Search

The article offers the authors' insights on how to calculate binary and tertiary value combinations. The authors explain that wave interference in quantum theory is cancelled while in formal axiology, it is transposed. They mention the assignment of an amplitude number for each of the three kinds of values which are finite, infinite, and non-denumerably infinite. They add that the length of a vector indicates value.

The article discusses aspects of the duality of particle and wave in the quantum theory in the interpretation of nature. It says that quantum theory refers to the interchangeability of waves and particles with two versions such as one by Austrian physicist Erwin Schrödinger and one by German physicist Werner Heisenberg. It mentions that quantum theory does not solve the conflict on the duality of wave and particle, since matter can be seen as a particle or as a wave.

The article presents Chapter Seven of the book "Formal Axiology & Its Critics," edited by Rem B. Edwards. It explores the development of the finitistic quantum wave model value calculus by president Mark A. Moore of the Robert S. Hartman Institute for Formal and Applied Axiology. It also discusses several serious critical flaws in transfinite value calculus including the axiom, the value distinctions between good or bad objects, and the numerical value for all eighteen binary combinations.

The article discusses the different indicator for the cardinality of concepts of value which is utilized by author Frank Forrest than Robert Hartman. It says that Hartman claimed three types of concepts including analytic, singular, and formal which correspond to types of value such as systemic and intrinsic value. It mentions that each type of value or concept can also be disvalued or valued, in which their blending yields 18 combinations. It adds that the quantum wave method yields 18 rankings

The article discusses axiology, which provides method for the relative goodness or badness of a particular value relations. It says that the analysis of Frank Forrest distinguishes eight cardinalities which are based on the 18 binary value combinations. It mentions that four of the cardinalities are transpositions while the other four are compositions. It adds that the quantum wave method offers 18 different relations of better than and worse than, in which the vector length measures the value.

The article presents the authors' insights on the use of principles of wave mechanics to measure values. The authors say that the dual nature of quantum mechanics requires consciousness. They mention a method of computing quantum wave vectors based on the standard method, the Pythagorean Theorem as well as the direct application of the principles to value and valuation.

The article focuses on understanding how waves are measured. It says that measuring waves are done in three ways such as determining the wave amplitude or the height of the wave and calculating the period frequency or the time it takes the wave to complete a cycle. It mentions that waves do not have energy but probability in quantum theory which is equal to squared amplitude. It adds that the phases of the waves are compared to understand what happens when two waves meet.

The article presents the average value of sets of subsets in which gives variety of valuations and provide a confirmation on the vital principle that covers value judgment which cannot be made without determining the details, which is also consistent with the principles of quantum mechanics.

The article presents the ordinal ranking of values through the use of quantum wave model.

The article focuses on the analytic concepts of Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle which is the cornerstone of Quantum theory. It relates the book "The Emperor's New Mind," by Roger Penrose which indicates that the consideration of the possibility of quantum activity is never uncertain. Moreover, similarity of the Uncertainty Principle to the relation of intension to extension of analytic also discussed.

The article focuses on the similarities of quantum and value theories which both require that meanings be either in phase or out of phase and either have composition or transposition.

The article focuses on the direct comparison between value theory, which involves what people desire, and quantum theory, which involves atoms.