Semmler, Georg, Meyer, Elias Laurin, Kozbial, Karin, Schwabl, Philipp, Hametner-Schreil, Stefanie, Zanetto, Alberto, Bauer, David, Chromy, David, Simbrunner, Benedikt, Scheiner, Bernhard, Stättermayer, Albert F., Pinter, Matthias, Schöfl, Rainer, Russo, Francesco Paolo, Greenfield, Helena, Schwarz, Michael, Schwarz, Caroline, Gschwantler, Michael, Alonso López, Sonia, and Manzano, Maria Luisa
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with advanced chronic liver disease (ACLD) caused by chronic hepatitis C who have achieved sustained virologic response (SVR). We developed risk stratification algorithms for de novo HCC development after SVR and validated them in an independent cohort. We evaluated the occurrence of de novo HCC in a derivation cohort of 527 patients with pre-treatment ACLD and SVR to interferon-free therapy, in whom alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and non-invasive surrogates of portal hypertension including liver stiffness measurement (LSM) were assessed pre-/post-treatment. We validated our results in 1,500 patients with compensated ACLD (cACLD) from other European centers. During a median follow-up (FU) of 41 months, 22/475 patients with cACLD (4.6%, 1.45/100 patient-years) vs. 12/52 decompensated patients (23.1%, 7.00/100 patient-years, p < 0.001) developed de novo HCC. Since decompensated patients were at substantial HCC risk, we focused on cACLD for all further analyses. In cACLD, post-treatment-values showed a higher discriminative ability for patients with/without de novo HCC development during FU than pre-treatment values or absolute/relative changes. Models based on post-treatment AFP, alcohol consumption (optional), age, LSM, and albumin, accurately predicted de novo HCC development (bootstrapped Harrel's C with/without considering alcohol: 0.893/0.836). Importantly, these parameters also provided independent prognostic information in competing risk analysis and accurately stratified patients into low- (~2/3 of patients) and high-risk (~1/3 of patients) groups in the derivation (algorithm with alcohol consumption; 4-year HCC-risk: 0% vs. 16.5%) and validation (3.3% vs. 17.5%) cohorts. An alternative approach based on alcohol consumption (optional), age, LSM, and albumin (i.e. , without AFP) also showed a robust performance. Simple algorithms based on post-treatment age/albumin/LSM, and optionally, AFP and alcohol consumption, accurately stratified patients with cACLD based on their risk of de novo HCC after SVR. Approximately two-thirds were identified as having an HCC risk <1%/year in both the derivation and validation cohort, thereby clearly falling below the cost-effectiveness threshold for HCC surveillance. Simple algorithms based on age, alcohol consumption, results of blood tests (albumin and α-fetoprotein), as well as liver stiffness measurement after the end of hepatitis C treatment identify a large proportion (approximately two-thirds) of patients with advanced but still asymptomatic liver disease who are at very low risk (<1%/year) of liver cancer development, and thus, might not need to undergo 6-monthly liver ultrasound. [Display omitted] • We studied de novo HCC development in patients with cACLD after SVR in a derivation cohort (n = 475) and validation cohort (n = 1,500). • Algorithms based on post-treatment age/albumin/LSM, and optionally, AFP and alcohol consumption, accurately stratified de novo HCC risk. • Approximately two-thirds of patients were identified as having an HCC risk <1%/year. • In these patients, HCC-surveillance might not be cost-effective. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]