Search

This article details methodologies employed to enable sharing and coconstructing the stories of threewomen’s lives in physics. The first case explores the usefulness of timeline interviewing, where participantsnarrate episodes that are coconstructed with the researcher as meaningful over time. We illustrate thismethod in the case of a mature student in Sweden from a working-class background who shared momentsthat added up to a life outside of physics and then a sharp turn into physics later in life. The second caseexplores life-history interviewing using a narrative-inquiry approach and deep relationship building whichenabled the coconstruction of stories of experiences over time. These moments are coconstructed with theresearcher and analyzed using an intersectionality lens to yield a story depicting the transnationalexperiences of a woman of color moving across various European contexts into the North Americanphysics context. The final case is of a first-generation Canadian woman of color who shared her navigationsof in and out of school physics via a method known as the “Rivers of Life.” Using this method, theparticipant narrates their experiences with physics as a river, using metaphorical tools like rafts, rocks,rapids, tributaries to discuss various moments described as twists and turns over time that together amountto a life in physics. We discuss the value of different approaches to coconstructing narratives withparticipants and, in particular, the need for this kind of research in physics context

[This paper is part of the Focused Collection on Qualitative Methods in PER: A Critical Examination.] This article details methodologies employed to enable sharing and coconstructing the stories of three women’s lives in physics. The first case explores the usefulness of timeline interviewing, where participants narrate episodes that are coconstructed with the researcher as meaningful over time. We illustrate this method in the case of a mature student in Sweden from a working-class background who shared moments that added up to a life outside of physics and then a sharp turn into physics later in life. The second case explores life-history interviewing using a narrative-inquiry approach and deep relationship building which enabled the coconstruction of stories of experiences over time. These moments are coconstructed with the researcher and analyzed using an intersectionality lens to yield a story depicting the transnational experiences of a woman of color moving across various European contexts into the North American physics context. The final case is of a first-generation Canadian woman of color who shared her navigations of in and out of school physics via a method known as the “Rivers of Life.” Using this method, the participant narrates their experiences with physics as a river, using metaphorical tools like rafts, rocks, rapids, tributaries to discuss various moments described as twists and turns over time that together amount to a life in physics. We discuss the value of different approaches to coconstructing narratives with participants and, in particular, the need for this kind of research in physics contexts.

[This paper is part of the Focused Collection on Qualitative Methods in PER: A Critical Examination.] This article details methodologies employed to enable sharing and coconstructing the stories of three women’s lives in physics. The first case explores the usefulness of timeline interviewing, where participants narrate episodes that are coconstructed with the researcher as meaningful over time. We illustrate this method in the case of a mature student in Sweden from a working-class background who shared moments that added up to a life outside of physics and then a sharp turn into physics later in life. The second case explores life-history interviewing using a narrative-inquiry approach and deep relationship building which enabled the coconstruction of stories of experiences over time. These moments are coconstructed with the researcher and analyzed using an intersectionality lens to yield a story depicting the transnational experiences of a woman of color moving across various European contexts into the North American physics context. The final case is of a first-generation Canadian woman of color who shared her navigations of in and out of school physics via a method known as the “Rivers of Life.” Using this method, the participant narrates their experiences with physics as a river, using metaphorical tools like rafts, rocks, rapids, tributaries to discuss various moments described as twists and turns over time that together amount to a life in physics. We discuss the value of different approaches to coconstructing narratives with participants and, in particular, the need for this kind of research in physics contexts.

[This paper is part of the Focused Collection on Qualitative Methods in PER: A Critical Examination.] This article details methodologies employed to enable sharing and coconstructing the stories of three women’s lives in physics. The first case explores the usefulness of timeline interviewing, where participants narrate episodes that are coconstructed with the researcher as meaningful over time. We illustrate this method in the case of a mature student in Sweden from a working-class background who shared moments that added up to a life outside of physics and then a sharp turn into physics later in life. The second case explores life-history interviewing using a narrative-inquiry approach and deep relationship building which enabled the coconstruction of stories of experiences over time. These moments are coconstructed with the researcher and analyzed using an intersectionality lens to yield a story depicting the transnational experiences of a woman of color moving across various European contexts into the North American physics context. The final case is of a first-generation Canadian woman of color who shared her navigations of in and out of school physics via a method known as the “Rivers of Life.” Using this method, the participant narrates their experiences with physics as a river, using metaphorical tools like rafts, rocks, rapids, tributaries to discuss various moments described as twists and turns over time that together amount to a life in physics. We discuss the value of different approaches to coconstructing narratives with participants and, in particular, the need for this kind of research in physics contexts.

[This paper is part of the Focused Collection on Qualitative Methods in PER: A Critical Examination.] This article details methodologies employed to enable sharing and coconstructing the stories of three women’s lives in physics. The first case explores the usefulness of timeline interviewing, where participants narrate episodes that are coconstructed with the researcher as meaningful over time. We illustrate this method in the case of a mature student in Sweden from a working-class background who shared moments that added up to a life outside of physics and then a sharp turn into physics later in life. The second case explores life-history interviewing using a narrative-inquiry approach and deep relationship building which enabled the coconstruction of stories of experiences over time. These moments are coconstructed with the researcher and analyzed using an intersectionality lens to yield a story depicting the transnational experiences of a woman of color moving across various European contexts into the North American physics context. The final case is of a first-generation Canadian woman of color who shared her navigations of in and out of school physics via a method known as the “Rivers of Life.” Using this method, the participant narrates their experiences with physics as a river, using metaphorical tools like rafts, rocks, rapids, tributaries to discuss various moments described as twists and turns over time that together amount to a life in physics. We discuss the value of different approaches to coconstructing narratives with participants and, in particular, the need for this kind of research in physics contexts.

Who is a scientist? Who aspires to be a scientist? Who can be a scientist? In this inaugural lecture, I invite the audience to think about issues related to diversity and inclusion to science and explore the construct of “science identity”.Science identity becomes valuable when exploring social and cultural aspects of scientific practice and science teaching and it is connected to goals related to equity, especially in terms of access to educational resources and opportunities to engage with science. Why? Because science is or has to be for everyone.The term ‘possible selves’ is used to refer to the possibility of becoming scientifically literate and critically utilise scientific knowledge in our everyday lives. What do we eat? What do we wear? What we do with our bodies? What do we do with animals? What we do with plants? What we do with water? What we do with land?The term ‘possible futures’ is used to refer to more sustainable and socially just futures, affected by developments in science, technology, and society as well as interactions between humans, non-humans, and more-than-humans: people, animals, plants, machines, and robots.In imagining possible futures, healthier and more balanced relationships with our natural habitat as well as social environments are envisioned. Science education in general, and science identity in particular, play a crucial role in both imagining and shaping such futures. Omslagontwerp en opmaak: LINE UP boek en media bv | Riëtte van ZwolAlle illustraties, tenzij anders vermeld, zijn van de auteur. Uitgegeven door University of Groningen PressBroerstraat 49712 CP Groningenhttps://ugp.rug.nl

Who is a scientist? Who aspires to be a scientist? Who can be a scientist? In this inaugural lecture, I invite the audience to think about issues related to diversity and inclusion to science and explore the construct of “science identity”. Science identity becomes valuable when exploring social and cultural aspects of scientific practice and science teaching and it is connected to goals related to equity, especially in terms of access to educational resources and opportunities to engage with science. Why? Because science is or has to be for everyone. The term ‘possible selves’ is used to refer to the possibility of becoming scientifically literate and critically utilise scientific knowledge in our everyday lives. What do we eat? What do we wear? What we do with our bodies? What do we do with animals? What we do with plants? What we do with water? What we do with land? The term ‘possible futures’ is used to refer to more sustainable and socially just futures, affected by developments in science, technology, and society as well as interactions between humans, non-humans, and more-than-humans: people, animals, plants, machines, and robots. In imagining possible futures, healthier and more balanced relationships with our natural habitat as well as social environments are envisioned. Science education in general, and science identity in particular, play a crucial role in both imagining and shaping such futures.

In addressing contemporary socio-ecological challenges it is imperative to engage individuals with the moral dilemmas in the human-nature context. A socioscientific-issues (SSI) approach to secondary biology education can contribute to engaging students in moral dilemmas and reflecting on their values. Following a design research methodology, we aimed to: (1) develop a set of design principles of an intervention in Dutch upper secondary SSI biology education, aimed at supporting secondary biology students’ morality in the human-nature context; (2) concretise the design principles as a module. We describe the different phases of this study (orientation, design, and evaluation phase). The practical output of the study is a module, which was refined and improved during the design phase, and then implemented by two biology teachers. In this paper, we present an exemplary example of a lesson from the module. As theoretical output, we discuss the role of the design principles: nature of the dilemmas; Four Component Model of morality; group work; and ethical matrix. Based on experiences in classrooms, we provide recommendations for further research and practice.

In this qualitative case study we examined the impact of a specially-designed classroom intervention for a group of 15–16-year-old Dutch biology students’ use of values in contemplating five socioscientific issues in the human-nature context. The students worked in small groups to support various aspects of their morality. An ethical matrix was used as a heuristic to explore different arguments and moral values from different perspectives. The collected data consisted of written assignments, group conversations, and individual interviews. The results show that students’ use of values differed from one issue to another. The values they used in their moral decision-making indicated that the influence of the intervention activities, aimed at enhancing a relationship between moral agent (student) and moral object (topic), was limited. The study provides evidence that the intervention positively conduced to students’ cognition of the values that are personally relevant. Recommendations for further theorization, research and practice are discussed.

[This paper is part of the Focused Collection on Qualitative Methods in PER: A Critical Examination.] This article details methodologies employed to enable sharing and coconstructing the stories of three women’s lives in physics. The first case explores the usefulness of timeline interviewing, where participants narrate episodes that are coconstructed with the researcher as meaningful over time. We illustrate this method in the case of a mature student in Sweden from a working-class background who shared moments that added up to a life outside of physics and then a sharp turn into physics later in life. The second case explores life-history interviewing using a narrative-inquiry approach and deep relationship building which enabled the coconstruction of stories of experiences over time. These moments are coconstructed with the researcher and analyzed using an intersectionality lens to yield a story depicting the transnational experiences of a woman of color moving across various European contexts into the North American physics context. The final case is of a first-generation Canadian woman of color who shared her navigations of in and out of school physics via a method known as the “Rivers of Life.” Using this method, the participant narrates their experiences with physics as a river, using metaphorical tools like rafts, rocks, rapids, tributaries to discuss various moments described as twists and turns over time that together amount to a life in physics. We discuss the value of different approaches to coconstructing narratives with participants and, in particular, the need for this kind of research in physics contexts.

International reform documents have called for an emphasis on students’ engagement in core scientific practices, such as inquiry and argumentation, from an early age. However, the role of the teacher in inquiry-based activities remains a largely unexplored research area in early childhood education. To address this gap, this study explores the role of the teacher when early childhood students engage in inquiry and argumentation practices in the context of learning about forces. Discourse analysis methods were used to characterise the teacher’s inquiry cycle and how it contributes to students’ enactment of inquiry and argumentation practices. The participants were a teacher with long experience in inquiry-based teaching and her 25 students (5–6 years old). The inquiry cycle established by the teacher engaged children in inquiry and argumentation practices related to them. This study sheds light on the underexplored research area of teaching-based inquiry practices in early childhood education, providing evidence that it is necessary to reformulate the role of the teacher’s guidance as an integral part of inquiry-based teaching in early childhood.

Who is a scientist? Who aspires to be a scientist? Who can be a scientist? In this inaugural lecture, I invite the audience to think about issues related to diversity and inclusion to science and explore the construct of “science identity”.Science identity becomes valuable when exploring social and cultural aspects of scientific practice and science teaching and it is connected to goals related to equity, especially in terms of access to educational resources and opportunities to engage with science. Why? Because science is or has to be for everyone.The term ‘possible selves’ is used to refer to the possibility of becoming scientifically literate and critically utilise scientific knowledge in our everyday lives. What do we eat? What do we wear? What we do with our bodies? What do we do with animals? What we do with plants? What we do with water? What we do with land?The term ‘possible futures’ is used to refer to more sustainable and socially just futures, affected by developments in science, technology, and society as well as interactions between humans, non-humans, and more-than-humans: people, animals, plants, machines, and robots.In imagining possible futures, healthier and more balanced relationships with our natural habitat as well as social environments are envisioned. Science education in general, and science identity in particular, play a crucial role in both imagining and shaping such futures. Omslagontwerp en opmaak: LINE UP boek en media bv | Riëtte van ZwolAlle illustraties, tenzij anders vermeld, zijn van de auteur. Uitgegeven door University of Groningen PressBroerstraat 49712 CP Groningenhttps://ugp.rug.nl

The most recent scientific reports emphasize the need to take urgent action to solve the climate change problem. Educational settings such as schools can create equitable learning experiences where the youth can learn effective approaches to mitigation and adaptation based on scientific evidence. This chapter sees teachers’ agency in solving climate change problems as critical for designing meaningful learning experiences. The authors explore how a preservice teacher, Ms. Crawford, conceptualizes her sense of agency as she teaches climate change in: multiple contexts across time, middle school classrooms, professional learning environments, family gatherings, and research meetings. In this single case study of Ms. Crawford, we use an ethnographic perspective where we conduct participant observations and iterative cycles of interviews to make sense of the reason for the change in the conceptualization of agency. This study's findings shed light on how preservice teachers’ agency is shaped through interaction with stakeholders, considerations of ethics of care, and attention to intergenerational equity.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of virtual reality on undergraduate students’ self-efficacy, self-concept, interest, and laboratory anxiety in an introductory chemistry course. We used a mixed-methods approach to improve our understanding of how these factors mediate student learning. The findings showed that (i) the use of the virtual reality application had an overall positive impact on students’ self-efficacy, self-concept, interest, and anxiety; and (ii) students who expressed some anxiety about doing the lab prior to the course reported the use of the virtual reality application decreased their levels of anxiety at the end of the lab. The implications of these findings speak to the potential value of the use of virtual reality applications in higher education and especially in situations when distance learning is the only option as well as in situations where the costs of real laboratories cannot be afforded.

This review study synthesises 28 empirical research articles emphasising the learning of morality aspects in the context of addressing socioscientific issues (SSI) in secondary science education. The key interrelated questions we seek to address in this study are how morality is conceptualised in the science classroom in the light of emerging sustainability issues and how it can be developed. We used the Four Component Model of Morality to create a knowledge base for how morality has been conceptualised in the literature on secondary science education and how it can be developed. The findings of this review study show that not all studies have used concrete, explicit conceptualisations of morality and that the role of sense of place and the situatedness of morality have often been neglected. It also emerged that studies focusing on students’ moral character and action-taking were underrepresented. We recommend that further research be carried out on the interrelationships between moral character and enacted moral reasoning. The review also reveals a gap between morality research and teaching. Based on the outcomes of this review, we propose a set of recommendations aimed at guiding and encouraging students’ morality within secondary science education.

Framed within the Four Component Model (FCM) of morality, this case study investigates the nature of Dutch 15–16 years old biology students’ morality in socioscientific issues in the human-nature context. In doing so, we discuss the morality of 12 students with data collected through individual semi-structured interviews following the implementation of a specially-designed curriculum. During the interviews the students discussed a moral dilemma related to the rehabilitation of seals. The findings indicate that students demonstrated aspects of all four FCM components. The students placed themselves in the perspectives of involved stakeholders, both affectively and cognitively. In addition, the students exhibited both rationality-based and emotion-based moral reasoning. A number of students experienced an “inner conflict” between cognitive and emotional reasoning, which affected their moral motivation and–as such–represented their moral reflection process. Students’ moral emotions were often decisive in their moral decision-making. Among the different kinds of moral emotions (compassion, guilt, duty, respect), compassion appeared most. The findings are discussed alongside implications for future research with a focus on encouraging aspects of students’ morality, which are an important part of citizenship skills.

In this chapter I present the story of a beginning elementary science teacher’s (Anna) science identity trajectory through time and across contexts. For the purpose of exploring Anna’s story I used various kinds of biographical data collected over a period of a year in Southern Europe. In conceptualizing identity as a lived experience, in this study I aimed to uncover through a life-history approach critical events that Anna had experienced through her participation as a science learner in various contexts and communities, elucidate the meaning that she had assigned to those events, and explore the ways in which those events impacted her science identity trajectory.

Even though enhancement of students’ understanding of social justice is thought to contribute to good citizenship, contextualising social justice in science education remains challenging for teachers because social justice is not conventionally a common feature of science teaching and learning. A separate issue in science education concerns a vast body of work on nature of science (NOS) elated to understanding of and about science. Understanding NOS is thought to contribute to scientific literacy as well as citizenship. Although social justice and NOS literatures share similar themes such as citizenship goals, the precise intersection of these literatures remains relatively understudied. In this chapter, we present an argument about how contemporary conceptualizations of NOS as well as NOS instruction might be used to promote goals related to social justice. In so doing, we aim to contribute to NOS literature by drawing on theories of social justice grounded in political philosophy. We trace the potential overlap of social justice and NOS concepts and draw out example recommendations for curriculum statements and practical teaching as well as practical teaching and learning approaches. Overall, we advocate the promotion of educational goals related to social justice through NOS instruction.

Even though enhancement of students’ understanding of social justice is thought to contribute to good citizenship, contextualising social justice in science education remains challenging for teachers because social justice is not conventionally a common feature of science teaching and learning. A separate issue in science education concerns a vast body of work on nature of science (NOS) elated to understanding of and about science. Understanding NOS is thought to contribute to scientific literacy as well as citizenship. Although social justice and NOS literatures share similar themes such as citizenship goals, the precise intersection of these literatures remains relatively understudied. In this chapter, we present an argument about how contemporary conceptualizations of NOS as well as NOS instruction might be used to promote goals related to social justice. In so doing, we aim to contribute to NOS literature by drawing on theories of social justice grounded in political philosophy. We trace the potential overlap of social justice and NOS concepts and draw out example recommendations for curriculum statements and practical teaching as well as practical teaching and learning approaches. Overall, we advocate the promotion of educational goals related to social justice through NOS instruction.

Even though enhancement of students’ understanding of social justice is thought to contribute to good citizenship, contextualising social justice in science education remains challenging for teachers because social justice is not conventionally a common feature of science teaching and learning. A separate issue in science education concerns a vast body of work on nature of science (NOS) elated to understanding of and about science. Understanding NOS is thought to contribute to scientific literacy as well as citizenship. Although social justice and NOS literatures share similar themes such as citizenship goals, the precise intersection of these literatures remains relatively understudied. In this chapter, we present an argument about how contemporary conceptualizations of NOS as well as NOS instruction might be used to promote goals related to social justice. In so doing, we aim to contribute to NOS literature by drawing on theories of social justice grounded in political philosophy. We trace the potential overlap of social justice and NOS concepts and draw out example recommendations for curriculum statements and practical teaching as well as practical teaching and learning approaches. Overall, we advocate the promotion of educational goals related to social justice through NOS instruction.

Report produced by the participants of the workshop The Role of Science Education in a Changing world, 8-12/1 2018

In this chapter I present the story of a beginning elementary science teacher’s (Anna) science identity trajectory through time and across contexts. For the purpose of exploring Anna’s story I used various kinds of biographical data collected over a period of a year in Southern Europe. In conceptualizing identity as a lived experience, in this study I aimed to uncover through a life-history approach critical events that Anna had experienced through her participation as a science learner in various contexts and communities, elucidate the meaning that she had assigned to those events, and explore the ways in which those events impacted her science identity trajectory.

This theoretical paper attempts to make the case for the use of narrative (i.e., fictional written text) in science education as a way of making science meaningful, relevant and accessible to the public. Grounded in literature pointing to the value of narrative in supporting learning and the need to explore new modes of communicating science, this paper explores the use of narrative in science education. More specifically, in this paper we explore the question: What is narrative and what are its necessary components that may be of value to science education? In answering this question we propose a view of narrative and its necessary components, which permits narrative a role in science education, and, is in fact, the main contribution of this paper. Also, a range of narrative text examples are offered in the paper to make the case for a representation of fictional narrative in science. In order to address questions connected with the use of fictional narrative in science education, a research agenda based on perspectives on narrative implications for learning, is framed.

Our purpose in this paper is to shed light on the intricacies of designing and enacting curricular innovations aiming to enhance students’ interest in science and their understandings of STEM careers. We present the design and describe the implementation of a set of STEM career-oriented curriculum materials referred to as career-based scenarios. A review of the literature demonstrates that such curricular innovations create potentially useful mechanisms for broadening students’ awareness of STEM careers and facilitating more informed decisions. We present the design process we followed to create career-based scenarios and we provide a rationale for each design decision. We also provide a description of the implementation of one representative scenario in three school classrooms. We conclude with a reflective section in which we identify lessons learned from our experiences and broader implications for curricular innovations targeting students’ interests.