Search

Summary: T‐cell lymphomas (TCLs) constitute a rare subset of non‐Hodgkin lymphomas, with mycosis fungoides/Sézary syndrome (MF/SS) being the most common subtype of cutaneous TCLs (CTCLs). Considered an incurable but treatable disease, MF/SS management presents several challenges including diagnostic delays, debilitating effect on patients' quality of life, need for several lines of therapies, multidisciplinary care and cumulative drug toxicities limiting duration of use. The present review intends to provide an overview of the recent advances in our understanding of the biology of CTCL and how these are being leveraged to provide additional treatment options for management of advanced and recurrent disease. In addition, the discussion of the different modalities of treatment is summarised to further outline the importance of multidisciplinary care and early referral to CTCL centres. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Clinical approval of the immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) agents for multiple cancer types has reinvigorated the long‐standing work on cancer vaccines. In the pre‐ICB era, clinical efforts focused on the Ag, the adjuvants, the formulation, and the mode of delivery. These translational efforts on therapeutic vaccines range from cell‐based (e.g., dendritic cells vaccine Sipuleucel‐T) to DNA/RNA‐based platforms with various formulations (liposome), vectors (Listeria monocytogenes), or modes of delivery (intratumoral, gene gun, etc.). Despite promising preclinical results, cancer vaccine trials without ICB have historically shown little clinical activity. With the anticipation and expansion of combinatorial immunotherapeutic trials with ICB, the cancer vaccine field has entered the personalized medicine arena with recent advances in immunogenic neoantigen‐based vaccines. In this article, we review the literature to organize the different cancer vaccines in the clinical space, and we will discuss their advantages, limits, and recent progress to overcome their challenges. Furthermore, we will also discuss recent preclinical advances and clinical strategies to combine vaccines with checkpoint blockade to improve therapeutic outcome and present a translational perspective on future directions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) patients have a poorer prognosis than systemic lymphoma. Gain-of-function MYD88 c.794T > C (p. L265P) mutation and programed cell death-1 (PD-1) pathway alterations are potential targetable pathways. Our study objective was to determine the clinicopathologic correlates of MYD88 mutation and PD-1 alterations in PCNSL and the impact of Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) infection. We studied 53 cases including 13 EBV-associated (EBVpos) PCNSL, 49% harbored MYD88 mutation, none seen in EBVpos PCNSL. MYD88 protein expression did not correlate with MYD88 mutation. T-cell and macrophage infiltration was common. All PD-L1-positive tumors were EBVpos. Two PD-L1 positive tumors showed 9p24.1/PD-L1 locus alterations by Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization. T cells and macrophages expressed PD-1 and/or PD-L1 in 98% and 83% cases, respectively. MYD88 mutation or protein expression and PD-1 or PD-L1 expression did not predict outcome. We hypothesize that EBVpos PCNSL has a distinct activation mechanism, independent of genetic alterations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Primary central nervous lymphoma (PCNSL) is a rare extra-nodal subtype of non-Hodgkin lymphoma and most cases are of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma histology with an aggressive presentation. The treatment of PCNSL has evolved over the years from radiation alone to multi-agent chemotherapy with the goal of minimizing long-term toxicity. Recent studies have evaluated autologous stem cell transplant as consolidation in eligible patients with success. The prognosis of relapsed disease remains poor and hence the emphasis is on effective and less toxic frontline strategies. Our growing understanding of the pathogenetic pathways in PCNSL is giving way to an exciting new era of targeted and immunotherapy options with the potential for inclusion in upfront therapy in the future. This review critically evaluates the current evidence including ongoing studies for the frontline treatment of PCNSL. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) in malignant tumors have been linked to tumor aggressiveness and represent a new target for cancer immunotherapy. As new TAM-targeted immunotherapies are entering clinical trials, it is important to detect and quantify TAM with noninvasive imaging techniques. The purpose of this study was to determine if ferumoxytol-enhanced MRI can detect TAM in lymphomas and bone sarcomas of pediatric patients and young adults. Experimental Design: In a first-in-patient , Institutional Review Board-approved prospective clinical trial, 25 pediatric and young adult patients with lymphoma or bone sarcoma underwent ferumoxytol-enhanced MRI. To confirm ferumoxytol enhancement, five pilot patients (two lymphoma and three bone sarcoma) underwent pre- and postcontrast MRI. Subsequently, 20 patients (10 lymphoma and 10 bone sarcoma) underwent ferumoxytol-enhanced MRI 24 to 48 hours after i.v. injection, followed by tumor biopsy/resection and macrophage staining. To determine if ferumoxytol-MRI can differentiate tumors with different TAM content, we compared T2* relaxation times of lymphomas and bone sarcomas. Tumor T2* values of 20 patients were correlated with CD68 + and CD163 + TAM quantities on histopathology. Results: Significant ferumoxytol tumor enhancement was noted on postcontrast scans compared with precontrast scans ( P = 0.036). Bone sarcomas and lymphomas demonstrated significantly different MRI enhancement and TAM density ( P < 0.05). Within each tumor group, T2* signal enhancement on MR images correlated significantly with the density of CD68 + and CD163 + TAM ( P < 0.05). Conclusions: Ferumoxytol-enhanced MRI is immediately clinically applicable and could be used to stratify patients with TAM-rich tumors to immune-targeted therapies and to monitor tumor response to these therapies. Clin Cancer Res; 24(17); 4110-8. ©2018 AACR ., (©2018 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Purpose To compare the agreement of three-dimensional (3D) tumor measurements for therapeutic response assessment of Ewing sarcoma according to the Children's Oncology Group (COG) criteria, one-dimensional (1D) Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), and two-dimensional (2D) measurements defined by the World Health Organization (WHO) with tumor volume measurements as the standard of reference and to determine which method correlates best with clinical outcomes. Materials and Methods This retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board of three institutions. Seventy-four patients (mean age ± standard deviation, 14.5 years ± 6.5) with newly diagnosed Ewing sarcoma treated at three medical centers were evaluated. Primary tumor size was assessed on pre- and posttreatment magnetic resonance images according to 1D RECIST, 2D WHO, and 3D COG measurements. Tumor responses were compared with the standard of reference (tumor volume) on the basis of RECIST, COG, and WHO therapeutic response thresholds. Agreement between the percentage reduction measurements of the methods was assessed with concordance correlation, Bland-Altman analysis, and Spearman rank correlation. Agreement between therapeutic responses was assessed with Kendall tau and unweighted κ statistics. Tumor responses were compared with patient survival by using the log-rank test, Kaplan-Meier plots, and Cox regression. Results Agreement with the reference standard was significantly better for 3D measurement than for 1D and 2D measurements on the basis of RECIST and COG therapeutic response thresholds (concordance correlation of 0.41, 0.72, and 0.84 for 1D, 2D, and 3D measurements, respectively; P < .0001). Comparison of overall survival of responders and nonresponders demonstrated P values of .4133, .0112, .0032, and .0027 for 1D, 2D, 3D, and volume measurements, respectively, indicating that higher dimensional measurements were significantly better predictors of overall survival. Conclusion The 3D tumor measurements according to COG are better predictors of therapeutic response of Ewing sarcoma than 1D RECIST or 2D WHO measurements and show a significantly higher correlation with clinical outcomes. (©) RSNA, 2016 Online supplemental material is available for this article.