Search

Aim: This observational study investigated the association between remdesivir treatment during hospitalization for COVID-19 and 30-day COVID-19-related and all-cause readmission across different variants time periods. Patients & methods: Hospitalization records for adult patients discharged from a COVID-19 hospitalization between 1 May 2020 to 30 April 2022 were extracted from the US PINC AI Healthcare Database. Likelihood of 30-day readmission was compared among remdesivir-treated and nonremdesivir-treated patients using multivariable logistic regression models adjusted for age, corticosteroid treatment, Charlson comorbidity index and intensive care unit stay during the COVID-19 hospitalization. Analyses were stratified by maximum supplemental oxygen requirement and variant time period (pre-Delta, Delta and Omicron). Results: Of the 440,601 patients discharged alive after a COVID-19 hospitalization, 248,785 (56.5%) patients received remdesivir. Overall, remdesivir patients had a 30-day COVID-19-related readmission rate of 3.0% and all-cause readmission rate of 6.3% compared with 5.4% and 9.1%, respectively, for patients who did not receive remdesivir during their COVID-19 hospitalization. After adjusting for demographics and clinical characteristics, remdesivir treatment was associated with significantly lower odds of 30-day COVID-19-related readmission (odds ratio 0.60 [95% confidence interval: 0.58-0.62]), and all-cause readmission (0.73 [0.72-0.75]). Significantly lower odds of 30-day readmission in remdesivir-treated patients was observed across all variant time periods. Conclusion: Treating patients hospitalized for COVID-19 with remdesivir is associated with a statistically significant reduction in 30-day COVID-19-related and all-cause readmission across variant time periods. These findings indicate that the clinical benefit of remdesivir may extend beyond the COVID-19 hospitalization.

Coronavirus is a family of viruses that cause upper respiratory infections in humans. Drug properties can be obtained by studying the molecular structure of corresponding drugs. The calculation of the topological index of a drug structure enables scientists to have a better understanding of the physical chemistry and biological characteristics of drugs. In this paper, we study topological indices and find the exact formulas for general topological indices m S O γ (G) and K A (γ , η) 1 (G). By the appropriate choice of parameters γ and η, several new/old inequalities that reveal topological indices are obtained. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: This study reviewed the current knowledge and guidelines on managing COVID‐19 in children and proposed a practical approach to drug treatment. Methods: We analysed international guidelines from four prominent scientific bodies on treating COVID‐19 in children. These were the UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, the American National Institutes of Health, the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Australian National Clinical Evidence Taskforce COVID‐19. Results: Most paediatric patients with COVID‐19 only require symptomatic treatment. There was limited evidence on treatment recommendations for children with severe COVID‐19 or at risk of disease progression. However, several drugs are available for children and we have summarised the guidelines, in order to provide a concise, practical format for clinicians. All the guidelines agree that nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir or remdesivir can be used as prophylaxis for severe COVID‐19 in high‐risk patients. Remdesivir can also be used for severe COVID‐19 cases. Glucocorticosteroids are recommended, particularly in patients requiring oxygen therapy. Tocilizumab or baricitinib should be reserved for patients with progressive disease and/or signs of systemic inflammation. Conclusion: The guidelines provide useful advice and a degree of consensus on specific drug treatment for children with severe COVID‐19 or at risk of progression. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The global effort to cure COVID-19 is still ongoing. Thus, a prospective, block-balanced, open-label, randomized controlled trial was conducted to evaluate how Tenofovir Alafenamide Fumarate affects hospitalized COVID-19 patients' outcomes. Methods: The intervention and control groups of 60 hospitalized COVID-19 patients were randomly allocated. Along with normal medication, the intervention group received 25 mg of tenofovir orally daily for seven days. The control group got normal therapy, including remdesivir and corticosteroids. ICU hospitalization duration, laboratory data, fever, dyspnea, arterial blood oxygen saturation with and without an oxygen face mask, mechanical ventilation, and mortality were the outcomes. Results: Sixty of 236 eligible patients between September 2020 and February 2021 were enrolled. The intervention group had a mean age (±SD) of 61.33 (±13.09) years and the control group 60.03 (±18.03). Sixteen (53.3%) intervention patients and 15 (50.0%) control patients were males. The intervention group had fewer mechanical ventilation and ICU days. Tenofovir Alafenamide Fumarate did not improve fever, dyspnea, oxygen saturation with or without a face mask or nasal cannula, or laboratory data including WBC, ESR, CRP, AST, ALT, AlkP, total and direct bilirubin, in COVID-19 patients. Conclusion: According to this pilot trial, Tenofovir Alafenamide Fumarate, along with conventional treatment, significantly reduced mechanical ventilation and ICU stay in COVID-19 patients. Further thorough research is necessary to verify this conclusion. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Pregnant people with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) experience higher risk for severe disease and adverse pregnancy outcomes, but no pharmacokinetic (PK) data exist to support dosing of COVID-19 therapeutics during pregnancy. We report PK and safety data for intravenous remdesivir in pregnancy. Methods IMPAACT 2032 was a phase 4 prospective, open-label, nonrandomized opportunistic study of hospitalized pregnant and nonpregnant women receiving intravenous remdesivir as part of clinical care. Intensive PK sampling was performed on infusion days 3, 4, or 5 with collection of plasma and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). Safety data were recorded from first infusion through 4 weeks after last infusion and at delivery. Geometric mean ratios (GMR) (90% confidence intervals [CI]) of PK parameters between pregnant and nonpregnant women were calculated. Results Fifty-three participants initiated remdesivir (25 pregnant; median gestational age, 27.6 weeks; interquartile range, 24.9–31.0 weeks). Plasma exposures of remdesivir, its 2 major metabolites (GS-704277 and GS-441524), and the free remdesivir fraction were similar between pregnant and nonpregnant participants. Concentrations of the active triphosphate (GS-443902) in PBMCs increased 2.04-fold (90% CI, 1.35–3.03) with each additional infusion in nonpregnant versus pregnant participants. Three adverse events in nonpregnant participants were related to treatment (1 grade 3; 2 grade 2 resulting in treatment discontinuation). There were no treatment-related adverse pregnancy outcomes or congenital anomalies detected. Conclusions Plasma remdesivir PK parameters were comparable between pregnant and nonpregnant women, and no safety concerns were identified based on our limited data. These findings suggest no dose adjustments are indicated for intravenous remdesivir during pregnancy. Clinical Trials Registration NCT04582266. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

ABSTRACT The first Adaptive COVID‐19 Treatment Trial (ACTT‐1) showed that remdesivir improved COVID‐19 recovery time compared with placebo in hospitalized adults. The secondary outcome of mortality was almost significant overall (p = 0.07) and highly significant for people receiving supplemental oxygen at enrollment (p = 0.002), suggesting a mortality benefit concentrated in this group. We explore analysis methods that are helpful when a single subgroup benefits from treatment and apply them to ACTT‐1, using baseline oxygen use to define subgroups. We consider two questions: (1) is the remdesivir effect for people receiving supplemental oxygen real, and (2) does this effect differ from the overall effect? For Question 1, we apply a Bonferroni adjustment to subgroup‐specific hypothesis tests and the Westfall and Young permutation test, which is valid when small cell counts preclude normally distributed test statistics (a frequently unexamined condition in subgroup analyses). For Question 2, we introduce Qmax, the largest standardized difference between subgroup‐specific effects and the overall effect. Qmax simultaneously tests whether any subgroup effect differs from the overall effect and identifies the subgroup benefitting most. We demonstrate that Qmax strongly controls the familywise error rate (FWER) when test statistics are normally distributed with no mean–variance relationship. We compare Qmax to a related permutation test, SEAMOS, which was previously proposed but not extensively applied or tested. We show that SEAMOS can have inflated Type 1 error under the global null when control arm event rates differ between subgroups. Our results support a mortality benefit from remdesivir in people receiving supplemental oxygen. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

AbstractThe novel, highly infectious SARS-CoV-2 virus caused millions of deaths and infections globally. At the same time, the emerged drug repurposing strategy may ultimately not yield a significant clinical benefit. Herein, we designed and synthesized a novel class of pyrazolo[3,4-d]pyrimidines (HCQ-PPs) whose structures were verified by spectral and analytical means as novel anti-SARS-CoV-2 agents. CPE-inhibition assay emerged the 6-((2-hydroxyethyl)aminomethyl) HCQ-PP-1 as the most active analog, exposing about 50% and 29% inhibition compared to remdesivir (88.75% and 70.42% inhibition) at 100 and 10 µM, respectively, indicating the pivotal role of N1, C3 and C4 functionalization. The docking results displayed a unique binding mode of HCQ-PP-1 in the SARS-CoV-2 Mpro binding pocket that could underlie its potential activity with FRED energies of −7.71 comparable to that of remdesivir (-6.71). Its drug-likeness properties met the criteria of Pfizer with an excellent ADMET profile. Therefore, this study presents a novel anti-SARS-CoV-2 lead compound that is worthy of further investigation and activity improvement. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

AbstractBackgroundObjectivesMethodsResultsConclusionsThe effectiveness of remdesivir in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and severe renal insufficiency remains underexplored.To evaluate whether remdesivir reduces the risk of mortality or invasive mechanical ventilation/extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (IMV/ECMO) in this population.This retrospective observational study utilising the COVID-19 Registry Japan (COVIREGI-JP) included noncritical patients with COVID-19 and severe renal insufficiency (defined as serum creatinine levels ≥3 mg/dL, on maintenance dialysis, or kidney transplant recipients) admitted to Japanese hospitals within 7 days of symptom onset between January 1, 2020 and May 8, 2023. Patients were classified into the remdesivir group if remdesivir was initiated within the first 2 days of admission. We estimated the multivariable-adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for mortality and initiation of IMV/ECMO using landmark analysis to address immortal time bias.Among the 1,449 patients included in the landmark analysis (median age, 74 years [interquartile range 62–84 years]; 992 [68.5%] were male), 272 initiated remdesivir within the first 2 days of admission. During the 28 days from the landmark timepoint, 19 (7.0%) and 136 (11.6%) patients in the remdesivir and control groups, respectively, had an outcome. The remdesivir group had a lower risk of mortality or IMV/ECMO initiation than the control group (adjusted HR, 0.44; 95% confidence interval, 0.23–0.83).In noncritical patients with COVID-19 and severe renal insufficiency at admission, initiating remdesivir early after disease onset, within the first 2 days of admission, led to a lower risk of mortality or IMV/ECMO initiation, compared with non-initiation of remdesivir. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic poses severe risks for immunocompromised patients, especially those with neutropenia due to chemotherapy. This study evaluates the safety and effectiveness of remdesivir use in COVID-19 patients with neutropenia. Methods: This retrospective study used the Chang Gung Research Database (CGRD) and extracted data from 98,763 patients with COVID-19 diagnosed between April 2021 and September 2022. The patients were divided into groups based on their remdesivir use and the presence of neutropenia. The adverse effects of remdesivir and their outcomes were analyzed after propensity score matching. Results: We compared common adverse effects of remdesivir in neutropenic patients before and after a 5-day regimen. A slight decrease in heart rate was observed but lacked clinical significance. There were no significant differences observed in hemoglobin, liver function tests, and blood glucose levels. After propensity score matching of COVID-19 patients with neutropenia according to gender, age, dexamethasone use, oxygen use, MASCC score, and WHO ordinal scale, no significant differences were found in length of stay, intubation rate, or ICU admission rate between the matched patients. Conclusions: Our study found remdesivir to be safe for COVID-19 patients with neutropenia, with no common adverse reactions observed. However, its effectiveness for these patients remains uncertain. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The extent of the SARS-CoV-2 short-term evolution under Remdesivir (RDV) exposure and whether it varies across different upper respiratory compartments are not fully understood. Methods: Patients hospitalized for COVID-19, with or without RDV therapy, were enrolled and completed up to three visits, in which they provided specimens from four respiratory compartments. Near full-length genome SARS-CoV-2 sequences were obtained from viral RNA, standard lineage and variant assignments were performed, and viral mutations in the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) region—the RDV target gene—were detected and compared between participants with and without RDV, across the four compartments, within participants across visits, and versus a larger sequence dataset. The statistical analysis used a generalized linear mixed-effects model. Results: A total of 139 sequences were obtained from 37 out of the 44 (84%) enrolled participants. The genotyping success varied across respiratory compartments, which ranged from 42% with oropharyngeal specimens to 67% with nasopharyngeal specimens and showed improvement with higher viral loads. No RdRp mutations known to be associated with RDV resistance were identified, and for 34 detected mutations at 32 amino acid positions that are not known as RDV-associated, there was no evidence of any associations with the RDV exposure, respiratory compartment, or time. At least 1 of these 34 mutations were detected in all participants, and some differed from the larger sequence dataset. Conclusions: This study highlighted the SARS-CoV-2 short-term genomic stability within hosts and across upper respiratory compartments, which suggests a lack of evolution of RDV resistance over time. This contributes to our understanding of SARS-CoV-2 genomic dynamics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

SARS‐CoV‐2 variants of concern (VOC), such as Delta and Omicron have harbored mutations, which increased viral infectivity or ability to evade neutralizing antibodies. Immunocompromised patients might be a source of some of these emerging variants. In this study, we sequenced 17 consecutive samples from an immunocompromised patient with a long‐term SARS‐CoV‐2 infection with the pre‐VOC era lineage B.1.177.35. We here describe the emergence of 73 nonsynonymous minority variants in this patient and show that 10 of these mutations became dominant in the viral population during the treatment period. Four of these were seen throughout the infection period and had a very low global prevalence, although three of them were also observed later in the Alpha, Delta, and Omicron lineages. We also found that two adjacent nsp12 variants (M785I and S786P) belonged to different quasi‐species and competed during the early stages of infection and remdesivir administration. This emphasizes the importance of ongoing genome surveillance of SARS‐CoV‐2 among immunocpromised patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Cyclodextrin (CD) derivatives have gained significant attention in biomedical applications due to their remarkable biocompatibility, unique inclusion capabilities, and potential for functionalization. This review focuses on recent advancements in CD-based assemblies, specifically their role in improving drug delivery, emphasizing remdesivir (RMD). The review introduces CD materials and their versatile applications in self-assembly and supramolecular assembly. CD materials offer immense potential for designing drug delivery systems with enhanced activity. Their inherent inclusion capabilities enable the encapsulation of diverse therapeutic agents, including RMD, resulting in improved solubility, stability, and bioavailability. The recent advances in CD-based assemblies, focusing on their integration with RMD have been concentrated here. Various strategies for constructing these assemblies are discussed, including physical encapsulation, covalent conjugation, and surface functionalization techniques. Furthermore, exploring future directions in these fields has also been provided. Ongoing research efforts are directed toward developing novel CD derivatives with enhanced properties, such as increased encapsulation efficiency and improved release kinetics. Moreover, the integration of CD-based assemblies with advanced technologies such as nanomedicine and gene therapy holds tremendous promise for personalized medicine and precision therapeutics [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The aim of this study was to assess the pharmacokinetics of the existing remdesivir intravenous formulation (100 mg dose) against the newly developed oral formulation (20 mg dose) for remdesivir and its active nucleoside metabolite (GS‐441524) in beagle dogs followed by healthy human volunteers. A quantification method for remdesivir and its active nucleoside metabolite (GS‐441524) in beagle dog and human plasma has been developed and validated using liquid chromatography coupled to triple quadrupole mass spectrometry detection. The analytical methods for beagle dogs and human differ in the calibration curve range, plasma matrix, processing volume, reconstitution volume and injection volume; however all other parameters were same in both methods. A simple protein precipitation extraction was carried out using acetonitrile containing the internal standard remdesivir D5. Remdesivir and GS‐441524 were separated on an Endurus C‐18P, 100 × 4.6 mm, 3 μm column and detected using a mass spectrometer with electrospray ionization in positive ion mode. The ion transitions used were m/z 603.1 → m/z 200.0 for remdesivir, m/z 292.0 → m/z 202.2 for GS‐441524 and m/z 608.2 → m/z 205.1 for remdesivir D5. The calibration curve results were linear in beagle dog plasma (2.0–2,000.8 ng/ml range for remdesivir and 2.0–1,500.4 ng/ml for GS‐441524) and human plasma (30.0–4,503.9 ng/ml range for remdesivir and 2.0–200.4 ng/ml for GS‐441524). The recovery was >90% in beagle dog and human plasma. These methods were successfully used to determine the pharmacokinetic parameters of the intravenous injection and subcutaneous tablets dosage forms in beagle dogs and healthy humans. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: In December 2019, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) was first identified in adults with pneumonia in Wuhan, China. Areas covered: It is now believed that several billion humans have been infected with SARS-CoV-2 and more than ten million have died from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), the disease caused by SARS-CoV-2. Expert opinion: The first five years of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic have been marked by unfathomable suffering as well as remarkable scientific progress. This manuscript examines what has been learned about the treatment of inpatients with COVID-19 and explores how the therapeutic approach may evolve in the years ahead. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Pig carboxylesterases (CESs) are recognized as enzymes that metabolize xenobiotics, and many drugs used in pig breeding that contain ester groups can be hydrolyzed by CESs. However, there are a limited number of publications focused on the molecular weight, inhibitor effects, and enzyme kinetics of porcine cytosolic carboxylesterase. This study presents the first investigation of the presence, kinetics, inhibition, and amino acid sequence of CES1, the major cytosolic CES isozyme in pig liver. The molecular weight of pig liver cytosolic CES1 was estimated to be approximately 179 kDa, and the amino acid sequence of the enzyme subunit was determined. The inhibition of CES1 by the antiviral drugs remdesivir and sofosbuvir was studied, and the IC50 values were determined. The results indicate that remdesivir and sofosbuvir can act as potent modulators of CES1. The inhibitors exhibited mixed‐type inhibition on pig liver cytosol CES1. It was found that the affinity of the remdesivir and sofosbuvir for free enzyme is greater than that for the enzyme‐substrate complex. A spectrofluorimetric method confirmed the inhibition findings, as the fluorescence intensity of remdesivir decreased upon interaction with the enzyme. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: This study aimed to assess changes in the morphology of the retina and cornea in patients treated and hospitalized during the acute active phase of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Methods: A total of 24 patients with symptomatic early COVID-19 disease and 38 healthy participants from a control group were enrolled in our study. Among them, 20 received oxygen therapy at flow rates ranging from 1–10 L, while four received high-flow intranasal oxygen therapy (HFNOT). Some patients were treated with other types of therapy, such as Remdesivir, COVID-19 convalescent plasma therapy, or Tocilizumab. In the study, we focused on the analysis of optical coherence tomography (OCT) images of the cornea and retina including corneal thickness, central retinal thickness, retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL), and optic disc parameters. The measurements were acquired using Spectral-domain OCT REVO FC 130. Results: The analysis did not show significant changes between the examined ophthalmological parameters before and after therapy. Furthermore, there were no detected significant differences between the tested parameters of the retina and cornea in COVID-19-positive patients compared to the control group. Conclusions: No ophthalmological manifestations of COVID-19 disease were observed during the study. Taking into account the results of other publications, the lack of an unambiguous position on this topic requires further research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Although antivirals remain important for the treatment COVID-19, methods to assess treatment efficacy are lacking. Here, we investigated the impact of remdesivir on viral dynamics and their contribution to understanding antiviral efficacy in the multicenter Adaptive COVID-19 Treatment Trial 1, which randomized patients to remdesivir or placebo. Methods Longitudinal specimens collected during hospitalization from a substudy of 642 patients with COVID-19 were measured for viral RNA (upper respiratory tract and plasma), viral nucleocapsid antigen (serum), and host immunologic markers. Associations with clinical outcomes and response to therapy were assessed. Results Higher baseline plasma viral loads were associated with poorer clinical outcomes, and decreases in viral RNA and antigen in blood but not the upper respiratory tract correlated with enhanced benefit from remdesivir. The treatment effect of remdesivir was most pronounced in patients with elevated baseline nucleocapsid antigen levels: the recovery rate ratio was 1.95 (95% CI, 1.40–2.71) for levels >245 pg/mL vs 1.04 (95% CI,.76–1.42) for levels <245 pg/mL. Remdesivir also accelerated the rate of viral RNA and antigen clearance in blood, and patients whose blood levels decreased were more likely to recover and survive. Conclusions Reductions in SARS-CoV-2 RNA and antigen levels in blood correlated with clinical benefit from antiviral therapy. Clinical Trial Registration NCT04280705 (ClinicalTrials.gov). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Transaminase and creatinine elevations have been well described in adults treated with remdesivir for COVID-19. It is hypothesized that a similar safety profile exists in children with COVID-19 treated with remdesivir, but available data are limited, especially in children < 12 months. The primary aim of this study was to determine the prevalence and timing of elevations in transaminases and creatinine in children with COVID-19 who were treated with remdesivir. Methods: This was a retrospective, observational cohort study including all pediatric patients admitted to a single, freestanding children’s hospital who were positive for COVID-19 and received at least 1 dose of remdesivir between 1/1/2020 and 5/31/2022. Available baseline and peak transaminase and creatinine concentrations were evaluated. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors for transaminase elevation. Results: A total of 180 patients met inclusion criteria. Creatinine elevation of any grade was noted in 16% and remained elevated only in those with underlying chronic kidney disease. Transaminase elevation of any grade was noted in 58% of patients and remained elevated in only 1%. Older age and critical respiratory disease were associated with higher risk of significant transaminase elevation, whereas non-Hispanic ethnicity was strongly associated with protection against significant transaminase elevation. Conclusions: In our cohort of hospitalized children with COVID-19 who were treated with remdesivir, most patients experienced only mild transaminitis and normal creatinine concentrations. A limited number of patients experienced laboratory abnormalities which were transient, suggesting a favorable safety profile for remdesivir use in pediatrics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Remdesivir therapy has been declared as efficient in the early stages of Covid-19. Of the 339 patients (males 55.8%, age 71(59;77) years) with a detectable viral load, 140 were treated with remdesivir (of those 103 in the ICU and 57 immunosuppressed) and retrospectively compared with 199 patients (of those 82 in the ICU and 28 immunosuppressed) who were denied therapy due to advanced Covid-19. The viral load was estimated by detecting nucleocapsid antigen in serum (n = 155, median 217(28;1524)pg/ml), antigen in sputum (n = 18, COI 18(4.6;32)), nasopharyngeal antigen (n = 44, COI 17(8;35)) and the real-time PCR (n = 122, Ct 21(18;27)). After adjustment for confounders, patients on remdesivir had better 12-month survival (HR 0.66 (0.44;0.98), p = 0.039), particularly when admitted to the ICU (HR 0.49 (0.29;0.81), p = 0.006). For the immunocompromised patients, the difference did not reach statistical significance (HR 0.55 (0.18;1.69), p = 0.3). The other most significant confounders were age, ICU admission, mechanical ventilation, leukocyte/lymphocyte ratio, admission creatinine and immunosuppression. The impact of monoclonal antibodies or previous vaccinations was not significant. Despite frequent immune suppression including haemato-oncology diseases, lymphopenia, and higher inflammatory markers in the remdesivir group, the results support remdesivir administration with respect to widely available estimates of viral load in patients with high illness severity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives To describe the management of haematological patients experiencing prolonged SARS-CoV-2 viral shedding, as the optimal management strategy for this condition remains undetermined. Methods We conducted a retrospective evaluation of our prospectively followed cohort of haematological patients treated with remdesivir for more than 10 days. Starting January 2023, upon COVID-19 diagnosis, the treatment strategy was based on symptoms and PCR cycle threshold (Ct) as follows: (i) when Ct was 25 or less or if the patient had symptoms, a course of remdesivir for at least 10 days, nirmatrelvir/ritonavir for 5 days (whenever possible) and convalescent plasma was administered; and (ii) when the patient was asymptomatic and had a PCR Ct of more than 25, when possible, a course of 5 days of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir was administered. The patient was considered to have achieved viral clearance and, thus, remdesivir was stopped, in either of these cases: (i) PCR negativity, or (ii) subgenomic RNA negativity. Results From January to November 2023, 18 patients benefited from a safe extended remdesivir administration, resulting in detection of SARS-CoV-2 viral clearance in a median time of 3.5 weeks (IQR 2.6–3.9) (min–max 1.6–8.0). No clinical or biological side effects were detected. No patient died or needed further treatment for their COVID-19 episode. Conclusions The extended course of remdesivir, combined with other active therapies for COVID-19 infection, was well tolerated. Cure and virus negativity were obtained in all these high-risk patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BACKGROUND: Immunocompromised patients are at high risk of severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and death, yet treatment strategies for immunocompromised patients hospitalized for COVID-19 reflect variations in clinical practice. In this comparative effectiveness study, we investigated the effect of remdesivir treatment on inpatient mortality among immunocompromised patients hospitalized for COVID-19 across all variants of concern (VOC) periods. METHODS: Data for immunocompromised patients hospitalized for COVID-19 between December 2020 and April 2022 were extracted from the US PINC AITM Healthcare Database. Patients who received remdesivir within 2 days of hospitalization were matched 1:1 using propensity score matching to patients who did not receive remdesivir. Additional matching criteria included admission month, age group, and hospital. Cox proportional hazards models were used to examine the effect of remdesivir on risk of 14- and 28-day mortality during VOC periods. RESULTS: A total of 19 184 remdesivir patients were matched to 11 213 non-remdesivir patients. Overall, 11.1% and 17.7% of remdesivir patients died within 14 and 28 days, respectively, compared with 15.4% and 22.4% of non-remdesivir patients. Remdesivir was associated with a reduction in mortality at 14 (hazard ratio [HR], 0.70; 95% confidence interval, .62-.78) and 28 days (HR, 0.75; 95% CI, .68-.83). The survival benefit remained significant during the pre-Delta, Delta, and Omicron periods. CONCLUSIONS: Prompt initiation of remdesivir in immunocompromised patients hospitalized for COVID-19 is associated with significant survival benefit across all variant waves. These findings provide much-needed evidence relating to the effectiveness of a foundational treatment for hospitalized COVID-19 patients among a high-risk population.

INTRODUCTION. The risk of liver damage correlates with the severity of COVID-19. However, a growing number of studies have shown an association between liver function impairment and combinations of medicinal products used to treat COVID-19.AIM. The study aimed to analyse the annual consumption of medicinal products associated with a high risk of drug-induced liver injury (DILI) used as part of combination therapy in COVID-19 patients and to review a number of medication administration records in order to develop measures to prevent DILI.MATERIALS AND METHODS. The study used the ATC/DDD methodology to study consumption data for 2020, 2021, and 2022 and analysed a sample of 1250 inpatient medical records and medication administration records of COVID-19 patients treated in a Volgograd region hospital converted into a COVID-19 care centre. For genetically engineered biologicals and cyclophosphamide, which were lacking DDDs, the authors calculated the volume of consumption using the average dose per treatment course. The authors identified medicines capable of causing clinically apparent liver damage (according to the LiverTox database and Russian clinical practice guidelines) and/or elevated liver enzymes in ≥1% of patients (according to safety reports).RESULTS. The study found that 28% of the medicinal products used in combination for inpatient treatment of COVID-19 were associated with a high risk of DILI. In 2020, 2021, and 2022, the total consumption of medicinal products associated with a high risk of DILI was 342.3, 425.3, and 402.3 DDDs per 100 bed days, and the total consumption of genetically engineered biologicals (administered as a single dose) and cyclophosphamide was 3.5, 16.9, and 29.7 average course doses per 100 patients, respectively. According to the selective analysis of medical records, 19.8% (247/1250) reported concomitant use of 5 or more medicinal products associated with a high risk of DILI, which increased the risk of adverse drug interactions leading to DILI. In 2022, the most prescribed medicinal products with a high risk of DILI were omeprazole (188.7 DDDs per 100 bed days), non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and paracetamol (54.4 DDDs per 100 bed days), atorvastatin (46.2 DDDs per 100 bed days), levofloxacin (26.4 DDDs per 100 bed days), ceftriaxone (20.5 DDDs per 100 bed days), favipiravir (17.3 DDDs per 100 bed days), and genetically engineered biologicals (24.0 DDDs per 100 bed days).CONCLUSIONS. To reduce the risk of DILI in COVID-19 patients admitted to infectious disease units, including the risk of DILI due to drug interactions, it is necessary to limit the use of hepatotoxic antibacterial agents, proton-pump inhibitors, and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, or consider alternative medicinal products with a lower risk of hepatotoxicity.

Abstract Background Transaminase and creatinine elevations have been well described in adults treated with remdesivir for COVID-19. It is hypothesized that a similar safety profile exists in children with COVID-19 treated with remdesivir, but available data are limited, especially in children

Background : The use of remdesivir in solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs) with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been studied. The present systematic review and analysis aimed to assess its effectiveness in this population. Methods : A comprehensive search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Embase, medRxiv, and Google Scholar was conducted to identify relevant articles published up to April 2024. The quality of the included studies was evaluated using the Cochrane assessment tool. Data analysis was performed using the Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software ver. 3.0. Results : The meta-analysis included seven eligible retrospective studies, involving a total of 574 SOTRs. The findings indicated no significant differences in mortality rate (odds ratio [OR], 1.19; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.59-2.39), hospitalization rate (OR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.10-4.79), need for mechanical ventilation (OR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.44-2.18), or need for oxygen therapy (OR, 3.73; 95% CI, 0.75-18.34) between the groups that received remdesivir and those that did not. However, a statistically significant difference was observed in the rate of intensive care unit admissions between the two groups (OR, 2.39; 95% CI, 1.24-4.57). Conclusion : s: Our meta-analysis found that remdesivir offers no clinical benefits to SOTRs infected with COVID-19. Additional high-quality research is required to assess the potential clinical advantages of remdesivir for SOTRs with COVID-19.

Abstract Remdesivir therapy has been declared as efficient in the early stages of Covid-19. Of the 339 patients (males 55.8%, age 71(59;77) years) with a detectable viral load, 140 were treated with remdesivir (of those 103 in the ICU and 57 immunosuppressed) and retrospectively compared with 199 patients (of those 82 in the ICU and 28 immunosuppressed) who were denied therapy due to advanced Covid-19. The viral load was estimated by detecting nucleocapsid antigen in serum (n = 155, median 217(28;1524)pg/ml), antigen in sputum (n = 18, COI 18(4.6;32)), nasopharyngeal antigen (n = 44, COI 17(8;35)) and the real-time PCR (n = 122, Ct 21(18;27)). After adjustment for confounders, patients on remdesivir had better 12-month survival (HR 0.66 (0.44;0.98), p = 0.039), particularly when admitted to the ICU (HR 0.49 (0.29;0.81), p = 0.006). For the immunocompromised patients, the difference did not reach statistical significance (HR 0.55 (0.18;1.69), p = 0.3). The other most significant confounders were age, ICU admission, mechanical ventilation, leukocyte/lymphocyte ratio, admission creatinine and immunosuppression. The impact of monoclonal antibodies or previous vaccinations was not significant. Despite frequent immune suppression including haemato-oncology diseases, lymphopenia, and higher inflammatory markers in the remdesivir group, the results support remdesivir administration with respect to widely available estimates of viral load in patients with high illness severity.

COVID-19-associated intensive care unit (ICU) admissions were recognized as critical health issues that contributed to morbidity and mortality in SARS-CoV-2-infected patients. Severe symptoms in COVID-19 patients are often accompanied by cytokine release syndrome. Here, we analyzed publicly available data from the Yale IMPACT cohort to address immunological misfiring and sex differences in early COVID-19 patients. In 2020, SARS-CoV-2 was considered far more pathogenic and lethal than other circulating respiratory viruses, and the inclusion of SARS-CoV-2 negative patients in IMPACT cohorts confounds many findings. We ascertained the impact of several important biological variables such as days from symptom onset (DFSO); pre-existing risk factors, including obesity; and early COVID-19 treatments on significantly changed immunological measures in ICU-admitted COVID-19 patients that survived versus those that did not. Deceased patients had 19 unique measures that were not shared with ICU patients including increased granzyme-B-producing GzB+CD8+ T cells and interferon-γ. Male COVID-19 patients in ICU experienced many more changes in immunological and clinical measures than female ICU patients (25% vs. ~16%, respectively). A total of 13/124 measures including CCL5, CCL17, IL-18, IFNα2, Fractalkine, classical monocytes, T cells, and CD4Temra exhibited significant sex differences in female vs. male COVID-19 patients. A total of nine measures including IL-21, CCL5, and CD4Temra differed significantly between female and male healthy controls. Immunosuppressed patients experienced the most decreases in CD4Temra and CD8Tem cell numbers. None of the early COVID-19 treatments were effective in reducing levels of IL-6, a major component of the cytokine storm. Obesity (BMI >30) was the most impactful risk factor for COVID-19-related deaths and worst clinical outcomes. Our analysis highlights the contribution of biological sex, risk factors, and early treatments with respect to COVID-19-related ICU admission and progression to morbidity and mortality.

Broad spectrum oral antivirals are urgently needed for the early treatment of many RNA viruses of clinical concern. We previously described the synthesis of 1-O-octadecyl-2-O-benzyl-glycero-3-phospho-RVn (V2043), an orally bioavailable lipid prodrug of remdesivir nucleoside (RVn, GS-441524) with broad spectrum antiviral activity against viruses with pandemic potential. Here we compared the relative activity of V2043 with new RVn lipid prodrugs containing sn-1 alkyl ether or sn-2 glycerol modifications. We found that 3-F-4-MeO-Bn, 3-CN-Bn, and 4-CN-Bn sn-2 glycerol modifications improved antiviral activity compared to V2043 when tested in vitro against clinically important RNA viruses from 5 virus families. These results support the continued development of V2043 and sn-2 glycerol modified RVn lipid prodrugs for the treatment of a broad range of RNA viruses for which there are limited therapies.

BACKGROUND: This comparative effectiveness study investigated the effect of remdesivir on in-hospital mortality among patients hospitalized for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) requiring supplemental oxygen including low-flow oxygen (LFO), high-flow oxygen/noninvasive ventilation (HFO/NIV), or invasive mechanical ventilation/extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (IMV/ECMO) across variant of concern (VOC) periods. METHODS: Patients hospitalized for COVID-19 between December 2020 and April 2022 and administered remdesivir upon admission were 1:1 propensity score matched to patients not administered remdesivir during their COVID-19 hospitalization. Analyses were stratified by supplemental oxygen requirement upon admission and VOC period. Cox proportional hazards models were used to derive adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for 14- and 28-day mortality. RESULTS: Patients treated with remdesivir (67 582 LFO, 34 857 HFO/NIV, and 4164 IMV/ECMO) were matched to non-remdesivir patients. Unadjusted mortality rates were significantly lower for remdesivir-treated patients at 14 days (LFO: 6.4% vs. 8.8%; HFO/NIV: 16.8% vs. 19.4%; IMV/ECMO: 27.8% vs. 35.3%) and 28 days (LFO: 9.8% vs. 12.3%; HFO/NIV: 25.8% vs. 28.3%; IMV/ECMO: 41.4% vs. 50.6%). After adjustment, remdesivir treatment was associated with a statistically significant reduction in in-hospital mortality at 14 days (LFO: aHR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.66-0.79; HFO/NIV: aHR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.77-0.89; IMV/ECMO: aHR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.65-0.82) and 28 days (LFO: aHR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.73-0.85; HFO/NIV: aHR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.82-0.93; IMV/ECMO: aHR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.67-0.82) compared with non-remdesivir treatment. Lower risk of mortality among remdesivir-treated patients was observed across VOC periods. CONCLUSIONS: Remdesivir treatment is associated with significantly reduced mortality among patients hospitalized for COVID-19 requiring supplemental oxygen upon admission, including those requiring HFO/NIV or IMV/ECMO with severe or critical disease, across VOC periods.

AbstractFeline infectious peritonitis (FIP) is a potentially fatal coronavirus-driven disease of cats. Treatment with nucleoside analogue GS-441524 and or prodrug remdesivir (RDV) have produced remission in both experimentally induced and naturally occurring FIP, yet information regarding metabolism of RDV into GS-441524 in cats is scarce. This study assessed possible phase I metabolism of RDV in cats, utilising an in vitro feline microsome model with in vitro t1/2 and in vitro Clint calculated using the substrate depletion method. A previously validated high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) fluorescence method was utilised for detection and analysis of RDV and GS-441524. Qualitative yield of RDV and intermediate metabolite GS-441524 were determined following microsome incubation, then compared to whole blood and plasma incubations. In vitro microsome incubation resulted in rapid depletion of RDV, though it did not appear to resemble a conventional phase I-dependent reaction in cats, as it is in humans and dogs. Depletion of RDV into GS-441524 was demonstrated in whole blood in vitro, suggesting cats convert RDV to GS-441524, likely via blood esterases, as observed in mice and rats. RDV metabolism is unlikely to be impacted by impaired liver function in cats. Furthermore, as RDV depletes within minutes, whereas GS-441524 is very stable, whole blood or plasma GS-441524 concentrations, rather than plasma RDV concentrations, are more appropriate for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) in cats receiving RDV.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is considered an infectious disease which is caused by infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Neonatal COVID-19 had been occurred in many countries which would indicate the need of effective and safe treatment for these vulnerable group. In this study, we showed symptoms of corona virus in neonates, investigation of coronavirus in neonates and radiological features of neonatal COVID-19. In addition, we discussed management of neonates with COVI-19, antiviral treatment, monoclonal antibodies administration, immunomodulatory therapy, antibiotics, vitamins, and minerals in the treatment of neonatal COVID-19, and also telemedicine in neonatal COVID-19 and feeding the newborn of COVID-19 mother. We also discussed multisystem inflammatory syndrome in neonates (MIS-N), management of affected COVID-19 neonates and discussion of the complication of the neonatal COVID-19. We further discussed the methods of dealing with COVID-19 neonates and the research done on the neonatal COVID-19 treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Literature on the safety of remdesivir in hospitalized COVID-19 patients with severe renal impairment is limited. We aimed to investigate the safety and effectiveness of remdesivir in this population. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adult hospitalized COVID-19 patients who received remdesivir between April 2022 and October 2022. Outcomes were compared between estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <30mL/min/1.73 m² and ≥30 mL/min/1.73 m² groups. The primary safety outcomes were acute kidney injury (AKI) and bradycardia, while the primary effectiveness outcomes included mortality in COVID-19-dedicated wards and hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included laboratory changes, disease progression, and recovery time. Results: A total of 1,343 patients were recruited, with 307 (22.9%) in the eGFR <30 group and 1,036 (77.1%) in the eGFR ≥30 group. Patients with an eGFR <30 had higher risks of AKI (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 2.92, 95% CI 1.93-4.44) and hospital mortality (aHR 1.47, 95% CI 1.06-2.05) but had comparable risks of bradycardia (aHR 1.15, 95% CI 0.85-1.56) and mortality in dedicated wards (aHR 1.43, 95% CI 0.90-2.28) than patients with an eGFR ≥30. Risk of disease progression was higher in the eGFR < 0 group (adjusted odds ratio 1.62, 95% CI 1.16-2.26). No difference between the two groups in laboratory changes and recovery time. Conclusions: Hospitalized COVID-19 patients receiving remdesivir with severe renal impairment had an increased risk of AKI, hospital mortality, and COVID-19 disease progression compared to patients without severe renal impairment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and objective: The World Health Organization advises against the use of the antiviral drug Remdesivir to treat severe COVID-19 infections due to potential toxicity. The molecular mechanism of this toxicity is not well established. ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters play an essential role in the transport of various drugs in many illnesses. Objective: This study examines the possible role of ATP-binding cassette, subfamily D, member 3 (ABCD3) in Remdesivir toxicity. Methods: Real-time PCR and MTT assays were used to demonstrate the toxicity of Remdesivir on ABCD3 gene expression in the HepG2 cell line. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was used to detect serum ABCD3 levels, Prestige24i was used to detect C-reactive protein (CRP), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST) in the serum. Nano-Checker710 was used to detect D-dimer in the serum of the patients. Results: Remdesivir exhibits dose-dependent toxicity to the HepG2 cell line. The drug toxicity is significantly increased at three doses of 5, 10, and 20 µg/ml in virus-free hepatic cell lines. It suppressed ABCD3 gene expression in both the HepG2 cell line and COVID-19 patients’ sera. COVID-19 virus increases serum levels of CRP, ALT, AST and D-dimer. The drug lowers serum CRP, transiently lowers D-dimer, and increases ALT and AST levels. Conclusion: Remdesivir suppressed ABCD3 gene expression and increased levels of inflammatory markers. Remdesivir contributes to hepatocyte damage independently of the COVID-19 virus.

Abstract Background A trial performed among unvaccinated, high-risk outpatients with COVID-19 during the delta period showed remdesivir reduced hospitalization. We used our real-world data platform to determine the effectiveness of remdesivir on reducing 28-day hospitalization among outpatients with mild-moderate COVID-19 during an Omicron period including BQ.1/BQ.1.1/XBB.1.5. Methods We did a propensity-matched, retrospective cohort study of non-hospitalized adults with SARS-CoV-2 infection between April 7, 2022, and February 7, 2023. Electronic healthcare record data from a large health system in Colorado were linked to statewide vaccination and mortality data. We included patients with a positive SARS-CoV-2 test or outpatient remdesivir administration. Exclusion criteria were other SARS-CoV-2 treatments or positive SARS-CoV-2 test more than seven days before remdesivir. The primary outcome was all-cause hospitalization up to day 28. Secondary outcomes included 28-day COVID-related hospitalization and 28-day all-cause mortality. Results Among 29,270 patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection, 1,252 remdesivir-treated patients were matched to 2,499 untreated patients. Remdesivir was associated with lower 28-day all-cause hospitalization (1.3% vs. 3.3%, adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 0.39 [95% CI 0.23–0.67], p

Abstract Introduction We compared the effectiveness and virological clearance (VC) at day 7 (T7) post-treatment with molnupiravir, nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, and remdesivir in SARS-CoV-2-infected patients at high risk (HR) for clinical progression. Methods We conducted a retrospective study enrolling HR patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 (Jan–Oct 2022) treated with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir or molnupiravir or 3 days of remdesivir. We investigated clinical recovery at T7 (resolution of symptoms for ≥ 72 h or all-cause death), VC at T7 (PCR/antigenic negative nasopharyngeal swab), and median time to VC (days from symptom onset to the first negative swab). Factors associated with VC were investigated by logistic regression. Results In the study, 92/376 (43.8%) patients received molnupiravir, 150/376 (24.7%) nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, and 134/376 (31.5%) remdesivir. Forty-nine (13%) patients were unvaccinated or incompletely vaccinated. Patients treated with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir were younger and presented immunodeficiencies more frequently; remdesivir was used more commonly in patients hospitalized for other diseases. A high proportion of patients obtained clinical recovery without differences among the therapies (97.5% for molnupiravir, 98.3% for nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, and 93.6% for remdesivir); 12 (3.7%) patients died. Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir was associated with a higher proportion of T7 VC and a shorter time to VC compared to molnupiravir/remdesivir, also after adjustment for age and immunodeficiency (AOR 0.445 RDV vs. NMV-r, 95% CI 0.240–0.826, p = 0.010; AOR 0.222 MNP vs. NMV-r, 95% CI 0.105–0.472, p

Remdesivir (RDV) is the first drug approved by the FDA for clinical treatment of hospitalized patients infected with COVID-19 because it has been shown to have good antiviral activity against a variety of viruses, including Arenaviridae and Coronaviridae viral families. However, it has been reported that its clinical treatment leads to the symptoms of sick sinus syndrome such as sinus bradycardia, conduction block, and sinus arrest, but the electrophysiological mechanism of its specific cardiac adverse events is still unclear. We report complementary, experimental, studies of its electrophysiological effects. In wireless cardiac telemetry experiments in vivo and electrocardiographic studies in ex vivo cardiac preparations, RDV significantly caused sinus bradycardia, sinus atrial block, and prolongation of the QT interval in guinea pigs. Dose-dependent effects of RDV on the electrical activities of sinoatrial node (SA node) preparations of guinea pigs were characterised by multielectrode, optical RH237 voltage mapping. These revealed reversibly reduced sinoatrial conduction time (SACT), increased AP durations (APDs), and decreased the pacemaking rate of the SA node. Patch-clamp experiments showed that RDV significantly inhibited the If current of HCN4 channels, resulting in a significant decrease in the spontaneous firing rate of SA node cells, which may underlie the development of sick sinus node syndrome. In addition, RDV significantly inhibits IKr currents in hERG channels, leading to prolongation of the QT interval and playing a role in bradycardia. Therefore, these findings provide insights into the understanding the bradycardia effect of RDV, which may be used as basic theoretical guidance for the intervention of its adverse events, and prompt safety investigations of RDV's cardiac safety in the future. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The aim of this study was to synthesize and evaluate nanostructured lipid carriers (NLCs) loaded with Remdesivir (RDV) to control its side effects in COVID-19 patients. Due to the low solubility and short half-life of RDV in the blood, an injectable formulation was prepared using sulphobutylether-beta-cyclodextrin. However, it can accumulate in the kidney and cause renal impairment. NLCs improve the parenteral delivery of hydrophobic drugs such as RDV by increasing drug solubility and bioavailability. For the synthesis of RDV-NLCs, the aqueous phase containing Tween 80 was injected into the lipid phase under rapid stirring and was sonicated. The experimental conditions were optimized using Box-Behnken design and Design Expert software. The optimum formulation contained a total lipid of 2.13%, a total surfactant of 1%, and a hot bath time of 71 min. The optimum formulation showed particle size, polydispersity index, zeta potential, and entrapment efficiency values of 151.0 ± 1.7 nm (from 149.1 to 152.1), 0.4 ± 0.1 (from 0.3 to 0.5), −43.8 ± 1.2 mV (from −42.4 to −44.7), and 81.34 ± 1.57% (from 79.52 to 82.33%), respectively. RDV-NLCs showed acceptable stability for 30 days at 25 ℃ and were compatible with commonly used intravenous infusion fluids for 48 h. FE-SEM images of RDV-NLC showed spherical particles with a mean diameter of 207 nm. The NLC-RDV formulation showed a sustained release of RDV with a low risk of dose-dumping, minimizing potential side effects. In addition, RDV in the form of RDV-NLC causes less cytotoxicity to healthy normal kidney cells, which is expected to reduce renal impairment in COVID-19 patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background We aimed to evaluate the cardiac adverse events (AEs) in hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) who received remdesivir plus standard of care (SoC) compared with SoC alone (control), as an association was noted in some cohort studies and disproportionality analyses of safety databases. Methods This post hoc safety analysis is based on data from the multicenter, randomized, open-label, controlled DisCoVeRy trial in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. Any first AE that occurred between randomization and day 29 in the modified intention-to-treat (mITT) population randomized to either remdesivir or control group was considered. Analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier survival curves, and Kaplan-Meier estimates were calculated for event rates. Results Cardiac AEs were reported in 46 (11.2%) of 410 and 48 (11.3%) of 423 patients in the mITT population (n = 833) enrolled in the remdesivir and control groups, respectively. The difference between both groups was not significant (hazard ratio [HR], 1.0; 95% confidence interval [CI],.7–1.5; P =.98), even when serious and nonserious cardiac AEs were evaluated separately. The majority of reports in both groups were of arrhythmic nature (remdesivir, 84.8%; control, 83.3%) and were associated with a favorable outcome. There was no significant difference between the two groups in the occurrence of cardiac AE subclasses, including arrhythmic events (HR, 1.1; 95% CI,.7–1.7; P =.68). Conclusions Remdesivir treatment was not associated with an increased risk of cardiac AEs compared with control in patients hospitalized with moderate or severe COVID-19. These results are consistent with other randomized, controlled trials and meta-analyses. Clinical Trials Registration. NCT 04315948; EudraCT 2020-000936-23. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

ABSTRACT The quality and the security of preparations in hospital centres are essential to guarantee the patient's safety. The development of fast and efficient analytical methods is required to control the finished product before use. In this context, the study aimed to compare the performance and interchangeability of two spectral analytical methods: the flow injection analysis (FIA) with UV detection and the Raman spectroscopy for the quality control of preparation before use to quantify the remdesivir as a SARS‐CoV‐2 drug. A quantitative study of remdesivir was performed using clinically relevant concentration solutions ranging from 0.25 to 1.625 mg.mL−1 in 0.9% NaCl. Samples were analysed by FIA‐UV at 245 nm and by a handheld Raman spectroscopy at 785 nm. Quantitative models were developed using a calibration set (n = 45 samples) and optimized using a validation set (n = 27). An external validation test set (n = 58) was used to compare the two methods by a Bland–Altman plot. Partial least square regression was used to analyse Raman spectra, while univariate analysis was performed at 245 nm for FIA‐UV. The regression coefficient was higher than 0.990 for both methods, and the root mean square error of prediction was 0.031 mg.mL−1 for Raman spectroscopy. The Bland–Altman plot confirmed the interchangeability of the two methods and the potential of Raman spectroscopy to control remdesivir during clinical preparation in the hospital. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: A trial performed among unvaccinated, high-risk outpatients with COVID-19 during the delta period showed remdesivir reduced hospitalization. We used our real-world data platform to determine the effectiveness of remdesivir on reducing 28-day hospitalization among outpatients with mild-moderate COVID-19 during an Omicron period including BQ.1/BQ.1.1/XBB.1.5. Methods: We did a propensity-matched, retrospective cohort study of non-hospitalized adults with SARS-CoV-2 infection between April 7, 2022, and February 7, 2023. Electronic healthcare record data from a large health system in Colorado were linked to statewide vaccination and mortality data. We included patients with a positive SARS-CoV-2 test or outpatient remdesivir administration. Exclusion criteria were other SARS-CoV-2 treatments or positive SARS-CoV-2 test more than seven days before remdesivir. The primary outcome was all-cause hospitalization up to day 28. Secondary outcomes included 28-day COVID-related hospitalization and 28-day all-cause mortality. Results: Among 29,270 patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection, 1,252 remdesivir-treated patients were matched to 2,499 untreated patients. Remdesivir was associated with lower 28-day all-cause hospitalization (1.3% vs. 3.3%, adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 0.39 [95% CI 0.23–0.67], p < 0.001) than no treatment. All-cause mortality at 28 days was numerically lower among remdesivir-treated patients (0.1% vs. 0.4%; aOR 0.32 [95% CI 0.03–1.40]). Similar benefit of RDV treatment on 28-day all-cause hospitalization was observed across Omicron periods, aOR (95% CI): BA.2/BA2.12.1 (0.77[0.19–2.41]), BA.4/5 (0.50[95% CI 0.50–1.01]), BQ.1/BQ.1.1/XBB.1.5 (0.21[95% CI 0.08–0.57]. Conclusion: Among outpatients with SARS-CoV-2 during recent Omicron surges, remdesivir was associated with lower hospitalization than no treatment, supporting current National Institutes of Health Guidelines. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The COVID-19 pandemic reminded us of the urgent need for new antivirals to control emerging infectious diseases and potential future pandemics. Immunotherapy has revolutionized oncology and could complement the use of antivirals, but its application to infectious diseases remains largely unexplored. Nucleoside analogs are a class of agents widely used as antiviral and anti-neoplastic drugs. Their antiviral activity is generally based on interference with viral nucleic acid replication or transcription. Based on our previous work and computer modeling, we hypothesize that antiviral adenosine analogs, like remdesivir, have previously unrecognized immunomodulatory properties which contribute to their therapeutic activity. In the case of remdesivir, we here show that these properties are due to its metabolite, GS-441524, acting as an Adenosine A2A Receptor antagonist. Our findings support a new rationale for the design of next-generation antiviral agents with dual - immunomodulatory and intrinsic - antiviral properties. These compounds could represent game-changing therapies to control emerging viral diseases and future pandemics. Synopsis: Adenosine analogs predicted to bind to the Adenosine A2A Receptor (A2AR) are endowed with immunomodulatory properties. These properties contribute to their antiviral function and are distinct from the intrinsic antiviral activity of these compounds. Computational modeling and molecular docking shows that remdesivir metabolite GS-441524 is predicted to bind to A2AR. Remdesivir and GS-441524 antagonize A2AR activation and downstream immunological effects in vitro and in vivo. A non-antiviral A2AR antagonist promotes T-cell infiltration and viral clearance in mice infected with SARS-CoV-2. Remdesivir has immunomodulatory effects analogous to an A2AR antagonist in promoting antiviral immune responses. Adenosine analogs predicted to bind to the Adenosine A2A Receptor (A2AR) are endowed with immunomodulatory properties. These properties contribute to their antiviral function and are distinct from the intrinsic antiviral activity of these compounds. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The antiviral agents, Favipiravir (FAV) and Remdesivir (REM), were introduced in the last few years alone or as combination regimen for successful management of the rapidly spreading CORONA virus pandemic. A newly developed rapid and sensitive high performance liquid chromatographic method (HPLC) has been developed for the simultaneous determination of their mixture. Firstly, one factor at a time optimization (OFAT) has been applied. Afterwards, quality by design approach (QbD) has been utilized using Box Behnken experimental design (BBD) for the development of an experimental design of four independent and nine dependent variables for much better refining of the optimized parameters. The established model has given an optimum resolution at; acetonitrile percentage of 52.66, mobile phase of pH 2.91, percentage of triethylamine of 0.15 and 1.30 mL/min flow rate. The proposed method has been validated according to the USP 31 NF 26 guidelines. Good linearity ranges have been obtained from 5.00 up to 50.00 μg/mL for FAV and from 2.00 up to 60.00 μg/mL for FAV and REM, respectively. Excellent relative standard deviation values (not more than 1.40) were obtained upon investigation of accuracy, precision and robustness. The developed method has succeeded in analysis of investigated drugs in their pharmaceutical formulations and spiked plasma samples with good recoveries of 99.00 and up to 106.00%. The proposed method is considered eligible for the quality control laboratories as well as in‐vivo determinations of both analytes. A rapid and sensitive HPLC method was developed to determine Favipiravir (FAV) and Remdesivir (REM) simultaneously. The method was optimized using one factor at a time optimization (OFAT) and quality by design approach (QbD) with Box Behnken experimental design (BBD). The optimized conditions resulted in an optimum resolution. The method was validated using USP guidelines, showing good linearity ranges and excellent accuracy, precision, and robustness. The method was successfully applied to analyze the drugs in pharmaceuticals and spiked plasma samples. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Efficacy of remdesivir for COVID-19 remains unclear. We updated our published systematic review to better inform on the use of remdesivir for COVID-19. We searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) among hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Meta-analysis was conducted using an inverse variance, random-effects model, presenting relative risk (RR) or mean difference (MD) and their associated 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Statistical heterogeneity was calculated using the I2 statistic. In addition, we conducted trial sequential analysis (TSA). Outcomes with additional data were clinical progression, hospitalization days, and all-cause mortality. We included nine RCTs (12,876 individuals). Three trials each were of a low, unclear, and a high risk of bias. Compared with no treatment/placebo, remdesivir (100 mg daily, over 10 days) significantly improved clinical progression (RR 1.06, CI 1.02–1.11), but did not significantly reduce hospitalization days (MD −0.48, CI −2.18–1.21) and all-cause mortality (RR 0.92, CI 0.84–1.01). TSA suggested that further information is not required to conclude on the efficacy of remdesivir in improving clinical progression, and that, while more information is required for hospitalization days and all-cause mortality, further RCTs to prove fewer hospitalization days may be futile, as efficacy of remdesivir for this outcome is unlikely. Remdesivir appeared promising for COVID-19, but there is insufficient evidence of its efficacy. High quality RCTs are needed for a stronger evidence base. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Purpose: There is a need for effective anti‐COVID‐19 treatments, mainly for individuals at risk of severe disease such as the elderly and the immunosuppressed. Drug repositioning has proved effective in identifying drugs that can find a new application for the control of coronavirus disease, in particular COVID‐19. The purpose of the present study was to find synergistic antiviral combinations for COVID‐19 based on lethal mutagenesis. Experimental Approach: The effect of combinations of remdesivir and ribavirin on the infectivity of SARS‐CoV‐2 in cell culture has been tested. Viral populations were monitored by ultra‐deep sequencing, and the decrease of infectivity as a result of the treatment was measured. Key Results: Remdesivir and ribavirin exerted a synergistic inhibitory activity against SARS‐CoV‐2, quantified both by CompuSyn (Chou‐Talalay method) and Synergy Finder (ZIP‐score model). In serial passage experiments, virus extinction was readily achieved with remdesivir‐ribavirin combinations at concentrations well below their cytotoxic 50 value, but not with the drugs used individually. Deep sequencing of treated viral populations showed that remdesivir, ribavirin, and their combinations evoked significant increases of the number of viral mutations and haplotypes, as well as modification of diversity indices that characterize viral quasi‐species. Conclusion and Implications: SARS‐CoV‐2 extinction can be achieved by synergistic combination treatments based on lethal mutagenesis. In addition, the results offer prospects of triple drug treatments for effective SARS‐CoV‐2 suppression. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The spread of COVID-19 has significantly increased research on antiviral drugs and measures such as case isolation and contact tracing. This study compared the effects of lopinavir/ritonavir and remdesivir on COVID-19 patients with a control group receiving no antiviral drugs. Patients confirmed to have a SARS-CoV-2 infection via real-time RT-PCR were divided into three groups: lopinavir/ritonavir, remdesivir, and control. We assessed the efficacy of these drugs in reducing viral load and viral shedding duration using real-time RT-PCR and Vero E6 cell cultures. Lopinavir/ritonavir led to no detectable infectious SARS-CoV-2, with a median viral clearance time of one day, whereas one remdesivir-treated case remained culture-positive until day 12. Lopinavir/ritonavir significantly reduced viral load compared to remdesivir and control groups (p = 0.0117 and p = 0.0478). No infectious virus was detected in the lopinavir/ritonavir group, and the non-infectious SARS-CoV-2 proportion remained constant at 90%, higher than in the remdesivir and control groups (p = 0.0097). There was a significant difference in culture positivity among the groups (p = 0.0234), particularly between the lopinavir/ritonavir and remdesivir groups (p = 0.0267). These findings suggest that lopinavir/ritonavir reduces viral load and shortens the viral shedding duration compared to remdesivir, despite not being an effective treatment option. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: Background: Antiviral drugs have become crucial in managing COVID-19, reducing complications and mortality. Remdesivir has emerged as an effective therapeutic drug for hospitalized patients at risk of disease progression, especially when alternative treatments are infeasible. While the recommended treatment duration of remdesivir extends up to 7 days post-symptom onset, this study examines how early remdesivir administration impacts clinical outcomes. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis using clinical data from consecutively PCR confirmed SARS-CoV‑2 adult patients (≥ 18 years) who received remdesivir during their hospitalization at the department of infectious diseases, Klinik Favoriten in Vienna. The data covered the period from July 1, 2021, to April 31, 2022. Patients were divided into two groups based on the timing of remdesivir administration: an early group (0–3 days since symptom onset) and a late group (≥ 4 days since symptom onset). The primary outcome was in-hospital disease progression, assessed using the WHO COVID-19 Clinical Progression Scale (≥ 1 point increase). Multivariable logistic regression, adjusted for age, sex, SARS-CoV‑2 variant, and COVID-19 vaccination status, was used to assess clinical outcomes. Results: In total 219 patients were included of whom 148 (67.6%) were in the early group and 71 (32.4%) were in the late group. The average age was 66.5 (SD: 18.0) years, 68.9% of the patients were vaccinated, and 72.6% had the Omicron virus variant. Late remdesivir administration was associated with a significantly higher probability of needing high-flow oxygen therapy (OR 2.52, 95% CI 1.40–4.52, p = 0.002) and ICU admission (OR 4.34, 95% CI 1.38–13.67, p = 0.012) after adjusting for confounders. In the late group there was a trend towards a higher risk of clinical worsening (OR 2.13, 95% CI 0.98–4.64, p = 0.056) and need for any oxygen therapy (OR 1.85, 95% CI 0.94–3.64, p = 0.074). Conclusion: Compared to patients who received remdesivir within the first 3 days after symptom onset, administering remdesivir after day 3 in hospitalized COVID-19 patients is associated with higher risk for complications, such as the need for high-flow oxygen therapy and ICU admission. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

AbstractNew therapies and vaccines changed the management of COVID-19. The aim of this retrospective study was to describe characteristics, in-hospital mortality and its predictors in patients with moderate/severe COVID-19, considering the 4 different pandemic waves and viral variants’ prevalence from February 2020 to January 2022. Among 1135 patients included, 873 (77%) had at least one comorbidity, 177 (16%) were immunocompromised. From waves 1 to 4, patients with severe respiratory failure and ICU admission decreased over time (p < 0.001), like the length of in-hospital stay (p < 0.001). Despite a reduction of in-hospital mortality from 19% to 11%, increased risk of death was related to older age and immunocompromising conditions, especially during the 4th wave (HR = 5.07 and HR = 10.86, p < 0.001 respectively) while remdesivir treatment in the 3rd wave (HR = 0.41, p = 0.010) and positive serology (aHR = 0.66, p = 0.027) were protective for survival. These data support the need for tailoring vaccine campaign for future COVID-19 waves. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: Remdesivir (RDV) causes liver enzyme elevation in adults; however, the frequency of this elevation in children and the associated risk factors are largely unknown. Therefore, we aimed to examine risk factors for liver enzyme elevation in hospitalised paediatric patients who received RDV. Methods: This was a retrospective case–control study of all patients aged <18 years who were diagnosed with coronavirus disease 2019 and received RDV at a tertiary care hospital between February 2022 and September 2023. Demographic and clinical data were retrieved from the medical records and analysed. Patients with liver enzyme elevation were defined as cases, while those with no liver enzyme elevation were defined as controls. The two groups were compared and analysed for possible risk factors for liver enzyme elevation with RDV use. Results: Sixty‐six patients were treated with RDV, 12 (18.2%) of whom developed liver enzyme elevation. Liver enzyme elevation was associated with the median duration of RDV administration (7.5 days vs. 3 days, P = 0.012), median total RDV dose (17.7 mg/kg vs. 10.3 mg/kg, P = 0.017) and acetaminophen use (67% vs. 22%) (odds ratio = 4.34; 95% confidence interval, 1.05–19.97, P = 0.023). All patients showed improvement, except three who had no liver enzyme measurements after having the highest aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase values during the observation period. Conclusion: Liver enzyme elevation was reversible after discontinuing RDV use. Overall, RDV can be considered safe in children with careful monitoring. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Our study focuses on screening ligands against the target 6Y2E using the iGemDock docking pro- gram, encompassing phytochemical, synthetic and marine sources, suggesting suitability for oral use against SARS-CoV-2 Main protease. Docking process involves iGemDock program for assessment, Argus Labs, for binding energy determination, Swiss ADME for evaluating pharmacological properties, and Chimera for visualizing interactions. Docking score gauges how effectively a ligand inhibits SARS-CoV-2 Mpro, with compounds ranked based on their docking scores. Rosmarinic acid, a phytochemical compound, achieved a docking score of -117.629 and energy of -11.051. Remdesivir, a synthetic compound, attained a docking score of -118.091 and energy of -9.31522. Spongouridine, a marine compound, secured a docking score of -83.1317 and energy of -6.38, making them the top-ranked molecules in the docking process. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: We compared the effectiveness and virological clearance (VC) at day 7 (T7) post-treatment with molnupiravir, nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, and remdesivir in SARS-CoV-2-infected patients at high risk (HR) for clinical progression. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study enrolling HR patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 (Jan–Oct 2022) treated with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir or molnupiravir or 3 days of remdesivir. We investigated clinical recovery at T7 (resolution of symptoms for ≥ 72 h or all-cause death), VC at T7 (PCR/antigenic negative nasopharyngeal swab), and median time to VC (days from symptom onset to the first negative swab). Factors associated with VC were investigated by logistic regression. Results: In the study, 92/376 (43.8%) patients received molnupiravir, 150/376 (24.7%) nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, and 134/376 (31.5%) remdesivir. Forty-nine (13%) patients were unvaccinated or incompletely vaccinated. Patients treated with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir were younger and presented immunodeficiencies more frequently; remdesivir was used more commonly in patients hospitalized for other diseases. A high proportion of patients obtained clinical recovery without differences among the therapies (97.5% for molnupiravir, 98.3% for nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, and 93.6% for remdesivir); 12 (3.7%) patients died. Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir was associated with a higher proportion of T7 VC and a shorter time to VC compared to molnupiravir/remdesivir, also after adjustment for age and immunodeficiency (AOR 0.445 RDV vs. NMV-r, 95% CI 0.240–0.826, p = 0.010; AOR 0.222 MNP vs. NMV-r, 95% CI 0.105–0.472, p < 0.001). Conclusions: SARS-COV-2 antiviral treatments are an excellent therapeutic strategy in HR patients. Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir showed a higher proportion of VC as early as 7 days after treatment, confirming its likely superiority in indirect comparisons. Plain Language Summary: Nirmatrelvir-ritonavir, molnupiravir, and a 3-day course of remdesivir are antiviral therapies recommended in patients with a mild-to-moderate COVID-19 disease at high risk of clinical progression. Randomized controlled trials and observational studies have shown their efficacy in reducing all-cause mortality and clinical progression. Few data are available about a direct comparison among the three drugs; furthermore, the possible role of nirmatrelvir-ritonavir in increasing viral clearance and in reducing the duration of viral shedding needs to be further elucidated. We thus investigated the effectiveness, safety, and virological clearance 7 days after treatment with these three antivirals in our retrospective cohort. We included in the analysis patients that have received these treatments from January 2022 and October 2022; we observed that patients receiving nirmatrelvir-ritonavir displayed a shorter median time from symptoms' onset to virological clearance and a higher proportion of virological clearance at day 7, also after adjustment for possible confounders, compared to molnupiravir and remdesivir. Our data might help in understanding which COVID-19 patients may benefit mostly from antiviral therapies and in the choice of antiviral therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]