Search

Li Xie,1 Ehsan Vaghefi,1,2 Song Yang,1 David Han,1,2 John Marshall,3 David Squirrell1,4 1Toku Eyes Limited, Auckland, New Zealand; 2School of Optometry and Vision Science, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand; 3Institute of Ophthalmology, UCL, London, UK; 4Department of Ophthalmology, Auckland District Health Board, Auckland, New ZealandCorrespondence: Ehsan Vaghefi, Tel +6493737599, Email e.vaghefi@auckland.ac.nzPurpose: To create an ensemble of Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), capable of detecting and stratifying the risk of progressive age-related macular degeneration (AMD) from retinal photographs.Design: Retrospective cohort study.Methods: Three individual CNNs are trained to accurately detect 1) advanced AMD, 2) drusen size and 3) the presence or otherwise of pigmentary abnormalities, from macular centered retinal images were developed. The CNNs were then arranged in a “cascading” architecture to calculate the Age-related Eye Disease Study (AREDS) Simplified 5-level risk Severity score (Risk Score 0 – Risk Score 4), for test images. The process was repeated creating a simplified binary “low risk” (Scores 0– 2) and “high risk” (Risk Score 3– 4) classification.Participants: There were a total of 188,006 images, of which 118,254 images were deemed gradable, representing 4591 patients, from the AREDS1 dataset. The gradable images were split into 50%/25%/25% ratios for training, validation and test purposes.Main Outcome Measures: The ability of the ensemble of CNNs using retinal images to predict an individual’s risk of experiencing progression of their AMD based on the AREDS 5-step Simplified Severity Scale.Results: When assessed against the 5-step Simplified Severity Scale, the results generated by the ensemble of CNN’s achieved an accuracy of 80.43% (quadratic kappa 0.870). When assessed against a simplified binary (Low Risk/High Risk) classification, an accuracy of 98.08%, sensitivity of ≥ 85% and specificity of ≥ 99%

OBJECTIVES To identify whether the outcomes of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD), diabetic macular oedema (DMO) and retinal vein occlusion (RVO) in routine clinical practice have changed over time. METHODS We analysed 12-month outcomes in treatment-naïve eyes that started aflibercept or ranibizumab for nAMD (3802 eyes), DMO (975 eyes), Branch RVO (BRVO, 357 eyes), Central RVO (CRVO, 371 eyes) and Hemi-RVO (HRVO, 54 eyes) from 2015 and 2019 tracked in the prospectively designed observational Fight Retinal Blindness! Registry. RESULTS The mean VA change at 12-month for each year between 2015 and 2019 remained stable or otherwise showed no discernible trends over time in eyes with nAMD (+3.3 to +6 letters), DMO (+3.6 to +6.7 letters) and RVO (+10.3 to +11.7 letters for BRVO, +5.9 to +17.7 letters for CRVO and 10.2 to 20.7 letters for HRVO). The median number of VEGF-inhibitor injections in eyes that completed 12-month follow-up also remained stable at 8-9 for nAMD, 6-7 for DMO, 7-9 for RVO. Fewer eyes (

PURPOSE Compare the 3-year outcomes of ranibizumab versus aflibercept in eyes with diabetic macular edema in daily practice. METHODS This was a retrospective analysis of naive diabetic macular edema eyes starting intravitreal injections of ranibizumab (0.5 mg) or aflibercept (2 mg) from January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2017 that were collected in the Fight Retinal Blindness! Registry. RESULTS We identified 534 eyes (ranibizumab-267 and aflibercept-267) of 402 patients. The adjusted mean (95% confidence interval) visual acuity change of +1.3 (-0.1 to 4.2) letters in the ranibizumab group and +2.4 (-0.2 to 5.1) letters (P = 0.001) in the aflibercept group at 3 years was not clinically different. However, the adjusted mean CST change seemed to remain significantly different throughout the 3-year period with higher reductions in favor of aflibercept (-87.8 [-108.3 to -67.4] µm for ranibizumab vs. -114.4 [-134.4 to -94.3] for aflibercept; P < 0.01). When baseline visual impairment was moderate (visual acuity ≤68 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters), we found a faster improvement in visual acuity in eyes treated with aflibercept up until 18 months of treatment than eyes treated with ranibizumab, which then stayed similar until 36 months of treatment, whereas there was no apparent difference when baseline visual impairment was mild (visual acuity ≥69 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters). The rate of serious adverse events was low. CONCLUSION Aflibercept and ranibizumab were both effective and safe for diabetic macular edema over 3 years.

PURPOSE The main purpose of the study was to report the estimated incidence, cumulative rate, risk factors and outcomes of submacular haemorrhage (SMH) with loss of vision in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) receiving intravitreal injections (IVT) of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitor in routine clinical practice. METHODS Retrospective analysis of treatment-naïve eyes receiving IVTs of VEGF inhibitors (ranibizumab, aflibercept or bevacizumab) for nAMD from 1 January 2010 to 31 December 2020 that were tracked the Fight Retinal Blindness! registry. Estimated incidence, cumulative rate and hazard ratios (HR) of SMH with loss of vision during treatment were measured using the Poisson regression, Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Cox proportional hazard models. RESULTS We identified 7642 eyes (6425 patients) with a total of 135 095 IVT over a 10-year period. One hundred five eyes developed SMH with loss of vision with a rate of 1 per 1283 injections (0.08% 95% confidence interval [95% CI] [0.06; 0.09]). The estimated incidence [95% CI] was 4.6 [3.8; 5.7] SMH with loss of vision per year per 1000 treated patients during the study. The cumulative [95% CI] rate of SMH per patient did not increase significantly with each successive injection (p = 0.947). SMH cases had a mean VA drop of around 6 lines at diagnosis, which then improved moderately to a 4-line loss at 1 year. CONCLUSIONS Submacular haemorrhage (SMH) with loss of vision is an uncommon complication that can occur at any time in eyes treated for nAMD in routine clinical practice, with only limited recovery of vision 1 year later.