Search

Purpose: Over the last decade, there has been a rapid rise in the development and refinement of abdominal wall repair (AWR) techniques. Numerous cadaveric AWR training courses have been set up with the goal of helping practicing surgeons learn and incorporate them into their surgical repertoire. Some maybe excellent but their quality and consistency are unknown. The aim of this article is to present a stepwise cadaveric dissection template and checklist to standardize all training on open AWR courses and to help course organizers benchmark the quality of their program. Methods: This article is based on both the authors experience as faculty and course leads of cadaveric AWR courses, and the published anatomical and operative literature. The authors represent the training committee of the European Hernia Society, and the AWR subcommittees of the British Hernia Society and Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain & Ireland. Results: A standardized stepwise approach for the cadaveric training of the most recognized procedures for open AWR, including retrorectus repair, posterior and anterior component separation techniques, is presented. Considerations on delegate selection, pre-course material and testing, course structure, and cadaveric models is also provided. Conclusion: Time and financial resources for surgeons to attend courses to learn and hone the skills required for safe effective AWR is limited. Ideally all courses should deliver up to date consistent training of the highest quality. One step to achieve this is by developing a standardized approach to ensure delegate understanding of the operative steps and key anatomical features. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: Incisional herniation (IH) is a frequent complication following midline abdominal closure with significant associated morbidity. Randomized controlled trials have demonstrated that the small bites technique (SBT) and prophylactic mesh augmentation (PMA) may reduce IH compared to mass closure techniques, but data are lacking on their implementation in contemporary surgical practice. This survey aimed to evaluate the use of the SBT and PMA and to identify factors associated with their adoption. Method: Between 22 January 2023 and 16 March 2023, consultant surgeons across the UK were asked to complete a 25‐question survey on closure of an elective primary midline incision. Results: Responses were received from 267 of 675 eligible surgeons (39.6%) in 38 NHS Trusts. Respondents were evenly split between tertiary centres (47.6%) and district general hospitals (49.4%). SBT and PMA were used by 19.9% and 3.0% of respondents, respectively. Compared to other techniques, surgeons using the SBT were more likely to close the anterior aponeurotic layer only, use single suture filaments, 2–0 gauge sutures and sharp needle points and routinely dissect abdominal layers to aid closure (all p < 0.001). Attendance at lectures/conferences on SBT (p = 0.043) and basing practice on available evidence (p < 0.001) were independently associated with use of the SBT. The commonest barriers to adopting SBT were a perceived lack of evidence (23.8%) and belief that personal IH rates were low (16.8%). Conclusion: A minority of UK consultant surgeons have adopted the SBT or PMA. Practice change should be driven by more widespread dissemination of current evidence and procedural information. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: Use of open abdomen (OA) remains an important life‐saving manoeuvre in the management of trauma and the abdominal catastrophe. The National Open Abdomen Audit (NOAA) is an audit project investigating the indications, management, and subsequent outcomes of OA treatment throughout the UK. The aim is to generate a snapshot of practice which will inform the management of future patients and potentially reduce the significant harm that can be associated with OA. Methods and analysis: NOAA is a collaborative, prospective observational audit recruiting patients from across Great Britain and Ireland. The study will open from July 2023 with rolling recruitment across participating sites. All adult patients who leave theatre with an OA will be included and followed‐up for 90 days. The primary objective is to prospectively audit the national variability in the management of the OA. Secondary outcomes include the treatment modality used for OA, indication, outcome of treatment and complications, including mortality and development of intestinal failure. All data will be recorded and managed using the secure REDCap electronic data capture and analysed using Stata (version 16.1). Results will be reported in accordance with the STROBE statement. Conclusion: Results will be used to formulate a practical clinical guideline on when to implement an OA along with a stepwise management plan once initiated to reduce the associated morbidity and mortality. It is hoped that participation in this study will facilitate education of surgeons with a "trickle down" effect on all members of the surgical team and remove variability in the management. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: The effect of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) on the pathogenesis and outcome of enteroatmospheric fistulation (EAF) in the septic open abdomen (OA) is unclear. This study compares the development and outcome of EAF following NPWT with that occurring in the absence of NPWT. Methods: Consecutive patients admitted with EAF following abdominal sepsis at a National Reference Centre for intestinal failure between 01 January 2005 and 31 December 2015 were included in this study. Patients were divided into two groups based on those that had been treated with NPWT and those that had not (non‐NPWT) and characteristics of their fistulas compared. Clinical outcomes concerning nutritional autonomy at 4 years and time to fistula development, size of abdominal wall defect and complete fistula closure were compared between groups. Results: A total of 160 patients were admitted with EAF following a septic abdomen (31‐NPWT and 129‐non‐NPWT). Median (range) time taken to fistulation after OA was longer with NPWT (18 [5–113] vs. 8 [2–60] days, p = 0.004); these patients developed a greater number of fistulas (3 [2–21] vs. 2 [1–10], p = 0.01), involving a greater length of small bowel (42.5 [15–100] cm vs. 30 [3.5–170] cm, p = 0.04) than those who did not receive NPWT. Following reconstructive surgery, nutritional autonomy was similar in both groups (77% vs. 72%) and a comparable number of patients were also fistula‐free (100% vs. 97%). Conclusions: Negative pressure wound therapy appears to be associated with more complex and delayed intestinal fistulation, involving a greater length of small intestine in the septic OA. This did not, however, appear to adversely affect the overall outcome of intestinal and abdominal wall reconstruction in this study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article discusses the use of the open abdomen technique in the management of secondary peritonitis. The open abdomen technique involves leaving the abdomen open after surgery to treat severe and intractable peritonitis, allowing for drainage. However, there is limited evidence supporting its use in peritonitis, and the benefits are questionable. Studies have shown that closing the abdomen at the earliest opportunity reduces the risk of complications such as fistulation and hernia. The article suggests that the majority of abdomens should be closed, and the open abdomen technique should be considered a temporary measure. [Extracted from the article]

Aim: There is a requirement for an expansive and up to date review of the management of emergency colorectal conditions seen in adults. The primary objective is to provide detailed evidence‐based guidelines for the target audience of general and colorectal surgeons who are responsible for an adult population and who practise in Great Britain and Ireland. Methods: Surgeons who are elected members of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland Emergency Surgery Subcommittee were invited to contribute various sections to the guidelines. They were directed to produce a pathology‐based document using literature searches that were systematic, comprehensible, transparent and reproducible. Levels of evidence were graded. Each author was asked to provide a set of recommendations which were evidence‐based and unambiguous. These recommendations were submitted to the whole guideline group and scored. They were then refined and submitted to a second vote. Only those that achieved >80% consensus at level 5 (strongly agree) or level 4 (agree) after two votes were included in the guidelines. Results: All aspects of care (excluding abdominal trauma) for emergency colorectal conditions have been included along with 122 recommendations for management. Conclusion: These guidelines provide an up to date and evidence‐based summary of the current surgical knowledge in the management of emergency colorectal conditions and should serve as practical text for clinicians managing colorectal conditions in the emergency setting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article discusses abdominal wall reconstruction techniques for abdominal wall hernias. Topics covered include the principles of successful reconstruction such as tension-free approximation of well-vascularized tissues, reconstruction of the linea alba, and avoidance of surgical site infection, the need for surgeons to conduct preoperative assessment to identify potential risk reduction strategies, and the open techniques such as simple suture repair, inlay technique and onlay technique.

Purpose: Over the last decade, there has been a rapid rise in the development and refinement of abdominal wall repair (AWR) techniques. Numerous cadaveric AWR training courses have been set up with the goal of helping practicing surgeons learn and incorporate them into their surgical repertoire. Some maybe excellent but their quality and consistency are unknown. The aim of this article is to present a stepwise cadaveric dissection template and checklist to standardize all training on open AWR courses and to help course organizers benchmark the quality of their program., Methods: This article is based on both the authors experience as faculty and course leads of cadaveric AWR courses, and the published anatomical and operative literature. The authors represent the training committee of the European Hernia Society, and the AWR subcommittees of the British Hernia Society and Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain & Ireland., Results: A standardized stepwise approach for the cadaveric training of the most recognized procedures for open AWR, including retrorectus repair, posterior and anterior component separation techniques, is presented. Considerations on delegate selection, pre-course material and testing, course structure, and cadaveric models is also provided., Conclusion: Time and financial resources for surgeons to attend courses to learn and hone the skills required for safe effective AWR is limited. Ideally all courses should deliver up to date consistent training of the highest quality. One step to achieve this is by developing a standardized approach to ensure delegate understanding of the operative steps and key anatomical features., Competing Interests: Declarations. Competing interests: The author has no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature.)