As the most-discussed topic of the recent period, the world's economic crisis has attracted the attention of most scholars, analysts, and politicians who try to find a quick solution for a problem generated during the last couple of decades. While some believe that the current crisis is just a descending curve of the life cycle of the world economy, something that is far from curious and unpredictable, others, such as the influential George Soros, predict an end of the current economic system. Where does the current crisis stand and what is a solution for it? The aim of my paper is to first analyse the pros and cons of the 'free market' approach to development, then to decide whether the current crisis is as dangerous as some predict, and finally to provide the solution to it. In the first part of the paper, since the free market approach is theoretically backed by neoliberalism, I first define this theory and explain some of the policies associated with it. Following that, I focus mainly on free trade as a main feature of structural adjustment programs and its significance as a factor for development. Later in the paper, I present the advantages and disadvantages of the free market approach (with a focus on free trade). Finally, I conclude by examining whether this approach is useful for the development processes of the developing countries and if it a way to solve the current crisis. In the second part of my paper, I explain why I believe protectionism can only make the crisis worse instead of solving the problem, and I conclude that the continuation of the American Open Door policy as a strategy is the best way to overcome the current global economic crisis. Being the most discussed topic in the last period, the world's economic crisis attracted the attention of most scholars, analysts, and politicians who try to find a quick solution for a problem generated during the last couple of decades. On one hand some believe that the current crisis is just a descending curve of the life cycle of the world economy, something that is far from curious and unpredictable. On the other hand, however, there are those, among whom is the influential George Soros, who go very far and predict an end of the current economic system. Where does the current crisis stand and what is a solution for it? The aim of this paper is to first analyze the pros and cons of 'free market' approach to development, then decide whether the current crisis is as dangerous as some predict, and finally provide the solution to it. In the first part of the paper, since the free market approach is theoretically backed by neoliberalism, I will first define this theory and explain some of the policies that go along with it. Following that, I will focus mainly on free trade as a main feature of structural adjustment programs and its significance as a factor for development. Later in the paper I will present the advantages and disadvantages of free market approach (with a focus on free trade) to development. Finally, I will conclude whether this approach is useful for the development processes of the developing countries. "The essence of the neo-liberal position on international commerce is the proposition that economic growth will be most rapid when the movement of goods, services and capital is unimpeded by government regulations". In another words, the neo-liberal argument states that in order for governments to pursue economic growth it is necessary for them to adopt free trade which would mean that the movement of goods, services and capital over boundaries will be unregulated. More broadly, free trade is just a part of what is known as structural adjustment which rates in construction activity during this period. In addition, the sector of services continues to provide the primary contribution to economic growth at home. The positive developments in domestic production have been also evidenced by the increase of economic tendency indicator, derived from the business and consumer opinions, and by the increased number in employed persons. In annual terms, unemployment rate fell by 1.5 percent to 12.62 percent, being mainly triggered by the increase in the average number of employed persons in the private agricultural sector. The Albanian economy will mainly be affected by the global economic downturn through a decline in export demand, investment, remittances, and, as mentioned, less availability of credit. Export demand might in particular hurt the re-exporting industry in shoes and clothing but other sectors will also be affected. Meanwhile, remittances have been key to boost household incomes and have been particularly important as a safeguard for the poorest households. embodies the neoclassical theory. Structural adjustment aims at making both the state and the market more efficient in order to help them accelerate growth which ultimately leads to development. Apart from free trade, structural adjustment aims at putting the market at center stage, gives the state a secondary role in development, and "puts its faith in the potential of unfettered individual initiatives, creativity, and ingenuity. Concrete reforms that states need to undertake in order for structural adjustment to achieve its goals are: fiscal austerity (reduction in government spending), privatization (private ownership of state-owned companies), trade liberalization (elimination of qualitative and quantitative restrictions on imports, thus allowing a free flow of goods, services, and capital across national borders), currency devaluation (gives the producers of export goods an incentive to increase production), abolition of marketing boards (enables producers obtain better prices on their sales), and retrenchment and deregulation (frees up the market and reduces the inhibitions on private entrepreneurs). "Free market" theory "contains two elements: a set of arguments demonstration that trade will maximize welfare in a stable fashion, and another set laying out the conditions that must be brought into existence to enable this to occur". According to "free market" theory, the only function of the government is to ensure that the benefits that arrive from free trade are secured. Brett states four main functions of the government which pursues "free market" approach to development. First of all, the government needs to make sure that foreign competitors and domestic producers have equal access to domestic markets. Second, the government must not organize the payments in a way that it will favor their domestic competitors. Third, governments need to ensure the provision of credit to countries that are in deficit. And fourth, it is the obligation of the government to put in place domestic policies which transform the deficit into surplus. Thus, having in mind these four functions of the government incorporated in the "free market" approach it can be clearly concluded that the government has a very limited function and by no means has rights to use protection mechanism as a way to favor domestic production. One of the examples that Brett uses with the aim to present the advantages of "free market" approach to development is in relations the above mentioned currency devaluation. Namely, the exchange rate of a country will tend to fall in the case where the balance of payments is in deficit which causes the central bank to lose its result. On the other hand, the exchange rate rises when the balance of payments is in surplus and the central bank is accumulating reserves. In the case when the balance of payments is in deficit, central banks tend to borrow money. The good thing about borrowing is the fact that it will enable the government to avoid having to impose different more direct controls over trade or money, or in the same time might enable it to defeat the speculators. However, the borrowing by the government is considered to be wrong by "free market" theorists who argue that it would be better if instead of borrowing money in order to defend an 'overvalued' exchange rate the central bank devaluates the currency and the government undergoes domestic economic policies which would aim at making home production more competitive. In addition, in the case when a country's balance of payments is in deficit, that country needs to find a way to cut imports and to increase exports. A way to do it is through governmental intervention through protection of the domestic market or by providing subsidies to exporters. However, Brett argues, government intervention is not useful since the market itself will deal with the balance of payments, one of the main claims by "free market" approach to development. Sometimes theory does not correlate with practice, but for the purpose of this paper I will mainly focus on the theoretical part. Namely, in the following part of the paper I will mainly focus on free trade as a part of the free market approach to development, while in the final part through presenting the advantages and weaknesses of the free market approach to development I will conclude whether this approach is efficient or not. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]