Search

Background: The expression and functional role of CysLT2 receptors in asthma have not been clarified. In this study, we evaluated CysLT2 receptors expression, and effects of CysLT2-and CysLT1/2-receptor antagonists on antigen-induced bronchoconstriction using isolated lung tissues from both asthma and non-asthma subjects. Methods: CysLT1 and CysLT2 receptors expression in asthma and non-asthma lung tissue preparations was examined in immunohistochemistry experiments, and their functional roles in antigen-induced bronchoconstriction were assessed using ONO-6950, a dual CysLT1/2-receptor antagonist, montelukast, a CysLT1 receptor antagonist, and BayCysLT2RA, a CysLT2 receptor-specific antagonist. Results: CysLT1 receptors were expressed on the bronchial smooth muscle and epithelium, and on alveolar leukocytes in 5 in 5 non-asthma subjects and 2 in 2 asthma subjects. On the other hand, although degrees of CysLT2 receptors expression were variable among the 5 non-asthma subjects, the expression in the asthma lung was detected on bronchial smooth muscle, epithelium and alveolar leukocytes in 2 in 2 asthma subjects. In the non-asthma specimens, antagonism of CysLT2 receptors did not affect antigen-induced bronchial contractions, even after pretreatment with the CysLT1-receptor specific antagonist, montelukast. However, in the bronchus isolated from one of the 2 asthma subjects, antagonism of CysLT2 receptors suppressed contractions, and dual antagonism of CysLT1 and CysLT2 receptors resulted in additive inhibitory effect on anaphylactic contractions. Conclusions: CysLT2 receptors were expressed in lung specimens isolated from asthma subjects. Activation of CysLT2 receptors may contribute to antigen-induced bronchoconstriction in certain asthma population.

Background: Japanese cedar pollen-induced allergic rhinitis in a guinea pig model clearly induced not only sneezing but also biphasic nasal blockage. To date, there have only been a few reports on models of murine allergic rhinitis which clearly show nasal blockage. Therefore, in order to try and develop such a model, we administered multiple dosages of intranasal pollen or purified antigen protein Cry j 1. Methods: B10.S mice were sensitized by intranasal instillations of either pollen extract or Cry j 1 twice a day for 7 days, which was adsorbed on Al(OH)3. Subsequently, once a week, the mice were given multiple intranasal instillation challenges of either the pollen suspension or Cry j 1 and the frequency of sneezing was observed after respective challenges were made. Specific airway resistance (sRaw) was measured as an indicator for nasal blockage. Cry j 1-specific IgE levels were measured using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Results: The serum Cry j 1-specific IgE level showed clear elevation only in the group sensitized by Cry j 1 + Al(OH)3 and then challenged by Cry j 1. No elevations were seen in the groups sensitized by pollen extract + Al (OH)3 followed by a pollen suspension challenge. There was an immediate increase in sneezing after challenges in all of the sensitized-challenged groups. Nevertheless, no increases in sRaw in any of the groups were detected at any of the time points during the 8 hours following the challenges. Conclusions: Cry j 1 may be more effective than crude antigens for efficient sensitization/challenge in mice. No increase in sRaw occurred, even in mice that possessed high amounts of Cry j 1-specific IgE and that exhibited sneezing.

Background: As a non-injection route for immunotherapy, local nasal immunotherapy has been examined in allergic rhinitis patients. However, it is unclear how the immunotherapy affects sneezing, biphasic nasal blockage and nasal hyperresponsiveness. Thus, we evaluated the therapeutic effects of nasal immunotherapy on the symptoms of guinea pig allergic rhinitis. Additionally, we also evaluated whether the immunotherapy relieved pollen-induced allergic conjunctivitis. Methods: Sensitized animals were repeatedly challenged by pollen inhalation once every week. After the 7th challenge, the pollen extract was intranasally administered 6 times a week until the 30th challenge. Sneezing frequency was counted after each of the challenges. As an indicator of nasal blockage, changes in specific airway resistance were measured. Nasal hyperresponsiveness was assessed by measuring leukotriene D4-induced nasal blockage. Additionally, during the immunotherapy, we applied pollen onto the ocular surface to induce the allergic conjunctivitis symptoms. Results: At the 11th—30th challenges, the nasal immunotherapy showed inhibition or a tendency to inhibit the biphasic nasal blockage although the inhibitions were variable at respective challenges. The development of nasal hyperresponsiveness was markedly suppressed by the immunotherapy. Nevertheless, neither sneezing nor antigen-specific IgE antibody production was substantially influenced by the immunotherapy. On the other hand, the nasal immunotherapy did not affect the induction of allergic conjunctivitis symptoms. Conclusions: Local nasal immunotherapy may be clinically useful for allergic nasal blockage associated with nasal hyperresponsiveness. The mechanisms responsible for this effectiveness might not be related to IgE production. Additionally, the effectiveness for nasal tissue was dissociated from that seen for the ocular tissue.

It has been hypothesized that air pollution has played a role in the increase in allergy prevalence. However, it remains unclear what exact roles are played by polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), which are encountered in the environment in the form of air pollution, in allergic rhinitis. Thus, we examined whether benzo(a)pyrene (BaP) and 1-nitropyrene (1-NP), representative PAHs, aggravate allergic rhinitis symptoms, using a guinea-pig model. Sensitized animals were repeatedly challenged by inhalation of Japanese cedar pollen once a week. BaP or 1-NP was daily and intranasally administered for 2 weeks (short-term treatment) or for 22 weeks from the time before the sensitization period (long-term treatment). The short-term treatment affected neither nasal blockage nor sneezing induced by antigen. In contrast, the long-term treatment aggravated the antigen-induced nasal blockage that was induced 7 weeks after the start of the treatment with BaP or 1-NP. This aggravation continued during the intranasal treatment with PAH. However, neither sneezing nor Cry j 1-specific IgE antibody production was affected even by the long-term treatment. In conclusion, the long-term treatment with BaP and 1-NP can aggravate allergic rhinitis. The mechanisms underlying this aggravation are not associated with production of Cry j 1-specific IgE. Keywords:: benzo(a)pyrene, 1-nitropyrene, allergic rhinitis, nasal blockage, pollen

To elucidate the mechanisms underlying nasal symptoms in patients with aspirin hypersensitivity, we evaluated the effects of orally administered non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) on the nasal patency of guinea pigs with cedar pollen–induced chronic allergic rhinitis. Indomethacin (10 mg/kg) administered 1 h before a pollen challenge amplified the antigen-induced nasal blockage. More interestingly, even in the absence of the pollen challenge, indomethacin induced nasal blockage at 30 min at 4 h after administration. However, indomethacin-induced nasal blockage was not provoked in non-sensitized animals. Another NSAID, diclofenac (30 mg/kg), also evoked nasal blockage, but unexpectedly, aspirin (500 mg/kg) did not affect nasal patency. Indomethacin-induced nasal blockage was unaffected by a cysteinyl leukotriene receptor (CysLT1 receptor) antagonist, pranlukast (30 mg/kg, p.o.), or by prostaglandin E2 (10− M, intranasal), suggesting that the nasal blockage may not be due to hyperproduction of cysteinyl leukotrienes or inhibition of prostaglandin E2 production. These results indicate that the indomethacin-induced nasal blockage may not be an identical phenomena to airway symptoms in aspirin hypersensitivity patients. However, because chronic nasal inflammation is indispensable for the development of nasal blockage, indomethacin-induced nasal blockage may become a clue to elucidate new mechanisms underlying hypersensitivity to NSAIDs. Keywords:: nasal blockage, indomethacin, aspirin, cysteinyl leukotriene, prostaglandin E2

Itching is the most important symptom in atopic dermatitis because the persistent scratching in response to itching aggravates the disease. However, the etiologic mechanisms of itching in atopic dermatitis remain uncertain. HR-1 hairless mice fed a special diet, HR-AD, develop atopic dermatitis-like symptoms with prolonged scratching episodes. The purpose of this study was to examine whether skin nerve fiber changes were involved in the prolonged scratching seen in this mouse model. On day 56 after the start of feeding, prolonged scratching, as well as atopic dermatitis-like skin changes, were clearly observed in HR-AD-fed mice, while no abnormal changes were observed in mice fed a normal diet. Immunohistochemical analyses of the skin using antibody to protein gene product 9.5 showed the development of numerous immunoreactive nerve fibers in the epidermis of HR-AD-fed mice. Furthermore, after cessation of HR-AD feeding, the reduction in intraepidermal nerve fibers coincided with decreased scratching. Neither the prolongation of scratching nor the increase in intraepidermal nerve fibers was affected by dexamethasone treatment. Thus, the increased number of intraepidermal nerve fibers could be involved in the aggravation of itch-related scratching observed in this model. Keywords:: itch, atopic dermatitis, nerve fiber, hairless mice, protein gene product 9.5

We previously reported that when Japanese cedar pollen was prophylactically p.o. administered before a sensitization stage in a guinea-pig model of allergic rhinitis, pollen-induced nasal blockage was suppressed. In this study, we evaluated whether the oral immunotherapy is also effective when the pollen extract was administered starting from the day when the nasal blockage was clearly induced and whether the effectiveness continued after cessation of the immunotherapy. Sensitized animals were repeatedly challenged by pollen inhalation once every week. After the 7th challenge, the extract was orally administered twice a week until the 30th challenge. At the 11th challenge, the oral immunotherapy showed inhibition of the biphasic nasal blockage. The effectiveness was consistently observed during the immunotherapy until the 30th challenge. Furthermore, the increased nasal responsiveness to intranasal application of leukotriene D4 was markedly suppressed by the immunotherapy. Interestingly, even after cessation of the therapy, inhibition of the nasal blockage was sustained for more than 2 months. Nevertheless, neither sneezing nor antigen-specific IgE antibody production was substantially influenced by the immunotherapy. In conclusion, Oral immunotherapy may be clinically useful for allergic nasal blockage. Mechanisms underlying the effectiveness may be associated with the hyporesponsiveness of the nasal mucosa to released mediators. Keywords:: allergic rhinitis, animal model, oral immunotherapy, nasal blockage, pollenosis

ABSTRACT: Whether a state of nasal hyperresponsiveness influences antigen-induced biphasic nasal blockage and sneezing were examined using a guinea pig model of allergic rhinitis. Sensitized animals were challenged with an antigen, Japanese cedar pollen, once every week. Before the 13th challenge, the animals were randomly divided into 2 groups, and then the 13th challenge was performed (Groups A-0 and B-0). The 14th challenge was done on day 2 (Group A-2) and on day 7 (Group B-7) after the 13th challenge, on which nasal hyperresponsiveness was present and absent, respectively. Biphasic nasal blockage and sneezing after the challenge in Group A-2 were more severe than those in Group A-0, while those of Group B-7 were almost the same as those of Group B-0. An anti-histaminic, mepyramine, inhibited sneezing but not the biphasic nasal blockage in Group B-7. A cysteinyl leukotriene (CysLT) antagonist, pranlukast, suppressed the late nasal blockage but not the early blockage and sneezing in Group B-7. In contrast, in Group A-2, mepyramine significantly attenuated not only sneezing but also the early nasal blockage. Pranlukast significantly inhibited both nasal blockage and sneezing in Group A-2. In conclusion, nasal hyperresponsiveness aggravated the antigen-induced nasal responses, to which histamine and CysLTs considerably contributed.

ABSTRACT: To develop an allergic dermatitis model showing persistent scratching in mice, toluene-2,4-diisocyanate (TDI) was repeatedly painted onto the skin of hairless HR-1 mice, and induction of itch-associated scratching behavior was observed. When HR-1 mice were epicutaneously sensitized with 1% TDI and then challenged by repeated painting the cervicodorsal skin with 0.1% TDI once every 10 days until the 10th challenge, delayed type scratching responses peaked at 1 – 2 days after challenge. TDI at 0.1% hardly induced scratching in non-sensitized HR-1 mice. The delayed scratching response was influenced by neither an H1 nor 5-HT1/2 receptor antagonist. On the other hand, intradermal injection of histamine and serotonin induced frequent scratching in HR-1 mice. In conclusion, repeated application of TDI can induce delayed type allergic scratching. Although HR-1 mice are high responders to both histamine and serotonin, induction of the delayed response depends on neither of these chemical mediators. This delayed response may be useful in analyzing the mechanisms of allergic pruritis.

The majority of cases of allergic asthma in experimental animals have been provoked by inhalation with mist antigen. Because of the inherent inability of some species to breathe through the mouth, including guinea pigs, mice and rats, an upper airway response may be substantially involved in experimental asthma induced by antigen inhalation. With this in mind, we evaluated three types of nebulizers (a hand-made glassware pressure nebulizer (GPN), a DeVilbiss nebulizer (DN) and an ultrasonic nebulizer (UN)) with respect to their ability to adequately sensitize/challenge guinea pigs by antigen inhalation in bronchial asthma. Several solutions and suspensions, including antigen and AI(OH)3, were atomized with these three nebulizers. The results obtained were as follows: irrespective of the type of solution or suspension used, of the three nebulizers, GPN generated mists with the smallest diameter. The rank order of median diameter of the mists generated was GPN (1.6-2.1 μm) < DN (2.2-3.5 μm) < UN (4.3-4.7 μm). When Evans blue mists produced by the GPN were presented to guinea pigs, 79% of the mist trapped in the whole airway was found in the lung, while 49 and 79% of mists produced by DN and UN, respectively, were already deposited in the upper airway. These results strongly suggest that GPN is more useful for inhalation challenge in experimental asthma in animals.