Search

We hereby propose to identify the limits where it can be assessed as just cause of the revocation of a mandate contract, as it is stipulated by the provisions of art. 1431, paragraph (4) from Law no. 31/1990, being known that the revocation without just cause of the mandatory (administrator/director of the Board of Directors) entitles him/her to payment of damages. The analysis starts from jurisprudence solutions and it has been necessary as the problem has been treated differently in practice, this collocation "just cause" being interpreted either restrictively, by reporting only to the mandatory, or extensively, by reporting to the subjective--objective resorts of the mandator. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study is aimed at analyzing the cases and conditions in which the interception of conversations is actually authorized, as per Law no. 51/1991. At the same time the manner in which the provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure interfere with this Law and with Law no. 535/2004 is presented on legal grounds with regards to issuing the mandate. This analysis studies the aspects of compatibility between the provisions of the present Law and the Convention for Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, i.e. the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The commercial intermediation is a complex juridical operation which includes a different number of juridical relationships that takes place between contractual partners either on a national or international level. These partners bare different naming due to their different set of rights and obligations set forth by the law or by the parties, and it is from this that the classification of the intermediation can be set forth. The commercial intermediation represents the activity that one person executes either in the name and on behalf of another person, or using its own name but on behalf of another person, or, finally, using its own name but on behalf of acting towards a common goal with the person who mandated her (the principal), in relation with who it is either a proxy or an independent intermediary, only negotiating or both negotiating and binding the principal. The purpose of the paper is to strictly define and set in order the various variations of the juridical operation that is the commercial intermediation, presented both in the light of the actual legal framework and also by reference to the New Civil Code. Also, the purpose is to highlight and systematize the contractual relationships from which the parties involved in a commercial intermediary operation may choose and the rights and obligations specific to each contract. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]