Search

This paper questions how to respond to the publication of political dreams in relation to efforts to reduce radicalism in Indonesia according to Sadd al-Dzari'ah's study. This research is qualitative in nature and its presentation uses descriptive analysis method. Publication of dreams is a common thing in society, moreover dreams that are disseminated are good dreams. However, sometimes the publication of a dream, according to people who experience it, is suitable for public consumption, on the other hand it may have an impact on the emergence of radicalism in a country. An example that recently occurred was the dream of Haikal Hassan who met Rasulullah SAW regarding the shooting of the Islamic Defenders Front (FPI) laskar by the police in Mega Mendung, West Java. The publication of this dream seemed to have political nuances and caused turmoil among the FPI, because in this dream Rasullullah SAW seemed to blame the police for handling the FPI laskar and on the contrary defending the FPI laskar who was killed. This paper concludes that the act of publishing dreams which was previously immutable is not permitted if the publication creates a radicalism movement that may threaten the integrity of the country. In the study of siyasah syar'iyyah, security and public order (maslahah) is a very important part of state politics. Therefore, according to Sadd al-Dzari'ah's study, the legal position of publishing dreams, which has so far been converting, can become haram if it causes harm to a country.

Abstract: The Prohabitions on Wearing Niqab (Face Covers for Mulism Women) in Higher Education Perspectives of Sadd al-dzarî`ah. Wearing niqab for women in colleges has recently become a polemic. This happened after two Islamic universities in Indonesia made a policy of prohibition for the academic community to wear the niqab on campus. Pros cons arise to address the policy of the rector II college. In the study of Jurisprudence, Hanafi, Maliki, and Shafi’i schools agree that women’s faces are not aurat (private parts of human’s body that cannot be exposed or should be covered according to Islam). Only the Hambali school of thought which says that the whole body of a woman, including the face, is aurat. Therefore, outside the prayers only Hambali schools that require covering the face for women by using niqab. While the other three schools of thought argue that wearing niqab is considered Sunnah (the way of the prophet), and can become mandatory if it is feared to cause slander. Since wearing niqab is categorized a khilafiah, the universities is entitled to establish a policy which prohibits its students to wear niqab: as long as this is believed and based on the strong and real reasons for its positive impact on the college and the student themselves. This action may be justified and appropriate under the sadd al-dzarî`ah proposition, as a preventive and anticipatory measure to prevent potential harm and damage that will result from wearing the veil on campus.