Search

Copyright of Mostariensia: Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities is the property of University of Mostar and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The paper deals with the recent topic of plea bargaining in relation to the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights. It focuses on several areas in the Court's jurisprudence, which are waiver of the right to a fair trial, prejudice to the accused, the right to a defense, the speed of criminal proceedings, and finally, the presumption of innocence and group cases. The paper concludes with an assessment of whether the regulation of the plea bargaining procedure is in conformity with the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of European Journal of Social Work is the property of Routledge and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

U radu se analiziraju politike državljanstva i imigracije u Hrvatskoj, s posebnim osvrtom na etnifikaciju i marketizaciju građanstva koja se odvija u posljednja tri desetljeća. Studija polazi od koncepta građanstva kao "diferenciranog članstva" koji pretpostavlja da su beneficije članstva nejednako raspoređene među različitim subjektima građanstva neovisno o njihovom formalnom državljanskom statusu i često u suprotnosti s dominantnim nacionalnim mitologijama. Po modelu Rogersa Brubakera i njegovog koncepta "socijalnog zatvaranja", studije državljanstva u Hrvatskoj dosad su se bavile problematikom etniciteta i formalnog članstva. Pri tome, etnicitet se poima kao ključna kategorija koja pretpostavlja stjecanje državljanstva i građanskih prava. Nasuprot tome, slijedeći pristup Brigdet Anderson, u ovom radu na etničko državljanstvo gledam kao političku strategiju kojom se održava mit da sudjelovanje u naciji nosi jasne simboličke i materijalne koristi članstva. Ovaj rad nastojat će pokazati da procesi komodifikacije djeluju protiv logike etnonacionalizma pa se građanska prava rastaču u korist tržišta, a na štetu ciljanih socioekonomskih skupina unutar (etno)nacionalne većine i manjina. Socijalno građanstvo koje Brubaker i literatura "socijalnog zatvaranja" zanemaruju kritično je za razumijevanje građanstva kao koncepta i društvene prakse.

Copyright of Annals of the Croatian Political Science Association / Anali Hrvatskog Politoloskog Drustva is the property of Croatian Political Science Association and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Business Consultant / Poslovni Konsultant is the property of FINconsult Ltd. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Knihovna is the property of Library Institute of the Czech National Library and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Pozornost je autora u ovom radu usmjerena, ponajviše, prema upravnom sporu pune jurisdikcije. Zbog važnosti upravnosudske kontrole činjeničnog stanja i zbog postojanja različitih gledišta po tom pitanju, opširnije se prikazuje spor pune jurisdikcije u francuskom upravnom pravu. U članku se ukazuje na važnost novih činjenica u upravnom sporu, posebno ako iste nedvojbeno pokazuju da su različite od činjeničnog stanja utvrđenog u upravnom postupku. U zaključku rada ukazuje se na promjenivost upravnog spora pune jurisdikcije.

Integration, as a dynamic and bilateral process, requires not only the adaptation of foreign nationals to the new environment, but also the state must create conditions for that. It is an integral part of migration. These issues are addressed in the introductory part of the article. The paper also focuses on the legal aspects of the status of foreigners in the Slovak Republic in the context of the integration processes. The article includes an explanation of the so called law on aliens, selected aspects of the Act on Asylum, the Act on the Residence of Aliens, and the Act on Citizenship. The article also introduces the possibilities of enforcing certain rights which are part of the state's integration policy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Pravnik is the property of Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of State & Law and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

U radu su prikazane tri (3) odluke Ustavnog suda Republike Hrvatske u vezi prava trgovačkih društava na pomorskom dobru: 1) Odluka br: U-III-3579/2006 od 26.10.2010; 2) Rješenje br: U-I-1216/1997 od 04.07.2001.; 3) Odluka br: U-III-726/2006 od 08.07.2009. iz kojih proizlaze redom sljedeći zaključci: a) prvenstvena koncesija je koncesija sui generis za nastavak obavljanja lučkih djelatnosti i korištenja lučkih objekata u istom opsegu kao do pretvorbe; b) osporene odredbe Zakon o morskim lukama iz 1995. g. - pravni položaj lučkih objekata na pomorskom dobra – su u suglasnosti s Ustavom; c) društva koja obavljaju brodograđevnu djelatnost u lukama za posebne namjene ne mogu postići uknjižbu vlasništva zemljišta i objekata sagrađenih na tom zemljištu jer su to stvari izvan prometa res extra ciommercium.

Copyright of Legal Thought / Pravna Misao is the property of Legal Thought / Pravna Misao and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Collected Papers of the Faculty of Law in Split / Zbornik Radova Pravnog Fakulteta u Splitu is the property of Split Faculty of Law and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The article opens with an introduction to the key aspects of the globalization debates and their controversies, while it later deals with the crisis of the national model of citizenship. Since the 1990's the debate is between the advocates of two conflicting theses. According to the first camp of authors, citizenship has proven resistant to the globalization changes in the economic, political and cultural sphere, and even capable of revival. On the other side, it has been argued that the identity of a person, as a member of a national community, was gradually separated from its human and civil rights. That led to the establishment of a 'postnational model of membership' -- individual and group rights independent of citizenship. According to the second camp, the nation state was fundamentally transformed and it has become an instrument for implementation of the international conventions and norms of human rights understood as personal instead of citizenship rights. There are also attempts to reconcile the two standpoints. These authors recognize the challenges to the conventional national mode of citizenship, but argue that the processes of citizenship transformation are primarily an internal issue for the liberal democracies. Some authors try to step out of the narrow and exclusive conceptual frameworks of the nation state and postnational membership, attempting to explain the conflicting transformation processes of citizenship rights. There are also proposals for new concepts of citizenship -- a multicultural and a supranational, for example -- as a response to the challenges of globalization and international migration. Finally, postmodern writers talk about postmodern or a cosmopolitan citizenship that is not immediately tied to the nation-state. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]