Search

Study Objective: To identify knowledge gaps in business education among obstetrics and gynecology fellows METHODS: An online anonymous survey was distributed to obstetrics and gynecology subspecialty fellows, including pediatric and adolescent gynecology, minimally invasive gynecologic surgery, and reproductive endocrinology and infertility fellows., Results: Of the 483 fellows who received the questionnaire, 159 completed the surveys, resulting in a response rate of 32.9%. A total of 80 reproductive endocrinology and infertility fellows (50.3%), 47 minimally invasive gynecologic surgery fellows (29.6%), and 32 pediatric and adolescent gynecology (20.1%) fellows completed the survey. Over half reported debt from either undergraduate or medical school (52.2%). Over half (58.5%) reported 0 hours of finance education in their residency or fellowship training. In general, fellows reported relatively higher levels of confidence in nonmedical aspects of business, such as purchasing a home (63.9%), life and disability insurance (57.2%), and making financial plans for the future (57.9%). Conversely, a large portion of fellows reported feeling "not at all confident" in business topics related to the field of medicine, including contract negotiation (24.7%), non-competes (27.1%), relative value units system-based pay (32.0%), general office practice management (58.2%), legal aspects of business (71.8%), accounting and billing (54.4%), and marketing (55.7%)., Conclusion: Our survey demonstrates an unmet demand among obstetrics and gynecology fellows to learn topics related to the business of medicine. Knowledge of these topics is critical for those pursuing private practice or academic medicine. Future initiatives should evaluate other subspecialties and prioritize creating a standardized education tool to better prepare trainees entering medical practice., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest All authors have no financial or personal relationships with people or organizations that could influence the design, conduct or reporting of this work., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Aim: Diseases that affect peripheral vasculature or neurological function can manifest with peripheral skin temperature abnormalities. This pilot study investigates the accuracy of current physical examination techniques and determines whether a hand-held infrared device can be used to estimate peripheral skin temperature and detect temperature disparities., Methods: Comparison between traditional physical examination of hands/feet by 30 healthcare professionals and a hand-held infrared device was made in 12 individuals (ages 4-25 years; 5 with disorders affecting peripheral skin temperature). Thermal camera measurements served as the reference temperature for comparison., Results: A total of 231 extremity examinations by healthcare professionals were analysed. Healthcare professionals correctly identified subjects with colder or warmer than normal peripheral temperature. Hand-held device measurements were significantly different than reference measurements, with the size of the temperature difference diverging significantly between hands (1.20°C) and feet (0.78°C). When analysing temperature disparities, healthcare professionals identified fewer clinically significant disparities (≥3.0°C) than the hand-held device (76% vs. 99%)., Conclusion: Although different from reference temperatures, the hand-held infrared device provided a more accurate and objective method than traditional physical exam in identifying peripheral skin temperature asymmetries that may be related to chronic paediatric illness., (©2015 Foundation Acta Paediatrica. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Purpose: To screen samples from patients with presumed autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa (adRP) for mutations in 12 disease genes as a contribution to the research and treatment goals of the National Ophthalmic Disease Genotyping and Phenotyping Network (eyeGENE)., Methods: DNA samples were obtained from eyeGENE. A total of 170 probands with an intake diagnosis of adRP were tested through enrollment in eyeGENE. The 10 most common genes causing adRP (IMPDH1, KLHL7, NR2E3, PRPF3/RP18, PRPF31/RP11, PRPF8/RP13, PRPH2/RDS, RHO, RP1, and TOPORS) were chosen for PCR-based dideoxy sequencing, along with the two X-linked RP genes, RPGR and RP2. RHO, PRPH2, PRPF31, RPGR, and RP2 were completely sequenced, while only mutation hotspots in the other genes were analyzed., Results: Disease-causing mutations were identified in 52% of the probands. The frequencies of disease-causing mutations in the 12 genes were consistent with previous studies., Conclusions: The Laboratory for Molecular Diagnosis of Inherited Eye Disease at the University of Texas in Houston has thus far received DNA samples from 170 families with a diagnosis of adRP from the eyeGENE Network. Disease-causing mutations in autosomal genes were identified in 48% (81/170) of these families while mutations in X-linked genes accounted for an additional 4% (7/170). Of the 55 distinct mutations detected, 19 (33%) have not been previously reported. All diagnostic results were returned by eyeGENE to participating patients via their referring clinician. These genotyped samples along with their corresponding phenotypic information are also available to researchers who may request access to them for further study of these ophthalmic disorders. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00378742.).