Search

The short- and long-term efficacy of oral encainide was studied in 14 patients with chronic high-frequency ventricular arrhythmias and in 14 patients with chronic frequent episodes of non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT). Encainide efficacy was assessed during a dose–titration perios and in a 36-month follow-up alos studying the drug effects on routine haematologic data and left ventricular function (LVF). During does–litration, encainide caused a 78.3% decrease in the average hourly frequency of isolated PVC and a 96.1% reduction in NSVT episodes in the two groups pf patients. On follow-up (11 patients in each group) the mean percentage redutions were 95.1% in isolated PVC and 99.7% in NSVT episodes. Encainide did not impair LVF as showed by the comparision of echocardiographic fractional shortening before and after 12 months of treatment. Minor adverse effects of encainide were dose-related visual disturbances in two patients. A major adverse effect was the apperance of sustained VT in one NYHA class IV patient. Oral encainide effectively reduces the frequency of PVC and NSVT, it does not impair left ventricular function and it is associated with infrequent minor side effects. Uncommon, but severe, side effects may appear in patients with marked impairment of left ventricular function. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Background: Existing data on the impact of sex differences on transvenous lead extraction (TLE) outcomes in cardiac device patients are limited., Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of mechanical TLE in female patients., Methods: A retrospective evaluation was performed on 3051 TLE patients (group 1: female; group 2: male) from a single tertiary referral center. All individuals received treatment using single sheath mechanical dilation and various venous approaches as required., Results: Our analysis included 3051 patients (group 1: 750; group 2: 2301), with a total of 5515 leads handled with removal. Female patients were younger, had a higher left ventricular ejection fraction, and lower prevalences of coronary artery disease and diabetes mellitus. Infection was more common in male patients, whereas lead malfunction or abandonment were more frequent in female patients. Radiologic success was lower in female patients (95.8% vs 97.5%; P = .003), but there was no significant difference in clinical success between groups (97.2% vs 97.5%; P = .872). However, major complications (1.33% vs 0.60%; P <.001) and procedural mortality (0.4% vs 0.1%; P <.001) were higher in females compared to male patients. After multivariate analysis, female sex emerged as the only predictor of major complications, including deaths (odds ratio 3.96; 95% confidence interval 1.39-11.24)., Conclusion: TLE using unpowered simple mechanical sheaths in female patients is safe and effective, but is associated with lower radiologic success and higher complication rates and mortality than in males. This finding underscores the importance of recognizing sex differences in TLE outcomes., (© 2023 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Introduction: Transcatheter atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation is still carried out with continuous invasive radial arterial blood pressure (IBP) monitoring in many centers. Continuous noninvasive blood pressure (CNBP) measurement using the volume-clamp method is a noninvasive alternative method used in ICU. No data on CNBP reliability are available in the electrophysiology lab during AF ablation, where rhythm variations are common., Background: The objective of the present study was to compare continuous noninvasive arterial pressure measured with the ClearSight device (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA, USA) with invasive radial artery pressure used as the reference method during AF ablation., Methods: We prospectively enrolled 55 consecutive patients (age 62 ± 11 years, 80% male) undergoing transcatheter AF ablation (62% paroxysmal, 38% persistent) at our center. Standard of care IBP monitoring via a radial cannula and a contralateral noninvasive finger volume-clamp CNBP measurement device were positioned simultaneously in all patients for the entire procedure. Bland-Altman analysis was used to analyze the agreement between the two techniques., Results: A total of 1219 paired measurements for systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial pressure were obtained in 55 subjects, with a mean (SD) of 22 (9) measurements per patient. The mean bias (SD) was -12.97 (13.89) mmHg for systolic pressure (level of agreement -14.24-40.20; correlation coefficient 0.84), -1.85 (8.52) mmHg for diastolic pressure (level of agreement -18.54-14.84; correlation coefficient 0.77) and 2.31 (8.75) mmHg for mean pressure (level of agreement -14.84-19.46; correlation coefficient 0.85)., Conclusion: In patients undergoing AF ablation, CNBP monitoring with the ClearSight device showed acceptable agreement with IBP monitoring. Larger studies are needed to confirm the potential clinical implications of continuous noninvasive BP monitoring during AF ablation.

Purpose: The aim of the study was to compare the long-term clinical and electrical performance of Micra leadless pacemaker with transvenous single-chamber pacemaker (TV-VVI PM) in a high-volume centre for transvenous lead extraction (TLE)., Methods: One-hundred patients (group 1) undergoing Micra implant were matched with 100 patients undergoing TV-VVI PM implant (group 2) by age, sex, left ventricular systolic ejection fraction and previous TLE., Results: The implant procedure was successful in all patients. In group 1, the procedure duration was lower than in group 2 (43.86 ± 22.38 vs 58.38 ± 17.85 min, p < 0.001), while the fluoroscopy time was longer (12.25 ± 6.84 vs 5.32 ± 4.42 min, p < 0.001). There was no difference about the rate of septal implant at the right ventricle (76% vs 86%, p = 0.10). Patients were followed-up for a median of 12 months. No acute and chronic procedure-related complication was observed in group 1, while we reported acute complications in seven patients (7%, p = 0.02) and long-term complications in three patients (3%, p = 0.24), needing for a system revision in 6 cases (6%, p = 0.038), in group 2. One systemic infection occurred in TV-VVI PM group. Electrical measurements were stable during follow-up in both groups, with a longer estimated battery life in group 1 (mean delivered energy at threshold at discharge: 0.14 ± 0.21 vs 0.26 ± 0.22 μJ, p < 0.001)., Conclusion: Micra pacemaker implant is a safe and effective procedure, with a lower rate of acute complications and system revisions compared with TV-VVI PM, even in a real-life setting including patients who underwent TLE., (© 2020. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: Cardiac computed tomography (CT) is commonly used to study left atrial (LA) and pulmonary veins (PVs) anatomy before atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. The aim of the study was to determine the impact of pre-procedural cardiac CT with 3D reconstruction on procedural outcomes and radiological exposure in patients who underwent radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFA) of AF., Methods: In this registry, 493 consecutive patients (age 62 ± 8 years, 70% male) with paroxysmal (316) or persistent (177) AF who underwent first procedure of RFA were included. A pre-procedural CT scan was obtained in 324 patients (CT group). Antral pulmonary vein isolation was performed in all patients using an open-irrigation-tip catheter with a 3D electroanatomical navigation system. Procedural outcome, including radiological exposure, and clinical outcomes were compared among patients who underwent RFA with (CT group) and without (no CT group) pre-procedural cardiac CT., Results: Acute PV isolation was obtained in all patients, with a comparable overall complication rate between CT and no CT group (4.3% vs 3%, p = 0.7). No differences were observed about mean duration of the procedure (231 ± 60 vs 233 ± 58 min, p = 0.7) and fluoroscopy time (13 ± 10 vs 13 ± 8 min, p = 0.6) among groups. Cumulative radiation dose resulted significantly higher in the CT group compared with no CT group (8.9 ± 24 vs 4.8 ± 15 mSv, P = 0.02). At 1 year, freedom from AF/atrial tachycardia were comparable among groups (CT group, 227/324 (70%), vs no CT group,119/169 (70%), p = ns)., Conclusions: Pre-procedural CT does not improve safety and efficacy of AF ablation, increasing significantly the cumulative radiological exposure.

To evaluate predictors of zero-X ray procedures for supraventricular arrhythmias (SVT) using minimally fluoroscopic approach (MFA). Patients referred for RF catheter ablation of SVT were admitted for a MFA with an electro-anatomical navigation system or a conventional fluoroscopic approach (ConvA). Exclusion criterion was the need to perform a transseptal puncture. 206 patients (98 men, age 53 ± 19 years) underwent an EP study, 93 (45%) with an MFA and 113 (55%) with a ConvA. Fifty-five had no inducible arrhythmias (EPS). Fifty-four had AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT), 49 patients had typical atrial flutter (AFL), 37 had AV reciprocating tachycardia (AVRT/WPW), 11 had focal atrial tachycardia (AT), and underwent a RF ablation. X-ray was not used at all in 51/93 (58%) procedures (zero X ray). MFA was associated with a significant reduction in total fluoroscopy time (5.5 ± 10 vs 13 ± 18 min, P = 0.01) and operator radiation dose (0.8 ± 2.5 vs 3 ± 8.2 mSV, P < 0.05). The greatest absolute dose reduction was observed in AVNRT (0.1 ± 0.3 vs 5.1 ± 10 mSV, P = 0.01, 98% relative dose reduction) and in AFL (1.3 ± 3.6 vs 11 ± 16 mSV, P = 0.003, 88% relative dose reduction) groups. Both AVNRT or AFL resulted the only statistically significant predictors of zero x ray at multivariate analysis (OR 4.5, 95% CI 1.5-13 and OR 5, 95% CI 1.7-15, P < 0.001, respectively). Success and complication rate was comparable between groups (P = NS). Using MFA for SVT ablation, radiological exposure is significantly reduced. Type of arrhythmia is the strongest predictor of zero X ray procedure.

Aims: Optimal management of redundant or malfunctioning leads is controversial. We aimed to assess safety and efficacy of mechanical transvenous lead extraction (TLE) in patients with abandoned leads., Methods and Results: Consecutive TLE procedures performed in our centre from January 2009 to December 2017 were considered. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of mechanical TLE in patients with abandoned (Group 1) compared to non-abandoned (Group 2) leads. We analysed 1210 consecutive patients that required transvenous removal of 2343 leads. Group 1 accounted for 250 patients (21%) with a total of 617 abandoned leads (26%). Group 2 comprised 960 patients (79%) with 1726 leads (74%). The total number of leads (3.0 vs. 2.0), dwelling time of the oldest lead (108.00 months vs. 60.00 months) and infectious indications for TLE were higher in Group 1. Clinical success was achieved in 1168 patients (96.5%) with a lower rate in Group 1 (90.4% vs. 98.1%; P < 0.001). Major complications occurred in only 9 patients (0.7%), without significant differences among the two groups. The presence of one or more abandoned leads [odds ratio (OR) 3.47; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.07-11.19; P = 0.037] and dwelling time of the oldest lead (OR 1.01 for a month; 95% CI 1.01-1.02; P < 0.001) were associated with a higher risk of clinical failure., Conclusion: Transvenous mechanical lead extraction is a safe procedure also in high-risk settings, as patients with abandoned leads. Success rate resulted a bit lower, especially in the presence of abandoned leads with long implantation time., (Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author(s) 2020. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Aims: We aimed at investigating the feasibility and outcome of Micra implant in patients who have previously undergone transvenous lead extraction (TLE), in comparison to naïve patients implanted with the same device., Methods and Results: Eighty-three patients (65 males, 78.31%; 77.27 ± 9.96 years) underwent Micra implant at our centre. The entire cohort was divided between 'post-extraction' (Group 1) and naïve patients (Group 2). In 23 of 83 patients (20 males, 86.96%; 73.83 ± 10.29 years), Micra was implanted after TLE. Indication to TLE was an infection in 15 patients (65.21%), leads malfunction in four (17.39%), superior vena cava syndrome in three (13.05%), and severe tricuspid regurgitation in one case (4.35%). The implant procedure was successful in all patients and no device-related events occurred at follow-up (median: 18 months; interquartile range: 1-24). No differences were observed between groups in fluoroscopy time (13.88 ± 10.98 min vs. 13.15 ± 6.64 min, P = 0.45), single device delivery (Group 1 vs. Group 2: 69.56% vs. 55%, P = 0.22), electrical performance at implant and at 12-month follow-up (Group 1 vs. Group 2: pacing threshold 0.48 ± 0.05 V/0.24 ms vs. 0.56 ± 0.25 V/0.24 ms, P = 0.70; impedance 640 ± 148.83 Ohm vs. 583.43 ± 99.7 Ohm, P = 0.27; and R wave amplitude 10.33 ± 2.88 mV vs. 12.62 ± 5.31 mV, P = 0.40). A non-apical site of implant was achievable in the majority of cases (72.3%) without differences among groups (78.26% vs. 70%; P = 0.42)., Conclusion: Micra implant is an effective and safe procedure in patients still requiring a ventricular pacing after TLE, with similar electrical performance and outcome compared with naïve patients at long-term follow-up., (Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author(s) 2019. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Aims: To demonstrate the feasibility and long-term performances of a non-apical Micra pacemaker implantation., Methods and Results: Fifty-two consecutive patients underwent Micra implantation, targeting a non-apical site of delivery when feasible. Each patient received a regular follow-up (mean 13 ± 9 months). The first 17 patients were also enrolled in the Micra transcatheter pacing system trial (Group 1); the remaining ones presented broader indications and included post-extraction subjects (Group 2). In 19 of 52 patients (Group 1: 6%, Group 2: 51%; P = 0.002) Micra was implanted because of high-risk characteristics that discouraged the implantation of a traditional pacemaker. In 31 of 52 patients (60%) Micra was implanted in a non-apical location, with a lower rate of single delivery compared with apical sites (48% vs. 81%, P = 0.035), but without any impact on electrical performance. Pacing threshold remained optimal in the majority of patients (94%), regardless of the site of implantation (apical vs. non-apical location: 0.50 vs. 0.52 V/0.24 ms; P = 0.856) and group membership, with only 6% of the subjects showing elevated values (mean 1.92 ± 0.92 V/0.24 ms) at the last follow-up. No device-related adverse events were registered., Conclusion: Micra pacemaker implant is a safe and effective procedure even in a real life cohort of high-risk patients. A non-apical site of implantation is feasible in the majority of patients allowing stable electrical performance at long-term follow-up.

Introduction: Increasing device implantations, patient comorbidities, and longer life expectancy contribute to an increased need for lead extraction. Even if transvenous lead extraction (TLE) is a highly successful procedure, some serious procedural complications are reported. In order to identify those patients who are at higher risk, risk stratification scores were proposed. Areas covered: The major obstacles to lead extractions are represented by the body's response to the foreign implanted material and by the following development of fibrotic reaction between the lead and the vascular system. Several clinical factors and device features are associated with major complications and worse outcomes. Although different multiparametric scores predicting the safety and the efficacy of TLE procedures were reported, none of these scores were prospective evaluated. Expert commentary: A correct risk stratification is needed in order to refer complex patients to centers with proven experience and avoid futile procedures. Furthermore, the identification of high-risk patients allows to perform the extraction procedure in the operating room instead of electrophysiology lab. Albeit some risk scores able to predict adverse event in cardiac lead extraction were described, there are still several limitations to their use and reproducibility.

The implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) is today an indisputable evidence-based treatment for cardiac sudden death both in primary and secondary prevention. However many clinical conditions that would represent an indication to ICD implantation, according to guidelines, may be potentially reversible or may be accompanied by temporary contraindications to the implant. Moreover transvenous cardioverter defibrillator implantation still carries a not negligible risk of complications both acutely and at follow-up. The Wearable Cardioverter Defibrillator and the Subcutaneous Defibrillator are two recently developed technologies that can potentially overcome the aforementioned limitations of traditional transvenous ICDs. This review will discuss the main aspects of these 2 technologies, the data coming from clinical experiences and future perspectives.

Introduction: The implantation rate of cardiac implantable electronic devices has consistently increased in the last 20 years, as have the related complication rates. The most relevant issue is the removal of pacing and implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) leads, which a few months after implantation tend to develop intravascular fibrosis, often making extraction a challenging and risky procedure. Areas covered: The transvenous lead extraction (TLE) scenario is constantly evolving. TLE is a key procedure in lead management strategies. Many efforts have been made to develop new TLE approaches and techniques allowing a safe and effective procedure for patients. The increasing rate of cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) implantations and of CIED related complications highlight the importance of TLE. Lead related- and patient-related factors may change the future of extractions. We review the current status of TLE, focusing on the strategies available to perform the optimal procedure in the right patient and reducing procedure related complications. Expert commentary: Understanding the importance of an accurate TLE risk stratification is mandatory to optimize the procedural risk-to-benefits ratio. The use of adequate tools, techniques and approaches, and appropriate training are cornerstones for the achievement of safer procedures.

Introduction: Transvenous lead extraction (TLE) is the gold standard for lead removal. The increasing rate of cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) implantations and of CIED related complications highlight the importance of transvenous lead extraction ., Areas Covered: The TLE scenario is constantly changing. Optimizing lead related technology and improving TLE practice across the world are the cornerstones to improving safety and efficacy. We review the state of the art in TLE, focusing on potential future implications and improvements in terms of skills and technologies. Expert commentary: The increased number of extractions will increase the necessity of safe and effective TLE. New technologies, techniques and appropriate training is warranted across the world.

Sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias represent a kind of complication shared by a number of clinical presentations of heart disease, sometimes leading to sudden cardiac death. Many efforts have been made in the fight against such a complication, mainly being represented by the implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). In recent years, catheter ablation has grown as a means to effectively treat patients with sustained ventricular arrhythmias, in the contest of different cardiac substrates. Since carrying an ICD is associated with a potential risk deriving from its possible infective or malfunctioning complications, and given the current effectiveness of lead extraction procedures, it has been thought not to be unreasonable to ask ourselves about how to deal with ICD patients who have been successfully treated by means of ablation of their ventricular arrhythmias. To date, no control data have been published on transvenous lead extraction in the setting of VT ablation. In this paper we will review the current evidence about ICD therapy, catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias and lead extraction, trying to outline some considerations about how to face this new clinical issue.

Background: Riata (RT) and Sprint Fidelis (SF) leads were recalled by the United States Food and Drug Administration because of an increased rate of failure mainly due to conductor fracture or insulation abrasion. According to lead design and type of failure, extraction complexity may be different, potentially affecting procedural outcomes and indications., Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess the extraction profile of RT leads with and without cable externalization in comparison to SF leads., Methods: From January 1997 to April 2014, all consecutive RT and SF leads extracted transvenously were analyzed. Among 661 consecutive patients with 705 ventricular implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) leads extracted, 194 patients with 134 RT leads (RT group) and 61 SF leads (SF group) were identified. Removal indications often were infective (64%), and extracted leads had a prevalence of dual-coil design (89%). Baseline patients and lead characteristics were comparable between groups., Results: Success rate was high in both groups (97.8% RT vs 100% SF) without major complications. Mechanical dilation was comparable between groups, but RT leads often required larger sheaths (11.7 ± 1.4 vs 11.3 ± 1.4), a more frequent crossover to the internal transjugular approach (14% vs 3%), and a longer procedural time (23 ± 33 minutes vs 12 ± 16 minutes). Implantation time (odds ratio 4.84, 95% confidence interval 1.05-22.2, P = .042) and RT leads (odds ratio 1.04, 95% confidence interval 1.02-1.06, P <.001) were independent predictors of the internal transjugular approach., Conclusion: Extraction of RT leads is feasible and effective. However, extraction of RT leads is more complex than that of SF leads. Lack of coil backfilling and cable externalization in RT group may account for these differences., (Copyright © 2015 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The implantable cardioverter defibrillator is today an indisputable evidence-based treatment for cardiac sudden death both in primary and secondary prevention. However, trans-venous cardioverter defibrillator implantation still carries a not negligible risk of complications both acutely and during follow-up. Trans-venous endocardial lead is the weak link of implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) technology being the source of most mechanical complications on vessels and heart structures and exposed to infection, malfunction and recalls. A totally subcutaneous defibrillation lead has recently been introduced in clinical practice. With the subcutaneous pulse generator forms a defibrillation system that leaves the vessels and the heart completely "untouched." Subcutaneous ICD has proven to be safe and effective in many clinical trials. Patients without pacing indications and at higher risk of complications from trans-venous lead implantation represent the perfect candidates to S-ICD technology. However, with technical improvement, it is reasonable to expect a further expansion of indications.

Background: Percutaneous removal of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) leads is a difficult procedure because of the consequence of massive fibrous tissue growth along the lead., Objective: The purpose of this study was to describe the occurrence and location of fibrous adherences in ICD lead extraction and to identify potential predictors among patient and lead characteristics., Methods: We studied 637 consecutive patients who underwent transvenous extraction of 678 ICD leads from 1997 to 2013., Results: Procedural success rate was 99%, without major complications. Areas of adherence were found in the subclavian vein (78%), innominate vein (65%), superior vena cava (66%), and heart (73%). Dwell-time, passive fixation, and dual-coil lead design were independently associated with adherences. Dual-coil lead design was associated with adherences in the innominate vein and superior vena cava, whereas coil treatment (eg, expandable polytetrafluoroethylene-coated or medical adhesive back-filled strategies) prevented adherences. Passive fixation mechanism was associated with adherences in the heart., Conclusion: ICD leads, after long dwell-time, are affected by fibrous adherences uniformly distributed along the lead course. Lead features represent major predictors of the phenomenon. Careful lead selection is recommended at the time of implantation to prevent adherences. In addition, lead-related risk stratification is mandatory before a transvenous extraction procedure., (Copyright © 2014 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Aims: We report our 15 years experience of a mechanical single-sheath technique with a multiple venous entry-site approach. We evaluated the effectiveness and safety of this technique in implantable defibrillator (ICD) lead extraction and investigated the potential association between clinical and lead-related factors and procedural complexity., Methods and Results: The proposed technique consists of an initial attempt at manual traction, followed by mechanical dilatation performed through the venous entry-site and, if necessary, by crossover to the internal transjugular approach. The study cohort comprised 545 consecutive patients referred to our institution for transvenous lead extraction from January 1997 to December 2012. Initial manual traction resulted in the effective removal of 6% of leads. Mechanical dilatation increased the success rate to 89% when performed through the venous entry-site, and to 99% when subsequently attempted via the internal jugular vein. No major complications were associated with lead extraction. Dwell-time, a passive fixation mechanism and dual-coil lead design were independently associated with the need for mechanical dilatation. However, dwell-time was the only variable associated with crossover to the internal transjugular approach. Specifically, a dwell-time of 20 months best predicted the need for venous entry-site mechanical dilatation, while a value of 55 months predicted crossover to the internal transjugular approach., Conclusion: Mechanical transvenous extraction of ICD leads is a complex but safe and effective procedure. A longer lead dwell-time is associated with the need for mechanical dilatation and for crossover to the internal transjugular approach; this should be considered when planning the removal procedure. Moreover, passive lead fixation and dual-coil lead design predict a more challenging extraction procedure., (Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author 2014. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Recent publications have identified a different epidemiological prevalence related to sex in some of the most common supraventricular and ventricular arrhythmias. This fact is attributed to the effect of sex hormones on myocardial cell electrophysiology. Women, in particular, have a higher prevalence than males with regard to intranodal reentrant tachycardia, idiopathic monomorphic ventricular tachycardia and ventricular arrhythmias in congenital or acquired long QT syndrome. A higher incidence in females with regard to complications during atrial fibrillation has also been reported. This paper examines data from the literature regarding gender differences in the prevalence of the most common arrhythmias, the causes of these differences, and some discriminating aspects related to female sex in the architecture of published clinical studies.

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate procedural outcomes of coronary sinus (CS) lead extraction, focusing on predictors and need for mechanical dilatation (MD) in the event that manual traction (MT) is ineffective., Methods: The study assessed results in 145 consecutive patients (age 69 ± 10 years; 121 men)--a total of 147 CS pacing leads--who underwent transvenous CS lead removal between January 2000 and March 2010., Results: All leads but one (99%) (implantation time 29 ± 25 months) were successfully removed. MT was effective in 103 (70%), and MD was necessary in the remaining 44 (30%) procedures. In multivariate analyses, unipolar design (odds ratio [OR] 3.22, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.43-7.7; P = 0.005) and noninfective indication (OR 4.8, 95% CI 1.8-13, P = 0.002) were independent predictors for MD (P < 0.0001), with a predictive trend for prior cardiac surgery (OR 2.2, 95% CI 0.98-5.26; P = 0.06). Five (3.4%) complex procedures required a transfemoral vein approach (TFA) or repeat procedure. No deaths occurred, and there was one major complication (0.7%), cardiac tamponade, after MT. No complication predictors were identified., Conclusions: CS leads were safely and effectively removed in nearly all patients, and 70% were removed with MT alone; 30% required MD. Preoperative predictors suggesting the need for MD or TFA were noninfective indication and unipolar lead design. Complications were rare, and there was no predictable pattern among MT or MD removal techniques., (©2011, The Authors. Journal compilation ©2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

We described a 77-year-old patient, previously implanted with a dual-chamber pacemaker later upgraded to a cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillator (CRT-D) device with an active-fixation coronary sinus pacing lead, who underwent a transvenous mechanical extraction procedure for a device-related systemic infection. All leads were removed successfully with a transvenous approach. With regard to the coronary sinus (CS) lead (Attain 4195 StarFix, Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA), manual traction was ineffective and extraction required long and challenging mechanical dilatation up to distal CS using either conventional sheaths or modified CS lead delivery., (©2010, The Authors. Journal compilation ©2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Background: In the Endotak Reliance G defibrillating leads (Guidant Corporation, St. Paul, MN, USA), coils are covered with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) to prevent tissue ingrowth. The aim of the study was to evaluate transvenous extraction performance, outcomes, and fibrotic adherences rate of ePTFE defibrillating leads in comparison to traditional non-ePTFE cardiac defibrillator (ICD) leads., Methods: Seventeen consecutive ICD recipients (ePTFE Group A, 16 men, mean age 66 ± 12 years) with 17 Endotak Reliance G dual-coil ICD leads (mean implantation time 23 ± 26 months) underwent a transvenous removal procedure. They were compared with two control groups, including 20 Sprint Quattro 6944 (non-ePTFE Group B; Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA) and 36 Riata 1570 ICD leads (non-ePTFE Group C; St. Jude Medical, St. Paul, USA). The indication for lead extraction was local infection in 35 patients (48%), sepsis in 24 patients (33%), and lead malfunction in 14 patients (19%)., Results: In all groups, all leads were successfully and completely removed without major complications. Overall manual traction was effective in six patients (8%) and more effective in the ePTFE Group (29%) compared to Group B (0%) and Group C (3%) (P = 0.001). Sixty-seven leads (92%) required mechanical dilatation by the venous entry site approach, with a shorter extraction time in the ePTFE Group (5 ± 11 min) compared to Group B (21 ± 22 min) and Group C (16 ± 22 min) (P = 0.003). ePTFE leads showed a lower rate of fibrotic adherences at the superior vena cava level (P = 0.01) without statistically significant differences in the other sites., Conclusions: ePTFE-covered leads may be removed more easily and quickly than non-ePTFE leads, requiring less frequently mechanical dilatation., (©2010, The Authors. Journal compilation ©2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

A dual-coil defibrillation lead was inserted in a 64-year-old male through a persistent left superior vena cava draining into the coronary sinus. The lead, connected to a cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implanted in the left pectoral area, was looped in the right atrium positioning the proximal and distal lead coils in the coronary sinus and right ventricular outflow track respectively and resulting in a low and stable defibrillation threshold. Because of its relative ease and effectiveness, this procedure may be recommended in patients with persistent left superior vena cava requiring an ICD implant.

Radiofrequency ablation inside the coronary sinus (CS) is associated with the risk of vein stenosis, or perforation or damage to the circumflex artery. Cryothermic ablation has proved less harmful, but there are no data on its use within a venous structure. A patient with a posterolateral accessory pathway underwent several unsuccessful attempts at endocardial ablation. Ablation then was performed with cool energy within the CS, where the shortest VA interval and a possible Kent potential were recorded. Selective left coronary angiography showed a normal circumflex artery and the absence of lesions of the CS. Six months later, the patient was asymptomatic without taking antiarrhythmic drugs. We conclude that cryoablation within the CS may be effective and safe.

Background: Aim of the study was to evaluate the prognostic and decision making value of Holter detected myocardial ischemia after acute myocardial infarction in comparison with clinically detected postinfarction angina and exercise test., Methods: To this aim the patients consecutively admitted to our coronary care unit with acute myocardial infarction during one year were retrospectively evaluated. One hundred and eighty-nine patients (age 70+/-11 years, 137 male and 51 female) had a 24 hour Holter monitoring. One-year follow up of these patients was obtained., Results: Myocardial ischemia was detected by Holter monitoring in 21 patients (11%), 4 with and 17 without angina. Symptom limited exercise test was obtained before discharge in 116 patients (62%): 45% were positive, 42% non-diagnostic and 13 negative for myocardial ischemia. Post infarction angina was present in 15 patients (9%). Patients with Holter detected myocardial ischemia were older (73+/-10 vs 66+/-11 years, p<0.05) and had higher prevalence of both angina and positive exercise test (p<0.01). One-year follow up was obtained in 186 patients. Holter detected myocardial ischemia positive predictive value for death or reinfarction was 15%, negative predictive value was 90%, similar to the absence of angina (90%) and the absence of positive exercise test (93%). Angina and exercise test identified 62% of patients with Holter detected myocardial ischemia. Residual myocardial ischemia was exclusively observed by Holter monitoring in 4% of the population, particularly in 1 patients with and 7 without exercise test., Conclusions: The additive contribution of Holter detected myocardial ischemia in the prognosis and decision making of post infarction patients is rather scanty.

Background: Morphological and functional changes induced by aging can hamper a clear distinction between pathological or paraphysiological phenomena in very old people. The incidence of hyperkinetic ventricular arrhythmias, for example, progressively increases in the elderly, even in the absence of overt cardiac disease., Methods: One-hundred fifty-two clinically stable patients older than 80 years, submitted within 15 days to clinical evaluation, 24-hour continuous ambulatory ECG monitoring and echo Doppler examination, in the absence of antiarrhythmic treatment, were retrospectively selected in order to evaluate the incidence of ventricular arrhythmias, in patients with and without significant heart disease. The further aim of the study was to correlate the number of arrhythmias with left ventricular morphological and functional parameters, echocardiographically assessed. From the initial population, 80 patients (41 males, age 83 +/- 3 years) had significant heart disease (ischemic, hypertensive or valvular): Group I. Seventy-two patients (30 males, age 83 +/- 3 years) had no clinical or instrumental signs of heart disease: Group II., Results: Considering echocardiographic data, Group I patients had a significantly higher left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (52 +/- 6 mm vs 47 +/- 4 mm, p < 0.01), lower ejection fraction (57 +/- 10% vs 64 +/- 6%, p < 0.01) and higher mass (275 +/- 84 g vs 208 +/- 46 g, p < 0.01), when compared with Group II. From ECG monitoring data, significant differences between the two groups were recorded in the incidence of premature ventricular beats per hour (79 +/- 163 vs 15 +/- 34, Group I vs Group II, p < 0.01) and presence of complex phenomena (couplets, triplets and runs: 51% vs 22%, p < 0.01). In old patients with documented cardiac disease a significant correlation was present between premature ventricular beats incidence and left ventricular end diastolic diameter (r = 0.39, p < 0.05) and left ventricular ejection fraction (r = 0.40, p < 0.05), while in patients without heart disease, no significant correlation was found between incidence of premature ventricular beats and echocardiographic morpho-functional parameters., Conclusions: In conclusion, hyperkinetic ventricular arrhythmias are globally frequent in old persons of very advanced age (more than 80 years), but, also in this subset, a significant distinction in terms of incidence and severity of arrhythmias is present between subjects with and without cardiac disease. A significant correlation between incidence of premature beats and non-invasive morpho-functional left ventricular parameters is present only for patients with overt heart disease.

Background: Nisoldipine, a dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker with strong coronary dilatative action, is commonly used in the treatment of myocardial ischaemia; its beneficial effect on effort angina has been demonstrated by several previous reports. Infusion of dipyridamole in doses sufficient to provoke myocardial ischaemia in patients with significant coronary artery disease is used safely in imaging studies for diagnostic purposes., Objective: To evaluate the potential effect of nisoldipine on dipyridamole-induced ischaemia and to compare the results with the effect of nisoldipine on exercise-induced ischaemia., Method: Twelve patients (10 men and two women, mean age 62 +/- 8 years) with significant coronary artery disease (at least 70% lumen reduction in at least one major coronary vessel) were selected for inclusion in the study. In accordance with the inclusion criteria, the patients exhibited an ischaemic diagnostic response to a multistage exercise electrocardiography stress test (> 0.15 mV ST segment depression compared with the resting electrocardiographic tracing) and to a dipyridamole-echocardiography test (transient left ventricular dyssynergy of contraction during infusion of dipyridamole up to 0.84 mg/kg over 10 min), after 3 days' cessation of antianginal treatment. After treatment with oral nisoldipine (10 mg twice daily) was introduced, the patients repeated the two tests, within 18 days of the first evaluation., Results: The dipyridamole-echocardiography test was positive for ischaemia in 12 patients who were not receiving nisoldipine and in eight patients who were receiving the drug (100% and 67% respectively, P < 0.05). In the eight patients who gave positive dipyridamole-echocardiography tests both with and without treatment, dipyridamole time (time to onset of dyssynergy during the test) increased from 7.9 +/- 2.9 min to 10.2 +/- 3.1 min (P < 0.01). In these patients, no significant changes were observed, at ischaemia, in the severity and extent of induced dyssynergy, evaluated as wall motion score index (each of 16 left ventricular segments scored from 1 = normal to 4 = dyskinetic) after treatment (score variations from baseline to ischaemia: 0.20 +/- 0.11 without nisoldipine and 0.16 +/- 0.06 with nisoldipine; NS). Variations in dipyridamole time (arbitrarily considered to be 15 min in the negative dipyridamole-echocardiography test) were significantly correlated with variations in exercise time (duration of exercise to exhaustion or diagnostic positive response on the electrocardiogram): r = 0.75 (P < 0.01). No significant differences were recorded in rate-pressure product (beats/min x mmHg x 100) at peak ischaemia between patients who were or were not receiving nisoldipine, during either the exercise electrocardiography stress test (233 +/- 36 with nisoldipine and 244 +/- 39 without nisoldipine; NS) or the dipyridamole-echocardiography test (147 +/- 21 with nisoldipine and 133 +/- 30 without nisoldipine; NS)., Conclusion: Nisoldipine treatment can protect from dipyridamole-induced ischaemia, being associated with a longer stress time, and completely preventing the development of ischaemia in some patients. The therapy-induced changes in ischaemic threshold during the dipyridamole-echocardiography test correlate with variations in exercise tolerance.