Search

Copyright of Revista Digital de Derecho Administrativo is the property of Universidad Externado de Colombia and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of European Review of Public Law is the property of European Public Law Organization and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Romanian Review of Private Law / Revista Română de Drept Privat is the property of Universul Juridic Publishing House and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

This paper describes the design, implementation and results of a formative action with 61 students for primary education teachers, oriented to the development of the competence of analysis of the didactic suitability of educational videos about percentages. The a priori analysis of the video made by the researchers revealed important deficiencies in the different facets of didactic suitability, being especially relevant those detected in the epistemic dimension. Most of the students for teacher made quite relevant global assessments of the didactic suitability (70.49% considered it between low and medium) basing their judgment on the precision or degree of fulfillment of the suitability indicators in the different components. However, although the suggestions for improvement indicated are quite timely, not all students who identify weaknesses in the videos are able to explicitly make changes to the resource. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper presents the results of a research based on the process of reflection on school mathematics of middle school teacher. For this purpose, a three-component theoretical model was configured, articulated with the Socioepistemological Theory. Specifically, it shows how the process takes place: what and how awareness is acquired, what knowledge is constructed and what is transformed. For the analysis we considered a category of meanings and another on the forms of argumentation related to direct proportionality; both categories allowed us to understand the state of the teacher's knowledge at the beginning and at the end of the ref lective process. Among the results we have that the ref lection of school proportionality gives evidence that the change of relationship to this mathematical knowledge promotes the awareness of responsibility for mathematical education and the development of autonomy over mathematical knowledge (both related to proportionality), two aspects that characterize the professionalization of mathematics teachers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Le présent article est tiré de nos travaux de thèse portant sur l’écologie et la proportionnalité dans l’enseignement fondamental au Mali de 1960 à nos jours. Notre problématique est centrée d’une part sur la persistance de la technique de la règle de trois malgré les différentes évolutions du curriculum prescrit de 1960 à nos jours au Mali et d’autre part sur les conceptions que les enseignants entretiennent avec la notion. À travers l’analyse des productions des enseignants soumis à un questionnaire, nous constatons que la règle de trois reste le modèle dominant dans le traitement de la proportionnalité et que les conceptions des enseignants influent beaucoup sur les comportements des élèves face à un problème de proportionnalité. En effet de 1960 à nos jours, nos résultats révèlent que la règle de trois a joué un rôle prépondérant dans le traitement des problèmes de proportions et de proportionnalité. Notre étude a révélé que cette restriction de la vie de la proportionnalité au détriment des règles qui rattachent les situations de proportionnalité au concept de référence la fonction linéaire est en grande partie liée à la conception que les enseignants de terrain (aussi acteurs de la noosphère) se font de la proportionnalité.

Les problèmes juridiques rattachés au Coronavirus ne constituent pas des conséquences directes à la pandémie, mais plutôt des effets engendrés suite aux mesures prises par les autorités publics pour faire face au COVID-19. Dès lors la question qui se pose est la suivante : Comment les mesures légales prises à l’occasion du COVID-19 ont-t-elles perturbé la vie juridique ? Toutes les disciplines du droit public et du droit privé ont été affectées par ces mesures, du droit administratif au droit civil en passant par le droit de propriété intellectuelle. Toutefois, deux volets saillants ont été particulièrement montrés du doigt : les libertés individuelles et la sécurité contractuelle.

Les problèmes juridiques rattachés au Coronavirus ne constituent pas des conséquences directes à la pandémie, mais plutôt des effets engendrés suite aux mesures prises par les autorités publics pour faire face au COVID-19. Dès lors la question qui se pose est la suivante : Comment les mesures légales prises à l’occasion du COVID-19 ont-t-elles perturbé la vie juridique ? Toutes les disciplines du droit public et du droit privé ont été affectées par ces mesures, du droit administratif au droit civil en passant par le droit de propriété intellectuelle. Toutefois, deux volets saillants ont été particulièrement montrés du doigt : les libertés individuelles et la sécurité contractuelle.

La pandémie du COVID-19 est à l’origine d’une véritable crise sanitaire. Les décideurs sont contraints de faire appel aux règles existantes pour gérer la situation mais aussi d’adopter de nouveaux textes afin de trouver des solutions idoines. Les décideurs politiques se trouvent face à des dilemmes qu’ils sont obligés de résoudre, en optant pour des solutions équilibrées. Ils doivent procéder à une pondération des intérêts en jeu et respecter le principe de la proportionnalité entre les différents droits et libertés. Pour leur part, les professionnels de la santé sont tenus de respecter certaines obligations aussi bien lors du diagnostic que lors du traitement. Le médecin doit assumer les conséquences de ses fautes et doit respecter les données acquises de la science, même si en temps du COVID , il est difficile de parler de « données acquises ».

La pandémie du COVID-19 est à l’origine d’une véritable crise sanitaire. Les décideurs sont contraints de faire appel aux règles existantes pour gérer la situation mais aussi d’adopter de nouveaux textes afin de trouver des solutions idoines. Les décideurs politiques se trouvent face à des dilemmes qu’ils sont obligés de résoudre, en optant pour des solutions équilibrées. Ils doivent procéder à une pondération des intérêts en jeu et respecter le principe de la proportionnalité entre les différents droits et libertés. Pour leur part, les professionnels de la santé sont tenus de respecter certaines obligations aussi bien lors du diagnostic que lors du traitement. Le médecin doit assumer les conséquences de ses fautes et doit respecter les données acquises de la science, même si en temps du COVID , il est difficile de parler de « données acquises ».

Copyright of Romanian Review of Private Law / Revista Română de Drept Privat is the property of Universul Juridic Publishing House and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Revista de Derecho Comunitario Europeo is the property of Centro de Estudios Politicos y Constitucionales and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The delimitation of maritime boundaries is a complex and multifaceted process with legal and technical aspects. The process involves the determination of a maritime boundary in a situation where two or more states are confronted with overlapping titles. In the absence of any precise rules in treaty law and established customary rules based on state practice, it has been left to the jurisprudence of international courts and tribunals to develop the applicable law of maritime boundary delimitation. This article provides a detailed examination of the complex and multifaceted processes involved in maritime delimitation law. In doing so, it highlights recent developments in the field, with an emphasis on the emerging principles of "non-cut-off" and "non-distortion." The article also analyzes the crystalizing rules on delimitation beyond 200 nautical miles and questions the applicability of these rules to the ongoing maritime boundary dispute between Canada and the United States in the Beaufort Sea. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Ius Novum is the property of Sciendo and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Ius Novum is the property of Sciendo and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Over four sections, the paper approaches the biomedical and biopolitical production of COVID-19 by linking the discourse of the pandemic and the discourse of war. The first section considers the drift and imposition of martial language, discourses and analogies in relation to framing and conceptualizing the pandemic. The second section describes the military territorialization and martial genealogy of K'jipuktuk (Halifax) to think through the pandemic. The third section considers how the object of population is shared by military counterinsurgency methods and pandemic public safety measures in relation to the idea of proportionality and acceptable losses. The fourth section ends by engaging with notions of biopolitical pre-existing conditions in advance of COVID-19 to consider the provision and production of safety in a post-pandemic recovery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Revista Română de Drept European is the property of Wolters Kluwer Romania and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

This work aims to study the ecology of the knowledge proportionality on the curricular references from the state of Pernambuco (Brazil), in elementary school and in high school. Qualitative research of documents, which allows for the analyses of the institutional approach to the knowledge proportionality under the Anthropologic Theory of Didatics. Therefore, we have identified the existence of an institutional approach between the knowledge proportionality and the reference analyzed. We have found different places that constitute the habitats of this knowledge and have identified its activities on different niches. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Recherches en Sciences de Gestion is the property of ISEOR and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

This analysis of the ethical issues raised by the relationship between caregiver and patient is based on the history of psychiatry and sensitivity to the ethical tensions that run through the field of psychiatry and mental health. Taking a step back from the injunction to treat well, not fetishizing it, adopting a holistic approach, equipping ourselves to counter the stigmatization and self-stigmatization that so often accompany psychic and/or psychosocial disability, and inviting reflection on proportionality in mental health are all ethical priorities that are insufficiently invested in psychiatric clinics., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

The study of mathematical knowledge in different contexts has acquired relevance due to the current interest in students' ability to use mathematics in solving real life problems. Thus, the purpose of this research is to characterize the knowledge in use in the measurement of inaccessible distances in Johann Stöffler's Elucidatio Fabricoe Ususque Astrolabii, published in 1513. The theoretical model used considers the study of the constitution of knowledge through the analysis of its genesis, development and transversality. The results reveal in the analyzed work an episteme of the measurement of inaccessible distances that includes both the search for a suitable reason to carry out the measurement and the dynamic analysis of the behavior of the shadows or the visual rays in the estimation of inclinations. This episteme is critical for the understanding of this mathematical knowledge in problem solving. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Face à la complexité de la comparaison entre les droits de l’Union européenne et de la Communauté andine caractérisés par une internationalisation pluraliste croissante, l’idée de coordination du pluriel appelle l’émergence de «macro-principes» pour penser l’universalité juridique, tant dans sa diversité que dans son unité, dans le cadre d’un système juridique supranational. Sur ce point, un constat liminaire s’impose: on ne peut aujourd’hui définir les frontières d’un droit communautaire internationalisé car elles sont floues et ouvertes. Il convient dès lors de prendre comme point de départ une étude du noyau de cette internationalisation qui passe par une comparaison de principes à vocation universelle («macro principes»). En ce sens, la proportionnalité et la subsidiarité peuvent faire l’objet d’une analyse à travers une étude comparée de la jurisprudence de la CJUE et du TJCA. Le premier principe peut ainsi être vu comme un moyen de coordination de droits communautaire tandis que le second se révèle être un outil de coordination de compétences communautaires.

Most modern legal systems recognize right of self-defense as justifying fact, although it requires that the defense respects strict conditions, namely that it is current, necessary and proportionate to the attack. These conditions are then not respected, so we might observe that there is an exceeding of the limits of self-defense, and this is why the action becomes punishable. In the absence of proper provisions of exceeding the limits of self-defense text, we use the general rules. Thus, if the act is voluntary, the excess is too, if it is in good faith due to carelessness or negligence, then we invoke an involuntary offense, we call on an intentional offence, if there is a criminal qualification to the fault; or if we are unable to estimate the circumstances of the facts, we considerer that there is no fault, and finally whether the excess is based on an error according to the law, there will be no punishable fault because the causes of defense were objective. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Bucharest University Annals - Law Series is the property of CH Beck Publishing House and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Romanian Review of Private Law / Revista Română de Drept Privat is the property of Universul Juridic Publishing House and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Nous étudions l’activité évaluative de dix-huit professeurs stagiaires – professeurs des écoles (enseignement primaire) et professeurs de mathématiques (enseignement secondaire) – confrontés à des productions d’élèves en mathématiques. Les observations réalisées visent principalement l’identification du référent de l’évaluateur. Le dispositif de recherche organisé autour d’une « situation aménagée » permet de proposer des conditions expérimentales analogues pour tous les professeurs. Les analyses réalisées nous amènent à distinguer quatre profils de comportements évaluatifs et à relever plusieurs phénomènes évaluatifs.

The problem of multiple offence sentencing is both common and perplexing. It has recently attracted the attention of several leading sentencing scholars, but a principled response still seems elusive. A totality approach ought not to undermine proportionality. Perhaps the answer will require different approaches for different categories of problems. High end offences, attracting long sentences, can be distinguished as one category. For this group, totality is the sentencing driver, not a limit. Restraint is the key. For non-high end offences, it is valuable to consider them in relation to higher levels of culpability to maintain both proportionality and restraint. Here, totality is a limit, not the driver. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The importance of the arithmetical proportion is unquestionable from two points of view: school mathematics and its practical application. Its importance is reflected in a series of works in the Mathematics Education field, which is our main topic. In this article we show an historical review of some of the main concepts related to the arithmetical proportion, such as ratio and proportion. Besides its importance, as an historical study, we believe that the conclusions that follow this research may be useful in order to improve the teaching of ideas, concepts and techniques involved. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of ERA Forum is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Increasingly, risk assessments are being adopted throughout the criminal justice system in Canada, and they are playing a significant role in the preparation of pre-sentence reports. Over the past five years, nine of Canada's jurisdictions have adopted the use of risk assessments for the preparation of youth pre-sentencing reports (PSR). While ample theoretical knowledge about risk exists, there are noticeably fewer empirical studies of how risk frameworks (re)shape and (re)organize local institutional decision-making practices or of what the socio-political effects of these processes are. Drawing on interviews, case law review, and analyses of risk-assessment documents, this article considers the implications of using risk assessments in the preparation of youth pre-sentencing reports (PSRs). In particular, attention is paid to the tensions between emerging risk practices and the emphasis on proportional sentencing under the Youth Criminal Justice Act (YCJA). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of European Journal of Population is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)