Search

The sources cited within this issue are presented including "Belief and Knowledge," by Robert Ackermann, "Concepts of Epistemic Justification," by Jonathan Alston, and "A Contextualist Theory of Epistemic Justification," by David B. Annis.

Chapter 7 of the book "Theory of Knowledge," 2nd edition, by Keith Lehrer is presented. It explores the creation of a theory that may convert personal justification into defeated justification that does not depend on error. It examines the argument that undefeated justification is a personal justification which is not based in error. It also discusses the concept of ultra justification.

Chapter 6 of the book "Theory of Knowledge," 2nd edition, by Keith Lehrer is presented. It explores concepts of coherence with a background system and acceptance system, and personal justification. It examines the generation of justification through acceptance system and the separate systems that create conflict between knowledge and belief.

Chapter 5 of the book "Theory of Knowledge," 2nd edition, by Keith Lehrer is presented. It explores the alternative theory of justification, the concept of coherence theory and the schema for a coherence theory of justification. It examines the three major reasons for the rejection of the explanatory coherence theory of justification.

Chapter 4 of the book "Theory of Knowledge," 2nd edition, by Keith Lehrer is presented. It examines the attributes and disadvantages of fallible foundationalism. It explores the perceptual belief and independent information, justification and innocent belief. It highlights the concept of semantic information and the argumentation of self-justification and necessary truth.

The article offers the author's insights on the role of liberal state in value education. He mentions that liberalism requires state neutrality on the values its citizen should adopt, values autonomy, and seek to further liberal values in accordance with liberal principles. He adds that various versions of liberal theory seem to have difficulfy finding justification for supporting values and virtues in which value education may remain the weakness of liberal theory.