Search

Background and Objectives: The Stress Management and Relaxation Training-Relaxation Response Resiliency Program (SMART-3RP) is a mind-body group intervention that integrates relaxation training with cognitive behavioral and positive psychology techniques. This study assessed SMART-3RP feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy for enhancing resilience and flourishing among older adults in continuing care retirement communities (CCRCs)., Research Design and Methods: We conducted a prospective single-arm study of SMART-3RP groups delivered by clinicians at 4 CCRCs (n = 80). Eligible residents lived in community apartments. Participants completed pre- and postintervention surveys. We evaluated attendance (hypothesis: ≥60% attend ≥6 of 9 sessions), enrollment, and retention. Mixed methods were used to explore acceptability. Paired samples t-tests were conducted to explore changes in resilience, flourishing, and key intervention targets., Results: From March to June 2021, we screened 89 residents with 87 (98%) consenting to participate and 80 (90%) enrolling in the study. Among 80 participants (85% female; 98% non-Hispanic White; M age = 80 years [SD = 6]), 88% attended ≥6 sessions, and 89% completed the postintervention survey. Participants found meaning in participation and practiced skills in the context of challenges such as caregiving burden or bereavement. Survey results, showing increases in resilience, flourishing, and several intervention targets, aligned with participants' perceived intervention value., Discussion and Implications: SMART-3RP was feasible and acceptable for CCRC residents; participants perceived value in practicing mind-body strategies in a group-based setting. Preliminary evidence suggested a pattern of improvements in resilience, flourishing, and intervention targets. Findings provide insights for mind-body interventions and recommendations for adaptations to late-in-life concerns and community settings., Clinical Trials Registration Number: NCT04720014., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

The aim of this study was to explore provider practices and attitudes towards routine follow-up counselling after prescription of contraceptives. An anonymous 16-item survey was pilot-tested and sent to providers of the Internal Medicine, Family Medicine, Pediatrics, and OBGYN departments of Thomas Jefferson University Hospitals (TJUH), an urban academic medical centre in Philadelphia, PA, USA. Frequency and descriptive statistics were used to analyse quantitative data while a framework analysis approach was applied to open-ended questions. Fifty percent of providers said they typically follow up with patients regarding a newly prescribed contraceptive. Only 15.3% said they do for an existing prescription. Eighty-three percent reported that it is important though only 30% believed follow-up guidelines were clear. Ultimately, there is a gap between providers' interest in delivering follow-up care and established direction on how to do so.Impact Statement What is already known on the subject? Prescription contraceptive adherence is suboptimal. However, it is known that proactive follow-up has positive effects on prescription contraceptive adherence. What do the results of the study add? Most respondents believe that patients take their prescription contraception as prescribed. In light of this finding, providers are less likely to follow up with an existing prescription contraceptive. Interestingly, most respondents do believe that follow-up is important for patients using prescribed contraception but endorse that guidelines about follow-up are neither established nor clear. What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? Patient adherence to prescription contraceptives can be improved through optimised routine patient follow-up after initial prescription. This must be done in ways that minimise burdens to both patients and providers. Providers could benefit from clear guidelines regarding best practices. Future research is needed to understand how providers can best support patients on their contraceptive journey.

•Adherence can be broken into three processes: uptake, consistent use, and persistence.•Barriers and facilitators to NRT use vary over the three adherence processes.•Information gaps and negative stories about NRT are common barriers to adherence.•NRT adherence may be improved by addressing patient knowledge and concerns., Competing Interests: GRK has a family financial interest in Dimagi, Inc. NAR has consulted with Achieve Life Sciences, regarding an investigational smoking cessation medication, and receives royalties from UpToDate for review of smoking cessation treatments. JEH consults for Merck and the CDC., (© 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on US adults' smoking and quitting behaviors is unclear. We explored the impact of COVID-19 on smoking behaviors, risk perceptions, and reactions to text messages during a statewide stay-at-home advisory among primary care patients who were trying to quit. From May-June 2020, we interviewed smokers enrolled in a 12-week, pilot cessation trial providing text messaging and mailed nicotine replacement medication (NCT04020718). Twenty-two individuals (82% white, mean age 55 years), representing 88% of trial participants during the stay-at-home advisory, completed exit interviews; four (18%) of them reported abstinence. Interviews were thematically analyzed by two coders. COVID-19-induced environmental changes had mixed effects, facilitating quitting for some and impeding quitting for others. While stress increased for many, those who quit found ways to cope with stress. Generally, participants felt at risk for COVID-19 complications but not at increased risk of becoming infected. Reactions to COVID-19 and quitting behaviors differed across age groups, older participants reported difficulties coping with isolation (e.g., feeling disappointed when a text message came from the study and not a live person). Findings suggest that cessation interventions addressing stress and boredom are needed during COVID-19, while smokers experiencing isolation may benefit from live-person supports.