Search

Background: Simultaneous involvement of multiple distinct brain regions occurs in 2-5% of all high-grade gliomas (HGG) and is associated with poor prognosis. Whereas radiotherapy (RT) is an important and well-established treatment for high-grade glioma, the role of dose-escalated radiotherapy has yet to be established. In this case series, we report upon the dosimetry, adverse effects, and response in patients with multiple un-methylated high-grade gliomas receiving dose-escalated radiation. Materials and methods: We reviewed charts of patients with multifocal high grade glioma treated at our institution since January 2022. All patients had stereotactic biopsies after an magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) contrast-enhanced with T1, T2, FLAIR sequences and were discussed in a multidisciplinary oncology team. MGMT-positive patients received either TMZ alone or RT with TMZ and were excluded from this analysis. Un-methylated patients received dose-escalated RT without temezolamide (TMZ). Following computed tomography (CT) and MR simulation, the gros tumor volume (GTV) was delineated and prescribed 52.5 Gy in 15 fractions within the standard 40.05 Gy planning treatment volume (PTV). Treatment planning was volumetric modulated arc therapy. Results: A total of 20 patients with multiple un-methylated MGMT glioblastoma multiforme were treated with dose-escalated radiation therapy between January 2022 and June 2023. All patients completed dose escalated radiotherapy without acute adverse effects. Progression-free survival at six months was 85%, as defined by the RANO criteria. Conclusion: In this case series, we showed that un-methylated multiple high-grade glioma could be safely treated with dose escalation. Results of progression-free survival should be validated in a larger prospective clinical trial. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Elderly patients account for nearly 70% of all primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) cases. They cannot tolerate aggressive treatment and have poor prognosis with a median overall survival (OS) of less than 2 years and progression‐free survival (PFS) of 6–16 months. Ibrutinib penetrates the blood–brain barrier and has shown activity in PCNSL. Methods: This prospective study investigated whether ibrutinib maintenance is feasible, and whether it can benefit elderly PCNSL patients in terms of expected 2‐year PFS. It is an open label, phase 2 study in newly diagnosed PCNSL patients 60–85 years old who responded to first‐line high‐dose methotrexate (HDMTX)‐based treatment with partial or complete response. Ibrutinib maintenance (560 mg/d) was continued until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. Results: Twenty patients were enrolled, with a median age of 72 years (range, 61–80). Median time on ibrutinib maintenance was 12.5 (range, 2–46) months. Twelve patients stopped treatment: five due to central nervous system relapse and seven due to adverse events that were mainly grade 2. Five patients died (25%) all due to relapse. The 1‐ and 2‐year PFS are 90% and 72.6%, respectively, and the 2‐year OS is 89%. Conclusions: The study reached its primary end points and also showed that ibrutinib maintenance is tolerated reasonably well by the elderly. Therefore, this study supports the concept that ibrutinib maintenance should be further evaluated as an optional consolidation measure in the elderly. Ibrutinib maintenance following first‐line high dose methotrexate‐based chemotherapy in elderly patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma is feasible and probably also effective. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is a rare disease with an incidence of 0.4/per 100,000 person‐years. As there is a limited number of prospective randomized trials in PCNSL, large retrospective studies on this rare disease may yield information that might prove useful for the future design of randomized clinical trials. We retrospectively analyzed the data of 222 newly diagnosed PCNSL patients treated in five referral centers in Israel between 2001 and 2020. During this period, combination therapy became the treatment of choice, rituximab has been added to the induction therapy, and consolidation with irradiation was largely laid off and was mostly replaced by high‐dose chemotherapy with or without autologous stem cell transplantation (HDC‐ASCT). Patients older than 60 comprised 67.5% of the study population. First‐line treatment included high‐dose methotrexate (HD‐MTX) in 94% of patients with a median MTX dose of 3.5 g/m2 (range 1.14–6 g/m2) and a median cycle number of 5 (range 1–16). Rituximab was given to 136 patients (61%) and consolidation treatment to 124 patients (58%). Patients treated after 2012 received significantly more treatment with HD‐MTX and rituximab, more consolidation treatments, and autologous stem cell transplantation. The overall response rate was 85% and the complete response (CR)/unconfirmed CR rate was 62.1%. After a median follow‐up of 24 months, the median progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 21.9 and 43.5 months respectively with a significant improvement since 2012 (PFS: 12.5 vs. 34.2 p = 0.006 and OS: 19.9 vs. 77.3 p = 0.0003). A multivariate analysis found that the most important factors related to OS were obtaining a CR followed by rituximab treatment and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status. The observed improvement in outcomes may be due to multiple components such as an intention to treat all patients regardless of age with HD‐MTX‐based combination chemotherapy, treatment in dedicated centers, and more aggressive consolidation with the introduction of HDC‐ASCT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Objectives: Neurologic immune-related adverse events (n-irAEs) reportedly occur in up to 8% of patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) of all age groups. We investigated the association between age and n-irAEs in patients treated with ICIs and examined the effect of n-irAEs on survival outcomes in a large cohort of patients with melanoma., Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with advanced melanoma treated with ICIs at Ella Institute for Immuno-oncology and Melanoma between January 1, 2015, and April 20, 2022. The outcomes of interest were defined as the investigation of age-related frequency and severity of n-irAEs, the need for ICI interruption, the treatment required for n-irAE management, the safety of ICI reintroduction, and n-irAE's effect on survival., Results: ICI was administered to 937 patients. At least one irAE occurred in 73.5% (n = 689) of them. Among the study population, 8% (n = 76) developed a n-irAE, with a median age of 66 years in female and 68 years in male patients at onset. The median follow-up after n-irAE was 1,147 days (IQR: 1,091.5 range: 3,938). Fewer irAEs occurred in patients older than 70 years (median: 3 events, p = 0.04, CI 2.5-4.7) while specifically colitis and pneumonitis were more common in the 18-60 age group ( p = 0.03, 95% CI 0.8-0.38, p = 0.009, 95% CI 0.06-0.2). Grade ≥ 3 toxicity was seen in 35.5% of patients across age groups. The median time from ICI administration to n-irAE development was 48 days across age groups. Common n-irAE phenotypes were myositis (44.7%), encephalitis (10.5%), and neuropathy (10.5%). N-irAE required hospitalization in 40% of patients and steroids treatment in 46% with a median of 4 days from n-irAE diagnosis to steroids treatment initiation. Nine patients needed second-line immunosuppressive treatment. Rechallenge did not cause additional n-irAE in 71% of patients. Developing n-irAE (HR = 0.4, 95% CI 0.32-0.77) or any irAE (HR = 0.7195% CI 0.56-0.88) was associated with longer survival., Discussion: N-irAEs are a relatively common complication of ICIs (8% of our cohort). Older age was not associated with its development or severity, in contrast with non-n-irAEs which occurred less frequently in the elderly population. Rechallenge did not result in life-threatening AEs. Development of any irAEs was associated with longer survival; this association was stronger with n-irAEs.