Search

For the purposes of this guideline, a diving accident is defined as an event that is either potentially life-threatening or hazardous to health as a result of a reduction in ambient pressure while diving or in other hyperbaric atmospheres with and without diving equipment. This national consensus-based guideline (development grade S2k) presents the current state of knowledge and recommendations on the diagnosis and treatment of diving accident victims. The treatment of a breath-hold diver as well as children and adolescents does not differ in principle.In this regard only unusual tiredness and itching without visible skin changes are mild symptoms.The key action statements: on-site 100% oxygen first aid treatment, immobilization/no unnecessary movement, fluid administration and telephone consultation with a diving medicine specialist are recommended.Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) remains unchanged as the established treatment in severe cases, as there are no therapeutic alternatives. The basic treatment scheme recommended for diving accidents is hyperbaric oxygenation at 280 kPa., Ein Tauchunfall im Sinne dieser Leitlinie ist ein potenziell lebensbedrohliches oder gesundheitsschädigendes Ereignis, hervorgerufen durch Abfall des Umgebungsdruckes beim Tauchen oder aus sonstiger hyperbarer Atmosphäre mit und ohne Tauchgerät. Diese nationale S2k-Leitlinie legt den aktuellen Stand der Erkenntnisse und der konsentierten Empfehlungen in der Diagnostik und Behandlung von Patienten nach Tauchunfällen dar. Die Behandlung von Apnoetauchern sowie Kindern und Jugendlichen unterscheidet sich prinzipiell nicht.Milde Symptome sind nur die auffällige Müdigkeit und ein Hautjucken ohne sichtbare Hautveränderungen.Wesentliche Bedeutung bei der Versorgung von Tauchunfällen hat die frühzeitige Atmung von 100%igem Sauerstoff. Weiterhin werden die Ruhiglagerung/keine unnötige Bewegung, eine moderate Flüssigkeitsgabe und eine Taucherärztliche Telefonberatung empfohlen.Die hyperbare Sauerstofftherapie (HBOT) ist bei schweren Dekompressionsunfällen unverändert ohne therapeutische Alternative. Als Behandlungsschema wird grundsätzlich eine HBOT bei 280 kPa empfohlen.

(Mitchell SJ, Bennett MH, Bryson P, Butler FK, Doolette DJ, Holm JR, Kot J, Lafère P. Pre-hospital management of decompression illness: expert review of key principles and controversies. Diving and Hyperbaric Medicine. 2018 March;48(1):45е.doi.10.28920/dhm48.1.45-55.) Guidelines for the pre-hospital management of decompression illness (DCI) had not been formally revised since the 2004 Divers Alert Network/Undersea and Hyperbaric Medical Society workshop held in Sydney, entitled "Management of mild or marginal decompression illness in remote locations." A contemporary review was initiated by the Divers Alert Network and undertaken by a multinational committee with members from Australasia, the USA and Europe. The process began with literature reviews by designated committee members on: the diagnosis of DCI; first aid strategies for DCI; remote triage of possible DCI victims by diving medicine experts; evacuation of DCI victims; effect of delay to recompression in DCI; pitfalls in management when DCI victims present at hospitals without diving medicine expertise and in-water recompression. This was followed by presentation of those reviews at a dedicated workshop at the 2017 UHMS Annual Scientific Meeting, discussion by registrants at that workshop and, finally, several committee meetings to formulate statements addressing points considered of prime importance to the management of DCI in the field. The committee placed particular emphasis on resolving controversies around the definition of "mild DCI" arising over 12 years of practical application of the 2004 workshop's findings, and on the controversial issue of in-water recompression. The guideline statements are promulgated in this paper. The full workshop proceedings are in preparation for publication., info:eu-repo/semantics/published

Guidelines for the pre-hospital management of decompression illness (DCI) had not been formally revised since the 2004 Divers Alert Network/Undersea and Hyperbaric Medical Society workshop held in Sydney, entitled "Management of mild or marginal decompression illness in remote locations". A contemporary review was initiated by the Diver's Alert Network and undertaken by a multinational committee with members from Australasia, the USA and Europe. The process began with literature reviews by designated committee members on: the diagnosis of DCI; first aid strategies for DCI; remote triage of possible DCI victims by diving medicine experts; evacuation of DCI victims; effect of delay to recompression in DCI; pitfalls in management when DCI victims present at hospitals without diving medicine expertise and in-water recompression. This was followed by presentation of those reviews at a dedicated workshop at the 2017 UHMS Annual Meeting, discussion by registrants at that workshop and finally several committee meetings to formulate statements addressing points considered of prime importance to the management of DCI in the field. The committee placed particular emphasis on resolving controversies around the definition of "mild DCI" arising over 12 years of practical application of the 2004 workshop's findings, and on the controversial issue of in-water recompression. The guideline statements are promulgated in this paper. The full workshop proceedings are in preparation for publication., info:eu-repo/semantics/published

Introduction: Diving often causes the formation of 'silent' bubbles upon decompression. If the bubble load is high, then the risk of decompression sickness (DCS) and the number of bubbles that could cross to the arterial circulation via a pulmonary shunt or patent foramen ovale increase. Bubbles can be monitored aurally, with Doppler ultrasound, or visually, with two-dimensional (2D) ultrasound imaging. Doppler grades and imaging grades can be compared with good agreement. Early 2D imaging units did not provide such comprehensive observations as Doppler, but advances in technology have allowed development of improved, portable, relatively inexpensive units. Most now employ harmonic technology; it was suggested that this could allow previously undetectable bubbles to be observed. Methods: This paper provides a review of current methods of bubble measurement and how new technology may be changing our perceptions of the potential relationship of these measurements to decompression illness. Secondly, 69 paired ultrasound images were made using conventional 2D ultrasound imaging and harmonic imaging. Images were graded on the Eftedal-Brubakk (EB) scale and the percentage agreement of the images calculated. The distribution of mismatched grades was analysed. Results: Fifty-four of the 69 paired images had matching grades. There was no significant difference in the distribution of high or low EB grades for the mismatched pairs. Conclusions: Given the good level of agreement between pairs observed, it seems unlikely that harmonic technology is responsible for any perceived increase in observed bubble loads, but it is probable that our increasing use of 2D ultrasound to assess dive profiles is changing our perception of 'normal' venous and arterial bubble loads. Methods to accurately investigate the load and size of bubbles developed will be helpful in the future in determining DCS risk., QC 20140428

SCOPUS: ar.j, info:eu-repo/semantics/published

SCOPUS: ar.j, info:eu-repo/semantics/published

A continuous infusion of air was delivered via a fine aortic cannula into the arterial circulation of 7 anesthetized dogs until no spinal cord function could be elicited by somatosensory evoked potentials. The animals were then rapidly perfusion-fixed and the spinal cords removed for histological examination. The appearance of the embolized cords differed substantially from eight spinal cords injured by fulminant decompression sickness (DCS). The embolized cords appeared essentially normal whereas the DCS cords featured extravascular, nonstaining, space-occupying lesions (SOLs) scattered throughout the cord, mainly in the white matter. Two spinal cords injured by DCS with a delayed onset (30 min from surfacing) appeared similar to the embolized cords. These findings are compatible with the hypothesis that two mechanisms are involved in the onset of spinal cord DCS. Fulminant disease is associated with SOLs, which are probably caused by the in situ evolution of a gas phase. Disease with a delayed onset is more likely to be caused by an ischemic mechanism, which in the acute phase is histologically indistinguishable from gas embolism. Keywords: Central nervous system; Spinal cord; Bubbles; Reprints; Dysbarism., Pub. in Undersea Biomedical Research, v16 n6 p439-451 1989.