Search

How can organizations become responsive in a meaningful way to events which may occur way outside the boundaries of their own lifespan? We are living in a time of considerable climate crisis. The challenges presented by the Anthropocene are such that a piecemeal, incremental approach to addressing them will not be sufficient. In order to 'become active' and effect the radical change required, organizational processes need to be situated in relation to flows of activities that stretch across the enormity of 'Earth time'. We will re-imagine the possibilities of dialogically affirmative organization in creating engagement, hope, and solidarity by proposing a novel organizational approach that refigures the dialogical basis of 'thinking in time' in relation to the Earth System. We build on the work of both Serres and Jarry to explore the conditions under which a dialogue between the temporalities of organizations and Earth time might be possible. We make four contributions. First, we draw a novel link between the concern with dialogical organization and wider issues around sustainability and the capacity of organizations to engage with the magnitude of entering the Anthropocene. Second, we present a series of conceptual experiments through which organizational time can be related to Earth time and show how duration -- that time that makes 'us' -- can be extended towards broader time 'outside us', and for this reason, we suggest that organizations should have a "Board of Indirectors", a board of human and non-human actors that reflect on the long-term impact of organizations on the Earth System. We make a series of practical recommendations that are intended, in the spirit of 'pataphysics, as 'imaginary solutions' that provoke thought beyond its current grounding in established business doxa. Finally, we sketch out how dialogues with 'ethernity' begin to coalesce as a 'cybernetic ethics'. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper reconceptualises public value for the era of the Anthropocene and suggests that the best site for organizing for the creation of public value is the City. Existing understandings of public value are human-centric and only consider economic values. If public value is to be fit for the world of the Anthropocene and the climate crisis, local ecologies and other non-human actors need to be included as beneficiaries of public value creation. Including these new, non-human, actors facilitates a new understanding of what is value to focus on sustainability and resilience in the local natural ecosystem. The paper argues that City leadership and governance are best placed to both understand the needs of the local ecology and to produce the networks to create value for it. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]