Search

Aim: To identify the most relevant factors with respect to the management of fracture-related infection (FRI) and to develop a comprehensive FRI classification that guides decision-making and allows scientific comparison., Method: An international group of FRI experts determined the preconditions, purpose, primary factors for inclusion, format and detailed description of the elements of an FRI classification through a consensus driven process., Results: Three major elements were identified and grouped together in the FRI Classification: Fracture (F), Related patient factors (R) and Impairment of soft tissues (I). Each element was divided into five levels of complexity. Fractures can be healed (F1) or unhealed (F2-5). Patients may be fully healthy (R1) or have 4 levels of compromise, with and without end-organ damage (R2-5). Soft tissue condition ranges from well vascularized and easily closed (I1) to major skin defects requiring free flaps (I4). In all three elements, the fifth level (F5, R5 or I5) describes a patient who has an unreconstructible bone, soft tissue envelope or is not fit for surgery., Conclusion: The FRI classification, which is based on the three major elements Fracture (F), Related patient factors (R) and Impairment of soft tissues (I) is intended to guide decision-making and improve the quality of scientific reporting for FRIs in the future. The proposed classification is based on expert opinion and therefore an essential next step is clinical validation, in order to realize the ultimate goal of improving outcomes in the management of FRI., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

BACKGROUND This study aimed to evaluate the clinicopathological factors associated with surgical site infection (SSI) and the prognostic impact on patients after colorectal cancer (CRC) resection surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS This retrospective study evaluated the relationships between SSI and various clinicopathological factors and prognostic outcomes in 326 consecutive patients with CRC who underwent radical resection surgery at Wuhan Union Hospital during April 2015-May 2017. RESULTS Among the 326 patients who underwent radical CRC resection surgery, 65 had SSIs, and the incidence rates of incisional and organ/space SSI were 16.0% and 12.9%, respectively. Open surgery, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and a previous abdominal surgical history were identified as risk factors for incisional SSI. During a median follow-up of 40 months (range: 5-62 months), neither simple incisional nor simple organ/space SSI alone significantly affected disease-free survival (DFS) or overall survival (OS), whereas combined incisional and organ/space SSI had a significant negative impact on both the 3-year DFS and OS (P<0.001). A multivariate analysis identified that age ≥60 years, lymph node involvement, tumor depth (T3-T4), and incisional and organ/space SSI were independent predictors of 3-year DFS and OS. In addition, adjuvant chemotherapy and a carbohydrate antigen-125 concentration ≥37 ng/ml were also independent predictors of OS. CONCLUSIONS We have identified several clinicopathological factors associated with SSI, and identified incisional and organ/space SSI is an independent prognostic factor after CRC resection. Assessing the SSI classification may help to predict the prognosis of these patients and determine further treatment options.

Sternal wound complications are significant problems in cardiac surgery and cause challenges to surgeons as they are associated with high mortality, morbidity, and a tremendous load on the hospital budget. Risk factors and preventive measures against sternal wound infection need to be in focus. Classification of different types of sternotomy complications post cardiac surgery is important for specific categorization and management. Reviewing the literature, a variety of classifications was introduced to help understand the pathophysiology of these wounds and how best to manage them. Initial classifications were based on the postoperative period of the infectious process and risk factors. Recently, the anatomical description of sternal wound, including the depth and location, was shown to be more practical. There is a lack of evidence-based surgical consensus for the appropriate management strategy, including type of closure, choice of sternal coverage post sternectomy, whether primary, delayed and when to use reconstructive flaps.

Background: The role of site of infection in sepsis has been poorly characterized. Additionally, sepsis epidemiology has evolved. Early mortality has decreased, but many survivors now progress into chronic critical illness (CCI). This study sought to determine if there were significant differences in the host response and current epidemiology of surgical sepsis categorized by site of infection., Study Design: This is a longitudinal study of surgical sepsis patients characterized by baseline predisposition, insult characteristics, serial biomarkers, hospital outcomes, and long-term outcomes. Patients were categorized into five anatomic sites of infection., Results: The 316 study patients were predominantly Caucasian; half were male, with a mean age of 62 years, high comorbidity burden, and low 30-day mortality (10%). The primary sites were abdominal (44%), pulmonary (19%), skin/soft tissue (S/ST, 17%), genitourinary (GU, 12%), and vascular (7%). Most abdominal infections were present on admission and required source control. Comparatively, they had more prolonged proinflammation, immunosuppression, and persistent organ dysfunction. Their long-term outcome was poor with 37% CCI (defined as > 14 in ICU with organ dysfunction), 49% poor discharge dispositions, and 30% 1-year mortality. Most pulmonary infections were hospital-acquired pneumonia. They had similar protracted proinflammation and organ dysfunction, but immunosuppression normalized. Long-term outcomes are similarly poor (54% CCI, 47% poor disposition, 32% 1-year mortality). S/ST and GU infections occurred in younger patients with fewer comorbidities, less perturbed immune responses, and faster resolution of organ dysfunction. Comparatively, S/ST had better long-term outcomes (23% CCI, 39% poor disposition, 13% 1-year mortality) and GU had the best (10% CCI, 20% poor disposition, 10% 1-year mortality). Vascular sepsis patients were older males, with more comorbidities. Proinflammation was blunted with baseline immunosuppression and organ dysfunction that persisted. They had the worst long-term outcomes (38% CCI, 67% poor disposition, 57% 1-year mortality)., Conclusion: There are notable differences in baseline predisposition, host responses, and clinical outcomes by site of infection in surgical sepsis. While previous studies have focused on differences in hospital mortality, this study provides unique insights into the host response and long-term outcomes associated with different sites of infection.

Background: Incision complications (IC) have a significant impact on procedure-related morbidity after lower-limb revascularization. One of the most studied IC is surgical site infection (SSI). Reporting these complications in a uniform way is crucial to evaluate treatment approaches. The aim of this study was to propose a comprehensive classification of IC and apply it to compare SSI with other IC in a trial on elective open lower-limb revascularization procedures. Methods: Two hundred twenty-three eligible patients undergoing elective unilateral inguinal and infra-inguinal arterial vascular surgery were extracted from a randomized controlled trial on incisional negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) on inguinal vascular surgical incisions. The IC were classified by grades of severity (grade 0-6) that focused on IC-related consequences such as out-patient treatment (grade 1), prolonged in-patient treatment (grade 2), re-admission (grade 3), and re-operation (grade ≥4). An SSI was defined by the ASEPSIS score criteria. Results: An SSI was diagnosed in 63 patients (28.3%). Thirty-five of 160 patients (21.8%) not suffering from SSI underwent IC treatment. Treatment for IC was recorded for 25/144 patients (17.4%) with satisfactory site healing as judged by the ASEPSIS score. The median incision-related in-hospital stay in those with SSI (n = 79) and disturbed healing (n = 16) according to the ASEPSIS score was 13 days in both groups (p = 0.53). Five patients had peri-vascular SSI (IC grade 4 n = 4; grade 5 n = 1). The proposed classification of IC and the ASEPSIS score correlated highly (r = 0.77; p < 0.001). Inter-rater reliability for IC grading was substantial for three investigators with different levels of experience (k = 0.81, 0.71, and 0.70). Conclusions: The proposed incision classification suggests a comparable clinical significance of vascular IC in terms of IC-related in-patient stay, whether there was a surgical site infection or not. This classification system requires external validation.

The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons has developed Appropriate Use Criteria for the Management of Surgical Site Infections (SSIs) (website: http://www.orthoguidelines.org/go/auc/default.cfm?auc&#95;id=225018&actionxm=Terms). Evidence-based information, in conjunction with the clinical expertise of physicians, was used to develop the criteria to improve patient care and obtain best outcomes while considering the subtleties and distinctions necessary in making clinical decisions. The Appropriate Use Criteria for the Management of SSIs were derived by identifying clinical indications typical of patients commonly presenting with a SSI in clinical practice. These indications were most often parameters observable by the clinician, including symptoms and diagnostic tests. The 264 patient scenarios and nine treatments were developed by the writing panel, which consisted of a group of clinicians who are specialists in this Appropriate Use Criteria topic. Next, a separate, multidisciplinary, voting panel (made up of specialists and nonspecialists) rated the appropriateness of treatment of each patient scenario using a nine-point scale to designate a treatment as appropriate (median rating, seven to nine), may be appropriate (median rating, four to six), or rarely appropriate (median rating, one to three).

Background: Sternal wound complications pose a tremendous challenge post-cardiac surgery. There’s no consensus or clear guidelines to deal with them. We propose that simple and more objective classification helps to organize the range of sternal wound complications and suggest a relevant treatment strategy., Methods: One-hundred-sixteen cases of sternal wound complications retrospectively were reviewed out of 2,391 adult patients, who underwent full sternotomy during cardiac surgery from 2006 to 2018. Eighty-six cases conservatively were managed and the remaining 30 cases required surgical intervention. More objective classification was proposed and less invasive fasciocutaneous flap was considered for nearly all reconstructive procedures., Results: The incidence of sternal wound complications was 4.8%. Conservative management was adopted for 86 cases, mean duration was 11.19 ± 9.8 days. Surgical management was performed in 30 patients (25.86%); 28 (93.3%) of whom recovered with good outcomes with less invasive fasciocutaneous flap done for 13 cases. Two cases had recurrence; one conservatively was managed and other was reoperated and healed well. The most common organisms in recurrent infections were N. coagulase (29.8%), Klebsiella (12.5%), pseudomonas (10.5%), and MRSA (10.5%). We had 4 mortalities. None of the mortalities were related to sternal wound complications; one was related to the cardiac surgery., Conclusions: Sternal wound complications are grave events. Objective classification and proper management selection will gain better outcomes.

This study describes a combined surveillance of surgical site infection implemented in an Italian region, which relies on integration of the specific surveillance (SIChER) with other sources and the targeted review of a small proportion of cases. Additional information on post-surgical follow-up was obtained from hospital discharge, microbiology laboratory and emergency department databases. Based on these data, 76 patients were reclassified as possible cases and revised by the health trust representatives. Eventually 45 new cases were confirmed, leading to an increase in the infection ratio from 1.13% to 1.45%. The proposed method appears to be accurate and sustainable over time., (Copyright © 2019 The Healthcare Infection Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

The positive-unlabeled (PU) classification is a common scenario in real-world applications such as healthcare, text classification, and bioinformatics, in which we only observe a few samples labeled as "positive" together with a large volume of "unlabeled" samples that may contain both positive and negative samples. Building robust classifiers for the PU problem is very challenging, especially for complex data where the negative samples overwhelm and mislabeled samples or corrupted features exist. To address these three issues, we propose a robust learning framework that unifies area under the curve maximization (a robust metric for biased labels), outlier detection (for excluding wrong labels), and feature selection (for excluding corrupted features). The generalization error bounds are provided for the proposed model that give valuable insight into the theoretical performance of the method and lead to useful practical guidance, e.g., to train a model, we find that the included unlabeled samples are sufficient as long as the sample size is comparable to the number of positive samples in the training process. Empirical comparisons and two real-world applications on surgical site infection (SSI) and EEG seizure detection are also conducted to show the effectiveness of the proposed model.

Decisions regarding whether to close the skin in trauma patients with hollow viscus injuries (HVIs) are based on surgeon discretion and the perceived risk for an SSI. We hypothesized that leaving the skin open would result in fewer wound complications in patients with HVIs. We performed a retrospective analysis of all adult patients who underwent operative repair of an HVI. The main outcome measure was superficial or deep SSIs. Of 141 patients, 38 (27%) had HVIs. Twenty-six patients developed SSIs, of which 13 (50%) were superficial or deep SSIs. On adjusted analysis, only female gender ( P = 0.03) and base deficit were associated ( P = 0.001) with wound infections Open wound management was not associated with a decreased incidence of SSIs ( P = 0.19) in patients with HVIs. Further research is required to determine optimal strategies for reducing wound complications in patients sustaining HVIs.

Background: Infections following tissue expander (TE) placement are frequent complications in breast reconstruction. While breast surgery is a clean case, implant-based breast reconstruction has rates of infection up to 31%, decidedly higher than the typical 1% to 2% rate of surgical site infections (SSI). Few authors use the Center for Disease Control's (CDC) SSI definition for TE infections. We highlight how adoption of a consistent definition of TE infection may change how infections are researched, categorized, and ultimately managed., Methods: Two researchers with definitional discrepancies of infection performed an independent analysis of all postmastectomy patients receiving TEs (n = 175) in 2017., Results: Researcher One, using a clinical definition, delineated an infection rate of 19.4%. Antibiotics alone successfully treated 50% of cases. Researcher Two found an infection rate of 13.7% using CDC criteria. These infections were further delineated by a SSI rate of 6.3% and a TE infection rate post port access of 7.4%. Only 45.5% SSI's and 15.4% of TE infections were salvaged with antibiotics alone., Conclusions: Rigorous adoption of CDC criteria for infection characterization in published research will help standardize the definition of infection and allow surgeons to create evidence-based infection prevention regimens., (© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Objectives: The correct wound classification for vulvar procedures (VP) is ambiguous according to current definitions, and infection rates are poorly described. We aimed to analyze rates of surgical site infection (SSI) in women who underwent VP to correctly categorize wound classification., Methods: Patients who underwent VP for dysplasia or carcinoma were collected from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database (NSQIP). SSI rates of vulvar cases were compared to patients who underwent abdominal hysterectomy via laparotomy, stratified by the National Academy of Sciences wound classification. Descriptive analyses and trend tests of categorical variables were performed., Results: Between 2008 and 2016, 2116 and 31,506 patients underwent a VP or TAH, respectively. Among VP, 1345 (63.6%), 364 (17.2%), and 407 (19.2%) women underwent simple vulvectomy, radical vulvectomy, or radical vulvectomy with lymphadenectomy, respectively. The overall rate of SSI for VP was higher than that observed for TAH (5.6% vs. 3.8%; p < 0.0001). While patients undergoing TAH displayed a corresponding increase in the rate of SSI with wound type (type I: 3.4%; type II: 3.8%, type III: 6.8%; type IV 10.6%; p < 0.001), no such correlation was observed for simple VP (type I: 3.3%, type II: 3.0%; type III: 3.2%; type IV: 0%; p = 0.40). On the other hand, a non-significant correlation was observed for radical VP (type I: 4.0%, type II: 10.1%; type III: 14.3%; type IV: 20.0%; p = 0.08). The overall rate of SSI in patients undergoing any radical VP was similar to patients undergoing hysterectomy with a type IV wound (10.1% vs 10.6%, p = 0.87)., Conclusion: Patients undergoing VP are at high risk of infection. Simple vulvectomy should be classified as a type II and radical vulvectomy as a type III wound. These recommendations are important for proper risk adjustment., (Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: There is currently minimal evidence that preoperative malnutrition increases surgical site infection (SSI) risk in children with cerebral palsy (CP) undergoing spinal deformity surgery. Growth charts specifically for patients with CP have been created to aid in the clinical interpretation of body mass index (BMI) as a marker of nutritional status, but to our knowledge these charts have never been used to risk stratify patients before orthopaedic surgery. We hypothesize that patients with CP who have BMI-for-age below the 10th percentile (BMI≤10) on CP-specific growth charts are at increased risk of surgical site infection following spinal deformity surgery compared with patients with BMI-for-age above the 10th percentile (BMI>10)., Methods: Single-center, retrospective review comparing the rate of SSI in patients with CP stratified by BMI-for-age percentiles on CP-specific growth charts who underwent spinal deformity surgery. Odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals and Pearson χ tests were used to analyze the association of the measured nutritional indicators with SSI., Results: In total, 65 patients, who underwent 74 procedures, had complete follow-up data and were included in this analysis. Ten patients (15.4%) were GMFCS I-III and 55 (84.6%) were GMFCS IV-V; 39 (60%) were orally fed and 26 (40%) were tube-fed. The rate of SSI in this patient population was 13.5% with 10 SSIs reported within 90 days of surgery. There was a significant association between patients with a BMI below the 10th percentile on GMFCS-stratified growth charts and the development of SSI (OR, 13.6; 95% CI, 2.4-75.4; P=0.005). All SSIs occurred in patients that were GMFCS IV-V. There was no association between height, weight, feeding method, or pelvic instrumentation and development of SSI., Conclusions: CP-specific growth charts are useful tools for identifying patients at increased risk for SSI following spinal instrumentation procedures, whereas standard CDC growth charts are much less sensitive. There is a strong association between preoperative BMI percentile on GMFCS-stratified growth charts and SSI following spinal deformity surgery., Level of Evidence: Level III-Retrospective Study.

Peritoneal dialysis-related infections are the main complication in pediatric patients undergoing this renal replacement therapy, associating a high rate of morbidity, generating also a decreasing survival of the peritoneal membrane and worsening the patient outcome. We describe the recommended diagnostic and therapeutic modalities to treat dialysis-related in children.

Introduction: One of the most challenging musculoskeletal complications in modern trauma surgery is infection after fracture fixation (IAFF). Although infections are clinically obvious in many cases, a clear definition of the term IAFF is crucial, not only for the evaluation of published research data but also for the establishment of uniform treatment concepts. The aim of this systematic review was to identify the definitions used in the scientific literature to describe infectious complications after internal fixation of fractures. The hypothesis of this study was that the majority of fracture-related literature do not define IAFF., Material and Methods: A comprehensive search was performed in Embase, Cochrane, Google Scholar, Medline (OvidSP), PubMed publisher and Web-of-Science for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on fracture fixation. Data were collected on the definition of infectious complications after fracture fixation used in each study. Study selection was accomplished through two phases. During the first phase, titles and abstracts were reviewed for relevance, and the full texts of relevant articles were obtained. During the second phase, full-text articles were reviewed. All definitions were literally extracted and collected in a database. Then, a classification was designed to rate the quality of the description of IAFF., Results: A total of 100 RCT's were identified in the search. Of 100 studies, only two (2%) cited a validated definition to describe IAFF. In 28 (28%) RCTs, the authors used a self-designed definition. In the other 70 RCTs, (70%) there was no description of a definition in the Methods section, although all of the articles described infections as an outcome parameter in the Results section., Conclusion: This systematic review shows that IAFF is not defined in a large majority of the fracture-related literature. To our knowledge, this is the first study conducted with the objective to explore this important issue. The lack of a consensus definition remains a problem in current orthopedic trauma research and treatment and this void should be addressed in the near future., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

The best treatment strategy for infected osteosyntheses is still debated. While hardware removal or eventually early device exchange may be necessary in most of the cases, temporary hardware retention until fracture healing can be a valid alternative option in others. Aim of the present study is to report the long-term results of 215 patients with infected osteosyntheses, treated according to the ICS (Infection, Callus, Stability) classification in two Italian hospitals. Patients classified as ICS Type 1 (N = 83) feature callus progression and hardware stability, in spite of the presence of infection; these patients were treated with suppressive antibiotic therapy coupled with local debridement in 18.1% of the cases, and no hardware removal until bone healing. Type 2 patients (N = 75) are characterized by the presence of infection and hardware stability, but no callus progression; these patients were treated as Type 1 patients, but with additional callus stimulation therapies. Type 3 patients (N = 57), showing infection, no callus progression and loss of hardware stability, underwent removal and exchange of the fixation device. Considering only the initial treatment, performed according to the ICS classification, at a minimum 5 years follow up, 89.3% achieved bone healing and 93.5% did not show infection recurrence. The ICS classification appears as a useful and reliable tool to help standardizing the decision-making process in treating infected osteosynthesis with the most conservative approach., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Fracture-related infection (FRI) is a common and serious complication in trauma surgery. Accurately estimating the impact of this complication has been hampered by the lack of a clear definition. The absence of a working definition of FRI renders existing studies difficult to evaluate or compare. In order to address this issue, an expert group comprised of a number of scientific and medical organizations has been convened, with the support of the AO Foundation, in order to develop a consensus definition. The process that led to this proposed definition started with a systematic literature review, which revealed that the majority of randomized controlled trials in fracture care do not use a standardized definition of FRI. In response to this conclusion, an international survey on the need for and key components of a definition of FRI was distributed amongst all registered AOTrauma users. Approximately 90% of the more than 2000 surgeons who responded suggested that a definition of FRI is required. As a final step, a consensus meeting was held with an expert panel. The outcome of this process led to a consensus definition of FRI. Two levels of certainty around diagnostic features were defined. Criteria could be confirmatory (infection definitely present) or suggestive. Four confirmatory criteria were defined: Fistula, sinus or wound breakdown; Purulent drainage from the wound or presence of pus during surgery; Phenotypically indistinguishable pathogens identified by culture from at least two separate deep tissue/implant specimens; Presence of microorganisms in deep tissue taken during an operative intervention, as confirmed by histopathological examination. Furthermore, a list of suggestive criteria was defined. These require further investigations in order to look for confirmatory criteria. In the current paper, an overview is provided of the proposed definition and a rationale for each component and decision. The intention of establishing this definition of FRI was to offer clinicians the opportunity to standardize clinical reports and improve the quality of published literature. It is important to note that the proposed definition was not designed to guide treatment of FRI and should be validated by prospective data collection in the future., (Copyright © 2017 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Fracture-related infection (FRI) is one of the most challenging musculoskeletal complications in orthopaedic-trauma surgery. Although the orthopaedic community has developed and adopted a consensus definition of prosthetic joint infections (PJI), it still remains unclear how the trauma surgery community defines FRI in daily clinical practice or in performing clinical research studies. The central aim of this study was to survey the opinions of a global network of trauma surgeons on the definitions and criteria they routinely use, and their opinion on the need for a unified definition of FRI. The secondary aims were to survey their opinion on the utility of currently used definitions that may be at least partially applicable for FRI, and finally their opinion on the important clinical parameters that should be considered as diagnostic criteria for FRI., Methods: An 11-item questionnaire was developed to cover the above-mentioned aims. The questionnaire was administered by SurveyMonkey and was sent via blast email to all registered users of AO Trauma (Davos, Switzerland)., Results: Out of the 26'563 recipients who opened the email, 2'327 (8.8%) completed the questionnaire. Nearly 90% of respondents agreed that a consensus-derived definition for FRI is required and 66% of the surgeons also agreed that PJI and FRI are not equal with respect to diagnosis, treatment and outcome. Furthermore, "positive cultures from microbiology testing", "elevation of CRP", "purulent drainage" and "local clinical signs of infection" were voted the most important diagnostic parameters for FRI., Conclusion: This international survey infers the need for a consensus definition of FRI and provides insight into the clinical parameters seen by an international community of trauma surgeons as being critical for defining FRI., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To evaluate whether simultaneous abdominal surgery or wound contamination at the time of ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt placement are associated with increased shunt complications., Methods: Pediatric patients who underwent VP shunt placement were identified using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Pediatric database. VP shunt complication rates were compared between patients who underwent simultaneous abdominal surgeries at the time of VP shunt placement vs those who did not and between those with clean/clean-contaminated and contaminated/dirty wound classifications. Adjusted analysis was performed using 1:5 case-control matching., Results: Among 2715 patients who underwent VP shunt placement, 21 had simultaneous abdominal procedures and were matched with 105 control patients. No significant difference was found in overall (34.3 vs 14.3%, p = 0.07), infectious (8.6 vs 4.8%, p = 1.000), or non-infectious (25.7 vs 9.5%, p = 0.156) shunt complications in the simultaneous vs non-simultaneous group, respectively. In a separate analysis of wound classification, 12 patients with contaminated/dirty wounds were matched with 60 patients with clean/clean-contaminated wounds. The rates of shunt infections for clean/clean-contaminated and contaminated/dirty cases were 10.0 and 16.7%, respectively (p = 0.613)., Conclusion: In our matched case-control study, neither simultaneous abdominal surgery nor wound contamination at the time of VP shunt placement demonstrated significant increased risk of 30-day post-operative complication.

Background: It is unclear whether surgical residents understand how to classify incisions, which may impact how closure is handled in the operating room. We hypothesized that surgical residents define incision class (IC) accurately compared with an attending NSQIP surgeon champion (SC)., Methods: We evaluated our NSQIP database from April 1, 2015, to December 31, 2016, including cases in which a resident was present and IC was documented. Cases in which the resident, circulator, or surgical clinical rater disagreed on the IC were then reviewed by a blinded SC., Results: Residents were correct in 83.6% of the cases, with PGY 5 persons having the lowest accuracy. Class 3 incisions were most often misclassified (36%). A disproportionate number of misclassifications by PGY4 and PGY5-7 residents occurred in incision classes 2 and 3. Surgical site infections occurred in 7.4% of cases, ranging from 2.4% in IC 1 to 15.7% in IC 4 cases., Conclusions: Although overall accuracy appears reasonable, it is of concern that incisions at higher risk of infection (contaminated) were least likely to be classified appropriately. Chief residents, who often are making the decisions on incision closure, were the least accurate in determining IC. This may have a deleterious impact on incision management, suggesting a need for directed resident education on IC and further investigation to determine its impact on site infection risk and patient outcomes.

Objective: There is limited data characterizing the risk and impact of surgical site infection (SSI) in neonates; this makes it difficult to identify factors that increase neonatal SSI risk and to determine how SSI affects outcomes in this special population., Study Design: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Improvement Program Pediatric (NSQIP-P) collected data on children undergoing surgery at children's hospitals from 2012 to 2014. Neonates undergoing general surgical procedures were characterized with regard to demographic characteristics and comorbidities. Perioperative variables such as wound class, type of surgery and length of operation were also evaluated., Results: Seven thousand three hundred and seventy-nine neonates were identified in the NSQIP-P participant user file. The overall SSI rate was 2.6%. Only wound class and length of surgery were significantly associated with SSI. Furthermore, SSI was independently associated with longer length of stay, even after adjusting for covariates., Conclusions: This is the largest study to date analyzing SSI in neonates. We found that perioperative variables have a more significant impact on SSI than patient factors, suggesting that operation-related characteristics are influencing SSI. Furthermore, neonates with SSI are more likely to have prolonged hospitalizations even after adjusting for patient comorbidities.

Objective: We aimed to investigate the complications, surgical site infection (SSI), and survival in salvage surgery without free-flap reconstruction for patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma who were treated by platinum-based chemoradiotherapy (Plat-CRT) or cetuximab-based bioradiotherapy (Cet-BRT)., Methods: Thirty-three patients treated by Plat-CRT and six treated by Cet-BRT had salvage surgery. We categorized postoperative complications according to the Clavien-Dindo classification and SSI according to the wound grading scale. Overall survival calculated by Kaplan-Meier method., Results: Patients with Cet-BRT were significantly associated with the presence of SSI (P<0.01) and grades IIIb-V of the Clavien-Dindo classification (P<0.01) compared with those with Plat-CRT. Patients with Cet-BRT had a significantly lower overall survival than those with Plat-CRT (P<0.05)., Conclusion: We demonstrated that patients with Cet-BRT were significantly more associated with the presence of SSI and grades IIIb-V in the Clavien-Dindo classification than those with CRT., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Surgical site infections, also referred to as wound infections, are commonly studied within the plastic surgery literature. The definition of these terms is not standardized in the literature. Individual studies may select criteria to use in identifying infection. This may have important implications upon interpretation of study results., Methods: Studies evaluating surgical site infection in the plastic surgery literature were identified through search of the MEDLINE database across the five year period ending March 2016. Infection rates were calculated for included studies. Studies were grouped by method of defining infection. Subgroups were compared by calculating percentage of studies reporting greater than 10% infection rates., Results: Three hundred five articles were identified, 77 met study criteria. Thirty-one articles reported criteria for infection and 46 articles did not report criteria for infection. Methods used by studies to define infection were based on treatment received, national/organization definition, characteristics of infection, and International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision coding. Studies defining infection by national/organization definition included the greatest percentage reporting infection rates over 10% with 75% of studies. Studies reporting criteria for infection reported infection rates over 10% more often than studies that did not report criteria. 47.5% of studies reporting criteria for infection reported rates over 10% compared with 31.8% of studies which did not., Conclusions: Criteria used to define infection differs across studies in the plastic surgery literature. Comparison of reported infection rates on the basis of criteria for infection suggests an effect upon infection rate. Many studies do not report criteria used to identify infection and should consider reporting strict criteria for infection.

Surgical site infection (SSI) contributes significantly to surgical morbidity. Patient factors and operative factors contribute to the risk of development of SSI. This review focuses on understanding operative characteristics that are associated with an increased risk of SSI. Much attention has been given to protocol care to reduce SSI, such as hair removal, skin preparation, and pre-operative antibiotic agents. Even with this, the appropriate antibiotic and re-dosing regimens often remain a challenge. Other operative factors such as blood loss/transfusion, emergency/urgent cases, duration of the operation, type of anesthesia, and resident involvement are also potentially modifiable to reduce the risk of SSI. Data are reviewed to highlight the increased risk associated with such factors. Strategies to reduce risk, such as operative care bundles, have significant promise to reduce the incidence of SSI for any given procedure.

Background: Surgical site infections are a frequent complication of surgery and a severe burden for the patient as well as for the healthcare system. Sound knowledge of the disease pattern is an essential prerequisite for effective therapy., Objective: This article presents an overview of the diagnosis, classification and treatment options for surgical site infections., Material and Methods: Based on the existing experience, the currently available evidence and pathophysiological considerations, an overview of the diagnostic possibilities, the existing classification systems and the treatment options is presented., Results: The diagnosis of surgical site infections is based on the clinical symptoms and can particularly be supported by the microbiological analysis of wound samples. There is no validated classification system but the definition of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is most commonly used. After initial bedside processing, debridement and wound cleansing are the basis for the further treatment, which is supplemented by the rational use of antiseptics and antibiotics. The use of modern dressings with the aim of maintaining a physiological moist wound environment promotes wound healing. The negative pressure wound therapy is an available treatment option. Rare diseases need to be considered., Conclusion: The low level of evidence and critical consideration of the treatment options have been discussed in many guidelines, consensus documents and systematic reviews on the basis of which this article was written. Strengthening the evidence situation through intensive, targeted research should be the goal.

OBJECTIVE To investigate whether comparison by deep or adjusted deep surgical site infection (SSI) rates in orthopedic surgeries are a better basis for feedback to Finnish hospitals than overall SSI rates DESIGN Retrospective cohort study SETTING Hospitals conducting surveillance of hip arthroplasties (HPROs) and knee arthroplasties (KPROs) in the Finnish Hospital Infection Program METHODS We analyzed surveillance data for 73,227 HPROs and 56,860 KPROs performed in 18 hospitals during 1999-2014. For each hospital, the overall, deep, and adjusted deep SSI rates with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated, and the hospital ranks were simulated in the Bayesian framework. Adjustments were performed using relevant patient and hospital characteristics. The correlation between the median expected hospital ranks in overall versus deep SSI rates and deep vs adjusted deep SSI rates were assessed using Spearman's correlation coefficient ρ. RESULTS For HPRO, the overall SSI rates ranged from 0.92 to 6.83, the deep SSI rates ranged from 0.34 to 1.86, and the adjusted deep hospital-specific SSI rates ranged from 0.37 to 1.85. For KPRO, the overall SSI rates ranged from 0.71 to 5.03, the deep SSI rates ranged from 0.42 to 1.60, and the adjusted deep hospital-specific SSI rates ranged from 0.56 to 1.55. For both procedures, the 95% CIs of the rates between hospitals largely overlapped; only single outliers were detected. Hospital rank did not correlate between overall and deep SSI rates (HPRO, ρ=0.03; KPRO, ρ=0.40), but a correlation was observed in hospital rank for deep and adjusted deep SSI rates (HPRO, ρ=0.85; KPRO, ρ=0.94). CONCLUSION Deep SSI rates may be a better tool for interhospital comparisons than overall SSI rates. Although the adjustment could lead to fairer hospital ranking, it is not always necessary for feedback. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2017;38:423-429.

Background: Surgical wounds (incisions) heal by primary intention when the wound edges are brought together and secured, often with sutures, staples, or clips. Wound dressings applied after wound closure may provide physical support, protection and absorb exudate. There are many different types of wound dressings available and wounds can also be left uncovered (exposed). Surgical site infection (SSI) is a common complication of wounds and this may be associated with using (or not using) dressings, or different types of dressing., Objectives: To assess the effects of wound dressings compared with no wound dressings, and the effects of alternative wound dressings, in preventing SSIs in surgical wounds healing by primary intention., Search Methods: We searched the following databases: the Cochrane Wounds Specialised Register (searched 19 September 2016); the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; the Cochrane Library 2016, Issue 8); Ovid MEDLINE (including In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, MEDLINE Daily and Epub Ahead of Print; 1946 to 19 September 2016); Ovid Embase (1974 to 19 September 2016); EBSCO CINAHL Plus (1937 to 19 September 2016).There were no restrictions based on language, date of publication or study setting., Selection Criteria: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing wound dressings with wound exposure (no dressing) or alternative wound dressings for the postoperative management of surgical wounds healing by primary intention., Data Collection and Analysis: Two review authors performed study selection, 'Risk of bias' assessment and data extraction independently., Main Results: We included 29 trials (5718 participants). All studies except one were at an unclear or high risk of bias. Studies were small, reported low numbers of SSI events and were often not clearly reported. There were 16 trials that included people with wounds resulting from surgical procedures with a 'clean' classification, five trials that included people undergoing what was considered 'clean/contaminated' surgery, with the remaining studies including people undergoing a variety of surgical procedures with different contamination classifications. Four trials compared wound dressings with no wound dressing (wound exposure); the remaining 25 studies compared alternative dressing types, with the majority comparing a basic wound contact dressing with film dressings, silver dressings or hydrocolloid dressings. The review contains 11 comparisons in total., Primary Outcome: SSIIt is uncertain whether wound exposure or any dressing reduces or increases the risk of SSI compared with alternative options investigated: we assessed the certainty of evidence as very low for most comparisons (and low for others), with downgrading (according to GRADE criteria) largely due to risk of bias and imprecision. We summarise the results of comparisons with meta-analysed data below:- film dressings compared with basic wound contact dressings following clean surgery (RR 1.34, 95% CI 0.70 to 2.55), very low certainty evidence downgraded once for risk of bias and twice for imprecision.- hydrocolloid dressings compared with basic wound contact dressings following clean surgery (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.30 to 2.78), very low certainty evidence downgraded once for risk of bias and twice for imprecision.- hydrocolloid dressings compared with basic wound contact dressings following potentially contaminated surgery (RR 0.57, 95% CI 0.22 to 1.51), very low certainty evidence downgraded twice for risk of bias and twice for imprecision.- silver-containing dressings compared with basic wound contact dressings following clean surgery (RR 1.11, 95% CI 0.47 to 2.62), very low certainty evidence downgraded once for risk of bias and twice for imprecision.- silver-containing dressings compared with basic wound contact dressings following potentially contaminated surgery (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.51 to 1.37), very low certainty evidence downgraded twice for risk of bias and twice for imprecision. Secondary outcomesThere was limited and low or very low certainty evidence on secondary outcomes such as scarring, acceptability of dressing and ease of removal, and uncertainty whether wound dressings influenced these outcomes., Authors' Conclusions: It is uncertain whether covering surgical wounds healing by primary intention with wound dressings reduces the risk of SSI, or whether any particular wound dressing is more effective than others in reducing the risk of SSI, improving scarring, reducing pain, improving acceptability to patients, or is easier to remove. Most studies in this review were small and at a high or unclear risk of bias. Based on the current evidence, decision makers may wish to base decisions about how to dress a wound following surgery on dressing costs as well as patient preference.

Background: Wound classification has catapulted to the forefront of surgical literature and quality care discussions. However, it has not been validated in laparoscopy or children. We analyzed pediatric infection rates based on wound classification and reviewed the most common noninfectious complications which could be a more appropriate measure for quality assessment., Methods: We performed a retrospective review of 800 patients from 2011 to 2014 undergoing common procedures at a tertiary pediatric hospital. Demographics, procedure, wound classification and complications were analyzed using descriptive statistics., Results: Infection rates were in the expected low range for clean procedures. However, 5% of pyloromyotomy patients required readmission and 10% of circumcision patients developed penile adhesions; 2% required reoperation. Ostomy reversal, a clean contaminated case, had 17% wound infections, whereas acute appendicitis, a contaminated case had only a 4% infection rate. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (clean-contaminated or contaminated depending on inflammation) had 2% postoperative infections. Perforated appendicitis, a dirty procedure had an 18% infection rate, below the expected >27% for dirty cases in adults., Conclusions: Current wound classifications do not accurately approximate the risk of surgical site infections in children, particularly for laparoscopic procedures. It would be more appropriate to grade hospitals based on disease and procedure specific complications., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Infections after osteosynthesis are a feared complication of the surgical treatment of fractures and should be dealt with by a multidisciplinary team. In addition to the surgeon, also included in this multidisciplinary team are a specialist for infectious diseases, a microbiologist, a radiologist and often a plastic surgeon. This review article describes the current knowledge on the pathogenesis, diagnostics, classification and treatment. The aim is to demonstrate some basic rules in the treatment of infections associated with implants and to show potential therpeutic approaches., Material and Methods: The principles of diagnostics and combined surgical and antibiotic treatment are presented based on the current specialist literature., Results: With the help of a team approach the goals of treatment of an infected osteosynthesis, i.e. fracture healing, return to function and eradication of infection can be achieved. While the osteosynthesis material can usually be retained in acute infections, it is better to remove the infected hardware in chronic infections as eradication of the mature biofilm is no longer possible., Discussion: With adequate local wound débridement, the use of local and systemic antibiotics, as indicated by the specialist for infectious diseases and appropriate soft tissue coverage and wound closure, acute as well as chronic infections can be successfully treated. Nowadays, the surgeon has many different options for the management of bone defects. Depending on the anatomical location and the size of the defect a variety of techniques ranging from acute shortening to the Masquelet technique up to the Ilizarov distraction technique are available. These techniques should be combined with local bactericidal treatment.

Background: Considerable advances have already been made in the treatment of deep thoracic wound infections following a median sternotomy for cardiac surgery. Further improvement in diagnosis, treatment, and outcome will require a targeted approach by multidisciplinary teams. Clear communication and synergy between the various clinical and supportive disciplines would assist in removing the last barriers to standardized evidence-based studies and the development of improved evidence-based guidelines., Methods: An extensive literature search without language restrictions was carried out on PubMed (Medline), EMBASE, and Web of Science, covering the period 1988 to week 16, 2014, and a manual search of the reference lists was performed regarding all possible definitions and classifications of post-sternotomy mediastinitis. Two hundred and eighteen papers describing post-sternotomy infections in a multitude of terms were identified, and the strengths and weaknesses of the most popular definitions and terms relating specifically to post-sternotomy infections were examined., Results: This study revealed that clinicians use a multitude of terms to describe post-sternotomy infections without defining the condition under treatment. Occasionally, older epidemiological (surveillance) definitions were used. It also shows that supportive disciplines have their own definitions, or interpretations of existing definitions, to describe these infections., Conclusion: The outcome of this study is that clinicians have adopted no single definition, which is essential for further improvement for evidence-based studies. We suggest that it is possible to adopt a single term for thoracic infection after a sternotomy (and only sternotomy), and propose a clinical definition for this purpose., (© The Author(s) 2016.)

Objectives: Despite long-term survival benefits, the increased risk of sternal complications limits the use of bilateral internal thoracic artery (BITA) grafts for myocardial revascularization. The aim of the present study was both to analyse the risk factors for deep sternal wound infection (DSWI), which complicates routine BITA grafting and to create a DSWI risk score based on the results of this analysis., Methods: BITA grafts were used as skeletonized conduits in 2936 (70.6%) of 4160 consecutive patients with multivessel coronary artery disease who underwent isolated coronary bypass surgery at the authors' institution from 1 January 1999 to 2013. The outcomes of these BITA patients were reviewed retrospectively and a risk factor analysis for DSWI was performed., Results: A total of 129 (4.4%) patients suffered from DSWI. Two multivariable analysis models were created to examine preoperative factors either alone or combined with intraoperative and postoperative factors. Female gender, obesity, diabetes, poor glycaemic control, chronic lung disease and urgent surgical priority were the predictors of DSWI common to both models. Two (preoperative and combined) models of a new scoring system were devised to predict DSWI after BITA grafting. The preoperative model performed better than five of six scoring systems for sternal wound infection that were considered; the combined model performed better than three considered scoring systems., Conclusions: A weighted scoring system based on risk factors for DSWI was specifically created to predict DSWI risk after BITA grafting. This scoring system outperformed the existing scoring systems for sternal wound infection after coronary bypass surgery. Prospective studies are needed for validation., (© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.)

Background: Surgical wound classification (SWC) is a component of surgical site infection risk stratification. Studies have demonstrated that SWC is often incorrectly documented. This study examines the accuracy of SWC after implementation of a multifaceted plan targeted at accurate documentation., Methods: A reviewer examined operative notes of 8 pediatric operations and determined SWC for each case. This SWC was compared with nurse-documented SWC. Percent agreement pre- and postintervention was compared. Analysis was performed using chi-square and a P value less than .05 was significant., Results: Preintervention concordance was 58% (112/191) and postintervention was 83% (163/199, P = .001). Appendectomy accuracy was 28% and increased to 80% (P = .0005). Fundoplication accuracy increased from 44% to 84% (P = .016) and gastrostomy tube from 56% to 100% (P = .0002). The most accurate operation preintervention was pyloromyotomy and postintervention was gastrostomy tube and inguinal hernia. The least accurate pre- and postintervention was cholecystectomy., Conclusion: Implementation of a multifaceted approach improved accuracy of documented SWC., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Orthopaedic surgical site infections (SSIs) can delay recovery, add impairments, and decrease quality of life, particularly in patients undergoing spine surgery, in whom SSIs may also be more common. Efforts to prevent and treat SSIs of the spine rely on the identification and registration of these adverse events in large databases. The effective use of these databases to answer clinical questions depends on how the conditions in question, such as infection, are defined in the databases queried, but the degree to which different definitions of infection might cause different risk factors to be identified by those databases has not been evaluated., Questions/purposes: The purpose of this study was to determine whether different definitions of SSI identify different risk factors for SSI. Specifically, we compared the International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision (ICD-9) coding, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) criteria for deep infection, and incision and débridement for infection to determine if each is associated with distinct risk factors for SSI., Methods: In this single-center retrospective study, a sample of 5761 adult patients who had an orthopaedic spine surgery between January 2003 and August 2013 were identified from our institutional database. The mean age of the patients was 56 years (± 16 SD), and slightly more than half were men. We applied three different definitions of infection: ICD-9 code for SSI, the CDC criteria for deep infection, and incision and débridement for infection. Three hundred sixty-one (6%) of the 5761 surgeries received an ICD-9 code for SSI within 90 days of surgery. After review of the medical records of these 361 patients, 216 (4%) met the CDC criteria for deep SSI, and 189 (3%) were taken to the operating room for irrigation and débridement within 180 days of the day of surgery., Results: We found the Charlson Comorbidity Index, the duration of the operation, obesity, and posterior surgical approach were independently associated with a higher risk of infection for each of the three definitions of SSI. The influence of malnutrition, smoking, specific procedures, and specific surgeons varied by definition of infection. These elements accounted for approximately 6% of the variability in the risk of developing an infection., Conclusions: The frequency of SSI after spine surgery varied according to the definition of an infection, but the most important risk factors did not. We conclude that large database studies may be better suited for identifying risk factors than for determining absolute numbers of infections., Level of Evidence: Level III, prognostic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Intraoperative wound classification is a predictor of postoperative infection. Therefore, accurately assigning the correct classification to a surgical wound is of particular importance. Our institution participates in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP), a national outcomes database that collects wound classification for all qualifying operative procedures, and we noted discrepancies when comparing ACS NSQIP wound classification coding with perioperative coding in our electronic medical record. We tested the effectiveness of an intervention that included staff educational sessions, informational posters, and postoperative debriefings on improving the accuracy of documented intraoperative wound classification. The χ(2) test was used to compare proportions of wound classification miscodings before and after educational sessions and debriefings commenced. Baseline data revealed misclassification of wounds occurred 21 per cent (30 of 141) of the time in predominately colorectal procedures performed by two surgeons from April through August 2012. Errors decreased to 9 per cent (13 of 147) from August to December 2012, after our intervention of education sessions with operating room staff and the surgeons incorporating a statement confirming the wound classification at the end of the case debriefing. The χ(2) statistic was 8.7589. The P value was significant at 0.003. Ensuring concordance of classification between the surgeon and nurse during a postprocedure debriefing as well as education of perioperative nursing staff through posters and seminars significantly improved the accuracy of intraoperative wound classification coding.

Introduction: The drive to improve outcomes and the inevitability of mandated public reporting necessitate uniform documentation and accurate databases. The reporting of wound classification in patients undergoing hepato-pancreatico-biliary (HPB) surgery and the impact of inconsistencies on quality metrics were investigated., Methods: The 2005-2011 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) participant use file was interrogated to identify patients undergoing HPB resections. The effect of wound classification on post-operative surgical site infection (SSI) rates was determined through logistic regression. The impact of variations in wound classification reporting on perceived outcomes was modelled by simulating observed-to-expected (O/E) ratios for SSI., Results: In total, 27,376 patients were identified with significant heterogeneity in wound classification. In spite of clear guidelines prompting at least 'clean-contaminated' designation for HPB resections, 8% of all cases were coded as 'clean'. Contaminated [adjusted odds ratio (AOR): 1.39, P = 0.001] and dirty (AOR: 1.42, P = 0.02] cases were associated with higher odds of SSI, whereas clean-contaminated were not (P = 0.99). O/E ratios were highly sensitive to modest changes in wound classification., Conclusions: Perceived performance is affected by heterogeneous reporting of wound classification. As institutions work to improve outcomes and prepare for public reporting, it is imperative that all adhere to consistent reporting practices to provide accurate and reproducible outcomes., (© 2014 International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association.)

Objective: Our goal was to estimate the performance statistics of an electronic surveillance system for surgical site infections (SSIs), generally applicable in French hospitals., Methods: Three detection algorithms using 2 different data sources were tested retrospectively on 9 types of surgical procedures performed between January 2010 and December 2011 in the University Hospital of Nantes. The first algorithm was based on administrative codes, the second was based on bacteriological data, and the third used both data sources. For each algorithm, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV) were calculated. The reference method was the hospital's routine surveillance: a comprehensive review of the computerized medical charts of the patients who underwent one of the targeted procedures during the study period., Setting: A 3,000-bed teaching hospital in western France., Population: We analyzed 4,400 targeted surgical procedures., Results: Sensitivity results varied significantly between the three algorithms, from 25% (95% confidence interval, 17-33) when using only administrative codes to 87% (80%-93%) with the bacteriological data and 90% (85%-96%) with the combined algorithm. Fewer variations were observed for specificity (91%-98%), PPV (21%-25%), and NPV (98% to nearly 100%). Overall, performance statistics were higher for deep SSIs than for superficial infections., Conclusions: A reliable computer-enhanced SSI surveillance can easily be implemented in French hospitals using common data sources. This should allow infection control professionals to spend more time on prevention and education duties. However, a multicenter study should be conducted to assess the generalizability of this method.

Background: Surgical wounds (incisions) heal by primary intention when the wound edges are brought together and secured - often with sutures, staples, clips or glue. Wound dressings, usually applied after wound closure, provide physical support, protection from bacterial contamination and absorb exudate. Surgical site infection (SSI) is a common complication of surgical wounds that may delay healing., Objectives: To assess the effects of wound dressings for preventing SSI in people with surgical wounds healing by primary intention., Search Methods: In February 2014 we searched: The Cochrane Wounds Group Specialised Register; The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library); The Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE) (The Cochrane Library); The Health Technology Assessment Database (HTA) (The Cochrane Library); NHS Economic Evaluation Database (NHSEED) (The Cochrane Library); Ovid MEDLINE; Ovid MEDLINE (In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations); Ovid EMBASE and EBSCO CINAHL. There were no restrictions based on language or date of publication or study setting., Selection Criteria: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing alternative wound dressings or wound dressing with no dressing (wound exposure) for the postoperative management of surgical wounds healing by primary intention., Data Collection and Analysis: Two review authors performed study selection, risk of bias assessment and data extraction independently., Main Results: Twenty RCTs were included (3623 participants). All trials were at unclear or high risk of bias. Twelve trials included people with wounds resulting from surgical procedures with a contamination classification of 'clean', two trials included people with wounds resulting from surgical procedures with a 'clean/contaminated' contamination classification and the remaining trials evaluated people with wounds resulting from various surgical procedures with different contamination classifications. Two trials compared wound dressings with leaving wounds exposed. The remaining 18 trials compared two alternative dressing types. No evidence was identified to suggest that any dressing significantly reduced the risk of developing an SSI compared with leaving wounds exposed or compared with alternative dressings in people who had surgical wounds healing by primary intention., Authors' Conclusions: At present, there is insufficient evidence as to whether covering surgical wounds healing by primary intention with wound dressings reduces the risk of SSI or whether any particular wound dressing is more effective than others in reducing the rates of SSI, improving scarring, pain control, patient acceptability or ease of dressing removal. Most trials in this review were small and at high or unclear risk of bias. However, based on the current evidence, we conclude that decisions on wound dressing should be based on dressing costs and the symptom management properties offered by each dressing type e.g. exudate management.

Background: Surgical wound classification has been used in risk-adjustment models. However, it can be subjective and could potentially improperly bias hospital quality comparisons. The objective is to examine the effect of wound classification on hospital performance risk-adjustment models., Study Design: Retrospective review of the 2011 American College of Surgeons NSQIP database was conducted for the following wound classification categories: clean, clean-contaminated, contaminated, and dirty-infected. To assess the influence of wound classification on risk adjustment, 2 models were developed for all outcomes: 1 including and 1 excluding wound classification. For each model, hospital postoperative complications were estimated using hierarchical multivariable regression methods. Absolute changes in hospital rank, correlations of odds ratios, and outlier status agreement between models were examined., Results: Of the 442,149 cases performed in 315 hospitals: 53.6% were classified as clean; 34.2% as clean-contaminated; 6.7% as contaminated; and 5.5% as dirty-infected. The surgical site infection rate was highest in dirty-infected (8.5%) and lowest in clean (1.8%) cases. For overall surgical site infection, the absolute change in risk-adjusted hospital performance rank between models, including vs excluding wound classification, was minimal (mean 4.5 of 315 positions). The correlations between odds ratios of the 2 performance models were nearly perfect (R = 0.9976, p < 0.0001), and outlier status agreement was excellent (κ = 0.95ss08, p < 0.0001). Similar findings were observed in models of subgroups of surgical site infections and other postoperative outcomes., Conclusions: In circumstances where alternate information is available for risk adjustment, there appear to be minimal differences in performance models that include vs exclude wound classification. Therefore, the American College of Surgeons NSQIP is critically evaluating the continued use of wound classification in hospital performance risk-adjustment models., (Copyright © 2014 American College of Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Programmes surveying surgical site infection (SSI) have been implemented throughout the world and are associated with a reduction in SSI rates. We report data on non-prosthetic surgery from the Italian SSI surveillance programme for the period 2009 to 2011. Participation in the programme was voluntary. We evaluated the occurrence of SSI, based on protocols from the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, within 30 days of surgery. Demographic data, risk factors, type of surgery and presence of SSI were recorded. The National Coordinating Centre analysed the pooled data. On 355 surgical wards 60,460 operations were recorded, with the number of surveyed intervention doubling over the study period. SSI was observed in 1,628 cases (2,6%) and 60% of SSI were diagnosed through 30-days post discharge surveillance. Operations performed in hospitals with at least two years of surveillance showed a 29% lower risk of SSI. Longer intervention duration, American Society of Anesthesiologists’ (ASA) score of at least three, and pre-surgery hospital stay of at least two days were associated with increased risk of SSI, while videoscopic procedures had reduced SSI rates. Implementation of a national surveillance programme was helpful in reducing SSI rates and should be prioritised in all healthcare systems.

Background: Risk-adjusted rates of surgical site infections (SSI) are used as a quality metric to facilitate improvement within a hospital system and allow comparison across institutions. The NSQIP-Pediatric, among others, uses surgical wound classification as a variable in models designed to predict risk-adjusted postoperative morbidity, including SSI rates. The purpose of this study was to measure the level of agreement in wound classification assignment among 3 providers: surgeons, operating room (OR) nurses, and NSQIP surgical clinical reviewers (SCR)., Study Design: An analysis was performed of pediatric general surgery operations from 2010 to 2011. Wound classification was assigned at the time of operation by the OR nurse and surgeon, and by the NSQIP SCR postoperatively, according to NSQIP methodology. Disagreement was defined as any discrepancy in classification among the 3 providers, and the level of agreement was determined using the kappa statistic., Results: For the 374 procedures reviewed, there was an overall disagreement of 48% among all providers, kappa 0.48 (95% CI 0.43 to 0.53). When comparing wound classification by surgeon and NSQIP SCR, 23% of cases were in disagreement, kappa 0.74 (95% CI 0.68 to 0.78). Disagreement between OR nurse and either surgeon or NSQIP SCR was higher: 38%, kappa 0.45 (95% CI 0.38 to 0.53) and 40%, kappa 0.44 (95% CI 0.37 to 0.51). Fundoplication, appendectomy, and cholecystectomy demonstrated the highest overall disagreement (73%, 71%, and 60%, respectively)., Conclusions: There is significant variation in assigning surgical wound classification among health care providers. For future SSI comparative analyses, it will be critical to improve uniformity and understanding of wound class assignment among providers and institutions., (Copyright © 2013 American College of Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Despite the widespread utilization of a four-stage wound classification system to risk-adjust operations for surgical site infection (SSI) rates, we are not aware of any study evaluating the definitions of the wound classes for clarity. We limited our study of wound classifications to appendectomies and posed the question whether different reviewers classify individual cases differently., Methods: We evaluated the wound classifications of 105 consecutive appendectomies in our community hospital. Four reviewers graded retrospectively the wound classifications, first after reading the description of the appendix in the operative report and again after reading the pathology report. The wound classifications of the four reviewers were evaluated for concordance with the original operating room nurse (ORN) assignment., Results: The kappa scores for inter-observer concordance of wound classifications among the four reviewers based on their interpretation of the operative report and the ORN who originally classified the operation ranged from 0.1028 to 0.1597. By conventional standards, this represents no better than "slight agreement" for any of the reviewers. We found that 19%, 50%, 94%, 95%, or 96% of our appendectomies would be considered "high risk," Class 3 or 4, operations depending on which rater classified the operation. The additional information contained in the pathology reports did not change the distribution of wound classifications of the four reviewers significantly., Conclusions: Our study demonstrated considerable differences in the distribution of wound classifications of appendectomies among our ORNs and retrospective reviewers. A review of the surgical literature supports our finding that the incision classification system utilized commonly lacks precision, at least in the rating of appendectomies. We recommend that further studies be performed to determine whether changes in the definitions of wound classes are warranted.

Purpose: Surgical site infections (SSIs) are rare complications after total joint replacement (TJR); however, should an SSI occur, the clinical and economic consequences can be significant. A Medicare 5% national sample administrative dataset was used to identify and longitudinally observe patients undergoing total knee TJR for deep infections and revision surgery. In 69,663 patients undergoing elective total knee TJR, 1,400 infections (2%) were identified. The infection incidence within 2 years of implantation was 1.55%. A recent retrospective survey of 2,476 temporomandibular joint (TMJ) alloplastic TJR cases involving 3,368 joints reported that a 1.51% SSI rate occurred over a mean of 6 months postoperatively, with a range of 2 weeks to 12 years. This article discusses approaches to avoid and minimize TMJ TJR SSIs and recommends management options should early or late SSIs occur., Materials and Methods: On the basis of a review of the orthopedic SSI literature, this article will discuss TMJ TJR SSI risk, prevention, and management from a number of perspectives, including preoperative patient risk assessment, preincision antibiotic prophylaxis, anesthesia and skin preparation protocols, intraoperative surgical technique and duration of surgery, and postoperative antibiotic and follow-up regimens., Result: Ways to avoid and manage potential risks for SSI in TMJ TJR cases are recommended. The diagnostic criteria and management protocols for both early- and late-occurring SSIs after TMJ TJR are recommended., Conclusions: The risk of SSI after TMJ TJR can be decreased with appropriate consideration to preoperative patient risk assessment; properly timed antibiotic prophylaxis; and intraoperative, postoperative, and postdischarge attention to detail., (Copyright © 2012 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To assess the validity, reliability and sensitivity of the ASEPSIS scoring system, used to assess non-cardiac related surgery for surgical wound infection., Method: Five studies were included in this review. One study discussed the development of the ASEPSIS scoring system; two studies were on its reliability, one study on the sensitivity and the final compared the ASEPSIS scoring system against other surgical wound infection criteria and definitions. Due to variation in study designs, the findings were summarised and presented in a narrative format., Results: Validity and reliability were not established in assessing non-cardiac surgical sites. Sensitivity level was reported for non-cardiac surgical sites, but its reliability level declined as the severity of infection worsened., Conclusion: This review revealed that there are limited choices of scoring systems to assess different surgical sites for surgical wound infection. Currently, only the ASEPSIS scoring system is available, but it is not validated for use with non-sternal wounds. Therefore, it should be used cautiously when assessing non-cardiac surgical wound infection.