Search

While screening and early detection have reduced mortality from prostate cancer, castration-resistant disease (CRPC) is still incurable. Here, we report that combined EZH2/HDAC inhibitors potently kill CRPCs and cause dramatic tumor regression in aggressive human and mouse CRPC models. Notably, EZH2 and HDAC both transmit transcriptional repressive signals: regulating histone H3 methylation and histone deacetylation, respectively. Accordingly, we show that suppression of both EZH2 and HDAC are required to derepress/induce a subset of EZH2 targets, by promoting the sequential demethylation and acetylation of histone H3. Moreover, we find that the induction of one of these targets, ATF3, which is a broad stress response gene, is critical for the therapeutic response. Importantly, in human tumors, low ATF3 levels are associated with decreased survival. Moreover, EZH2- and ATF3-mediated transcriptional programs inversely correlate and are most highly/lowly expressed in advanced disease. Together, these studies identify a promising therapeutic strategy for CRPC and suggest that these two major epigenetic regulators buffer prostate cancers from a lethal response to cellular stresses, thereby conferring a tractable therapeutic vulnerability. Epigenetic, transcriptional, and functional studies show that two major epigenetic regulators (EZH2 and HDAC) buffer advanced prostate cancer from lethal stress responses, revealing a promising combination therapy for castration-resistant disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Although many long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) exhibit lineage-specific expression, the vast majority remain functionally uncharacterized in the context of development. Here, we report the first described human embryonic stem cell (hESC) lines to repress (CRISPRi) or activate (CRISPRa) transcription during differentiation into all three germ layers, facilitating the modulation of lncRNA expression during early development. We performed an unbiased, genome-wide CRISPRi screen targeting thousands of lncRNA loci expressed during endoderm differentiation. While dozens of lncRNA loci were required for proper differentiation, most differentially expressed lncRNAs were not, supporting the necessity for functional screening instead of relying solely on gene expression analyses. In parallel, we developed a clustering approach to infer mechanisms of action of lncRNA hits based on a variety of genomic features. We subsequently identified and validated FOXD3-AS1 as a functional lncRNA essential for pluripotency and differentiation. Taken together, the cell lines and methodology described herein can be adapted to discover and characterize novel regulators of differentiation into any lineage. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Significance: Combined EZH2 and RAS pathway inhibitors kill KRAS-mutant colorectal cancer cells and promote durable tumor regression in vivo. These agents function by cooperatively suppressing the WNT pathway, driving differentiation, and epigenetically reprogramming cells to permit the induction of apoptotic signals, which then kill these more differentiated tumor cells., (©2024 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research.)

Transcription initiates at both coding and noncoding genomic elements, including mRNA and long noncoding RNA (lncRNA) core promoters and enhancer RNAs (eRNAs). However, each class has a different expression profile with lncRNAs and eRNAs being the most tissue specific. How these complex differences in expression profiles and tissue specificities are encoded in a single DNA sequence remains unresolved. Here, we address this question using computational approaches and massively parallel reporter assays (MPRA) surveying hundreds of promoters and enhancers. We find that both divergent lncRNA and mRNA core promoters have higher capacities to drive transcription than nondivergent lncRNA and mRNA core promoters, respectively. Conversely, intergenic lncRNAs (lincRNAs) and eRNAs have lower capacities to drive transcription and are more tissue specific than divergent genes. This higher tissue specificity is strongly associated with having less complex transcription factor (TF) motif profiles at the core promoter. We experimentally validated these findings by testing both engineered single-nucleotide deletions and human single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in MPRA. In both cases, we observe that single nucleotides associated with many motifs are important drivers of promoter activity. Thus, we suggest that high TF motif density serves as a robust mechanism to increase promoter activity at the expense of tissue specificity. Moreover, we find that 22% of common SNPs in core promoter regions have significant regulatory effects. Collectively, our findings show that high TF motif density provides redundancy and increases promoter activity at the expense of tissue specificity, suggesting that specificity of expression may be regulated by simplicity of motif usage., (© 2019 Mattioli et al.; Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.)

While long intergenic noncoding RNAs (lincRNAs) and mRNAs share similar biogenesis pathways, these transcript classes differ in many regards. LincRNAs are less evolutionarily conserved, less abundant, and more tissue-specific, suggesting that their pre- and post-transcriptional regulation is different from that of mRNAs. Here, we perform an in-depth characterization of the features that contribute to lincRNA regulation in multiple human cell lines. We find that lincRNA promoters are depleted of transcription factor (TF) binding sites, yet enriched for some specific factors such as GATA and FOS relative to mRNA promoters. Surprisingly, we find that H3K9me3-a histone modification typically associated with transcriptional repression-is more enriched at the promoters of active lincRNA loci than at those of active mRNAs. Moreover, H3K9me3-marked lincRNA genes are more tissue-specific. The most discriminant differences between lincRNAs and mRNAs involve splicing. LincRNAs are less efficiently spliced, which cannot be explained by differences in U1 binding or the density of exonic splicing enhancers but may be partially attributed to lower U2AF65 binding and weaker splicing-related motifs. Conversely, the stability of lincRNAs and mRNAs is similar, differing only with regard to the location of stabilizing protein binding sites. Finally, we find that certain transcriptional properties are correlated with higher evolutionary conservation in both DNA and RNA motifs and are enriched in lincRNAs that have been functionally characterized., (© 2017 Melé et al. Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.)