Search

Abstract Objectives To compare surgical and functional outcomes between off‐clamp robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy with indocyanine‐green tumour marking through preliminary superselective embolization and on‐clamp robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy with intraoperative ultrasound identification of the renal mass. Material and methods One hundred and forty patients with a single renal mass underwent indocyanine‐green fluorescence‐guided off‐clamp robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy with preoperative superselective embolization (Group A, 70 patients) versus intraoperative ultrasound‐guided on‐clamp robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy without embolization (Group B, 70 patients). We assessed operative time, intraoperative blood loss, complications, length of stay, renal function, need for ancillary procedures and blood transfusions. Results Mean tumour size was 24 versus 25 mm in Group A versus Group B (p = 0.19). Mean operative time was 86.5 versus 121.8 min (p = 0.02), mean blood loss was 72.8 versus 214.2 mL (p = 0.02), and mean haemoglobin drop on postoperative day 1 was 1.1 versus 2.6 g/dL (p = 0.04) in Group A versus Group B. One‐month creatinine, hospital stay and enucleated tumour volume were comparable. Ten postoperative complications occurred in Group A (13.3%) and 11 in Group B (15.3%). Following superselective embolization, no patients required blood transfusions versus two patients in Group B. Postoperative selective renal embolization was needed in one case per group. Conclusions Preoperative superselective embolization of a renal mass with indocyanine‐green before off‐clamp robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy significantly reduces operative time and intraoperative blood loss compared to on‐clamp intraoperative ultrasound‐guided robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy. A longer follow‐up is needed to establish the effect on renal function.

ObjectivesPostoperative haematuria is a feared complication following prostate enucleation, and it may occur even weeks after discharge. We evaluated the risk of bleeding after discharge and its predictive factors in patients who underwent Thulium laser enucleation of the prostate (ThuLEP). MethodsBetween January 2015 and December 2018, patients with surgical indication for benign prostatic hyperplasia underwent ThuLEP in 4 urology departments. All procedures were performed by experienced urologists. Postoperative haematuria was defined as macroscopic haematuria occurring 7 days after discharge. Readmission rate due to macroscopic haematuria was assessed. Logistic regression models tested for predictors of postoperative bleeding requiring readmission. ResultsOverall, 748 patients were included, and 52 (6.9%) of them were readmitted after discharge because of macroscopic haematuria. No cases of deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism were diagnosed. Mean length of stay for surgical treatment was 2.1 days, and mean hospitalization for readmission was 5.6 days. None of the readmitted patients required reintervention, while 46.1% of them required blood transfusions. Diabetes mellitus (P < 0.05), a long bridge of oral anticoagulant drugs with low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) (P < 0.05) and history of constipation (P < 0.05) were significant predictors of readmission after discharge due to macroscopic haematuria. ConclusionsPatients with a clinical history of diabetes mellitus or constipation and patients who undergo a long bridge of oral anticoagulant therapy with LMWH are at higher risk of bleeding requiring readmission after ThuLEP.

Abstract Background To compare clinical intra and early postoperative outcomes between conventional Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) and Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate using the Virtual Basket tool (VB-HoLEP) to treat benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Methods This prospective randomized study enrolled consecutive patients with BPH, who were assigned to undergo either HoLEP (n = 100), or VB-HoLEP (n = 100). All patients were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively, with particular attention to catheterization time, operative time, blood loss, irrigation volume and hospital stay. We also evaluated the patients at 3 and 6 months after surgery and assessed maximum flow rate (Qmax), postvoid residual urine volume (PVR), the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and the Quality of Life score (QOLS). Results No significant differences in preoperative parameters between patients in each study arm were found. Compared to HoLEP, VB-HoLEP resulted in less hemoglobin decrease (2.54 vs. 1.12 g/dl, P = 0.03) and reduced operative time (57.33 ± 29.71 vs. 42.99 ± 18.51 min, P = 0.04). HoLEP and VB-HoLEP detrmined similar catheterization time (2.2 vs. 1.9 days, P = 0.45), irrigation volume (33.3 vs. 31.7 l, P = 0.69), and hospital stay (2.8 vs. 2.7 days, P = 0.21). During the 6-month follow-up no significant differences in IPSS, Qmax, PVR, and QOLS were demonstrated. Conclusions HoLEP and VB-HoLEP are both efficient and safe procedures for relieving lower urinary tract symptoms. VB-HoLEP was statistically superior to HoLEP in blood loss and operative time. However, procedures did not differ significantly in catheterization time, hospital stay, and irrigation volume. No significant differences were demonstrated in QOLS, IPSS, Qmax and PVR throughout the 6-month follow-up. Trial Registration: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN72879639; date of registration: June 25th, 2015. Retrospectively registred.

Abstract Background Conventional Percutaneous Lithotripsy (PCNL) has been an effective, successful and easy approach for especially > 1 cm sized calyceal stones however risks of complications and nephron loss are inevitable. Our aim is to compare the efficacy and safety of PCNL, MiniPerc (MP) and UltraMiniPerc (UMP) for lower calyceal stones between 1 and 2 cm with a multicenter prospective randomized study. Methods Between January 2015 and June 2018, 132 consecutive patients with single lower calyceal stone were enrolled. Patients were randomized in three groups; A: PCNL; B: MP; C: UMP. 44 patients for the Group A, 47 for Group B and 41 for Group C. Exclusion criterias were the presence of coagulation impairments, age of 75, presence of infection or serious comorbidities. Patients were controlled with computerized tomography scan after 3 months. A negative CT or an asymptomatic patient with stone fragments

Objective: To present a modification to the classical ThuLEP technique, called 7U-ThuLEP and to compare its clinical intra- and post-operative outcomes to those of conventional ThuLEP in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS).