Search

Članak daje pregled pokušaja stvaranja jedinica Jugoslovenske vojske u otadžbini na prostoru Primorske Slovenije u periodu posle kapitulacije Italije u jesen 1943. kao i tokom 1944. godine. Ova oblast bila je od kraja Prvog svetskog rata u okviru Italije, a od njene kapitulacije u Drugom svetskom ratu, u septembru 1943. godine, stavljena je pod nemačku okupacionu upravu. Na ovom prostoru, postojao je jak partizanski pokret kao i jedinice Slovenskog domobranstva. Pored njih, kao pokret otpora stvara se vojna i obaveštajna organizacija verna Kraljevini Jugoslaviji. Najviše aktivnosti na stvaranju ove organizacije, odigrale su se u 1944. godini. Njena organizacija je nazivana od protivnika: „pokret DM“, „četnici“ ili „plava garda“. U radu su korišćeni arhivski fondovi Arhiva Slovenije u Ljubljani, Vojnog arhiva u Beogradu, literatura kao i usmeni izvori koje je jedan od autora prikupio.

Copyright of Kronika is the property of Kronika, Casopis za Slovensko Krajevno Zgodovino and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Zgodovinski Casopis is the property of Zveza Zgodovinskih Drustev Slovenije and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Zgodovinski Casopis is the property of Zveza Zgodovinskih Drustev Slovenije and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Structural equation modeling (SEM) software commonly report information criteria, like the AIC, for the model under investigation and for the unconstrained/saturated model. With these criteria, (non-)nested models can be compared. This comes down to evaluating equalities (e.g., setting some paths equal or to 0). These criteria cannot evaluate inequality restrictions on the parameters, while the AIC-type criterion called GORICA can. For example, GORICA can evaluate the hypothesis stating that one predictor has more (standardized) strength than some other predictors. This paper illustrates inequality-constrained hypothesis-evaluation in SEM models using the GORICA (in R). Examples will be presented for confirmatory factor analysis, latent regression, and multigroup latent regression. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Sigismund grof Attems Petzenstein (1708–1758) je sredi 18. stoletja svojo rodbino »povzdignil do take veličine, kakršne ni dosegla v vseh preteklih časih« (G. Guelmi, Storia genealogico-cronologica degli Attems austriaci, 1783). Na novo pridobljeni ugled je pospremil s postavitvijo mestne rezidence na Kornu (1745) in vile v Podgori (1747–1748) ter z obnovo dvorca na Jazbinah (1747). Leta 1750, ob imenovanju brata Karla Mihaela (1711–1774) za prvega goriškega nadškofa, pa je dal modernizirati pročelje mestne palače. Za gradbene podvige je Sigismund praviloma zaposlil arhitekta Saveria Giannija, kar dokazujejo prvič objavljeni podatki iz zapuščinskega inventarja. Slikarsko opremo je naročal pri goriških slikarjih (Johann Michael Lichtenreit, Antonio Paroli), le za oltarno sliko družinske kapele v nekdanji cerkvi sv. Frančiška se je obrnil na veronskega umetnika Giambettina Cignarolija. Čeprav Sigismund ni dočakal namestitve slike, se je ravno s tem umetniškim podvigom vpisal v elitni krog evropskih naročnikov Cignarolijevih del.

Copyright of Kronika is the property of Kronika, Casopis za Slovensko Krajevno Zgodovino and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Acta Historiae Artis Slovenica is the property of Scientific Research Centre of Slovenian Academy of Sciences & Arts and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The paper observes the experience of the plague and its consequences through 17th century reports, which were written by "first hand" witnesses of the plague Fabio Fino, a syndic in Koper and Giovanni Maria Marusig, a priest in Gorica. From both testimonies and other available sources the paper extracts collective emotions triggered by the epidemics in the years 1630/31 and 1682/83, their demographic consequences and changes of the social order. At the same time, the paper observes how the chroniclers' positions, functions and personal involvement affected their reports. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Kronika is the property of Kronika, Casopis za Slovensko Krajevno Zgodovino and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Among the activities of St. Clement of Ohrid was the construction of the church and monastery in Ohrid, which was carried out at the end of the 9th century at the location where some Byzantine basilicas had stood previously. As findings of archaeological excavations have shown, St. Clement first built a small triconch church at the location of the ruined basilica. This triconchos was later expanded by the addition of a capacious “pronaos” in inscribed-cross form, where St. Clement was interred. This “pronaos” was characterized by entrances on the north and south sides that were identical to those of the inscribed-cross church that existed near the village of Velcë along the Šušica River (in southern Albania) at the turn of the 9th‒10th century. During the tenure of Archbishop Dmitrios Chomatianos (1216–1236), the “pronaos” was replaced with a new church into which the relics of St. Clement were placed. In the Ottoman period, the Church and Monastery of St. Clement were disassembled to build a mosque. At the very beginning of the 10th century, the triconchal church in the Monastery of St. Clement served as a model for the church in the Monastery of St. Naum, in the southern part of the Ohrid lake area. The groundwork(s) of a further church in a triconchal shape, whose construction can be traced back to the time of St. Clement, has also been discovered at Gorica, near Ohrid. Ruins of yet another triconchal church which also belongs to the period under review can be found near the village of Zlesti, in the Dolna Debarca region, not far from Ohrid. In the vicinity of the village of Izdeglavje, in the Gorna Debarca region, there is also a church whose establishment is related to the activity of St. Clement of Ohrid as well.

Copyright of Kronika is the property of Kronika, Casopis za Slovensko Krajevno Zgodovino and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Soon after the liberation of Venezia Giulia in May 1945, several arrests took part in the big city centres of the region, especially in Trieste and Gorizia. The representatives of the local Yugoslav authorities arrested numerous persons, among which there were prisoners of war, collaborators, people suspected of war crimes, political suspects and those who violated the Yugoslav occupation policy during the 42 days of their rule in the region. When it was clear that Yugoslavia would be forced to withdraw its troops from the territory, several people were relocated - today, those events are known as deportations. In the article, the author argues that this term is used incorrectly, since it does not correspond to the events from the historical or terminological point of view. Nowadays, these events are commemorated by two monuments in the Gorizia Park of Remembrance. The first was inaugurated in I960, followed by the second in I985/86. The latter, the lapidary that bears the names of the 665 people allegedly deported from Gorizia, is historically much more disputed. The author of the article argues that the inscription on the lapidary is historically incorrect. However, so far this has not been argued by historians, who consider the lapidary the second carrier of Gorizia's (Italian) identity, but do not question its historical adequacy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Zgodovina za Vse is the property of Zgodovinsko Drustvo Celje (The Historical Society of Celje) and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Zgodovina za Vse is the property of Zgodovinsko Drustvo Celje (The Historical Society of Celje) and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Historical Journal / Historijski Zbornik is the property of Drustvo za Hrvatsku Povjesnicu and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Kronika is the property of Kronika, Casopis za Slovensko Krajevno Zgodovino and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Journal of the Institute of Art History is the property of Radovi Instituta za Povijest Umjetnosti and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Kronika is the property of Kronika, Casopis za Slovensko Krajevno Zgodovino and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Kronika is the property of Kronika, Casopis za Slovensko Krajevno Zgodovino and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The article is a presentation of the book dedicated to the 25th anniversary of the Episcopacy of Frančišek Borgia Sedej, who was the Bishop of Gorizia from March 25, 1909, until his death on November 28, 1931. Parchment folios were decorated by an Ursuline nun from the Gorizia convent, and individual sheets were signed by the priests who worked at the diocese and provided pastoral care at the parishes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Cancianus de Goritia (Cancianus of Gorizia) was the first native of Gorizia to be appointed bishop in the Middle Ages (1313) after having previously worked as a vicar in Gorizia and as a parish priest in Miren. Research on him sheds light on the complexity of the situation in which the interests ofi the Patriarchate of Aquileia, Venice and the Holy Roman Empire intersected. Mostly performing the role of the Vicar General in spiritualibus ofi the patriarchs Ottobonus and Paganus della Torre (Thurn), Cancianus resided in Cividale del Friuli, the centre of the vast Patriarchate ofi Aquileia that covered the territory between the rivers Tagliamento and Sava. However, almost nothing is known about the small diocese in Istria, located between the Mima and Dragonja rivers, where Cancianus was bishop up until his death. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Kronika is the property of Kronika, Casopis za Slovensko Krajevno Zgodovino and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Zgodovinski Casopis is the property of Zveza Zgodovinskih Drustev Slovenije and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)