Search

Invasive lobular breast cancer (ILC) is characterized by a relatively high risk for late recurrence and a unique metastatic pattern with an increased risk for metastasis to gynecologic organs and peritoneum. We present a unique case of recurrent ILC with metastasis to the abdominal peritoneum as well as the uterine myometrium and cervix. Treatment was complicated by the discovery of concomitant uterine carcinosarcoma. This patient was effectively treated with a combination of hormonal therapy for her metastatic ILC and a combination of chemotherapy and immunotherapy for uterine carcinosarcoma. Molecular evaluation revealed a characteristic CDH1 mutation within the ILC and a PI3KCA mutation within the uterine carcinosarcoma, both of which have been linked to epithelial-to-mesenchymal transitions. Examination of the tumor immune microenvironment revealed proportionally more cytotoxic NK cells. This robust immune infiltration may be an indicator of the response to immunotherapy observed in this tumor or a result of the metastatic breast cancer within the uterus. This report provides a characterization of the molecular and immunologic landscape in this case with metastatic ILC and uterine carcinosarcoma. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This article has been retracted: please see Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal (https://www.elsevier.com/about/policies/article-withdrawal). This article has been retracted at the request of the Authors. The authors have independently identified an error in the formula that was utilized to calculate the Quality Adjusted Life Years which invalidates the data and the conclusion of the paper. The authors have contacted the journal requesting to retract the article. Apologies are offered to the readers of the journal for any confusion or inconvenience that may have resulted from the publication of this article. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Mismatch‐repair (MMR)/microsatellite instability (MSI) status has therapeutic implications in endometrial cancer (EC). The authors evaluated the concordance of testing and factors contributing to MMR expression heterogeneity. Methods: Six hundred sixty‐six ECs were characterized using immunohistochemistry (IHC), MSI testing, and mut‐L homolog 1 (MLH1) methylation. Select samples underwent whole‐transcriptome analysis and next‐generation sequencing. MMR expression of metastatic/recurrent sites was evaluated. Results: MSI testing identified 27.3% of cases as MSI‐high (n = 182), MMR IHC identified 25.1% cases as MMR‐deficient (n = 167), and 3.8% of cases (n = 25) demonstrated discordant results. A review of IHC staining explained discordant results in 18 cases, revealing subclonal loss of MLH1/Pms 1 homolog 2 (PMS2) (n = 10) and heterogeneous MMR IHC (mut‐S homolog 6 [MSH6], n = 7; MLH1/PMS2, n = 1). MSH6‐associated Lynch syndrome was diagnosed in three of six cases with heterogeneous expression. Subclonal or heterogeneous cases had a 38.9% recurrence rate (compared with 16.7% in complete MMR‐deficient cases and 9% in MMR‐proficient cases) and had abnormal MMR IHC results in all metastatic recurrent sites (n = 7). Tumors with subclonal MLH1/PMS2 demonstrated 74 differentially expressed genes (determined using digital spatial transcriptomics) when stratified by MLH1 expression, including many associated with epithelial–mesenchymal transition. Conclusions: Subclonal/heterogeneous MMR IHC cases showed epigenetic loss in 66.7%, germline mutations in 16.7%, and somatic mutations in 16.7%. MMR IHC reported as intact/deficient missed 21% of cases of Lynch syndrome. EC with subclonal/heterogeneous MMR expression demonstrated a high recurrence rate, and metastatic/recurrent sites were MMR‐deficient. Transcriptional analysis indicated an increased risk for migration/metastasis, suggesting that clonal MMR deficiency may be a driver for tumor aggressiveness. Reporting MMR IHC only as intact/deficient, without reporting subclonal and heterogeneous staining, misses opportunities for biomarker‐directed therapy. Plain Language Summary: Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecologic cancer, and 20%–40% of tumors have a defect in DNA proofreading known as mismatch‐repair (MMR) deficiency.These results can be used to guide therapy.Tests for this defect can yield differing results, revealing heterogeneous (mixed) proofreading capabilities.Tumors with discordant testing results and mixed MMR findings can have germline or somatic defects in MMR genes.Cells with deficient DNA proofreading in tumors with mixed MMR findings have DNA expression profiles linked to more aggressive characteristics and cancer spread.These MMR‐deficient cells may drive tumor behavior and the risk of spreading cancer. Intratumoral heterogeneity, including subclonal and heterogeneous mismatch‐repair (MMR) expression, can yield discordant results from diagnostic assays, such as immunohistochemistry and polymerase chain reaction‐based microsatellite instability testing. Within endometrial cancers, subclonal or heterogeneous MMR expression may be attributed to germline or somatic mutations in MMR proteins, and the authors demonstrate that these tumors are characterized by clonal selection favoring the propagation of MMR deficiency at sites of metastasis or recurrence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This document is a reply to a previous article discussing the significance of tumors with "unusual staining" from mismatch repair (MMR) immunohistochemistry (IHC) in endometrial cancer. The authors agree that ongoing conversation and multiple testing strategies are needed to improve outcomes for patients. They also emphasize the importance of quality assurance in performing and interpreting MMR IHC, including uniform fixation and grossing protocols. The authors acknowledge the potential benefits of primary assessment of MMR IHC staining on biopsy specimens but note that in their cohort, preoperative biopsies were performed outside their institution and MMR IHC was not performed on these specimens. They also discuss the interpretation of MSI testing in endometrial cancer and the use of the Promega panel for clarifying cases that are MSI-low on the National Cancer Institute panel. Further research is needed to define optimal testing for MMR-deficient/MSI endometrial cancer and predict response to immunotherapy. [Extracted from the article]

Only 30% of women achieve gestational weight gain (GWG) within recommended ranges set forth by National Academy of Medicine (NAM). Because extreme deviations from these recommendations for GWG have been associated with unfavorable maternal outcomes, a greater understanding of maternal metabolic factors that influence GWG is warranted. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to explore the potential link between maternal lipid metabolism and GWG. METHODS: Thirty-two women with a lean pre-pregnancy BMI were recruited during late pregnancy and fasting metabolic measurements using indirect calorimetry were assessed after an overnight fast. Fasting lipid oxidation rates were calculated using standardized equations. Pre-pregnancy weight and final delivery weight were self-reported and used to calculate total GWG, which was then categorized as follows: inadequate (below the NAM guidelines), adequate (adhered to the NAM guidelines), or excess (exceeded the NAM guidelines). One-way ANOVA with post-hoc Tukey tests were used to compare lipid oxidation rates across GWG categories and correlation coefficients were used to assess the relationship between GWG and maternal lipid oxidation. RESULTS: Fasting lipid oxidation was significantly higher (p<0.05) among women with excess GWG compared to women with adequate GWG. Absolute GWG was positively correlated to lipid oxidation (r= 0.507, p= 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: The results from this study indicate that fasting lipid oxidation may play an important role in GWG. A better understanding of the metabolic profile of women during pregnancy may be critical in truly understanding a woman's risk of GWG outside the recommendations. Mounting evidence suggests that GWG counseling during prenatal care may need to be tailored to women based not just on their weight status, but other metabolic characteristic, in order to achieve GWG for optimal maternal health. Funding was provided by NIH NIGMS IDeA Grant 5P20GM103436 and WKU RCAP Grant 17-8011. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Leadership in medicine(and in gynecologic oncology) is multifaceted and underemphasized in traditional education. • Leaders within gynecologic oncology have diverse insights and approach their roles with distinctive and unique styles. • Authenticity, vision, mentorship, self-reflection, and resiliency are keys to successful leadership. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: We sought to evaluate the contribution of mismatch repair (MMR) status to traditional risk stratification algorithms used to predict nodal involvement and recurrence in a large single-institution cohort., Methods: Endometrioid endometrial cancer (EC) cases from 2014-2020 were evaluated. MMR immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed universally. Uterine factors assessed in the Mayo criteria were used to retrospectively classify patients as low or high risk for lymphatic spread. Patients were classified according to risk for recurrence using GOG 99 and PORTEC criteria. Associations were evaluated using chi-square and t-tests and contributing factors assessed using logistic regression models., Results: 1,514 endometrioid EC were evaluated; 392 (25.9%) were MMR (MMR) deficient of which 80.4% of MMR defects were associated with epigenetic silencing of MLH1 . Epigenetic MMR defects were significantly more likely to be high risk for lymph node (LN) metastasis based on Mayo criteria (74.9% vs 60.6%, p =<0.001) and with the presence of LN metastasis (20.3 vs 10.5%, p =0.003) compared to MMR proficient tumors. Tumors with epigenetic MMR defects were significantly more likely to be classified as high or high intermediate risk using GOG99 and PORTEC criteria. Furthermore, cases with epigenetic MMR defects classified as low or low intermediate risk were significantly more likely to recur (GOG99 p =0.013; PORTEC p =0.008) and independently associated with worse disease-free survival (DFS). MMR status was found to be independently associated with worse DFS (HR 1.90; 95% CI 1.34-2.70; p =0.003) but not overall survival., Conclusion: While MMR deficient EC has been associated with poor prognostic features in prior reports; we demonstrate that only epigenetic MMR defects have poorer outcomes. Epigenetic MMR defect were independently associated with lymph node metastasis after controlling for risk criteria. Epigenetic MMR deficiency was found to be an independent predictor of recurrence beyond the factors considered in traditional risk stratification algorithms. Traditional uterine-based risk stratification algorithms may not fully reflect the risk for recurrence in MMR deficient tumors. Consideration should be given to implementing MMR status and MLH1 hypermethylation alongside traditional risk stratification algorithms. Performing MMR IHC on preoperative pathologic specimens may aid in risk stratification and patient counseling., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Riedinger, Brown, Haight, Backes, Cohn, Goodfellow and Cosgrove.)