Search

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is one of the most common cardiac arrhythmias, but its pathogenesis is still poorly understood. Catheter ablation is one of the most effective treatments for AF, but recurrence after ablation remains a challenge. There has been much research into the association of AF recurrence with several factors, including genetics. Over the past decade or so, significant advances have been made in the genetic architecture of atrial fibrillation. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified over 100 loci for genetic variants associated with atrial fibrillation. However, there is relatively little information on the systematic assessment of the genes related to AF recurrence after ablation. In this review article, we highlight the value of genetic polymorphisms in atrial fibrillation recurrence after catheter ablation and their potential mechanisms in the recurrence process to enhance our understanding of atrial fibrillation recurrence and contribute to individualized treatment strategies for patients with AF.

Background: Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) can be a useful tool during drug-eluting stents (DES) implantation as it allows accurate assessment of lesion severity and optimal treatment planning. However, numerous reports have shown that IVUS guided percutaneous coronary intervention is not associated with improved clinical outcomes, especially in non-complex patients and lesions.Methods: We searched the literature in Medline, the Cochrane Library, and other internet sources to identify studies that compare clinical outcomes between IVUS-guided and angiography-guided DES implantation. Random-effects model was used to assess treatment effect.Results: Twenty eligible studies with a total of 29,068 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The use of IVUS was associated with significant reductions in major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE, odds ratios [OR] 0.77, 95 % confidence intervals [CI] 0.71-0.83, P < 0.001), death (OR 0.62, 95 % CI 0.54-0.71, p < 0.001), and stent thrombosis (OR 0.59, 95 % CI: 0.47-0.73, P < 0.001). The benefit was also seen in the repeated analysis of matched and randomized studies. In stratified analysis, IVUS guidance appeared to be beneficial not only in patients with complex lesions or acute coronary syndromes (ACS) but also patients with mixed lesions or presentations (MACE: OR 0.69, 95 % CI: 0.60-0.79, p < 0.001, OR 0.81, 95 % CI 0.74-0.90, p < 0.001, respectively). By employing meta-regression analysis, the benefit of IVUS is significantly pronounced in patients with complex lesions or ACS with respect to death (p = 0.048).Conclusions: IVUS guidance was associated with improved clinical outcomes, especially in patients with complex lesions admitted with ACS. Large, randomized clinical trials are warranted to identify populations and lesion characteristics where IVUS guidance would be associated with better outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]