Search

Patients diagnosed with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) have a poor prognosis with survival ranging 2–3 years. The prevalence of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) amplification is approximately 3–4% in mCRC and increases up to 8% in patients with KRAS/NRAS/BRAF wild-type (WT) CRC tumors. Tucatinib is a highly selective HER2-directed tyrosine kinase inhibitor that, in combination with trastuzumab, has demonstrated clinically meaningful activity in patients with chemotherapy-refractory, HER2-positive (HER2+), RAS WT mCRC in the MOUNTAINEER trial. The MOUNTAINEER-03 phase III trial is designed to investigate the efficacy and safety of first-line tucatinib in combination with trastuzumab and modified FOLFOX6 (mFOLFOX6) versus standard of care (mFOLFOX6 plus bevacizumab or cetuximab) in patients with untreated HER2+, RAS WT locally advanced unresectable or mCRC. MOUNTAINEER-03 will include two arms of approximately 400 patients randomized 1:1 to either treatment arm. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival per RECIST v1.1 by blinded independent central review (BICR). Key secondary endpoints are overall survival and confirmed objective response rate (according to RECIST v1.1 per BICR). Safety assessments will include surveillance and recording of adverse events, physical examination findings, vital signs, cardiac assessments, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, concomitant medications, and laboratory tests. Clinical trial registration: NCT05253651 (ClinicalTrials.gov). Plain Language Summary Colorectal cancer is a common and leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide. Patients who have colorectal cancer that has spread to other parts of the body (metastasized) only live for 2 to 3 years after their diagnosis. Tucatinib is a medicine that has shown promising anti-tumor activity when it is given in combination with trastuzumab in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer that is of a certain type, called HER2-positive. HER2 is a protein that, when present in amounts above normal in cancer cells, can cause them to grow more and survive longer. The MOUNTAINEER-03 study is a trial in progress of patients with HER2-positive metastatic colorectal cancer. In this trial, researchers are investigating if tucatinib in combination with trastuzumab and chemotherapy increases the length of time patients live before their cancer grows or spreads (also called progression-free survival) and how long a person is alive after the start of treatment (also called overall survival) compared to standard of care treatment (chemotherapy combination). Researchers are also investigating whether this new tucatinib combination treatment makes the colorectal cancer shrink and stop spreading and if it is safe to use in patients with HER2-positive metastatic colorectal cancer. If the findings of the MOUNTAINEER-03 phase III trial are positive, the tucatinib combination treatment could be a new option for the first-line treatment of a patient population with a high unmet medical need. This paper describes the study design of the MOUNTAINEER-03 trial. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A profound understanding of the binding dynamics of drugs with plasma proteins is highly important as it determines its therapeutical potential. Herein, we have investigated the molecular interaction of Tucatinib (TUC), a novel, primitive and highly selective drug for treatment of HER2+ advanced unresectable breast cancer, with bovine serum albumin (BSA) using multi‐pronged spectroscopic techniques and molecular docking. TUC considerably quenched the intrinsic fluorescence of BSA via static quenching mechanism, and it binds to the hydrophobic cleft of subdomain IIA of BSA with a moderate binding affinity. The thermodynamic analysis revealed the major interplay of van der Waals forces and hydrogen bonding interactions in stabilising the binding. The Förster distance 'r' signifies feasible energy transfer between BSA and TUC. The conformational analyses indicate some alterations in the protein secondary structure as a consequence of some changes in the protein polar environment due to complex formation. The experimental results are supported by docking analyses. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Tucatinib (TUC), a HER2-directed tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is the first targeted drug demonstrating intracranial efficacy and significantly prolonged survival in metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer (BC) patients with brain metastases. Current treatments for brain metastases often include radiotherapy, but little is known about the effects of combination treatment with TUC. Therefore, we examined the combined effects of irradiation and TUC in human HER2-overexpressing BC, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and colorectal cancer (CRC) cell lines. For the latter two, a standard therapy successfully targeting HER2 is yet to be established. Methods Nine HER2-overexpressing (BC: BT474, ZR7530, HCC1954; CRC: LS411N, DLD1, COLO201; NSCLC: DV90, NCI-H1781) and three control cell lines (BC: MCF7, HCC38; NSCLC: NCI-H2030) were examined. WST-1 assay (metabolic activity), BrdU ELISA (proliferation), γH2AX assay (DNA double-strand breaks (DSB), Annexin V assay (apoptosis), and clonogenic assay (clonogenicity) were performed after treatment with TUC and/or irradiation (IR). The relevance of the treatment sequence was analyzed exemplarily. Results In BC, combinatorial treatment with TUC and IR significantly decreased metabolic activity, cell proliferation, clonogenicity and enhanced apoptotis compared to IR alone, whereby cell line-specific differences occurred. In the PI3KCA-mutated HCC1954 cell line, addition of alpelisib (ALP) further decreased clonogenicity. TUC delayed the repair of IR-induced DNA damage but did not induce DSB itself. Investigation of treatment sequence indicated a benefit of IR before TUC versus IR after TUC. Also in CRC and NSCLC, the combination led to a stronger inhibition of metabolic activity, proliferation, and clonogenic survival (only in NSCLC) than IR alone, whereby about 10-fold higher concentrations of TUC had to be applied than in BC to induce significant changes. Conclusion Our data indicate that combination of TUC and IR could be more effective than single treatment strategies for BC. Thereby, treatment sequence seems to be an important factor. The lower sensitivity to TUC in NSCLC and particularly in CRC (compared to BC) implicates, that tumor promotion there might be less HER2-related. Combination with inhibitors of other driver mutations may aid in overcoming partial TUC resistance. These findings are of high relevance to improve long-time prognosis especially in brain-metastasized situations given the intracranial activity of TUC.

Background: Tucatinib (TUC), a HER2-directed tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is the first targeted drug demonstrating intracranial efficacy and significantly prolonged survival in metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer (BC) patients with brain metastases. Current treatments for brain metastases often include radiotherapy, but little is known about the effects of combination treatment with TUC. Therefore, we examined the combined effects of irradiation and TUC in human HER2-overexpressing BC, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and colorectal cancer (CRC) cell lines. For the latter two, a standard therapy successfully targeting HER2 is yet to be established. Methods: Nine HER2-overexpressing (BC: BT474, ZR7530, HCC1954; CRC: LS411N, DLD1, COLO201; NSCLC: DV90, NCI-H1781) and three control cell lines (BC: MCF7, HCC38; NSCLC: NCI-H2030) were examined. WST-1 assay (metabolic activity), BrdU ELISA (proliferation), γH2AX assay (DNA double-strand breaks (DSB), Annexin V assay (apoptosis), and clonogenic assay (clonogenicity) were performed after treatment with TUC and/or irradiation (IR). The relevance of the treatment sequence was analyzed exemplarily. Results: In BC, combinatorial treatment with TUC and IR significantly decreased metabolic activity, cell proliferation, clonogenicity and enhanced apoptotis compared to IR alone, whereby cell line-specific differences occurred. In the PI3KCA-mutated HCC1954 cell line, addition of alpelisib (ALP) further decreased clonogenicity. TUC delayed the repair of IR-induced DNA damage but did not induce DSB itself. Investigation of treatment sequence indicated a benefit of IR before TUC versus IR after TUC. Also in CRC and NSCLC, the combination led to a stronger inhibition of metabolic activity, proliferation, and clonogenic survival (only in NSCLC) than IR alone, whereby about 10-fold higher concentrations of TUC had to be applied than in BC to induce significant changes. Conclusion: Our data indicate that combination of TUC and IR could be more effective than single treatment strategies for BC. Thereby, treatment sequence seems to be an important factor. The lower sensitivity to TUC in NSCLC and particularly in CRC (compared to BC) implicates, that tumor promotion there might be less HER2-related. Combination with inhibitors of other driver mutations may aid in overcoming partial TUC resistance. These findings are of high relevance to improve long-time prognosis especially in brain-metastasized situations given the intracranial activity of TUC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Opinion statement: Targeted treatment strategies are available for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)–positive (amplified and/or overexpressed) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), and HER2 testing is indicated in patients with mCRC. At present, standard of care first-line treatment for those with HER2-positive mCRC remains chemotherapy in combination with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors or bevacizumab, depending on RAS/BRAF mutational status and tumor sidedness. HER2-targeted agents should be considered for those with RAS/BRAF wild-type disease in subsequent-line treatment and in first-line treatment for patients not appropriate for intensive therapy. While the choice of anti-HER2 therapy is empiric given lack of head-to-head comparisons, the combination of trastuzumab plus tucatinib has received FDA accelerated approval for use in this setting and is generally the authors' preference. Trastuzumab plus lapatinib, trastuzumab plus pertuzumab, and trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) also have evidence of efficacy in this setting. As T-DXd has demonstrated activity following treatment with other HER2-targeted regimens and carries an increased risk of high-grade toxicities, the authors favor reserving it for use after progression on prior anti-HER2 therapy. HER2-targeted therapies that inhibit signal transduction appear to have limited activity in those with RAS mutations, including trastuzumab-containing regimens. However, the antibody drug conjugate T-DXd has some data showing efficacy in this setting, and the authors would consider T-DXd in subsequent-line therapy for HER2-positive, RAS-mutated mCRC. Several areas of uncertainty remain regarding how to best utilize HER2-targeted therapies in mCRC. These include the optimal sequence of anti-HER2 therapies with chemotherapy and anti-EGFR therapies, the optimal combination partners for anti-HER2 therapies, and the incorporation of predictive biomarkers to guide use of anti-HER2 therapies. Results of ongoing studies may thus alter the treatment paradigm above in the coming years. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Human papillomaviruses (HPVs) are a major cause of cancer. While surgical intervention remains effective for a majority of HPV-caused cancers, the urgent need for medical treatments targeting HPV-infected cells persists. The pivotal early genes E6 and E7, which are under the control of the viral genome's long control region (LCR), play a crucial role in infection and HPV-induced oncogenesis, aswell as immune evasion. In this study, proteomic analysis of endosomes uncovered the cointernalization of ErbB2 receptor tyrosine kinase, also called HER2/neu, with HPV16 particles from the plasma membrane. Although ErbB2 overexpression has been associated with cervical cancer, its influence on HPV infection stages was previously unknown. Therefore, we investigated the role of ErbB2 in HPV infection, focusing on HPV16. Through siRNA-mediated knockdown and pharmacological inhibition studies, we found that HPV16 entry is independent of ErbB2. Instead, our signal transduction and promoter assays unveiled a concentration- and activationdependent regulatory role of ErbB2 on the HPV16 LCR by supporting viral promoter activity. We also found that ErbB2's nuclear localization signal was not essential for LCR activity, but rather the cellular ErbB2 protein level and activation status that were inhibited by tucatinib and CP-724714. These ErbB2-specific tyrosine kinase inhibitors as well as ErbB2 depletion significantly influenced the downstream Akt and ERK signaling pathways and LCR activity. Experiments encompassing lowrisk HPV11 and high-risk HPV18 LCRs uncovered, beyond HPV16, the importance of ErbB2 in the general regulation of the HPV early promoter. Expanding our investigation to directly assess the impact of ErbB2 on viral gene expression, quantitative analysis of E6 and E7 transcript levels in HPV16 and HPV18 transformed cell lines unveiled a noteworthy decrease in oncogene expression following ErbB2 depletion, concomitant with the downregulation of Akt and ERK signaling pathways. In light of these findings, we propose that ErbB2 holds promise as potential target for treating HPV infections and HPV-associated malignancies by silencing viral gene expression. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Advancements in monoclonal antibodies, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and antibody drug conjugates (ADCs) have notably enhanced outcomes for metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer patients. Despite the expanding treatment options and clinical complexities, determining the optimal sequence of HER2-targeted therapies remains partly uncertain, influenced by various factors. Methods: To refine HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer management, particularly regarding tucatinib's position, a Steering Committee of leading oncologists in breast cancer care devised a panel of statements via a Delphi approach, focusing on five key topics: general clinical management, therapeutic approaches for patients with HER2-positive breast cancer and brain metastases, treatment sequence, and tucatinib's safety and efficacy. Results: A total of 29 statements were deliberated, with strong consensus achieved for most. However, no consensus emerged regarding the management of brain progression alongside stable extracranial disease: 48 % advocated for switching to tucatinib, while 53 % favored a stereotactic brain radiotherapy (SBRT) approach if feasible. Conclusion: The unanimous consensus attained in this Delphi panel, particularly regarding tucatinib's efficacy and safety, underscores oncologists' recognition of its clinical significance based on existing trial data. These findings align closely with current literature, shedding light on areas necessitating further investigation, not thoroughly explored in prior studies. Moreover, the results underscore the scarcity of data on managing brain progression alongside stable extracranial disease, emphasizing the imperative for dedicated research to address these gaps and yield definitive insights.

Aim and background: This study attempted to identify similarities and differences in adverse events (AEs) between human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) inhibitors, especially those related to hemorrhagic events and nervous system disorders. Methods: This study summarized the types, frequencies, and system organ classes (SOCs) of AEs of HER2 inhibitors. The US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) data from January 2004 through March 2022 was collected and analyzed. Disproportionality analyses were conducted to detect AEs signals for every HER2 inhibitor. The chi-square test, Wilcoxon test, and descriptive analysis were used to compare the differences of AEs for specific SOCs or drugs. Results: A total of 47,899 AE reports were obtained for eight HER2 inhibitors. Trastuzumab-related AEs were reported in the highest number and combination of regimens. In monotherapy, trastuzumab had the highest reported rate of cardiac disorders-related AEs (24.0%). However, small-molecule drugs exceeded other drugs in the reported rates of AEs related to gastrointestinal disorders, metabolism and nutrition disorders. The highest reported rates of respiratory disorders (47.3%) and hematologic disorders (22.4%) were associated with treatment with trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd). Patients treated with trastuzumab emtansine (TDM-1) had the highest reported rate (7.28%) of hemorrhagic events, especially intracranial haemorrhage events. In addition, patients treated with TDM-1 with concomitant thrombocytopenia were likely to experience hemorrhagic events compared to other HER2 inhibitors (p < 0.001). The median time to onset of intracranial haemorrhage associated with trastuzumab (0.5 months) and TDM-1 (0.75 months) was short. However, there was no significant difference in median time to onset intracranial haemorrhage between patients in different age groups or with different outcomes. Disproportionality analysis results reveal that cerebral haemorrhage is a positive signal associated with T-DXd and TDM-1. In addition, tucatinib was the drug with the highest rate of reported nervous system disorders (31.38%). Memory impairment (83 cases) is a positive signal for tucatinib. Conclusion: The types and reporting rates of AEs associated with different HER2 inhibitors vary across multiple systems. In addition, hemorrhagic events concomitant with TDM-1 treatment and nervous system disorders concomitant with tucatinib treatment may be worthy of attention. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The incidence of leptomeningeal metastases (LM) is increasing among breast cancer patients, but their prognosis remains dismal. Many therapeutic options are now available to treat HER2-positive (HER2+) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) involving the central nervous system (CNS). This case report illustrates a longlasting response of more than 2 years in a patient with HER2+ MBC with LM after sequential administration of systemic and intrathecal (IT) anti-HER2 therapies and highlights that an appropriate treatment of HER2+ LM can result in durable survival. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BACKGROUND: Tucatinib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor currently used in salvage therapy for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast and colorectal cancer. The use of tucatinib alone or in combination with ado-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) in the treatment of advanced HER2-positive cancers is rapidly expanding. OBJECTIVE/METHODS: We report the case of a 66-year-old female who presented to the dermatology clinic with a oneyear history of widespread telangiectasias that began after initiation of combination chemotherapy with tucatinib and T-DM1 for metastatic HER2-positive invasive ductal carcinoma. RESULTS: The patient’s lesions regressed upon cessation of combination therapy and reappeared in the setting of tucatinib re-initiation, with gradual improvement over the following four months following electrocautery to the affected regions. CONCLUSIONS: We postulate that telangiectasias may be a previously unreported dermatologic side effect of combination treatment with tucatinib and T-DM1. Electrocautery is a safe and effective procedure to reduce the appearance of telangiectasias and improve patient satisfaction during chemotherapy [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The incidence of leptomeningeal metastases (LM) is increasing among breast cancer patients, but their prognosis remains dismal. Many therapeutic options are now available to treat HER2-positive (HER2+) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) involving the central nervous system (CNS). This case report illustrates a long-lasting response of more than 2 years in a patient with HER2+ MBC with LM after sequential administration of systemic and intrathecal (IT) anti-HER2 therapies and highlights that an appropriate treatment of HER2+ LM can result in durable survival.

Background: Tucatinib is an oral human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-directed therapy approved in combination with trastuzumab and capecitabine for use in patients with previously treated HER2+ metastatic breast cancer (MBC) with/without brain metastases (BM). To inform clinical decision-making, it is important to understand tucatinib use in real-world clinical practice. We describe patient characteristics, treatment patterns, and clinical outcomes for tucatinib treatment in the real-world setting. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included patients diagnosed with HER2+ MBC (January 2017-December 2022) who received tucatinib treatment in a nationwide, de-identified electronic health record–derived metastatic breast cancer database. Patient demographics and clinical characteristics were described at baseline (prior to tucatinib initiation). Key outcomes included realworld time to treatment discontinuation (rwTTD), time to next treatment (rwTTNT), and overall survival (rwOS). Results: Of 3,449 patients with HER2+ MBC, 216 received tucatinib treatment (n=153 with BM; n=63 without BM) and met inclusion criteria. Median (range) age of patients was 56 (28-84) years, 57.9% were White, and 68.5% had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤1. Median (IQR) follow-up from start of tucatinib treatment was 12 (6-18) months. Among all patients who received tucatinib treatment, median (95% CI) rwTTD was 6.5 (5.4-8.8) months with 39.8% and 21.4% remaining on treatment at 12 and 24 months, respectively. Median (95% CI) rwTTNT was 8.7 (6.8-10.7) months. Patients who received the approved tucatinib triplet combination after ≥1 HER2-directed regimen in the metastatic setting had a similar median (95% CI) rwTTD (any line: 8.1 [5.7-9.5] months; second-line (2L) and third-line (3L): 9.4 [6.3-14.1] months) and rwTTNT (any line: 8.8 [7.1-11.8] months; 2L and 3L: 9.8 [6.8-14.1] months) to the overall Frontiers in population. Overall, median (95% CI) rwOS was 26.6 (20.2-not reached [NR]) months, with similar findings for patients who received the tucatinib triplet (26.1 [18.8-NR] months) and was NR in the subgroup limited to the 2L/3L population. Conclusion: Tucatinib treatment in the real-world setting was associated with a similar median rwTTD, rwTTNT, and rwOS as in the pivotal HER2CLIMB trial, with particular effectiveness in patients in the 2L/3L setting. These results highlight the importance of earlier use of tucatinib in HER2+ MBC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Opinion statement: Approximately 20% of breast cancers overexpress human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2+), conferring a particularly aggressive subtype of the disease with an increased risk for the development of systemic and brain metastases. However, the advent of trastuzumab and more recently several other HER2-targeting novel therapies has led to significant improvements in the prognosis, making the diagnosis a "double-edged sword." The current standard first-line therapy for patients with HER2+ metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is a taxane combined with trastuzumab and pertuzumab. Trastuzumab deruxtecan should be used preferentially in the second line, with the only caveat being patients with CNS involvement where the tucatinib, capecitabine, and trastuzumab regimen could be considered. In the third line setting, given the survival benefits demonstrated with the tucatinib regimen in patients with and without CNS metastases, this is the preferred strategy. In the fourth line and beyond, there is no clear standard. Options include margetuximab in combination with chemotherapy, neratinib + capecitabine, or trastuzumab + chemotherapy. There are several novel therapies under investigation reporting promising results in the late-line setting. The treatment landscape of HER2-positive advanced disease is evolving constantly, with several active therapies being moved to the early-stage setting. Accordingly, it will be critical to identify biomarkers and mechanisms of resistance to optimize therapy selection and maximize patient outcomes and quality of life. Here, we provide an overview of the current and future management of HER2-positive advanced breast cancer and address the specific scenarios which may impact treatment selection including triple-positive breast cancer and the presence of brain metastases. Finally, we highlight promising novel treatments and ongoing trials that may impact future treatment sequencing. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: HER2-positive breast cancer has a high risk of brain metastasis. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is standard of care for limited brain metastases. Tucatinib, a HER2-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has demonstrated intracranial efficacy in the HER2-CLIMB Trial. However, it is unknown whether tucatinib with SRS is safe or effective. Methods: A retrospective analysis of HER2-positive breast cancer treated with SRS and tucatinib for brain metastases management was performed. All patients received tucatinib and SRS for the management of active brain metastases. The primary endpoint was local and distant brain tumor control. Secondary endpoints were intracranial progression free survival (CNS-PFS), systemic PFS, overall survival (OS), and neurotoxicity. Results: A total of 135 lesions treated with SRS over 39 treatment sessions in 22 patients were identified. Median follow-up from tucatinib initiation was 20.8 months. Local brain control was 94% at 12-months and 81% at 24-months. Distant brain control was 39% at 12-months and 26% at 24-months. Median survival was 21.2 months, with 12- and 24-month OS rates of 84% and 50%, respectively. Median CNS-PFS was 11.3 months, with 12- and 24-month CNS-PFS rates of 44.9% at both time points. Median systemic PFS was not reached, with 12- and 24-month systemic PFS rates of 86% and 57%, respectively. Symptomatic radiation necrosis occurred in 6 (4%) lesions. No additional unexpected toxicities were noted. Conclusions: SRS in combination with tucatinib, capecitabine, and trastuzumab appears to be a safe and feasible treatment for HER2 + brain metastases. Further prospective evaluation of potential synergistic effects is warranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BackgroundTucatinib is an oral human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-directed therapy approved in combination with trastuzumab and capecitabine for use in patients with previously treated HER2+ metastatic breast cancer (MBC) with/without brain metastases (BM). To inform clinical decision-making, it is important to understand tucatinib use in real-world clinical practice. We describe patient characteristics, treatment patterns, and clinical outcomes for tucatinib treatment in the real-world setting.MethodsThis retrospective cohort study included patients diagnosed with HER2+ MBC (January 2017-December 2022) who received tucatinib treatment in a nationwide, de-identified electronic health record–derived metastatic breast cancer database. Patient demographics and clinical characteristics were described at baseline (prior to tucatinib initiation). Key outcomes included real-world time to treatment discontinuation (rwTTD), time to next treatment (rwTTNT), and overall survival (rwOS).ResultsOf 3,449 patients with HER2+ MBC, 216 received tucatinib treatment (n=153 with BM; n=63 without BM) and met inclusion criteria. Median (range) age of patients was 56 (28-84) years, 57.9% were White, and 68.5% had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤1. Median (IQR) follow-up from start of tucatinib treatment was 12 (6-18) months. Among all patients who received tucatinib treatment, median (95% CI) rwTTD was 6.5 (5.4-8.8) months with 39.8% and 21.4% remaining on treatment at 12 and 24 months, respectively. Median (95% CI) rwTTNT was 8.7 (6.8-10.7) months. Patients who received the approved tucatinib triplet combination after ≥1 HER2-directed regimen in the metastatic setting had a similar median (95% CI) rwTTD (any line: 8.1 [5.7-9.5] months; second-line (2L) and third-line (3L): 9.4 [6.3-14.1] months) and rwTTNT (any line: 8.8 [7.1-11.8] months; 2L and 3L: 9.8 [6.8-14.1] months) to the overall population. Overall, median (95% CI) rwOS was 26.6 (20.2-not reached [NR]) months, with similar findings for patients who received the tucatinib triplet (26.1 [18.8-NR] months) and was NR in the subgroup limited to the 2L/3L population.ConclusionTucatinib treatment in the real-world setting was associated with a similar median rwTTD, rwTTNT, and rwOS as in the pivotal HER2CLIMB trial, with particular effectiveness in patients in the 2L/3L setting. These results highlight the importance of earlier use of tucatinib in HER2+ MBC.

Copyright of Actualités Pharmaceutiques is the property of Elsevier B.V. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Abstract Overexpression of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) occurs in approximately 15–20% of breast cancer cases. HER2 is a member of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) family with tyrosinase kinase activity, and its overexpression is linked to poor prognosis and shorter progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Among various treatment options, HER2-targeting monoclonal antibodies and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have mostly been applied in recent decades to treat HER2-positive (HER2+) breast cancer patients. Although positive clinical outcomes were documented in both advanced disease and neoadjuvant settings, the development of resistance mechanisms to such approaches has been one of the major challenges with the continuous usage of these drugs. In addition, patients who experience disease progression after treatment with multiple HER2-targeted therapies often have limited treatment options. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has recently approved a new TKI (i.e., tucatinib) for use in combination with immunotherapy and/or chemotherapeutic agents for the treatment of advanced-stage/metastatic HER2+ breast cancer. This review highlights recent updates on the efficacy of tucatinib-based therapeutic approaches in experimental models as well as in the clinical settings of HER2+ breast cancer.

Simple Summary: Tucatinib is recommended by different guidelines as a third line of treatment in HER2+ breast cancer. Although it is an effective treatment, different studies have highlighted that the high price of the drug makes it a not cost-effective treatment option. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the appropriate cost of tucatinib and its cost-effectiveness when used in combination with trastuzumab and capecitabine (TXC) compared with TDM-1 from the perspective of the Italian National Healthcare System. Results suggested that TCX is cost-effective at a willingness to pay (WTP) of 60,000 EUR, using a tucatinib cost of 4828.44 EUR per cycle, in contrast to 4090.60 EUR considering a WTP of 20,000 EUR. Our findings can be used by stakeholders to guarantee the affordability of this drug in the Italian setting and can be used by other European and non-European countries as threshold to establish the appropriate price for the drug. Background: This study was aimed at estimating the appropriate price of tucatinib plus trastuzumab and capecitabine (TXC), as third-line treatment, in HER2+ breast cancer (BC) patients from the Italian National Health System (NHS) perspective. Methods: A partitioned survival model with three mutually exclusive health states (i.e., progression-free survival (PFS), progressive disease (PD), and death) was used to estimate the price of tucatinib vs trastuzumab emtansine (TDM-1), considering a willingness to pay (WTP) of 60,000 EUR. Data from the HER2CLIMB trial, the Italian population, and the literature were used as input. The model also estimated the total costs and the life-years (LY) of TXC and TDM1. Deterministic and probabilistic (PSA) sensitivity analyses were conducted to evaluate the robustness of the model. Results: In the base case scenario, the appropriate price of tucatinib was 4828.44 EUR per cycle. The TXC resulted in +0.28 LYs and +16,628 EUR compared with TDM-1. Results were mainly sensitive to therapy intensity variation. In PSA analysis, TXC resulted cost-effective in 53% of the simulations. Assuming a WTP ranging 20,000–80,000 EUR, the tucatinib price ranged from 4090.60 to 5197.41 EUR. Conclusions: This study estimated the appropriate price for tucatinib according to different WTP in order to help healthcare decision makers to better understand the treatment value. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer develop brain metastases in up to 30% of cases. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the effect of different systemic therapies in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer and brain metastases, acknowledging the heterogeneity and sometimes low quality of 51 included studies. Tucatinib (combined with trastuzumab and capecitabine) and trastuzumab-deruxtecan appear to constitute the most effective systemic therapy, while pyrotinib might be an option in Asian patients. Preferably, future research will comprise of randomized controlled trials, including patients with active and/or inactive brain metastases. Aim: Patients with HER2-positive (HER2+) metastatic breast cancer (mBC) develop brain metastases (BM) in up to 30% of cases. Treatment of patients with BM can consist of local treatment (surgery and/or radiotherapy) and/or systemic treatment. We undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the effect of different systemic therapies in patients with HER2+ mBC and BM. Methods: A systematic search was performed in the databases PubMed, Embase.com, Clarivate Analytics/Web of Science Core Collection and the Wiley/Cochrane Library. Eligible articles included prospective or retrospective studies reporting on the effect of systemic therapy on objective response rate (ORR) and/or median progression free survival (mPFS) in patients with HER2+ mBC and BM. The timeframe within the databases was from inception to 19 January 2022. Fixed-effects meta-analyses were used. Quality appraisal was performed using the ROBINS-I tool. Results: Fifty-one studies were included, involving 3118 patients. Most studies, which contained the largest patient numbers, but also often carried a moderate-serious risk of bias, investigated lapatinib and capecitabine (LC), trastuzumab-emtansine (T-DM1) or pyrotinib. The best quality data and/or highest ORR were described with tucatinib (combined with trastuzumab and capecitabine, TTC) and trastuzumab-deruxtecan (T-DXd). TTC demonstrated an ORR of 47.3% in patients with asymptomatic and/or active BM. T-DXd achieved a pooled ORR of 64% (95% CI 43–85%, I2 0%) in a heavily pretreated population with asymptomatic BM (3 studies, n = 96). Conclusions: Though our meta-analysis should be interpreted with caution due to the heterogeneity of included studies and a related serious risk of bias, this review provides a comprehensive overview of all currently available systemic treatment options. T-Dxd and TTC that appear to constitute the most effective systemic therapy in patients with HER2+ mBC and BM, while pyrotinib might be an option in Asian patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Mohamad Adham Salkeni,1 Wajeeha Rizvi,2 Kyaw Hein,3 Gerald M Higa4 1Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA; 2Department of Internal Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA; 3Department of Business, Lamar University, Houston, TX, USA; 4Departments of Clinical Pharmacy and Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USACorrespondence: Gerald M HigaDepartments of Clinical Pharmacy and Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, 26506, USAEmail ghiga@hsc.wvu.eduAbstract: Even though gene amplification or protein overexpression occurs in approximately one-fifth of all breast cancers, the discovery of HER2 has, nevertheless, had profound implications for the disease. Indeed, the characterization of the receptor resulted in a number of significant advances. Structurally, unique features provided avenues for the development of numerous compounds with target-specificity; molecularly, biological constructs revealed a highly complex, internal signal transduction pathway with regulatory effects on tumor proliferation, survival, and perhaps, even resistance; and clinically, disease outcomes manifested its predictive and prognostic value. Yet despite the receptor’s utility, the beneficial effects are diminished by tumor recurrence after neo- or adjuvant therapy as well as losses resulting from the inability to cure patients with metastatic disease. What these observations suggest is that while tumor response may be partially linked to uncoupling cell surface message reception and nuclear gene expression, as well as recruitment of the innate immune system, disease progression and/or resistance may involve a reprogrammable signaling mainframe that elicits alternative growth and survival signals. This review attempts to meld current perceptions related to HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer with particular attention to current biological insights and therapeutic challenges.Keywords: ado-trastuzumab emtansine, ErbB, Fam-trastuzumab deruxtecan, HER2, lapatinib, margetuximab, neratinib, neu, pertuzumab, PHESGO, trastuzumab, tucatinib

Cutaneous metastases are a common and very morbid development in women with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Tucatinib, an oral, potent, HER2-specific reversible tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is a new treatment for HER2-positive MBC. Here, we describe a case series of 7 patients who had cutaneous metastases from a phase 1b study of tucatinib. The phase 1b study enrolled women with progressive HER2-positive MBC previously treated with trastuzumab, pertuzumab, and ado-trastuzumab emtansine. Prior lapatinib, neratinib, or afatinib were allowed. Tucatinib was dosed in 2 cohorts of 350 mg (8 patients) and 300 mg (52 patients) orally twice daily with either capecitabine (1000 mg/m2 orally twice daily for 14 days of a 21-day cycle) or trastuzumab (8 mg/kg intravenous load then 6 mg/kg every 21 days) or the triplet. A total of 60 patients were treated, 16 of which (26.7%) had cutaneous metastasis. The experience of seven patients with cutaneous metastasis treated at three participating centers is described here. The seven patients, aged 36 to 58 years, had received a median 6 prior lines of therapy (range: 3-9), including lapatinib (n=6) and pertuzumab (n=6). All patients received tucatinib with an additional therapy (capecitabine or trastuzumab), and 5 patients received triplet therapy. The median time on therapy was 8 cycles (range: 5-12). Complete (n=1) or partial responses (n=3) of skin disease were observed in 4 patients resulting in a cutaneous response rate of 57.1%. An overall response (including all disease sites) was observed in 4 patients (57.1%). Tucatinib shows evidence of efficacy against cutaneous metastasis, which is common and difficult to control for patients with HER2-overexpressing MBC.

Overexpression of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) occurs in approximately 15–20% of breast cancer cases. HER2 is a member of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) family with tyrosinase kinase activity, and its overexpression is linked to poor prognosis and shorter progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Among various treatment options, HER2-targeting monoclonal antibodies and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have mostly been applied in recent decades to treat HER2-positive (HER2+) breast cancer patients. Although positive clinical outcomes were documented in both advanced disease and neoadjuvant settings, the development of resistance mechanisms to such approaches has been one of the major challenges with the continuous usage of these drugs. In addition, patients who experience disease progression after treatment with multiple HER2-targeted therapies often have limited treatment options. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has recently approved a new TKI (i.e., tucatinib) for use in combination with immunotherapy and/or chemotherapeutic agents for the treatment of advanced-stage/metastatic HER2+ breast cancer. This review highlights recent updates on the efficacy of tucatinib-based therapeutic approaches in experimental models as well as in the clinical settings of HER2+ breast cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Tucatinib, a small molecule for the treatment of metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer, was extensively metabolized in humans to multiple oxidative metabolites. To fully understand the elimination and biotransformation pathways of tucatinib, we investigated the in vitro and in vivo metabolism of tucatinib, and also conducted a Phase I trial using [14C]tucatinib. Methods: To identify the responsible enzymes for tucatinib clearance, we investigated the in vitro metabolism of tucatinib including enzyme phenotyping, which facilitated the discovery of several metabolites in human and monkey plasma and excreta, in particular M1 (ONT-993, an aliphatic hydroxylated metabolite). Stereoselective formation of M1 was further investigated in vitro, in vivo, and in silico. Results: In humans, approximately 86% of the total radiolabeled dose was recovered in feces and 4% in urine; in plasma, approximately 76% of radioactivity circulated as parent drug, with 19% attributed to multiple metabolites. The primary isoforms responsible for the elimination of tucatinib were CYP2C8 and CYP3A4/5. CYP2C8 was shown to possess sole catalytic activity for the formation of M1, whereas CYP3A4/5 and aldehyde oxidase catalyzed the formation of the remaining metabolites. Subsequent investigation revealed that M1 was formed in a stereoselective manner. Examination of the enantiomeric ratio of M1 stereoisomers observed in humans relative to cynomolgus monkeys revealed comparable results, suggesting that the enantiomers that comprise M1 were not considered to be unique or disproportionately high in human. Conclusion: CYP2C8 and CYP3A4/5 are the primary drug-metabolizing enzymes involved in the in vitro metabolism of tucatinib, which provided the basis to describe human disposition of tucatinib and formation of the observed metabolites. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Approximately 20% of breast cancers overexpress human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), providing an actionable target for many different therapies. In the metastatic setting, prognosis has improved greatly with the use of anti-HER2 drugs such as trastuzumab, pertuzumab, and trastuzumab-emtansine. In the third line setting and beyond, several emerging treatments have shown benefits, including novel small molecule targeted agents and antibody-drug conjugates. Systemic treatment of brain metastases in HER2-positive patients and the role of endocrine-based treatment for patients with hormone receptor (HR) positive disease remain areas of research interest. This article will review the current approach to systemic management of metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer in Canada, and present novel treatments that may be available in the near future. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In the primary analysis of the HER2CLIMB trial, tucatinib added to trastuzumab and capecitabine significantly improved overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive (HER2+) metastatic breast cancer. We report efficacy and safety outcomes, including the final OS and safety outcomes from follow-up in HER2CLIMB. HER2CLIMB is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in patients with locally advanced or metastatic HER2+ breast cancer, including patients with brain metastases. Patients were randomized 2 : 1 to receive tucatinib or placebo, in combination with trastuzumab and capecitabine. After the primary analysis (median follow-up of 14 months), the protocol was amended to allow for unblinding sites to treatment assignment and cross-over from the placebo combination to the tucatinib combination. Protocol prespecified descriptive analyses of OS, PFS (by investigator assessment), and safety were carried out at ∼2 years from the last patient randomized. Six hundred and twelve patients enrolled in the HER2CLIMB trial. At a median OS follow-up of 29.6 months, median duration of OS was 24.7 months for the tucatinib combination group versus 19.2 months for the placebo combination group [hazard ratio (HR) for death: 0.73, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.59-0.90, P = 0.004] and OS at 2 years was 51% and 40%, respectively. HRs for OS across prespecified subgroups were consistent with the HR for the overall study population. Median duration of PFS was 7.6 months for the tucatinib combination group versus 4.9 months for the placebo combination group (HR for progression or death: 0.57, 95% CI: 0.47-0.70, P < 0.00001) and PFS at 1 year was 29% and 14%, respectively. The tucatinib combination was well tolerated with a low rate of discontinuation due to adverse events. With additional follow-up, the tucatinib combination provided a clinically meaningful survival benefit for patients with HER2+ metastatic breast cancer. • Tucatinib combination shows continued prolongation of overall survival in patients with HER2+ metastatic breast cancer. • Overall survival benefit was consistent across all prespecified subgroups, including patients with brain metastases. • The tucatinib combination was well tolerated with a low rate of discontinuation due to adverse events (5.9%). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Excessively restrictive eligibility criteria hinder the enrollment of cancer patients to clinical trials. Those patients are supposed to represent the range of characteristics of the overall population with particular cancer. This, in turn, affects the generalizability of results and efficiency of the drug development process in oncology. Recent guidelines from the American Society of Clinical Oncology recommend broadening the eligibility criteria for early and late phase trials. A clearly defined rationale is essential for excluding patients. They selected specific items that commonly lead to the exclusion of patients from clinical trials, namely brain metastases, the minimum age for enrollment, human immunodeficiency virus infection, prior and concurrent malignancies, and organ dysfunction. We reviewed the clinical trials of abemaciclib and tucatinib, two novel anticancer agents, to investigate the eligibility criteria used in their ongoing trials and how the cut-offs for adequate kidney functions were defined. We provided recommendations to allow for enrollment of otherwise eligible patients.

Simon Peter Gampenrieder,1,2 Vanessa Castagnaviz,1 Gabriel Rinnerthaler,1,2 Richard Greil1,2 1Department of Internal Medicine III with Haematology, Medical Oncology, Haemostaseology, Infectiology and Rheumatology, Oncologic Center, Salzburg Cancer Research Institute - Laboratory for Immunological and Molecular Cancer Research (SCRI-LIMCR), Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria; 2Cancer Cluster Salzburg, Salzburg, AustriaCorrespondence: Richard GreilIIIrd Medical Department, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Müllner Hauptstraße 48, Salzburg 5020, AustriaTel +4357255-25801Fax +4357255-25999Email r.greil@salk.atAbstract: The prognosis of HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) has radically changed in recent years and continues to improve due to the broad application of effective therapies like monoclonal antibodies and small molecules targeting HER2. Persistent dependency of tumor cells on the oncogene HER2, on one hand, as well as low expression levels in healthy tissue, on the other hand, make this protein an ideal target for anti-cancer therapy. New HER2 targeting strategies including targeted delivery of cytotoxic drugs via HER2 receptor have been developed. Recently, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved three new drugs for the treatment of HER2-positive MBC: the antibody–drug conjugate trastuzumab deruxtecan and the two tyrosine kinase inhibitors neratinib and tucatinib. Here, we summarize recent publications and developments of novel anti-HER2 therapies like monoclonal antibodies with improved properties compared to trastuzumab and bispecific antibodies, which bind two different HER-epitopes or bring T cells closer to tumor cells. Furthermore, novel antibody-drug conjugates and small molecules against HER2 are discussed. These developments coupled with new combination strategies (eg, with CDK4/6 inhibitors or immunotherapy) will change the treatment landscape for patients with HER2-positive MBC very soon and will hopefully further improve clinical outcomes.Keywords: margetuximab, bispecific antibodies, trastuzumab duocarmazine, trastuzumab deruxtecan, neratinib, tucatinib, immunotherapy, CDK4/6 inhibitors

Abstract Background Brain metastases (BrM) incidence is 25% to 50% in women with advanced human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)‐positive breast cancer. Radiation and surgery are currently the main local treatment approaches for central nervous system (CNS) metastases. Systemic anti‐HER2 therapy following a diagnosis of BrM improves outcomes. Previous preclinical data has helped elucidate HER2 brain trophism, the blood‐brain/blood‐tumor barrier(s), and the brain tumor microenvironment, all of which can lead to development of novel therapeutic options. Recent findings Several anti‐HER2 agents are currently available and reviewed here, some of which have recently shown promising effects in BrM patients, specifically. New strategies driven by and focusing on brain metastasis‐specific genomics, immunotherapy, and preventive strategies have shown promising results and are under development. Conclusions The field of HER2+ breast cancer, particularly for BrM, continues to evolve as new therapeutic strategies show promising results in recent clinical trials. Increasing inclusion of patients with BrM in clinical studies, and a focus on assessing their outcomes both intracranially and extracranially, is changing the landscape for patients with HER2+ CNS metastases by demonstrating the ability of newer agents to improve outcomes.

This document is a corrigendum published in the journal Frontiers in Immunology. It corrects errors in a previously published article titled "ErbB2/HER2 receptor tyrosine kinase regulates human papillomavirus promoter activity." The errors include incorrect labeling in Figure 7 and a mistake in describing the CD151-specific antibody used in the study. The authors apologize for these errors and state that they do not affect the scientific conclusions of the article. The original article has been updated. [Extracted from the article]

Background: Evidence to date supports continued human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) suppression beyond progression on HER2-directed therapy for advanced HER2-positive breast cancer. Data from several phase II and III trials evaluating HER2-directed therapy following second-line T-DM1 have recently become available. Methods: We performed a systematic search of the published and presented literature to identify phase II and phase III trials assessing novel HER2-targeted agents as third-line therapy or beyond for HER2-positive advanced breast cancer using search terms 'breast cancer' AND 'HER2' AND 'advanced' AND ('phase II' OR 'phase III'). Results: Eight clinical trials reporting efficacy outcomes on third-line or greater HER2-directed therapy for HER2-positive advanced breast cancer were identified. In phase III trials, margetuximab and neratinib combinations demonstrated significant 1.3-month (hazard ratio, HR = 0.71, p < 0.001) and 0.1-month (HR = 0.76, p = 0.006) net improvements in median progression-free survival (PFS), respectively, with no significant improvements in overall survival (OS). Tucatinib added to trastuzumab and capecitabine demonstrated a significant 2.7-month improvement in median PFS (HR = 0.57, p < 0.00001) and a 5.5-month improvement in median OS (HR = 0.73, p = 0.004) in a randomized phase II trial, including significant clinical benefit for patients with brain metastases. Finally, trastuzumab-deruxtecan, zenocutuzumab, and poziotinib demonstrated benefit in phase II trials with the most robust overall response rate (62.0%) and median duration of response (18.2 months) observed for trastuzumab-deruxtecan among heavily pretreated patients. Conclusion: Tucatinib plus trastuzumab and capecitabine significantly prolongs OS, and promising preliminary response outcomes for trastuzumab-deruxtecan suggest that sequencing of these regimens following second-line therapy is reasonable. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Brain metastases are a leading cause of death in patients with breast cancer. The lack of clinical trials and the presence of the blood-brain barrier limit therapeutic options. Furthermore, overexpression of the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) increases the incidence of breast cancer brain metastases (BCBM). HER2-targeting agents, such as the monoclonal antibodies trastuzumab and pertuzumab, improved outcomes in patients with breast cancer and extracranial metastases. However, continued BCBM progression in breast cancer patients highlighted the need for novel and effective targeted therapies against intracranial metastases. In this study, we engineered the highly migratory and brain tumor tropic human neural stem cells (NSCs) LM008 to continuously secrete high amounts of functional, stable, fulllength antibodies against HER2 (anti-HER2Ab) without compromising the stemness of LM008 cells. The secreted anti-HER2Ab impaired tumor cell proliferation in vitro in HER2+ BCBM cells by inhibiting the PI3K-Akt signaling pathway and resulted in a significant benefit when injected in intracranial xenograft models. In addition, dual HER2 blockade using anti-HER2Ab LM008 NSCs and the tyrosine kinase inhibitor tucatinib significantly improved the survival of mice in a clinically relevant model of multiple HER2+ BCBM. These findings provide compelling evidence for the use of HER2Ab-secreting LM008 NSCs in combination with tucatinib as a promising therapeutic regimen for patients with HER2+ BCBM. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This report describes the rationale, purpose and design of A011801 (CompassHER2 RD), an ongoing prospective, multicenter, Phase III randomized trial. Eligible patients in the United States (US) and Canada with high-risk (defined as ER-negative and/or node-positive) HER2-positive (HER2+) residual disease (RD) after a predefined course of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and HER2-directed treatment are randomized 1:1 to adjuvant T-DM1 and placebo, versus T-DM1 and tucatinib. Patients have also received adjuvant radiotherapy and/or endocrine therapy, if indicated per standard of care guidelines. The primary objective of the trial is to determine if the invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) with T-DM1 plus tucatinib is superior to iDFS with T-DM1 plus placebo; other outcomes of interest include overall survival (OS), breast cancer-free survival (BCFS), distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS), brain metastases-free survival (BMFS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Correlative biomarker, quality of life (QoL) and pharmacokinetic (PK) end points are also evaluated. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The introduction of trastuzumab and other subsequent human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)–targeted therapies dramatically shifted the treatment landscape of HER2+ breast cancer, changing the natural history of the disease. There is no standard-of-care for patients with HER2+ metastatic breast cancer (MBC) in third and later lines of treatment; however, continued use of anti-HER2 therapies is recommended. Small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) that target HER2 and other HER family receptors play a central role in this setting. TKIs have demonstrated various degrees of efficacy against central nervous system (CNS) metastases, which are a major clinical challenge for patients with HER2+ MBC. The TKIs lapatinib, neratinib, and tucatinib have received regulatory approval for the treatment of HER2+ MBC, while pyrotinib and afatinib have been evaluated in this setting. These TKIs vary by molecular weight, HER protein specificity and reversibility of binding and in turn have unique safety profiles. Toxicities reported in clinical trials of TKIs in HER2+ MBC that may require specific management strategies include diarrhoea, palmar–plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome and rash. Here, we review the efficacy data, including CNS activity, and the safety profiles of the TKIs, and we provide guidance on adverse event management. Finally, we discuss how to incorporate the TKIs into the HER2+ MBC treatment algorithm. • TKIs that target HER proteins play a central role in the treatment of HER2+ MBC. • HER2-TKIs evaluated include lapatinib, neratinib, tucatinib, pyrotinib and afatinib. • The TKIs vary by molecular weight, HER specificity and reversibility of binding. • We review the efficacy and safety data for the TKIs. • We provide guidance on adverse event in the management of TKIs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Advancements in monoclonal antibodies, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and antibody drug conjugates (ADCs) have notably enhanced outcomes for metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer patients. Despite the expanding treatment options and clinical complexities, determining the optimal sequence of HER2-targeted therapies remains partly uncertain, influenced by various factors. To refine HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer management, particularly regarding tucatinib's position, a Steering Committee of leading oncologists in breast cancer care devised a panel of statements via a Delphi approach, focusing on five key topics: general clinical management, therapeutic approaches for patients with HER2-positive breast cancer and brain metastases, treatment sequence, and tucatinib's safety and efficacy. A total of 29 statements were deliberated, with strong consensus achieved for most. However, no consensus emerged regarding the management of brain progression alongside stable extracranial disease: 48 % advocated for switching to tucatinib, while 53 % favored a stereotactic brain radiotherapy (SBRT) approach if feasible. The unanimous consensus attained in this Delphi panel, particularly regarding tucatinib's efficacy and safety, underscores oncologists' recognition of its clinical significance based on existing trial data. These findings align closely with current literature, shedding light on areas necessitating further investigation, not thoroughly explored in prior studies. Moreover, the results underscore the scarcity of data on managing brain progression alongside stable extracranial disease, emphasizing the imperative for dedicated research to address these gaps and yield definitive insights. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In HER2CLIMB, tucatinib significantly improved progression-free and overall survival in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–positive (HER2+) metastatic breast cancer. We evaluated the impact of tucatinib on health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) in HER2CLIMB. Patients were randomised 2:1 to tucatinib or placebo combined with trastuzumab and capecitabine. Starting with protocol version 7, the EuroQol 5 Dimensions 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire and EQ visual analogue scale (VAS) were administered at day 1 of cycle 1, every two cycles during cycles 3–9, every three cycles during cycle 12 and thereafter and at each patient's 30-day follow-up visit. Among 364 patients eligible for HR-QoL assessment, 331 (91%) completed ≥1 assessment. EQ-VAS scores were similar for both arms at baseline and maintained throughout treatment. EQ-5D-5L scores were similar between the treatment arms, stable throughout therapy and worsened after discontinuing treatment. Risk of meaningful deterioration (≥7 points) on EQ-VAS was reduced 19% in the tucatinib vs. placebo arm (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.81; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.55, 1.18); the median (95% CI) time to deterioration was not reached in the tucatinib arm and was 5.8 months (4.3, -) in the placebo arm. Among patients with brain metastases (n = 164), risk of meaningful deterioration on EQ-VAS was reduced 49% in the tucatinib arm (HR: 0.51; 95% CI: 0.28, 0.93); the median (95% CI) time to deterioration was not reached in the tucatinib arm and was 5.5 months (4.2, -) in the placebo arm. HR-QoL was preserved for patients with HER2+ metastatic breast cancer who were treated with tucatinib added to trastuzumab and capecitabine and maintained longer with tucatinib therapy than without it among those with brain metastases. NCT02614794 • HR-QoL was preserved in HER2+ metastatic breast cancer patients on a tucatinib regimen. • HR-QoL was preserved longer in patients with brain metastases taking tucatinib. • Preserved HR-QoL was in context of improved progression-free and overall survival. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Despite great success as a targeted breast cancer therapy, trastuzumab use may be complicated by heart failure and loss of left ventricular contractile function. This review summarizes the risk factors, imaging, and prevention of cardiotoxicity associated with trastuzumab and other HER2-targeted therapies. Findings: Cardiovascular disease risk factors, advanced age, and previous anthracycline treatment predispose to trastuzumab-induced cardiotoxicity (TIC), with anthracycline exposure being the most significant risk factor. Cardiac biomarkers such as troponins and pro-BNP and imaging assessments such as echocardiogram before and during trastuzumab therapy may help in early identification of TIC. Initiation of beta-adrenergic antagonists and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors may prevent TIC. Cardiotoxicity rates of other HER2-targeted treatments, such as pertuzumab, T-DM1, lapatinib, neratinib, tucatinib, trastuzumab deruxtecan, and margetuximab, appear to be significantly lower as reported in the pivotal trials which led to their approval. Conclusions: Risk assessment for TIC should include cardiac imaging assessment and should incorporate prior anthracycline use, the strongest risk factor for TIC. Screening and prediction of cardiotoxicity, referral to a cardio-oncology specialist, and initiation of effective prophylactic therapy may all improve prognosis in patients receiving HER2-directed therapy. Beta blockers and ACE inhibitors appear to mitigate risk of TIC. Anthracycline-free regimens have been proven to be efficacious in early HER2-positive breast cancer and should now be considered the standard of care for early HER2-positive breast cancer. Newer HER2-directed therapies appear to have significantly lower cardiotoxicity compared to trastuzumab, but trials are needed in patients who have experienced TIC and patients with pre-existing cardiac dysfunction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The management of HER2 positive breast cancer has been transformed by the development of targeted therapies. Dual blockade with the monoclonal antibodies, trastuzumab and pertuzumab, added to first-line taxane chemotherapy and second-line therapy with the antibody–drug conjugate, T-DM1, are internationally agreed standards of care for advanced HER2 positive breast cancer, where available. However, until recently, options for patients for third-line therapy and beyond were of modest efficacy or limited by toxicity. In 2019, the results of trials of two exciting new agents for this space were presented. A third-generation HER2 tyrosine kinase inhibitor, tucatinib, combines the efficacy of the second-generation drug, neratinib, with a more manageable toxicity profile and has become a new standard of care after T-DM1, in combination with capecitabine and trastuzumab. The antibody–drug conjugate, trastuzumab deruxtecan, demonstrated remarkable efficacy in heavily pre-treated patients and received accelerated approval in the United States, whilst confirmatory Phase 3 trials are completed. This review will discuss the available data for the post-T-DM1 setting, focusing on tyrosine kinase inhibitors including tucatinib. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Tucatinib is a potent tyrosine kinase inhibitor selective for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of HER2‐positive metastatic breast cancer and in development for other HER2‐positive solid tumors. Modest, reversible serum creatinine (SCr) elevations have been observed in tucatinib clinical trials. SCr is conveyed by the renal drug transporters organic cation transporter 2 (OCT2) and multidrug and toxin extrusion protein 1 (MATE1) and 2‐K (MATE2‐K) and can increase in the presence of inhibitors of these transporters. In vitro, tucatinib inhibited OCT2‐, MATE1‐, and MATE2‐K‐mediated transport of metformin, with IC50 values of 14.7, 0.340, and 0.135 µM, respectively. Tucatinib also inhibited OCT2‐ and MATE1‐mediated transport of creatinine, with IC50 values of 0.107 and 0.0855 µM, respectively. A phase 1 study with metformin administered orally in the absence and presence of tucatinib was conducted in 18 healthy subjects. Renal function was assessed by measuring glomerular filtration rate (GFR; based on iohexol plasma clearance) and endogenous markers (SCr, cystatin C‐based estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR]) with and without tucatinib. Metformin exposure increased (1.4‐fold) and renal clearance decreased (29.99‐17.64 L/h) with tucatinib, with no effect on metformin maximum concentration. Creatinine clearance transiently decreased 23% with tucatinib. GFR and eGFR, which are unaffected by OCT2 and/or MATE1/2‐K transport, were unchanged with tucatinib. These data demonstrate that tucatinib inhibits OCT2‐ and MATE1/2‐K‐mediated tubular secretion of creatinine, which may manifest as mild SCr elevations that are not indicative of renal impairment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: The 2020 Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) was held in a virtual format due to the ongoing SARS-CoV‑2 pandemic. Despite these unique circumstances, results of several interesting studies in the field of breast cancer (BC) were reported. While overall survival data are still missing, KEYNOTE-355 suggests significant activity of pembrolizumab when added to first-line chemotherapy in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. TBCRC 048 evaluated the role of olaparib in homologous recombination deficient tumours due to genomic alterations other than germline BRCA1/2 mutations; clinically relevant activity was reported in patients with germline PALB2 and somatic BRCA1/2 mutations. In HER2-positive early stage disease, different strategies of chemotherapy de-escalation are under investigation, but the optimal approach is still not well defined. Updated results from the HER2CLIMB trial show that the third-generation HER2 tyrosine-kinase inhibitor tucatinib in combination with trastuzumab and capecitabine is the new standard-of-care for pretreated patients with HER2-positive metastatic BC with active brain metastases. Results from BYLieve supports the notion that the combination of endocrine therapy with the PIK3Ca inhibitor alpelisib is a reasonable treatment approach in hormone-receptor positive/HER2-negative BC after prior CDK4/6-inhibitor therapy. Finally, the ECOG-ACRIN 2108 trial failed to show a benefit for early surgery of the primary tumour in patients with metastatic BC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The clinical evaluation of HER2CLIMB trial showed a 21. 9-month median overall survival with the triplet regimens of tucatinib, capecitabine, and trastuzumab (TXT) for patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) –overexpressing metastatic breast cancer. From the payer's perspective of the United States and China, a cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted to evaluate the costs and benefits of adding tucatinib in this study.Methods: We constructed a Markov model for the economic evaluation of adding tucatinib to trastuzumab plus capecitabine in patients with HER-2 positive metastatic breast cancer in the United States and China. The model was conducted with a 10-year time horizon, and the health status was divided into three states: progression-free survival, progressing disease, and death. The health utility scores were consistent with published literature with similar patient status. The transition probabilities were derived from the survival data of the HER2CLIMB study. The unit prices of medicines were obtained from the West China Hospital, Red Book, and published literature. Outcomes were measured in quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, which robustness was evaluated by deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses.Results: Compared with the two-drug regimen of trastuzumab plus capecitabine (TX), the addition of tucatinib increased 0.21 QALY, with an increasing cost of $146,995.05 and $19,022.97 in the United States and China, respectively. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) for the TXT versus TX was $699,976.43 in the U.S. and $90,585.57 in China, both of which are higher than their respective threshold of willingness to play. Deterministic sensitivity analysis shows that the price of tucatinib is the parameter that has the most significant impact on ICERs, but it does not change the results of the model. Probability sensitivity analysis shows that the probability of cost-effective for TXT is 0 in the base case.Conclusion: In the United States and China, tucatinib combined with trastuzumab and capecitabine is not cost-effective for patients with HER-2 positive metastatic breast cancer.

HER-2 type breast cancer is one of the most aggressive malignancies found in women. Tucatinib is recently developed and approved as a potential medicine to fight this disease. In this manuscript, we present the gross structural features of this compound and its reactivity and wave function properties using computational simulations. Density functional theory was used to optimise the ground state geometry of the molecule and molecular docking was used to predict biological activity. As the electrons interact with electromagnetic radiations, electronic excitations between different energy levels are analysed in detail using time-dependent density functional theory. Various intermolecular and intermolecular interactions are analysed and reaction sites for attacking electrophiles and nucleophiles identified. Information entropy calculations show that the compound is inherently stable. Docking with COVID-19 proteins show docking score of − 9.42, − 8.93, − 8.45 and − 8.32 kcal/mol respectively indicating high interaction between the drug and proteins. Hence, this is an ideal candidate to study repurposing of existing drugs to combat the pandemic. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Excessively restrictive eligibility criteria hinder the enrollment of cancer patients to clinical trials. Those patients are supposed to represent the range of characteristics of the overall population with particular cancer. This, in turn, affects the generalizability of results and efficiency of the drug development process in oncology. Recent guidelines from the American Society of Clinical Oncology recommend broadening the eligibility criteria for early and late phase trials. A clearly defined rationale is essential for excluding patients. They selected specific items that commonly lead to the exclusion of patients from clinical trials, namely brain metastases, the minimum age for enrollment, human immunodeficiency virus infection, prior and concurrent malignancies, and organ dysfunction. We reviewed the clinical trials of abemaciclib and tucatinib, two novel anticancer agents, to investigate the eligibility criteria used in their ongoing trials and how the cut-offs for adequate kidney functions were defined. We provided recommendations to allow for enrollment of otherwise eligible patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The basis of improved systemic therapy for inoperable or metastatic human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer is formed by HER2-targeting monoclonal antibodies. Dual HER2 blockade with pertuzumab and trastuzumab in combination with docetaxel in previously untreated patients, and trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1, an antibody-drug conjugate [ADC] consisting of trastuzumab, a linker and a cytotoxic payload) after prior trastuzumab therapy have demonstrated progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) superior to what was achieved with the previous treatment routine. Therefore, pertuzumab and trastuzumab with chemotherapy (preferably with a taxane) and T-DM1 are considered the current standard of care in the first- and second-line settings, respectively. For later lines of therapy, no uniformly recognized standard of care has been defined. Accepted options include treatment with trastuzumab beyond progression, in combination with a broad variety of single-agent chemotherapies used sequentially, or lapatinib (an HER2-targeting tyrosine kinase inhibitor [TKI]) in combination with either trastuzu-mab or capecitabine. However, most of these options have not been formally tested in patients receiving the current standard of care therapy for metastatic disease. Summary: In patients previously treated with today's standard of care, including a significant subgroup with untreated or progressing brain metastases, the combination of tucatinib, a novel HER2-targeting TKI, with trastuzumab and capecitabine, demonstrates a clinically meaningful improvement in PFS and OS when compared to placebo with trastuzumab and capecitabine. Neratinib, another HER2 TKI, in combination with capecitabine, compared to lapatinib and capecitabine, as well as margetuximab, an HER2-directed monoclonal antibody with a fragment c (Fc) domain engineered to enhance immune activation, compared to trastuzumab, both combined with the investigator's choice of chemotherapy, showed a statistically significantly longer PFS. However, not all patients in the respective trials had received pertuzumab and T-DM1 prior to enrollment and, so far, no improvement in OS has been demonstrated. After a median of 6 prior lines of therapy, trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd), a novel ADC, showed a meaningful overall response and PFS. Although the safety profile was generally manageable, treatment-related interstitial lung disease (ILD) might pose a challenge in routine practice. Pyrotinib, another HER2 TKI, was evaluated in combination with capecitabine in patients after prior exposure to trastuzumab when pertuzumab and T-DM1 were not available. In this setting, PFS was better than with lapatinib and capecitabine. Key Messages: In 2020, pertuzumab and trastuzumab with taxane-based chemotherapy in the first line, and T-DM1 in the second line, remain the standard of care. Tucatinib, neratinib, margetuximab, and T-DXd expand the armamentarium for treatment beyond the second line. Pyrotinib might be another option, especially for patients, who do not have access to pertuzumab and T-DM1. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) is overexpressed in approximately 20% of all breast cancers. Before the development of HER2-directed monoclonal antibodies, HER2-positive breast cancer was associated with a rather poor prognosis. With the advent of monoclonal HER2-targeting antibodies (trastuzumab and pertuzumab) and antibody-drug conjugates (trastuzumab emtansine [T-DM1] and trastuzumab deruxtecan), clinical outcomes for HER2-positive breast cancer have dramatically changed, and a greater proportion of patients in the nonmetastatic setting are cured. However, in the metastatic setting, resistance to anti-HER2 treatments still remains a major therapeutic challenge, underscoring the importance of developing novel HER2-directed therapies. Over the last year, there has been a dramatic shift in the current treatment paradigms for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer, with recent U.S. Food and Drug Administration approvals of trastuzumab deruxtecan (DS-8201), neratinib, and tucatinib in combination with trastuzumab and capecitabine. The authors summarize recent phase 3 data with novel HER2-targeted therapies as well as phase 1 and 2 data with other novel HER2-targeting agents. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Brain metastases are frequent in HER2-positive breast cancer. ONT-380 (tucatinib) is a potent selective inhibitor of HER2 with intracranial activity in preclinical models. This was a phase I study of tucatinib with trastuzumab, without chemotherapy, in patients with progressive, measurable HER2-positive brain metastases. The study tested two schedules of tucatinib: cohort A was twice daily and cohort B was once daily. The primary objective was determination of the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Secondary end points included objective response (intracranial and extracranial) using modified RECIST and clinical benefit rate (CBR). Overall, 41 patients were enrolled (cohort A, n = 22; cohort B, n = 19). Patients had a median of two prior treatments for metastatic breast cancer and 83% had progressed after prior brain radiation. The MTD of tucatinib for cohort A was 300 mg twice daily and for cohort B was 750 mg once daily. The most common dose-limiting toxicities included thrombocytopenia and aspartate transaminase/alanine aminotransferase elevation. Grade 3/4 aspartate transaminase/alanine aminotransferase elevation occurred in nine of 41 patients (22%). Intracranial responses were observed in two of 17 (12%) patients in cohort A and one of 17 (6%) patients in cohort B treated at the MTD. In cohort A, CBR at 16 weeks was 35% (n = 6). In cohort B, CBR at 16 weeks was 53% (n = 9). Of 15 patients overall who experienced clinical benefit, 12 (80%) had received prior neratinib and/or lapatinib. Median progression-free survival for cohorts A and B was 3.4 and 4.1 months, respectively. The combination of tucatinib and trastuzumab is tolerable and demonstrated preliminary evidence of efficacy in patients with HER2-positive brain metastases. NCT01921335. • Phase I study of tucatinib and trastuzumab in patients with progressive HER2-positive breast cancer brain metastasis. • Two cohorts enrolled: cohort A, twice-daily (b.i.d.) tucatinib and cohort B, once-daily (q.d.) tucatinib. • The maximum tolerated dose of tucatinib was 300 mg p.o. b.i.d. in cohort A and 750 mg p.o. q.d. in cohort B. • The combination of tucatinib and trastuzumab was well tolerated. • We observed preliminary evidence of activity, including intracranial responses. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: At the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium, new data on the management of heavily pretreated human epidermal growth factor receptor 2(HER2)-positive metastatic breast cancer were discussed. The phase 3 HER2CLIMB and the phase 2 DESTINY-Breast01 trials investigating tucatinib and trastuzumab deruxtecan, respectively, have met their primary endpoints. In an early disease setting, four studies investigated whether image-guided biopsies could identify patients with a pathologic complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, thus allowing safe omission of surgery. As residual disease was missed in a significant number of cases, these trials could not confirm data from smaller previous studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The clinical evaluation of HER2CLIMB trial showed a 21. 9-month median overall survival with the triplet regimens of tucatinib, capecitabine, and trastuzumab (TXT) for patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) –overexpressing metastatic breast cancer. From the payer's perspective of the United States and China, a cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted to evaluate the costs and benefits of adding tucatinib in this study. Methods: We constructed a Markov model for the economic evaluation of adding tucatinib to trastuzumab plus capecitabine in patients with HER-2 positive metastatic breast cancer in the United States and China. The model was conducted with a 10-year time horizon, and the health status was divided into three states: progression-free survival, progressing disease, and death. The health utility scores were consistent with published literature with similar patient status. The transition probabilities were derived from the survival data of the HER2CLIMB study. The unit prices of medicines were obtained from the West China Hospital, Red Book, and published literature. Outcomes were measured in quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, which robustness was evaluated by deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. Results: Compared with the two-drug regimen of trastuzumab plus capecitabine (TX), the addition of tucatinib increased 0.21 QALY, with an increasing cost of $146,995.05 and $19,022.97 in the United States and China, respectively. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) for the TXT versus TX was $699,976.43 in the U.S. and $90,585.57 in China, both of which are higher than their respective threshold of willingness to play. Deterministic sensitivity analysis shows that the price of tucatinib is the parameter that has the most significant impact on ICERs, but it does not change the results of the model. Probability sensitivity analysis shows that the probability of cost-effective for TXT is 0 in the base case. Conclusion: In the United States and China, tucatinib combined with trastuzumab and capecitabine is not cost-effective for patients with HER-2 positive metastatic breast cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Older patients now form between 30 and 40% of breast cancer (BC) patients. Managing older patients with BC is particularly challenging due to the limited availability of high-quality evidence. In this review we discuss the available evidence on the efficacy and safety of anti-HER2 agents in older patients with HER2-positive BC is presented, with a particular look at the latest results of promising new agents such trastuzumab-deruxtecan. The data suggest that older patients can expect similar efficacy when using standard regimens, with higher toxicity, particular cardiac toxicity and diarrhea. Anti-HER2 agents should thus be used in most older patients most as per standard of care as long as adequate follow-up is available to manage toxicities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A new and improved synthetic route to tucatinib is described that involves three key intermediates. The first of these, 4-([1,2,4]triazolo[1,5- a ]pyridin-7-yloxy)-3-methylaniline, was prepared on a 100 g scale in 33% yield over five steps and 99% purity. Next, N 4-(4-([1,2,4]triazolo[1,5- a ]pyridin-7-yloxy)-3-methylphenyl)quinazoline-4,6-diamine was isolated in 67% yield over three steps and >99% purity. Then, 4,4-dimethyl-2-(methylthio)-4,5-dihydrooxazole trifluoromethanesulfonate was prepared under mild conditions in 67% yield over two steps. Finally, tucatinib was obtained in 17% yield over nine steps and in >99% purity (HPLC). Purification methods used to isolate the product and the intermediates involved in the route are also reported. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Besides predicting responsiveness to anti-HER2 agents, HER2 aberrations are associated with a high incidence of central nervous system (CNS) metastasis across several cancer types, including breast, lung, gastric and colorectal cancer. In this setting, several novel anti-HER2 agents with relevant CNS activity are emerging, including tucatinib and trastuzumab deruxtecan. Both agents are already FDA-approved for treating advanced breast cancer, but are also being tested for the treatment of other HER2-driven histologies. The confirmation of their activity in other cancer types may provide histology-agnostic weapons against HER2-driven brain metastasis, possibly improving the prognosis of a wide population of cancer patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]