Search

Although commercially produced complementary foods (CPCFs) are increasingly sold throughout Southeast Asia, concerns have been raised about CPCFs nutritional quality, labelling practices and the strength and scope of national CPCF regulations. The Consortium for Improving Complementary Foods in Southeast Asia (COMMIT), composed of UN agencies and civil society organizations, was formed to assess the nutrient gap in the diets of young children and the consumer, product and policy landscapes for CPCFs in seven Southeast Asian countries. Results from a nutrient gap assessment indicate that the diets of children aged 6–23 months are suboptimal and deficient in micronutrients. A consumer survey revealed that caretakers commonly use CPCFs, are conscious of the importance of nutrition and are influenced by label claims. Results from a CPCF benchmarking showed that many products sold in Southeast Asia contained added sugar or sweeteners, had a high total sugar and/or high sodium content and that no CPCF product adhered to all recommended labelling practices. Further, a legal review of national binding legal measures relevant to CPCFs showed minimal alignment with available global guidance. Urgent actions are necessary to strengthen national regulations related to CPCF nutrient composition and labelling practices. To speed progress, COMMIT developed a compendium of existing standards and global guidance to help countries align their national regulations with CPCF composition, labelling and production recommendations. Advocacy to garner public support for new or improved CPCF regulations, as well as strong government monitoring and enforcement of regulations, is crucial to support efforts to safeguard and improve the diets of older infants and young children in Southeast Asia. Key message: Poor diet quality is a major driver of the triple burden of malnutrition in Southeast Asia, where food environments are rapidly changing and commercially produced complementary foods (CPCFs) are widely available.CPCFs are routinely purchased for children 6–23 months of age because of their convenience and perceived nutritional value. COMMIT (Consortium for Improving Complementary Foods in Southeast Asia) found that caregivers' purchasing decisions are strongly influenced by CPCF labelling claims related to naturalness and healthfulness.Many CPCFs sold are fortified with micronutrients; however, 62% of cereals and ready‐to‐eat foods and 85% of snack and finger foods did not meet global nutritional standards and no products fully conformed to global CPCF labelling standards, which include the prohibition of claims.CPCFs that do not adhere to recommended nutrient composition and labelling requirements are unsuitable for children 6–36 months and should be prohibited from promotion. Legal measures in the seven countries studied are insufficient and require urgent action. A compendium of existing CPCF standards and global guidance, developed by COMMIT, can be used as a resource to update and strengthen national legislation to safeguard older infants and young child nutrition. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Ensuring consumption of nutrient‐dense, safe and appropriate complementary foods among older infants and young children (IYC) 6–36 months of age is critical for enabling optimal growth and development. The ubiquitous availability of and high demand for commercially packaged snack foods has culminated in a growing trend of snack food products specifically produced and promoted for older IYC. Commercially produced complementary foods (CPCF) that are finger foods/snacks often contain added sugars, excessive sodium content and high total sugar content, making them inappropriate for this young population. This study benchmarked the nutrient composition and labelling practices of CPCF finger foods/snacks available for purchase in seven countries in Southeast Asia. The study adapted a nutrient profiling model from the WHO Regional Office for Europe to determine the proportion of products suitable for promotion for older IYC. Of the total 606 products identified, 8.2% were automatically categorized as not suitable because they were confectionery items. Of the remaining 556 products assessed, over 85% failed to meet all nutrient composition requirements, with the presence of added sugars/sweeteners and excessive sodium and total sugar contents the primary reasons for failure. Products also demonstrated concerning labelling practices, with all of the products (98.6%) displaying an inappropriate claim on the label. These findings reveal major concerns with the nutrient composition and labelling practices of CPCF finger foods/snacks in the SEA region and should serve as an alarm bell for regulatory action. National binding legal measures, such as mandatory standards for composition and labelling are urgently needed. Key messages: CPCF finger foods/snacks made up 18‐45% of CPCF products across the seven countries, indicating a normalization of commercially packaged, processed snacks products in older IYC diets.Over 85% of products failed to meet all nutrient composition requirements. Three‐quarters contained added sugars/sweeteners, half high total sugar, and half excessive levels of sodium, indicating that most products are not nutritionally appropriate for this young age group.No CPCF finger foods/snacks met all labelling requirements and most displayed inappropriate claims. With nearly all products containing excessive levels of total sugar, added sugar or sodium, use of persuasive claims on these products is alarming. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Commercially produced complementary foods (CPCF), including ready‐to‐eat CPCF purées and meals, are gaining popularity among caregivers of older infants and young children (IYC) as a convenient alternative to home‐prepared foods in low and middle‐income countries. However, there is growing concern regarding the suitability of these products for older IYC, as they can contain high levels of sugar and/or sodium. Given the rapidly evolving market in Southeast Asia, it is crucial to monitor the appropriate composition and promotion of CPCF in the region. This study examined the nutrient composition and labelling practices of CPCF purées and meals sold in 2021 in the capital cities of seven Southeast Asian countries: Phnom Penh (Cambodia), Jakarta (Indonesia), Manila (Philippines), Bangkok (Thailand), Vientiane (Lao PDR), Hanoi (Viet Nam), Kuala Lumpur (Malaysia). The study adapted a nutrient profiling model from the WHO Regional Office for Europe to determine the proportion of products suitable for promotion for older IYC. The proportion of CPCF purées and meals that would require a high sugar front‐of‐pack warning based on the percentage energy from total sugar was also determined. Of the 459 CPCF purées/meals assessed, only 37.7% of the products met all nutrient composition requirements and none met all labelling requirements. In addition, most CPCF purées and meals were identified as having high total sugar content. To ensure that older IYC consume appropriate CPCF products, Southeast Asian countries need to implement and enforce regulations concerning the nutrient composition and labelling practices of CPCF purées and meals. Key messages: Only one‐third of CPCF purées/meals were identified as nutritionally suitable for promotion for older IYC, with performance varying by sub‐category, and over three‐quarters of products contained high levels of total sugar.None of the CPCF purées/meals presented fully appropriate labelling practices, with the use of inappropriate claims the most prevalent issue. Further, one‐third of products recommended an age of introduction of less than 6 months.To ensure that CPCF purées/meals sold in Southeast Asia have appropriate nutrient composition and labelling practices, it is essential that national standards are in accordance with global guidance and enforced. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Commercially produced complementary foods (CPCF) have the potential to fill nutritional gaps in the diets of older infants and young children. This study evaluated the accuracy of nutrient declarations on labels of 43 commonly available CPCF in three peri‐urban/urban locations: Khsach Kandal district, Cambodia (n = 11); Bandung, Indonesia (n = 11) and Guédiawaye and Dakar departments, Senegal (n = 21). Label values (LV) from product nutrient declarations were compared to analytical values (AV) derived from laboratory nutrient analysis for macronutrients (carbohydrate, protein and total fat), nutrients of public health concern (saturated fat, total sugar and sodium), and micronutrients of interest (calcium, iron and zinc). European Union guidance for nutrition label accuracy was used to set tolerance ranges for each nutrient LV relative to AV. LV were missing for one or more nutrients in 88.4% (n = 38) of the CPCF products and no CPCF met EU tolerance thresholds for all nine nutrients assessed. Over half of products with LV for key micronutrients (55.6%, n = 10/18) and macronutrients (54.8%, n = 23/42) met tolerances for LV accuracy. Eighty‐five percent (n = 11/13) of products with LV for nutrients of public health concern were determined to be accurate. Nutrient content claims for iron appeared on 19 (44.2%) of the 43 products. Of the products which made an iron content claim, 26.3% had inaccurate LV with the majority of these containing less iron than declared. Regulatory action is needed to ensure that CPCF labelling communicates complete and accurate nutrient content information that enables caregivers to make informed decisions for feeding older infants and young children. Key messages: None of the 43 commercially produced complementary food (CPCF) products assessed met tolerance thresholds for nutrient label value accuracy, either because of missing nutrient label information or discrepancies with laboratory derived analytical values.The proportion of accurate nutrient label values for individual nutrients ranged from 54.2% (n = 13/24) for calcium to 94.7% (n = 36/38) for sodium.While infant cereals generally had high proportions of accurate label values for the nine nutrients assessed, fewer than half of snacks/finger foods (e.g. rusks/biscuits) had accurate label values for protein and calcium and only a third were accurate for zinc.Nutrient content claims were prevalent across the 43 CPCF products, which can create a 'health halo' (the perception that something is healthy without direct evidence) for these products. However, over half of products with nutrient content claims for iron and calcium were found to contain lower levels of these micronutrients when compared to analytical values. These products were found to overstate iron content and calcium content by a median of 4.71 mg per 100 g product and 101.7 mg per 100 g product, respectively.Nutrient content claims and nutrient declarations should be regulated and monitored by national authorities to ensure accurate labelling of CPCF. Manufacturers of CPCF have a responsibility to provide consumers with correct product information and should be accountable for the content of CPCF nutrient declarations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To assess the nutritional suitability of commercially produced complementary foods (CPCF) marketed in three South-East Asian contexts. Design: Based on label information declared on the products, nutrient composition and content of CPCF were assessed against the WHO Europe nutrient profile model (NPM). The proportion of CPCF that would require a 'high sugar' warning was also determined. Setting: Khsach Kandal district, Cambodia; Bandung City, Indonesia; and National Capital Region, Philippines. Participants: CPCF products purchased in Cambodia (n 68) and Philippines (n 211) in 2020, and Indonesia (n 211) in 2017. Results: Only 4·4 % of products in Cambodia, 10·0 % of products in Indonesia and 37·0 % of products in the Philippines fully complied with relevant WHO Europe NPM nutrient composition requirements. Sixteen per cent of CPCF in Cambodia, 27·0 % in Indonesia and 58·8 % in the Philippines contained total sugar content levels that would require a 'high sugar' warning. Conclusions: Most of the analysed CPCF were not nutritionally suitable to be promoted for older infants and young children based on their nutrient profiles, with many containing high levels of sugar and sodium. Therefore, it is crucial to introduce new policies, regulations and standards to limit the promotion of inappropriate CPCF in the South-East Asia region. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

'Growing‐up milks' (GUMs)—breast‐milk substitutes targeted for young children (aged 12–36 months)—are commonly consumed in Indonesia. The World Health Assembly has stated that GUMs are not necessary for proper growth and development, and recently, the American Academy of Pediatrics declared that such products are not recommended for young children due to their common use of sweeteners. To contribute to the evidence base on the composition of GUMs and their appropriateness for young child diets, this cross‐sectional study documented the declared sugar content and presence of nutrient content claims of 99 GUMs newly launched in Indonesia between January 2017 and May 2019. Sugar content was evaluated against the draft 2018 Codex Alimentarius Standard for Follow‐Up Formula guidance on sugar content and the United Kingdom Food Standard Agency's front‐of‐pack (UK FSA FOP) colour coding system for sugar. Almost all (97%) GUMs contained one or more added sugars. None of the products were fully compliant with all three sugar content recommendations in the draft Codex standard. Seventy‐one per cent of GUMs were determined to have high sugar content according to the UK FSA FOP system. Nutrient content claims were found on 97% of GUMs. Median total sugar content was 7.3 g per 100 ml, similar to sugar content levels in sugar‐sweetened beverages. Many GUMs available in Indonesia claim to offer nutritional benefits; however, the current levels of sugar content in GUMs are a serious concern and are inappropriate for inclusion in the diets of young children. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]