Search

The article addresses the question posed in one of the guiding questions of this dossier, namely, in what dimension did Latin American thinkers place the Eurocentric problem of Marxism? We consider the research of the theoretical levels in which this problem was identified and processed by two Latin American intellectuals, José Aricó and Oscar del Barco. Both elucidate this problem in dialogue with their political and theoretical contexts of enunciation, which allowed them to configure a solid critique of the doctrinal perspective of Marxism. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Más allá de las diferencias entre las prácticas intelectuales y políticas de Dipesh Chakrabarty y José Aricó, la obra de ambos autores representa una forma común de intervenir en la discusión sobre el orientalismo de Marx. Simultáneamente a la obra de Said y a los debates que generó, el historiador indio y el intelectual argentino desarrollaron una lectura de Marx centrada en las ambivalencias del pensador alemán hacia las sociedades no europeas. Diferenciándose de la hipótesis de un necesario eurocentrismo en la configuración de la teoría marxista, ambos autores se esforzaron por demostrar la necesidad de contar con conceptos marxistas para dar cuenta de las realidades periféricas. En el caso de Chakrabarty, rescatando la narrativa del capital, pero abriendo el corpus marxista al problema de la diferencia histórica. En el caso de Aricó, desestabilizando la tradición marxista al recuperar un Marx interesado en las especificidades de las sociedades no europeas. A través de estas operaciones, Chakrabarty y Aricó desarrollaron un movimiento crítico dentro del marxismo que implicaba mantener una posición materialista, pero también abrirse a las singularidades nacionales y regionales.

O artigo tem o objetivo de analisar uma parte da obra de José Aricó (1931-1991), intelectual argentino, fundador da Revista Pasado y Presente e um dos grande introdutores das ideias de Antonio Gramsci em seu país e na América Latina. O que se pretende estudar é a recepção da obra gramsciana pelo autor no movimento de ruptura de Aricó e seu grupo com o Partido Comunista Argentino - PCA, que se deu nos fins dos anos 50 e início dos anos 60. A característica mais importante na recepção das ideias de Gramsci naquele período e na conjuntura argentina, foi a renovação do marxismo gramsciano em relação à prática e à teoria do PCA, marcadamente stalinista, segundo a avaliação do grupo de Córdoba, do qual Aricó foi um dos grandes expoentes. Com o estudo do pensamento de José Aricó tem-se a intenção de apreender dois processos distintos: em primeiro lugar, analisar a sua leitura da obra de Gramsci e a crítica ao marxismo de caráter positivista, que o levou a ser expulso do PCA, juntamente com outros integrantes “gramscianos”. Por outro lado, possibilitar a realização de leituras mais densas e articuladas com as realidades de nossos países. O objeto principal da leitura são os dois Manifestos publicados por Aricó na Revista Pasado y Presente, nos anos de 1963 e 1964, por meio dos quais podemos compreender o que aqui se entende por renovação do marxismo na obra do autor.

This review essay reads Mike Gonzalez's In the Red Corner: The Marxism of José Carlos Mariátegui alongside Martín Cortés's Translating Marx: José Aricó and the New Latin American Marxism. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Práticas da História is the property of Práticas da História and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Revista HISTEDBR on-line is the property of Universidade Estadual de Campinas - Portal de Periodicos Eletronicos Cientificos and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Siguiendo la hipótesis de que el marxismo siempre se halló en crisis, en lo que sigue se concede atención al trabajo de José Aricó. Se atiende al nuevo comienzo del marxismo que el autor propone en el contexto del exilio mexicano, al cual parte bastante después de haber sido expulsado del Partido Comunista Argentino y convertirse en el principal impulsor y artífice del proyecto neoizquierdista de Pasado y Presente. Se analiza no sólo la labor editorial y de difusión de ideas que Aricó lleva a cabo sino también, y en especial, el rol de lector crítico y polemista que asume situadamente, reconociendo su condición de pensador latinoamericano, sin establecer ninguna clase de garantía.

Copyright of Trans/Form/Ação is the property of Trans/Form/Acao and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of CIVILIZAR: Ciencias Sociales y Humanas is the property of Universidad Sergio Arboleda and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

I propose reading José Aricó’s “Marx y América Latina” as a work in which the author discusses Leopoldo Zea´s proposals to study the history of ideas in such a way that it also relates to Carlos Real de Azúa´s approaches: the obsessions and terms of a possible “esoteric history” or a “philosophical research”.

Copyright of Orbis Tertius is the property of Universidad Nacional de La Plata and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

With few exceptions, the impact of the work of Antonio Gramsci in Argentina is generally associated with the so called “Argentinian gramscians”, many of whom met around the journal Pasado y Presente, headed by José Aricó, without considering Gramsci’s earlier influence. However, it is often forgotten that the first introduction of Gramsci to Argentina was by the hand of Héctor P. Agosti. Agosti influenced many young intellectuals who subsequently congregated around Aricó. Beyond the observations made in this article regarding Agosti’s detractors, the aim here is to contribute to the diffusion, and presentation to the public of the thought of one of the most remarkable intellectuals that have arisen in the Communist Party of Argentina. This article also delves into relatively unexamined connections between the works of Agosti and Grasmci, highlighting the role played by the former in introducing the works of this Italian intellectual into Argentina during that period.

This article examines José Aricó's critical appraisal about the need to rethink the beclouding presence of populism in Latin America. This article analyses the way in which the constitution of a popular political subject has been conceived in studies about the origins of Peronism in Argentina. It proposes that studying the character of populism implies investigating the political nature of the crisis in distributing social places, displacing other explanations that lose sight of the specificity and singularity of the Latin American political experience. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Resumen: El texto propone un recorrido sucinto por los modos en que las lecturas marxistas de fines de los años setenta del siglo XX se apropiaron de la figura de Carl Schmitt, con el propósito de enriquecer con su concepción fuerte de lo político lo que era considerado una debilidad propia del marxismo: su teoría política. Se toman dos casos paradigmáticos en materia de articulación entre Schmitt y Marx: el del italiano Mario Tronti y el del argentino José María Aricó. La lectura parte de la hipótesis de que los ejercicios de Tronti y Aricó se pueden leer como intentos de complementar a Marx con las contribuciones de Schmitt, razón por la cual permanecen al interior del marxismo como horizonte problemático. Finalmente, sugerimos que sobre todo a partir de los años ochenta, y con mayor énfasis de los noventa hacia el presente, las lecturas de Schmitt que continuaron formulándose desde el campo de las izquierdas se hicieron por fuera -y quizá en contra- del marxismo, en la medida en que se lo considera incapaz de producir una teoría compleja de lo político. Se abre entonces la pregunta por los alcances de estas distintas operaciones en materia de crítica del presente.