Search

Abstract Background The gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol is advantageous given that it can avoid severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS), especially for patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Basic and clinical evidence has shown that a threshold of luteinizing hormone (LH) stimulation is required for adequate follicular development and oocyte maturation. Ultra-low or high levels of LH are detrimental to pregnancy outcomes. We previously demonstrated that LH could be an indicator for the timing and dosage of antagonist administration in a retrospective study. Methods/design In this randomized, single-center, non-inferiority trial, we aim to test the hypothesis that there is no significant difference in cumulative ongoing pregnancy rates between PCOS patients stimulated with LH-based flexible protocol versus traditional flexible GnRH antagonist protocol. The primary efficacy endpoint will be the cumulative ongoing pregnancy rate per cycle. The secondary outcomes will be clinical pregnancy rate, cancelation rate, serious OHSS rate, and cost-efficiency. The cumulative ongoing pregnancy rate per cycle in PCOS women was 80%. Considering that a non-inferiority threshold should retain 80% of the clinical effect of a control treatment, a minimal clinical difference of 16% (two-sided: α, 2.5%; β, 20%) and a total of 196 patients were needed. Anticipating a 10% dropout rate, the total number of patients required was 216. Discussion The results of this study will provide evidence for the efficacy and safety of the LH-based flexible GnRH antagonist protocol in PCOS patients. Moreover, it evaluates the cost-efficiency of both protocols. Trial registration Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR1800018129. Date assigned: 31 August 2018. Protocol version: 1.0 (18 July 2017)

Introduction Many patients demonstrate an insufficient endogenous luteinising hormone (LH) concentration during ovarian stimulation. With traditional fixed or flexible gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocols, antagonist administration may further reduce LH activity. Previously, we proved that LH can be used as an indicator for the timing and dosage of antagonist. Patients with a persistently low LH concentration during ovarian stimulation may not require antagonists, whereas antagonist administration can affect reproductive outcomes. To further explore this hypothesis, we designed a randomised clinical trial to compare the LH-based flexible GnRH antagonist protocol with traditional flexible GnRH antagonist protocol in women with normal ovarian response.Methods and analysis This study was a multicentre, parallel, prospective, randomised, non-inferiority study. The primary efficacy endpoint was cumulative ongoing pregnancy rate per cycle. The study aimed to prove the non-inferiority of cumulative ongoing pregnancy rate per cycle with an LH-based flexible GnRH antagonist protocol versus traditional flexible GnRH antagonist protocol. Secondary endpoints were the high-quality embryo rate, clinical pregnancy rate and cancellation rate. Differences in cost-effectiveness and adverse events were evaluated. The cumulative ongoing pregnancy rate per cycle in women with normal ovarian response was 70%. Considering that a non-inferiority threshold should retain 80% of the clinical effect of a control treatment, a minimal clinical difference of 14% (one-sided: α, 2.5%; β, 20%) and a total of 338 patients were needed. Anticipating a 10% drop-out rate, the total number of patients required was 372.Ethics and dissemination This trial has been approved by the Institutional Ethical Committee of Beijing Chao-Yang hospital. All participants in the trial will provide written informed consent. The study will be conducted according to the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki and its amendments. Results of this study will be disseminated in peer-reviewed scientific journals.Trial registration number ChiCTR1800018077.

AIM: To identify the disease-causing gene mutation in a Chinese pedigree with autosomal dominant cone-rod dystrophy (adCORD). METHODS: A southern Chinese adCORD pedigree including 9 affected individuals was studied. Whole-exome sequencing (WES), coupling the Agilent whole-exome capture system to the Illumina HiSeq 2000 DNA sequencing platform was used to search the specific gene mutation in 3 affected family members and 1 unaffected member. After a suggested variant was found through the data analysis, the putative mutation was validated by Sanger DNA sequencing of samples from all available family members. RESULTS: The results of both WES and Sanger sequencing revealed a novel nonsense mutation c.C766T (p.Q256X) within exon 5 of CRX gene which was pathogenic for adCORD in this family. The mutation could affect photoreceptor-specific gene expression with a dominant-negative effect and resulted in loss of the OTX tail, thus the mutant protein occupies the CRX-binding site in target promoters without establishing an interaction and, consequently, may block transactivation. CONCLUSION: All modes of Mendelian inheritance in CORD have been observed, and genetic heterogeneity is a hallmark of CORD. Therefore, conventional genetic diagnosis of CORD would be time-consuming and labor-intensive. Our study indicated the robustness and cost-effectiveness of WES in the genetic diagnosis of CORD.