Search

Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are non-coding RNAs longer than 200 nucleotides with dynamic regulatory functions. They interact with a wide range of molecules such as DNA, RNA, and proteins to modulate diverse cellular functions through several mechanisms and, if deregulated, they can lead to cancer development and progression. Recently, it has been described that lncRNAs are susceptible to form gene fusions with mRNAs or other lncRNAs, breaking the paradigm of gene fusions consisting mainly of protein-coding genes. However, their biological significance in the tumor phenotype is still uncertain. Therefore, their recent identification opens a new line of research to study their biological role in tumorigenesis, and their potential as biomarkers with clinical relevance or as therapeutic targets. The present study aimed to review the lncRNA fusions identified so far and to know which of them have been associated with a potential function. We address the current challenges to deepen their study as well as the reasons why they represent a future therapeutic window in cancer., (© 2023 The Authors. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of KeAi Communications Co., Ltd.)

In triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), only 30% of patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy achieve a pathological complete response after treatment and more than 90% die due to metastasis formation. The diverse clinical responses and metastatic developments are attributed to extensive intrapatient genetic heterogeneity and tumor evolution acting on this neoplasm. In this work, we aimed to evaluate genomic alterations and tumor evolution in TNBC patients with aggressive disease. We sequenced the whole exome of 16 lesions from four patients who did not respond to therapy, and took several follow-up samples, including samples from tumors before and after treatment, as well as from the lymph nodes and skin metastases. We found substantial intrapatient genetic heterogeneity, with a variable tumor mutational composition. Early truncal events were MCL1 amplifications. Metastatic lesions had deletions in RB1 and PTEN , along with TERT , AKT2 , and CCNE1 amplifications. Mutational signatures 06 and 12 were mainly detected in skin metastases and lymph nodes. According to phylogenetic analysis, the lymph node metastases occurred at an early stage of TNBC development. Finally, each patient had three to eight candidate driving mutations for targeted treatments. This study delves into the genomic complexity and the phylogenetic and evolutionary development of aggressive TNBC, supporting early metastatic development, and identifies specific genetic alterations associated with a response to targeted therapies.

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) presents a marked diversity at the molecular level, which promotes a clinical heterogeneity that further complicates treatment. We performed a detailed whole exome sequencing profile of 29 Mexican patients with long follow-up TNBC to identify genomic alterations associated with overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and pathologic complete response (PCR), with the aim to define their role as molecular predictive factors of treatment response and prognosis. We detected 31 driver genes with pathogenic mutations in TP53 (53%), BRCA1/2 (27%), CDKN1B (9%), PIK3CA (9%), and PTEN (9%), and 16 operative mutational signatures. Moreover, tumors with mutations in BRCA1/2 showed a trend of sensitivity to platinum salts. We found an association between deficiency in DNA repair and surveillance genes and DFS. Across all analyzed tumors we consistently found a heterogeneous molecular complexity in terms of allelic composition and operative mutational processes, which hampered the definition of molecular traits with clinical utility. This work contributes to the elucidation of the global molecular alterations of TNBC by providing accurate genomic data that may help forthcoming studies to improve treatment and survival. This is the first study that integrates genomic alterations with a long follow-up of clinical variables in a Latin American population that is an underrepresented ethnicity in most of the genomic studies.

Metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is a challenge for oncologists, and public efforts should focus on identifying additional molecular markers and therapeutic management to improve clinical outcomes. Among all diagnosed cases of breast cancer (BC; approximately 10%) involve metastatic disease; notably, approximately 40% of patients with early‑stage BC develop metastasis within 5 years. The management of MBC consists of systemic therapy. Despite different treatment options, the 5‑year survival rate is <20%, which may be due to a lack of response with de novo or acquired resistance. MicroRNAs (miRNAs or miRs) are promising biomarkers as they are readily detectable and have a broad spectrum and potential clinical applications. The aim of this study was to identify a miRNA profile for distinguishing patients with MBC who respond to systemic treatment. Patients with MBC were treated according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. We performed miRNA‑Seq on 9 primary tumors using the Thermo Fisher Scientific Ion S5 system. To obtain global miRNA profiles, we carried out differentially expressed gene elimination strategy (DEGES) analysis between the responsive and non‑responsive patients. The results identified a profile of 12 miRNAs associated with the response to systemic treatment. The data were validated in an independent cohort (TCGA database). Based on the results, the upregulation of miR‑342‑3p and miR‑187‑3p was associated with the response to systemic treatment, and with an increased progression‑free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS); by contrast, the downregulation of miR‑301a‑3p was associated with a higher PFS and OS. On the whole, the findings of this study indicate that these miRNAs may serve as biomarkers for the response to systemic treatment or the prognosis of patients with MBC. However, these data should be validated experimentally in other robust cohorts and using different specimens before implementing these miRNAs as biomarkers in clinical practice to benefit this group of patients.