Search

This PhD thesis is a qualitative comparative case study of industrial policy, skill formation, and job quality in the offshore wind turbine manufacturing industry in Denmark, Germany and England. It engages with the comparative industrial relations, skill formation, and job quality literature and proposes an alternative analytical and theoretical framework to the widely-used Varieties of Capitalisms approach (Hall and Soskice, 2001). This alternative framework is based on Marxist regulation school (Aglietta, 2015 [1979], Boyer, 2005), the marketisation framework (Doellgast and Greer, 2013), and previous studies of the offshore wind industry. This thesis makes another theoretical contribution by extending the concept investor capitalism (Useem, 1996) to describe the underlying logic identified in the design and implementation of offshore wind turbine industrial policy. This thesis also presents a number of important empirical findings, which suggest that theories that solely focus on supply side factors, miss half of the equation of what makes the “institutional foundations of the comparative advantage” of political economies and companies (Hall and Soskice, 2001). The way demand side policies incentivise investment decisions also plays an important part (cf. Aglietta, 2015 [1979]). This thesis shows how supply and demand side policies impact on skill formation and job quality in the offshore wind turbine industry. In more detail, this thesis identifies specific characteristics of funding for skill formation by industrial policy: ‘permanent’ in Denmark, ‘ad hoc’ in Germany, and ‘post-hoc’ in England. The nature of skill formation providers and public funding provisions impact on the character of participants in training programmes, favouring disadvantaged applicants in Germany in contrast to favouring high performing ones in England. The way skill formation was funded impacted on employer engagement in the institutionalisation of vocational education and training (VET) programmes - employers in Denmark supported the institutionalisation of emerging occupational profiles and corresponding VET, whereas in Germany they argued against it, presumably because they would incur the costs of dual vocational training once it was established. Short-term skills funding as part of ‘ad hoc’ and ‘post hoc’ industry policy had destabilising knock-on effects on skill formation providers in England as well as in Germany. This is a surprising finding, as both countries are usually characterised as examples of institutional complementarity and hence stability. This thesis shows that varying demand side policy impacts on work-based training and strengthens agencies. The combination of supply and demand side policies leads to a dynamic relationship between skills and job quality. Vocational skills may lead to stronger employment security, but not necessarily job security, and they are not a panacea against bad jobs. Active labour market policy (ALMP) training, when provided to directly employed unskilled workers during short-time work, and the lack of equivalent provisions for agency workers reinforced dualisation of the labour market.

The development and testing of a theoretical approach to homosexism is the main goal of the present research. The present research examined past homosexism findings and theories of racism. Racism theories were examined to determine whether constructs presented in these theories can apply to homosexism, aid in the understanding of homosexism, and in the development of a theoretical approach to homosexism. Review of past research suggested that the modern racism theory and the group conflict theory emphasized elements involved in racism, that are also involved in homosexism. For example, the group conflict theory suggests that perceptions of threat to a preferred state of affairs are an important element of the racist's belief system. Past homosexism researchers suggest that perceptions of threat, specifically perceptions of homosexual threat to traditional sex roles, are important elements in the homosexist's belief system. Modern racism theory suggests that perceived deviation from traditional American values is an important aspect of the racist's belief system. Deviation from values, specifically sexual values, has been found to be an important element in homosexist's belief system. Thus deviation and threat are constructs that apply to both homosexism and racism. Group conflict theory and modern racism theory were first considered according to their explanation of racism. Important constructs from both theories were then examined and applied to homosexism. Finally, two theoretical models based on these constructs were developed and tested through regression analyses. A combined model including constructs from both the modern racism and group conflict theories was also tested. Results suggested that the combined model was most appropriate. The combined model accounted for a significantly larger portion of explained variance than the 'modern homosexism' and 'homosexism group conflict' models. In addition, the homosexual deviation and acceptance of homosexuality threat measures were highly correlated. Results also suggested that female homosexists may be more concerned with homosexual deviation than acceptance of homosexuality threat; and that males may be more concerned with acceptance of homosexuality threat than homosexual deviation. Secondary goals of the present research included the examination of the relationship among the affective, behavioral, and cognitive components of homosexism; and the relationships among empathy, attitudes towards social change, and homosexism. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]