In my paper I will focus on the most efficient strategies for teaching Romanian as a Foreign Language in the Covid-19 context. My groups are composed of 20 students each, I team up with other 3 teachers and we devise our lessons so we cover general Romanian as well as Romanian for Specific Purposes. Our students study Romanian intensively, in 2 semesters, and at the end they follow their BSc/MA/doctoral programs. Students come from all over the world and their interests are extremely varied. This is one of the factors which can contribute to ensuring a high level of homogeneity of the intensive courses provided, as the teachers should – and do - have the skills and openness to: - collaborate closely in designing the course content and structure, - set up a methodological approach based on modern pedagogical principles, and - communicate quite closely throughout the study modules in order to adjust/amend course elements with a view to improving its quality. The permanent concern towards the optimization of the RFL course is generated by an effort of DCLM to contribute to an increase of visibility and prestige of the university – and, not less important – to its ranking among the best ones in Europe. In response to the Romanian legislation for higher education requirements, the course of RFL is now being under full process of being granted recognition by accreditation (after much debate took place at country level on the manner such a process should be organized). Hence an increased interest of the teaching team and DCLM management to carry out optimization of the RFL course in an appropriate way, by putting together various methods, among which getting feedback from all the actors in the instructional process is one of utmost significance. - take advantage of our current teaching potential – and even increase efforts by getting the staff members involved in the RFL course design and organization to do research in order to identify best ways of optimizing it, and share such information with fellow teachers – and this is precisely what we are trying to carry out in this study; - involve the teachers in the process of getting feedback, with a role of adding precious information and of triangulating the other data, of a more quantitative type; - monitor the students’ progress in learning and their way towards attaining professional success quite closely, and even publicly within our organization – and not only, by Testimonials, RFL Graduate Questionnaires and/or Interviews and so on; continue to design feedback obtaining ways and means/instruments and applying them periodically in order to optimize the RFL course permanently, as this is a cyclic amendable dynamic process. Historically speaking, RFL for Anul Pregatitor (Preparatory Year – PY) has got a long tradition with the POLITEHNICA University of Bucharest. The current teaching team consists of four teachers with qualifications in teaching Romanian as a foreign language and a PhD in Philology and/or Education Sciences; they have gained vast experience in teaching RFL. The UPB - PY welcomes foreign students from all over the world, viz. at least 10 different countries and three continents. Certainly, as pointed out in the literature - and as the case is in our context as well – there is ‘a great deal of variability between each student’s optimized learning zone’; this is determined of course by the following elements of difference: - different cultural backgrounds, with potential both linguistic and even cultural barriers, - different areas of skills – both hard and soft, and, - as our students are master and doctoral levels, age can also be an element of differentiation among them, too. The teaching of such a course as the RFL - PY to a variety of students has raised a range of problematic issues, due to the complexity of the situation. Some of the factors specific to the context, and that increase the challenge to be faced by the instructors are: - numerous groups of students, - variety of educational and cultural backgrounds of the students, - dates of students’ arrivals (due to visa obtaining problems in some cases), - difference between expectations and factual reality for some, - difference of mentality (‘I am the paying client, so I am the master here!’ – as a philosophy of some learners, at least at the beginning of the course), - logistics and organizational matters, related to the transfer of information and course input, on a daily basis, from one teacher to the next, - pace of reflection vs change, which is different for each teacher, as they are welldefined personalities, with already formed teaching principles. The main objectives of the course are to help the students to: - use the language in both a general and an academic context, - be able to develop all fours skills (reading, speaking, listening, writing), and - adopt a positive, intercultural attitude towards the other members of the team. The level aimed for the students to reach at the end of course is B2 - CEFR. The expectations of the factors involved in ordering the course, namely: the Ministry of Education of Romania, the UPB, the students themselves and the teachers of technical disciplines who are going to supervise the master and doctoral candidates dissertations and/or theses, are that by the end of the course the students have attained this level and they would have become independent learners who will be able to continue to study within the Romanian context. Awareness of the limitations and challenges of the given context is a must. Here are some of the issues to be faced: - as students never arrive at the same time, we cannot form a single homogenous group, but after the enrolment period has been closed, students are split into two or more groups, based on the time of their arrival and the level attained during the first weeks of tuition; - groups are usually large, and, considering that students come from very different cultural backgrounds, the integration stage may take long at the beginning; - the students’ low level of English that sometimes can hamper communication in class; - due to the fact that there are quite few teaching resources for the teaching – evaluation of RFL, teachers always have to adapt materials, design their own course materials and permanently (re)adjust them to the needs of the students; - teaching multicultural classes comes along with numerous challenges. Teachers need to consequently adapt materials, level their language to the students’ level and avoid sensitive topics for discussion in class. It is also of utmost importance for the teacher to be familiar with the cultural background of the students as this will ease the integration process. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]