Search

CT scans are an integral component of modern radiotherapy treatments, enabling the accurate localisation of the treatment target and organs-at-risk, and providing the tissue density information required for the calculation of dose in the treatment planning system. For these reasons, it is important to ensure exposures are optimised to give the required clinical image quality with doses that are as low as reasonably achievable. However, there is little guidance in the literature on dose levels in radiotherapy CT imaging either within the UK or internationally. This IPEM topical report presents the results of the first UK wide survey of dose indices in radiotherapy CT planning scans. Patient dose indices were collected for prostate, gynaecological, breast, lung 3D, lung 4D, brain and head and neck scans. Median values per scanner and examination type were calculated and national dose reference levels and 'achievable levels' of CT dose index (CTDIvol), dose-length-product (DLP) and scan length are proposed based on the third quartile and median values of these distributions, respectively. A total of 68 radiotherapy CT scanners were included in this audit. The proposed dose reference levels for CTDIvol and DLP are; prostate 16 mGy and 570 mGy · cm, gynaecological 16 mGy and 610 mGy · cm, breast 10 mGy and 390 mGy · cm, lung 3D 14 mGy and 550 mGy · cm, lung 4D 63 mGy and 1750 mGy · cm, brain 50 mGy and 1500 mGy · cm and head and neck 49 mGy and 2150 mGy · cm. Significant variations in dose indices were noted, with head and neck and lung 4D yielding a factor of eighteen difference between the lowest and highest dose scanners. There was also evidence of some clustering in the data by scanner manufacturer, which may be indicative of a lack of local optimisation of individual systems to the clinical task. It is anticipated that providing this data to the UK and wider radiotherapy community will aid the optimisation of treatment planning CT scan protocols. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This is the second paper arising from a project concerning the application of Monte Carlo simulations to provide scanner-specific organ dose coefficients for modern CT scanners. The present focus is centred on the bone dosimetry models that have been developed. Simulations have been performed in photon only transport mode, with the assumption of electron equilibrium. This approximation breaks down for doses to active marrow and endosteum since the target cells are localised within tens of micrometre from bone tissue and dose enhancement functions are necessary to correct for the additional dose from photoelectric electrons created in adjacent material. The dose enhancement models used previously in publications NRPB-SR250 (Jones and Shrimpton 1993 Software Report NRPB-SR250, National Radiological Protection Board, Chilton, UK) and ORNL-TM8381 (Cristy and Eckerman 1987 Technical Report Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN) have been implemented and compared with the contemporary approaches of Johnson et al (2011 Phys. Med. Biol. 56 2347–65) and ICRP Publication 116 (ICRP 2010 Ann. ICRP40 1–257) that are being adopted in the present project. In addition, the calculation of dose to endosteum in the medullary cavity is reviewed and updated using electron mode simulations. For the purposes of quality assurance and comparison, the various dose enhancement functions have been applied in relation to the NRPB18+DJ and HPA18+  stylised hermaphrodite phantoms and also the adult male and female voxel phantoms recommended in ICRP Publication 110 (ICRP 2009 Ann. ICRP39 1–165), for exposure from three CT scanners modelled previously. Contemporary results for standard examinations on the head and trunk calculated for these latter phantoms demonstrate moderate increases (modal value  +18%) in active marrow dose coefficients relative to values derived from data published in NRPB-SR250. A similar analysis in relation to endosteum dose coefficients shows larger reductions (modal value  −46%), owing at least in part to changes in assumed location of the target cells. Even larger changes are apparent for both of these dose coefficients in relation to examination of the upper legs (−39% and  −94%, respectively). However, resultant changes in any values of effective dose will be less owing to the low weighting factors applied for these tissues. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]