Search

Background: Awareness of sarcopenia and frailty is growing and both are known to be potentially reversible with effective resistance training. We aimed to establish whether existing exercise programmes offered to people with sarcopenia or frailty adhere to the known evidence base. Methods: We conducted a national on-line survey of practitioners delivering exercise programmes to older people with sarcopenia or frailty. The link to the online survey was distributed through the British Geriatrics Society, Chartered Society of Physiotherapy Special Interest Group for Older People (AGILE), the NHS England Future Collaboration Platform “Supporting People Living with Frailty” forum and social media. Questions covered target population and aims of the exercise programme, type, duration and frequency of exercise, progress assessment and outcomemeasures.Descriptive analyses were conducted using SPSS v24. Results: 136 responses were received from respondents who worked for NHS Trusts, clinical commissioning groups, private practices, and third sector providers. 94% of respondents reported prescribing or delivering exercise programmes to people with sarcopenia or frailty. Most programmes (81/135 [60%]) were primarily designed to prevent or reduce falls. Resistance training was reported as the main focus of the programme in only 11/123 (9%); balance training was the main focus in 61/123 (50%) and functional exercise in 28/123 (23%). Exercise was offered once a week or less by 81/124 (65%) of respondents; the median number of sessions offered was 8.5 (IQR 6 to 12). Outcome measures suitable for assessing the effect of resistance training programmes were reported by fewer than half of respondents (hand grip: 13/119 [11%]; chair stands: 55/119 [46%], short physical performance battery: 4/119 [3%]). Conclusions: Current exercise programmes offered to older people with sarcopenia or frailty lack the frequency, duration or specificity of exercise likely to improve outcomes for this group of patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The ageing global population is posing a significant challenge to healthcare systems worldwide. Healthcare needs have become more complex and the demand for services is ever increasing. Identification of frailty at the front door of hospitals can prompt comprehensive geriatric assessment and streamline patients to the most suitable clinical area. The United Kingdom has set a priority to develop front door services given the pressure on the National Health Service. A British Geriatrics Society survey has demonstrated that the majority of frailty assessments occur in the emergency department using the Clinical Frailty Scale. This survey prompted the creation of the setting up services guide and its key principles using a collaboration of experience from across the country. Understanding the systems that already exist and creating a network to enable a flow of care towards community teams is crucial to the successful provision of modern frailty attuned care., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Objectives: We surveyed healthcare staff working with older people to understand current practice in nutrition screening, initial management and referral for older people with sarcopenia and frailty., Methods: We conducted a UK-wide web-based survey of staff working with older people in both hospital and community settings. Surveys were distributed through professional organisation e-mail lists and social media channels. Descriptive data were generated from categorical responses and inductive thematic analysis was applied to free-text responses., Results: Data were analysed from 169 respondents (110 hospital, 59 community), representing 99 healthcare organisations. 91 (83%) hospital respondents and 24 (41%) community respondents reported that nutrition screening was performed on all patients with sarcopenia or frailty. The Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool was most commonly used to trigger referral to dietetics teams, but there was considerable variation in management before referral, referral thresholds and referral pathways. Themes derived from free-text responses included the need for training, issues of responsibility and ownership, inadequate resources (time, staff and equipment) and ineffective or inefficient processes for referral and management., Conclusions: Current UK nutritional care for older people with sarcopenia and frailty is heterogeneous. There are opportunities for better tools, processes, training and resources to improve current practice and pathways., (Copyright: © 2024 Hylonome Publications.)

Objectives: To establish whether existing exercise programmes offered to people with sarcopenia or frailty adhere to the current evidence base., Methods: We conducted a national survey of practitioners delivering exercise programmes to older people with sarcopenia or frailty in the UK. The link to the online survey was distributed through email lists of professional societies, practice networks and social media. Questions covered target population and programme aims, type, duration and frequency of exercise, progress assessment and outcome measures., Results: One hundred and thirty-six responses were received. 94% of respondents reported prescribing or delivering exercise programmes to people with sarcopenia or frailty. Most programmes (81/135 [60%]) were primarily designed to prevent or reduce falls. Resistance training was the main focus in only 11/123 (9%), balance training in 61/123 (50%) and functional exercise in 28/123 (23%). Exercise was offered once a week or less by 81/124 (65%) of respondents. Outcome measures suitable for assessing the effect of resistance training programmes were reported by fewer than half of respondents (hand grip: 13/119 [11%]; chair stands: 55/119 [46%])., Conclusions: Current UK exercise programmes offered to older people with sarcopenia or frailty lack the specificity, frequency or duration of exercise likely to improve outcomes for this patient group., Competing Interests: The authors have no conflict of interest., (Copyright: © 2020 Hylonome Publications.)

Background: checklists are increasingly proposed as a means to enhance safety and quality of care. However, their use has been met with variable levels of success. The Frailsafe project focused on introducing a checklist with the aim to increase completion of key clinical assessments and to facilitate communication for the care of older patients in acute admissions., Objectives: to examine the use of the Frailsafe checklist, including potential to contribute to improved safety, quality and reliability of care., Methods: 110 qualitative interviews and group discussions with healthcare professionals and other specialties, 172 h of ethnographic observation in 12 UK hospitals and reporting of high-level process data (completion of checklist and relevant frailty assessments). Qualitative analysis followed a thematic and theory-driven approach., Results: through use of the checklist, hospital teams identified limitations in their existing assessments (e.g. absence of delirium protocols) and practices (e.g. unnecessary catheter use). This contributed to hospitals reporting just 24.0% of sampled patients as having received all clinical assessments across key domains for this population for the duration of the project (1,687/7,021 checklists as fully completed). Staff perceptions and experiences of using the checklist varied significantly, primarily driven by the extent to which the aims of this quality improvement project aligned with local service priorities and pre-existing team communications styles., Conclusions: the Frailsafe checklist highlighted limitations with frailty assessment in acute care and motivated teams to review routine practices. Further work is needed to understand whether and how checklists can be embedded in complex, multidisciplinary care., (© The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Geriatrics Society.)

The number of people aged over 60 years worldwide is projected to rise from 605 million in 2000 to almost 2 billion by 2050, while those over 80 years will quadruple to 395 million. Two-thirds of UK acute hospital admissions are over 65, the highest consultation rate in general practice is in those aged 85-89 and the average age of elective surgical patients is increasing. Adjusting medical systems to meet the demographic imperative has been recognised by the World Health Organisation to be the next global healthcare priority and is a key feature of discussions on policy, health services structures, workforce reconfiguration and frontline care delivery.