Search

Your search keyword '"Bassignani A"' showing total 6 results
Start Over Author "Bassignani A" Publication Type Electronic Resources
6 results on '"Bassignani A"'

1. Critical Assessment of MetaProteome Investigation (CAMPI): a multi-laboratory comparison of established workflows

Author

Fonds National de la Recherche - FnR [sponsor], ERC-CoG 863664 [sponsor], Van Den Bossche, Tim, Kunath, Benoît, Schallert, Kay, Schäpe, Stephanie S., Abraham, Paul E., Armengaud, Jean, Arntzen, Magnus Ø., Bassignani, Ariane, Benndorf, Dirk, Fuchs, Stephan, Giannone, Richard J., Griffin, Timothy J., Hagen, Live H., Halder, Rashi, Henry, Céline, Hettich, Robert L., Heyer, Robert, Jagtap, Pratik, Jehmlich, Nico, Jensen, Marlene, Juste, Catherine, Kleiner, Manuel, Langella, Olivier, Lehmann, Theresa, Leith, Emma, May, Patrick, Mesuere, Bart, Miotello, Guylaine, Peters, Samantha L., Pible, Olivier, Teixeira Queiros, Pedro, Reichl, Udo, Renard, Bernhard Y., Schiebenhoefer, Henning, Sczyrba, Alexander, Tanca, Alessandro, Trappe, Kathrin, Trezzi, Jean-Pierre, Uzzau, Sergio, Verschaffelt, Pieter, von Bergen, Martin, Wilmes, Paul, Wolf, Maximilian, Martens, Lennart, Muth, Thilo, Fonds National de la Recherche - FnR [sponsor], ERC-CoG 863664 [sponsor], Van Den Bossche, Tim, Kunath, Benoît, Schallert, Kay, Schäpe, Stephanie S., Abraham, Paul E., Armengaud, Jean, Arntzen, Magnus Ø., Bassignani, Ariane, Benndorf, Dirk, Fuchs, Stephan, Giannone, Richard J., Griffin, Timothy J., Hagen, Live H., Halder, Rashi, Henry, Céline, Hettich, Robert L., Heyer, Robert, Jagtap, Pratik, Jehmlich, Nico, Jensen, Marlene, Juste, Catherine, Kleiner, Manuel, Langella, Olivier, Lehmann, Theresa, Leith, Emma, May, Patrick, Mesuere, Bart, Miotello, Guylaine, Peters, Samantha L., Pible, Olivier, Teixeira Queiros, Pedro, Reichl, Udo, Renard, Bernhard Y., Schiebenhoefer, Henning, Sczyrba, Alexander, Tanca, Alessandro, Trappe, Kathrin, Trezzi, Jean-Pierre, Uzzau, Sergio, Verschaffelt, Pieter, von Bergen, Martin, Wilmes, Paul, Wolf, Maximilian, Martens, Lennart, and Muth, Thilo

Abstract

Metaproteomics has matured into a powerful tool to assess functional interactions in microbial communities. While many metaproteomic workflows are available, the impact of method choice on results remains unclear. Here, we carry out a community-driven, multi-laboratory comparison in metaproteomics: the critical assessment of metaproteome investigation study (CAMPI). Based on well-established workflows, we evaluate the effect of sample preparation, mass spectrometry, and bioinformatic analysis using two samples: a simplified, laboratory-assembled human intestinal model and a human fecal sample. We observe that variability at the peptide level is predominantly due to sample processing workflows, with a smaller contribution of bioinformatic pipelines. These peptide-level differences largely disappear at the protein group level. While differences are observed for predicted community composition, similar functional profiles are obtained across workflows. CAMPI demonstrates the robustness of present-day metaproteomics research, serves as a template for multi-laboratory studies in metaproteomics, and provides publicly available data sets for benchmarking future developments.

Published
2021

2. Critical Assessment of MetaProteome Investigation (CAMPI): a multi-laboratory comparison of established workflows

Author

Fonds National de la Recherche - FnR [sponsor], ERC-CoG 863664 [sponsor], Van Den Bossche, Tim, Kunath, Benoît, Schallert, Kay, Schäpe, Stephanie S., Abraham, Paul E., Armengaud, Jean, Arntzen, Magnus Ø., Bassignani, Ariane, Benndorf, Dirk, Fuchs, Stephan, Giannone, Richard J., Griffin, Timothy J., Hagen, Live H., Halder, Rashi, Henry, Céline, Hettich, Robert L., Heyer, Robert, Jagtap, Pratik, Jehmlich, Nico, Jensen, Marlene, Juste, Catherine, Kleiner, Manuel, Langella, Olivier, Lehmann, Theresa, Leith, Emma, May, Patrick, Mesuere, Bart, Miotello, Guylaine, Peters, Samantha L., Pible, Olivier, Teixeira Queiros, Pedro, Reichl, Udo, Renard, Bernhard Y., Schiebenhoefer, Henning, Sczyrba, Alexander, Tanca, Alessandro, Trappe, Kathrin, Trezzi, Jean-Pierre, Uzzau, Sergio, Verschaffelt, Pieter, von Bergen, Martin, Wilmes, Paul, Wolf, Maximilian, Martens, Lennart, Muth, Thilo, Fonds National de la Recherche - FnR [sponsor], ERC-CoG 863664 [sponsor], Van Den Bossche, Tim, Kunath, Benoît, Schallert, Kay, Schäpe, Stephanie S., Abraham, Paul E., Armengaud, Jean, Arntzen, Magnus Ø., Bassignani, Ariane, Benndorf, Dirk, Fuchs, Stephan, Giannone, Richard J., Griffin, Timothy J., Hagen, Live H., Halder, Rashi, Henry, Céline, Hettich, Robert L., Heyer, Robert, Jagtap, Pratik, Jehmlich, Nico, Jensen, Marlene, Juste, Catherine, Kleiner, Manuel, Langella, Olivier, Lehmann, Theresa, Leith, Emma, May, Patrick, Mesuere, Bart, Miotello, Guylaine, Peters, Samantha L., Pible, Olivier, Teixeira Queiros, Pedro, Reichl, Udo, Renard, Bernhard Y., Schiebenhoefer, Henning, Sczyrba, Alexander, Tanca, Alessandro, Trappe, Kathrin, Trezzi, Jean-Pierre, Uzzau, Sergio, Verschaffelt, Pieter, von Bergen, Martin, Wilmes, Paul, Wolf, Maximilian, Martens, Lennart, and Muth, Thilo

Abstract

Metaproteomics has matured into a powerful tool to assess functional interactions in microbial communities. While many metaproteomic workflows are available, the impact of method choice on results remains unclear. Here, we carry out a community-driven, multi-laboratory comparison in metaproteomics: the critical assessment of metaproteome investigation study (CAMPI). Based on well-established workflows, we evaluate the effect of sample preparation, mass spectrometry, and bioinformatic analysis using two samples: a simplified, laboratory-assembled human intestinal model and a human fecal sample. We observe that variability at the peptide level is predominantly due to sample processing workflows, with a smaller contribution of bioinformatic pipelines. These peptide-level differences largely disappear at the protein group level. While differences are observed for predicted community composition, similar functional profiles are obtained across workflows. CAMPI demonstrates the robustness of present-day metaproteomics research, serves as a template for multi-laboratory studies in metaproteomics, and provides publicly available data sets for benchmarking future developments.

Published
2021

3. Critical Assessment of MetaProteome Investigation (CAMPI): a multi-laboratory comparison of established workflows

Author

Fonds National de la Recherche - FnR [sponsor], ERC-CoG 863664 [sponsor], Van Den Bossche, Tim, Kunath, Benoît, Schallert, Kay, Schäpe, Stephanie S., Abraham, Paul E., Armengaud, Jean, Arntzen, Magnus Ø., Bassignani, Ariane, Benndorf, Dirk, Fuchs, Stephan, Giannone, Richard J., Griffin, Timothy J., Hagen, Live H., Halder, Rashi, Henry, Céline, Hettich, Robert L., Heyer, Robert, Jagtap, Pratik, Jehmlich, Nico, Jensen, Marlene, Juste, Catherine, Kleiner, Manuel, Langella, Olivier, Lehmann, Theresa, Leith, Emma, May, Patrick, Mesuere, Bart, Miotello, Guylaine, Peters, Samantha L., Pible, Olivier, Teixeira Queiros, Pedro, Reichl, Udo, Renard, Bernhard Y., Schiebenhoefer, Henning, Sczyrba, Alexander, Tanca, Alessandro, Trappe, Kathrin, Trezzi, Jean-Pierre, Uzzau, Sergio, Verschaffelt, Pieter, von Bergen, Martin, Wilmes, Paul, Wolf, Maximilian, Martens, Lennart, Muth, Thilo, Fonds National de la Recherche - FnR [sponsor], ERC-CoG 863664 [sponsor], Van Den Bossche, Tim, Kunath, Benoît, Schallert, Kay, Schäpe, Stephanie S., Abraham, Paul E., Armengaud, Jean, Arntzen, Magnus Ø., Bassignani, Ariane, Benndorf, Dirk, Fuchs, Stephan, Giannone, Richard J., Griffin, Timothy J., Hagen, Live H., Halder, Rashi, Henry, Céline, Hettich, Robert L., Heyer, Robert, Jagtap, Pratik, Jehmlich, Nico, Jensen, Marlene, Juste, Catherine, Kleiner, Manuel, Langella, Olivier, Lehmann, Theresa, Leith, Emma, May, Patrick, Mesuere, Bart, Miotello, Guylaine, Peters, Samantha L., Pible, Olivier, Teixeira Queiros, Pedro, Reichl, Udo, Renard, Bernhard Y., Schiebenhoefer, Henning, Sczyrba, Alexander, Tanca, Alessandro, Trappe, Kathrin, Trezzi, Jean-Pierre, Uzzau, Sergio, Verschaffelt, Pieter, von Bergen, Martin, Wilmes, Paul, Wolf, Maximilian, Martens, Lennart, and Muth, Thilo

Abstract

Metaproteomics has matured into a powerful tool to assess functional interactions in microbial communities. While many metaproteomic workflows are available, the impact of method choice on results remains unclear. Here, we carry out a community-driven, multi-laboratory comparison in metaproteomics: the critical assessment of metaproteome investigation study (CAMPI). Based on well-established workflows, we evaluate the effect of sample preparation, mass spectrometry, and bioinformatic analysis using two samples: a simplified, laboratory-assembled human intestinal model and a human fecal sample. We observe that variability at the peptide level is predominantly due to sample processing workflows, with a smaller contribution of bioinformatic pipelines. These peptide-level differences largely disappear at the protein group level. While differences are observed for predicted community composition, similar functional profiles are obtained across workflows. CAMPI demonstrates the robustness of present-day metaproteomics research, serves as a template for multi-laboratory studies in metaproteomics, and provides publicly available data sets for benchmarking future developments.

Published
2021

4. Critical Assessment of MetaProteome Investigation (CAMPI): a multi-laboratory comparison of established workflows

Author

Fonds National de la Recherche - FnR [sponsor], ERC-CoG 863664 [sponsor], Van Den Bossche, Tim, Kunath, Benoît, Schallert, Kay, Schäpe, Stephanie S., Abraham, Paul E., Armengaud, Jean, Arntzen, Magnus Ø., Bassignani, Ariane, Benndorf, Dirk, Fuchs, Stephan, Giannone, Richard J., Griffin, Timothy J., Hagen, Live H., Halder, Rashi, Henry, Céline, Hettich, Robert L., Heyer, Robert, Jagtap, Pratik, Jehmlich, Nico, Jensen, Marlene, Juste, Catherine, Kleiner, Manuel, Langella, Olivier, Lehmann, Theresa, Leith, Emma, May, Patrick, Mesuere, Bart, Miotello, Guylaine, Peters, Samantha L., Pible, Olivier, Teixeira Queiros, Pedro, Reichl, Udo, Renard, Bernhard Y., Schiebenhoefer, Henning, Sczyrba, Alexander, Tanca, Alessandro, Trappe, Kathrin, Trezzi, Jean-Pierre, Uzzau, Sergio, Verschaffelt, Pieter, von Bergen, Martin, Wilmes, Paul, Wolf, Maximilian, Martens, Lennart, Muth, Thilo, Fonds National de la Recherche - FnR [sponsor], ERC-CoG 863664 [sponsor], Van Den Bossche, Tim, Kunath, Benoît, Schallert, Kay, Schäpe, Stephanie S., Abraham, Paul E., Armengaud, Jean, Arntzen, Magnus Ø., Bassignani, Ariane, Benndorf, Dirk, Fuchs, Stephan, Giannone, Richard J., Griffin, Timothy J., Hagen, Live H., Halder, Rashi, Henry, Céline, Hettich, Robert L., Heyer, Robert, Jagtap, Pratik, Jehmlich, Nico, Jensen, Marlene, Juste, Catherine, Kleiner, Manuel, Langella, Olivier, Lehmann, Theresa, Leith, Emma, May, Patrick, Mesuere, Bart, Miotello, Guylaine, Peters, Samantha L., Pible, Olivier, Teixeira Queiros, Pedro, Reichl, Udo, Renard, Bernhard Y., Schiebenhoefer, Henning, Sczyrba, Alexander, Tanca, Alessandro, Trappe, Kathrin, Trezzi, Jean-Pierre, Uzzau, Sergio, Verschaffelt, Pieter, von Bergen, Martin, Wilmes, Paul, Wolf, Maximilian, Martens, Lennart, and Muth, Thilo

Abstract

Metaproteomics has matured into a powerful tool to assess functional interactions in microbial communities. While many metaproteomic workflows are available, the impact of method choice on results remains unclear. Here, we carry out a community-driven, multi-laboratory comparison in metaproteomics: the critical assessment of metaproteome investigation study (CAMPI). Based on well-established workflows, we evaluate the effect of sample preparation, mass spectrometry, and bioinformatic analysis using two samples: a simplified, laboratory-assembled human intestinal model and a human fecal sample. We observe that variability at the peptide level is predominantly due to sample processing workflows, with a smaller contribution of bioinformatic pipelines. These peptide-level differences largely disappear at the protein group level. While differences are observed for predicted community composition, similar functional profiles are obtained across workflows. CAMPI demonstrates the robustness of present-day metaproteomics research, serves as a template for multi-laboratory studies in metaproteomics, and provides publicly available data sets for benchmarking future developments.

Published
2021

5. Critical Assessment of MetaProteome Investigation (CAMPI): a multi-laboratory comparison of established workflows

Author

Van Den Bossche, T., Kunath, B.J., Schallert, K., Schäpe, Stephanie, Abraham, P.E., Armengaud, J., Arntzen, M.Ø., Bassignani, A., Benndorf, D., Fuchs, S., Giannone, R.J., Griffin, T.J., Hagen, L.H., Halder, R., Henry, C., Hettich, R.L., Heyer, R., Jagtap, P., Jehmlich, Nico, Jensen, M., Juste, C., Kleiner, M., Langella, O., Lehmann, T., Leith, E., May, P., Mesuere, B., Miotello, G., Peters, S.L., Pible, O., Queiros, P.T., Reichl, U., Renard, B.Y., Schiebenhoefer, H., Sczyrba, A., Tanca, A., Trappe, K., Trezzi, J.-P., Uzzau, S., Verschaffelt, P., von Bergen, Martin, Wilmes, P., Wolf, M., Martens, L., Muth, T., Van Den Bossche, T., Kunath, B.J., Schallert, K., Schäpe, Stephanie, Abraham, P.E., Armengaud, J., Arntzen, M.Ø., Bassignani, A., Benndorf, D., Fuchs, S., Giannone, R.J., Griffin, T.J., Hagen, L.H., Halder, R., Henry, C., Hettich, R.L., Heyer, R., Jagtap, P., Jehmlich, Nico, Jensen, M., Juste, C., Kleiner, M., Langella, O., Lehmann, T., Leith, E., May, P., Mesuere, B., Miotello, G., Peters, S.L., Pible, O., Queiros, P.T., Reichl, U., Renard, B.Y., Schiebenhoefer, H., Sczyrba, A., Tanca, A., Trappe, K., Trezzi, J.-P., Uzzau, S., Verschaffelt, P., von Bergen, Martin, Wilmes, P., Wolf, M., Martens, L., and Muth, T.

Abstract

Metaproteomics has matured into a powerful tool to assess functional interactions in microbial communities. While many metaproteomic workflows are available, the impact of method choice on results remains unclear. Here, we carry out a community-driven, multi-laboratory comparison in metaproteomics: the critical assessment of metaproteome investigation study (CAMPI). Based on well-established workflows, we evaluate the effect of sample preparation, mass spectrometry, and bioinformatic analysis using two samples: a simplified, laboratory-assembled human intestinal model and a human fecal sample. We observe that variability at the peptide level is predominantly due to sample processing workflows, with a smaller contribution of bioinformatic pipelines. These peptide-level differences largely disappear at the protein group level. While differences are observed for predicted community composition, similar functional profiles are obtained across workflows. CAMPI demonstrates the robustness of present-day metaproteomics research, serves as a template for multi-laboratory studies in metaproteomics, and provides publicly available data sets for benchmarking future developments.

Published
2021

6. Simians of Swing by the group Simians of Swing [Album]

Author

Davies, Andy, Bassignani, Lorenzo, Raman, Saleem, Boscagin, Luca, Law, Ant, Leak, Sam, McLean, Benet, Neame, Ivo, Gibbons, Polly, Davies, Andy, Bassignani, Lorenzo, Raman, Saleem, Boscagin, Luca, Law, Ant, Leak, Sam, McLean, Benet, Neame, Ivo, and Gibbons, Polly

Abstract

The Simians of Swing are no ordinary jazz group; they are story tellers in the great comic book tradition. Each number on this album is a soundtrack to a hero or villain; some of the characters are good, most are bad … but all are legends with tales of revenge, tragedy and romance. Set in a post-apocalyptic world the Simians narrate their stories through the medium of jazz.

Published
2015

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results