Search

Since its first publication in 1986, the Organized/Disorganized typology of sexual homicide of the FBI has been the object of many criticisms. Recently, Canter, Alison, Alison, and Wentink (2004) even suggested that the dichotomy was not a valid one. Despite its opponents, a number of studies over the years have identified typologies similar to the dichotomous model of the FBI (Beauregard & Proulx, 2002; Beech, Robertson, & Clarke, 2001; Beech, Fisher, & Ward, 2005; Clarke & Carter, 1999; Folino, 2000; Kocsis, 1999; Keppel & Walter, 1999; Meloy, 2000; Ressler, Burgess, & Douglas, 1988; Revitch & Schlesinger, 1981). However, most of these typologies have neglected to consider situational factors that can influence the offending process as well as the crime scene characteristics. Also, they have failed to address the dynamic nature of the offending process. Hence, the concept of crime script has been suggested to reflect the dynamic nature of offending as well as the influence of context. Therefore, the aim of the current study was to identify scripts of sexual homicide based on corresponding features from the Organized/Disorganized model and also situational/contextual factors. Data on 85 sexual murderers was submitted to a combination of Multiple Correspondence and Hierarchical Cluster Analyses. Results will be discussed as to the differences/similarities with previous typologies, especially the Organized/Disorganized model. Finally, problems with a taxonomic approach for the study of the offending process will be highlighted and the use of scripts for criminal profiling will be suggested. ..PAT.-Unpublished Manuscript [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]