carried out prior to the implementation of the ACP intervention. A qualitative content analysis of the recorded interviews was performed. Results: Participants described the importance of ACP in outpatient care, their personal motivation and competence as well as necessary contextual conditions. Nursing professionals are motivated to offer ACP to patients to be able to care for them according to their wishes. For effective ACP conversations, nurse professionals considered in-depth knowledge of ACP, conversational skills and sufficient time resources as necessary. ACP consultations can be a suitable field of action for nurses as they have access and an established relationship of trust with patients. Conclusions: Under certain conditions, nurses' role in offering guidance on ACP in outpatient care was seen as feasible and beneficial. Prerequisites for implementation are financial resources and training for nurses for this service.

Background The STADPLAN study is a cluster-randomised controlled trial including 27 home care services in Germany. It assesses the effect of an advance care planning (ACP) intervention delivered by trained nurses to older care-dependent patients. Patients received two ACP conversations and an information brochure. Nurses were educated through a two-day programme and topic guides structuring the conversations. Objectives of the process evaluation were to determine: [1] whether the intervention was implemented as planned, [2] which change mechanisms were observed, [3] whether targeted process outcomes were achieved and [4] in which way contextual factors influenced the implementation process. Methods The process evaluation is based on a mixed methods approach following the recommendations of the UK-MRC framework for the development and evaluation of complex interventions. Qualitative and quantitative assessments were developed and analysed guided by a logic model comprising intervention, participants, mechanisms of change and context factors. The results of the main trial will be published elsewhere. Results Educational programme and topic guides were mostly implemented as planned and resulted in motivation, knowledge, and perceived competencies to facilitate ACP conversations in nurses. Deviances in the performance of ACP conversations indicated patients' varied individual needs, but also obstacles like reluctance of patients and caregivers to participate actively and time constraints of nurse facilitators. Patients and caregivers reported increased awareness of ACP, planning and other activities indicating that targeted process outcomes could be achieved. The relevance of multifaceted contextual factors acting as barriers or facilitators for the engagement in ACP interventions on the individual, organisational and macro level was evident. Conclusions The process evaluation elicits obstacles and achievements of the ACP intervention. The logic model organised a pletho

Background Sleep problems are highly prevalent in people with dementia. Nevertheless, there is no gold standard intervention to prevent or reduce sleep problems in people with dementia. Existing interventions are characterized by a pronounced heterogeneity as well as insufficient knowledge about the possibilities and challenges of implementation. The aim of this study is to pilot and evaluate the effectiveness of a newly developed complex intervention to prevent and reduce sleep problems in people with dementia living in nursing homes. Methods This study is a parallel group cluster-randomized controlled trial. The intervention consists of six components: (1) the assessment of established sleep-promoting interventions and an appropriate environment in the participating nursing homes, (2) the implementation of two sleep nurses as change agents per nursing home, (3) a basic education course for nursing staff: Sleep problems in dementia, (4) an advanced education course for nursing staff: Tailored problem-solving (two workshops), (5) workshops: Development of an institutional sleep-promoting concept (two workshops with nursing management and sleep nurses) and (6) written information and education material (e.g. brochure and One Minute Wonder poster). The intervention will be performed over a period of 16 weeks and compared with usual care in the control group. Overall, 24 nursing homes in North, East and West Germany will be included and randomized in a 1:1 ratio. The primary outcome is the prevalence of sleep problems in people with dementia living in nursing homes. Secondary outcomes are quality of life, quality of sleep, daytime sleepiness and agitated behavior of people with dementia, as well as safety parameters like psychotropic medication, falls and physical restraints. The outcomes will be assessed using a mix of instruments based on self- and proxy-rating. A cost analysis and a process evaluation will be performed in conjunction with the study. Conclusions It i

Background: Dementia guidelines propose the use of nonpharmacological interventions for sleep disturbances for older people. Based on available reviews, it seems most likely that multicomponent interventions have the strongest potential to be effective in improving sleep. However, a detailed description of multicomponent interventions is missing. This systematic review aims to identify, describe, and summarize multicomponent, nonpharmacological interventions to reduce or avoid sleep disturbances in nursing home residents. Methods: This review followed established methodological frameworks for systematic evidence syntheses. A computerized search was conducted in December 2018, using the databases PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, and Cochrane Library. Two independent reviewers assessed all search results to identify eligible studies and assessed studies' methodological quality following the Cochrane Risk of Bias methodology for randomized controlled trials and the CASP Appraisal Checklist for controlled trials. Evaluation studies of any design investigating multicomponent interventions were included, except case studies. Components of included intervention programs were analyzed applying the TIDieR and CReDECI 2 criteria. Results: A total of 2056 studies were identified through the database search; ten publications about nine interventions met the inclusion criteria and were included in the review. The identified interventions can be summarized assigned to the categories daytime activities, nighttime activities, staff training, and light exposure. The approaches showed similarities and differences in procedures, materials, modes of delivery, intervention provider, and intervention period. None of the studies described any intended interactions between components or considered context characteristics in intervention modeling as well as internal and external facilitators or barriers influencing delivery of intervention. We identified positive or mixed positive effects for sleep

Background: Dementia guidelines propose the use of nonpharmacological interventions for sleep disturbances for older people. Based on available reviews, it seems most likely that multicomponent interventions have the strongest potential to be effective in improving sleep. However, a detailed description of multicomponent interventions is missing. This systematic review aims to identify, describe, and summarize multicomponent, nonpharmacological interventions to reduce or avoid sleep disturbances in nursing home residents. Methods: This review followed established methodological frameworks for systematic evidence syntheses. A computerized search was conducted in December 2018, using the databases PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, and Cochrane Library. Two independent reviewers assessed all search results to identify eligible studies and assessed studies' methodological quality following the Cochrane Risk of Bias methodology for randomized controlled trials and the CASP Appraisal Checklist for controlled trials. Evaluation studies of any design investigating multicomponent interventions were included, except case studies. Components of included intervention programs were analyzed applying the TIDieR and CReDECI 2 criteria. Results: A total of 2056 studies were identified through the database search; ten publications about nine interventions met the inclusion criteria and were included in the review. The identified interventions can be summarized assigned to the categories daytime activities, nighttime activities, staff training, and light exposure. The approaches showed similarities and differences in procedures, materials, modes of delivery, intervention provider, and intervention period. None of the studies described any intended interactions between components or considered context characteristics in intervention modeling as well as internal and external facilitators or barriers influencing delivery of intervention. We identified positive or mixed positive effects for sleep

Background Sleep problems are highly prevalent in people with dementia. Nevertheless, there is no gold standard intervention to prevent or reduce sleep problems in people with dementia. Existing interventions are characterized by a pronounced heterogeneity as well as insufficient knowledge about the possibilities and challenges of implementation. The aim of this study is to pilot and evaluate the effectiveness of a newly developed complex intervention to prevent and reduce sleep problems in people with dementia living in nursing homes. Methods This study is a parallel group cluster-randomized controlled trial. The intervention consists of six components: (1) the assessment of established sleep-promoting interventions and an appropriate environment in the participating nursing homes, (2) the implementation of two sleep nurses as change agents per nursing home, (3) a basic education course for nursing staff: Sleep problems in dementia, (4) an advanced education course for nursing staff: Tailored problem-solving (two workshops), (5) workshops: Development of an institutional sleep-promoting concept (two workshops with nursing management and sleep nurses) and (6) written information and education material (e.g. brochure and One Minute Wonder poster). The intervention will be performed over a period of 16 weeks and compared with usual care in the control group. Overall, 24 nursing homes in North, East and West Germany will be included and randomized in a 1:1 ratio. The primary outcome is the prevalence of sleep problems in people with dementia living in nursing homes. Secondary outcomes are quality of life, quality of sleep, daytime sleepiness and agitated behavior of people with dementia, as well as safety parameters like psychotropic medication, falls and physical restraints. The outcomes will be assessed using a mix of instruments based on self- and proxy-rating. A cost analysis and a process evaluation will be performed in conjunction with the study. Conclusions It i

BackgroundProcess evaluation addresses the implementation, mechanisms of impact, and context of participants in complex interventions. The STADPLAN study assesses the effects of conversations on advance care planning (ACP) led by trained nurse facilitators. The complex intervention consists of several components that may lead to various changes in attitude and behavior regarding personal ACP activities. With the process evaluation, we aim to assess how changes were achieved in the STADPLAN intervention.MethodsThe planned process evaluation study will be conducted alongside a cluster-randomized controlled trial on ACP in home care services (HCS). Trained nurse facilitators will deliver the ACP intervention consisting of an information brochure and two ACP conversations. A logic model depicts the assumed change processes of the intervention: the educational program enables nurses to conduct ACP conversations with patients and their caregivers. Patients gain knowledge and reflect upon and engage in their own ACP. Caregivers better understand patients' wishes and feel reassured in their role as surrogates. Designation of a surrogate and communication on ACP are facilitated. We will assess the effects of the educational program with questionnaires and a focus group including all participating nurses. We will measure ACP engagement, and prevalence of advance directives in patients, and ask for their experiences with the intervention. We will conduct semi-structured interviews with caregivers about their expectations and experiences regarding ACP in general and the intervention. We will address context factors, e.g., basic characteristics of the HCS (such as ownership, number of clients, staff and qualification). Analysis will be based upon the logic model, integrating qualitative and quantitative data.DiscussionThe comprehensive process evaluation will provide essential information on the feasibility of implementation strategies and the clinical relevance of a nurse-led A

BackgroundProcess evaluation addresses the implementation, mechanisms of impact, and context of participants in complex interventions. The STADPLAN study assesses the effects of conversations on advance care planning (ACP) led by trained nurse facilitators. The complex intervention consists of several components that may lead to various changes in attitude and behavior regarding personal ACP activities. With the process evaluation, we aim to assess how changes were achieved in the STADPLAN intervention.MethodsThe planned process evaluation study will be conducted alongside a cluster-randomized controlled trial on ACP in home care services (HCS). Trained nurse facilitators will deliver the ACP intervention consisting of an information brochure and two ACP conversations. A logic model depicts the assumed change processes of the intervention: the educational program enables nurses to conduct ACP conversations with patients and their caregivers. Patients gain knowledge and reflect upon and engage in their own ACP. Caregivers better understand patients' wishes and feel reassured in their role as surrogates. Designation of a surrogate and communication on ACP are facilitated. We will assess the effects of the educational program with questionnaires and a focus group including all participating nurses. We will measure ACP engagement, and prevalence of advance directives in patients, and ask for their experiences with the intervention. We will conduct semi-structured interviews with caregivers about their expectations and experiences regarding ACP in general and the intervention. We will address context factors, e.g., basic characteristics of the HCS (such as ownership, number of clients, staff and qualification). Analysis will be based upon the logic model, integrating qualitative and quantitative data.DiscussionThe comprehensive process evaluation will provide essential information on the feasibility of implementation strategies and the clinical relevance of a nurse-led A